A decades-long broken economy screwed over millennials, and their decision to delay having kids is fueling America’s historically low birth rate - Amazingly, they aren't blaming avocado toast this time

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Birth rates are falling in the U.S. After the highs of the baby boom in the mid-20th century and the lows of the baby bust in the 1970s, birth rates were relatively stable for nearly 50 years. But during the Great Recession, from 2007-2009, birth rates declined sharply—and they’ve kept falling. In 2007, average birth rates were right around 2 children per woman. By 2021, levels had dropped more than 20%, close to the lowest level in a century. Why?

Is this decline because, as some suggest, young people aren’t interested in having children? Or are people facing increasing barriers to becoming parents?

We are demographers who study how people make plans for having kids and whether they are able to carry out those intentions.

In a recent study, we analyzed how changes in childbearing goals may have contributed to recent declines in birth rates in the United States. Our analysis found that most young people still plan to become parents but are delaying childbearing.
Digging into the demographic data

We were interested in whether people have changed their plans for childbearing over the past few decades. And we knew from other research that the way people think about having children changes as they get older and their circumstances change. Some people initially think they’ll have children, then gradually change their views over time, perhaps because they don’t meet the right partner or because they work in demanding fields. Others don’t expect to have children at one point but later find themselves desiring to have children or, sometimes, unexpectedly pregnant.

So we needed to analyze both changes over time—comparing young people now to those in the past, and changes across the life course—comparing a group of people at different ages. No single data set contains enough information to make both of those comparisons, so we combined information from multiple surveys.

Since the 1970s, the National Surveys of Family Growth, a federal survey run by the National Centers for Health Statistics, have been asking people about their childbearing goals and behaviors. The survey doesn’t collect data from the same people over time, but it provides a snapshot of the U.S. population about every five years.

Using multiple rounds of the survey, we are able to track what’s happening, on average, among people born around the same time—what demographers call a “cohort”—as they pass through their childbearing years.

For this study, we looked at 13 cohorts of women and 10 cohorts of men born between the 1960s and the 2000s. We followed these cohorts to track whether members intended to have any children and the average number of children they intended, starting at age 15 and going up to the most recent data collected through 2019.

We found remarkable consistency in childbearing goals across cohorts. For example, if we look at teenage girls in the 1980s—the cohort born in 1965-69—they planned to have 2.2 children on average. Among the same age group in the early 21st century—the cohort born in 1995-1999—girls intended to have 2.1 children on average. Slightly more young people plan to have no children now than 30 years ago, but still, the vast majority of U.S. young adults plan to have kids: about 88% of teenage girls and 89% of teenage boys.

We also found that as they themselves get older, people plan to have fewer children, but not by much. This pattern was also pretty consistent across cohorts. Among those born in 1975-79, for instance, men and women when they were age 20-24 planned to have an average of 2.3 and 2.5 children, respectively. These averages fell slightly, to 2.1 children for men and 2.2 children for women, by the time respondents were 35-39. Still, overwhelmingly, most Americans plan to have children, and the average intended number of children is right around 2.

So, if childbearing goals haven’t changed much, why are birth rates declining?
What keeps people from their target family size?

Our study can’t directly address why birth rates are going down, but we can propose some explanations based on other research.

In part, this decline is good news. There are fewer unintended births than there were 30 years ago, a decrease linked to increasing use of effective contraceptive methods like IUDs and implants and improved insurance coverage from the Affordable Care Act.

Compared with earlier eras, people today start having their children later. These delays also contribute to declining birth rates: Because people start later, they have less time to meet their childbearing goals before they reach biological or social age limits for having kids. As people wait longer to start having children, they are also more likely to change their minds about parenting.

But why are people getting a later start on having kids? We hypothesize that Americans see parenthood as harder to manage than they might have in the past.

Although the U.S. economy overall recovered after the Great Recession, many young people, in particular, feel uncertain about their ability to achieve some of the things they see as necessary for having children, including a good job, a stable relationship, and safe, affordable housing.

At the same time, the costs of raising children—from child care and housing to college education—are rising. And parents may feel more pressure to live up to high-intensive parenting standards and prepare their children for an uncertain world.

And while our data doesn’t cover the last three years, the COVID-19 pandemic may have increased feelings of instability by exposing the lack of support for American parents.

For many parents and would-be parents, the “right time” to have a child, or have another child, may feel increasingly out of reach—no matter their ideal family size.

-----

Some real howlers in this 'news' article. It's like they're desperately pretending to be too stupid to notice the causes of birthrates falling off a cliff.
 
That's how I got rabies and why I'll have babies with rabies (rabies babies).

Everyone knows what a condom is, most people don't like them. Likewise for birth control pills which women, besides white women (because of course) avoid because they're bad for you. Though if you want sex but no babies both are valid options.
Killing babies on the otherhand is difficult for people with a soul to go through with. Which is why it does not surprise me it's ghetto black women and middle class white women who have them the most.
You're an inspiration for birth control.
 
Everyone knows what a condom is, most people don't like them. Likewise for birth control pills which women, besides white women (because of course) avoid because they're bad for you. Though if you want sex but no babies both are valid options.
Killing babies on the otherhand is difficult for people with a soul to go through with. Which is why it does not surprise me it's ghetto black women and middle class white women who have them the most.
Again, wonder why you can't get laid. Truly a mystery for the ages.
 
It's at least partly related, but don't underestimate the changes in relationships and general social fabric. I know more than one gainfully employed, reasonably attractive millennial man who simply can't find ANY kind of relationship.
 
Guess what retards, their survival strategy is unironically the best. Which is why "responsible" people who resigned to a life of middle class mediocrity will be replaced by both the bottom and the top of society. Your intelligence and values don't fucking matter if nobody can pass those things on. Low average age of motherhood and low rates of single motherhood matter to a demographic, and economic and even genetic factors don't. As proven by Hispanics becoming the dominant demographic despite numering less than Asians not even 50 years ago and having an average IQ and income somewhere between American whites and American blacks.
It's not selfish or irresponsible, in fact it's selfless and responsible to shit out kids during times of strife. You've been taught a literal inversion of reality.
View attachment 4316650
I mean come on; being replaced is a little dramatic. Because a person decides to have one child with a good income means I’m destined to be replaced by the bottom or top? My child will have passed onto them far more resources than the guy down the road with 5 kids and no money. And as for being replaced by the top I doubt that because my work is used by the top and I’m paid decently for it. Probably my child will do the same.

The odds are in my favor (but never assured) that in all likelihood my child will grow up well, have sufficient resource and will do pretty good.

The lineage (of the lower class) has multiplied by an order in the last 125 years but there are restricting factors that make that projection over the next 100 years virtually impossible.

Wealth accumulation appears to be getting smaller (the lauded 1%) but really their reproductive rate has been merely less than the lower class so while it this true to say the percentage of ultra wealthy and wealthy is getting smaller it is actually still numerically growing but is eclipsed by the garbage that is multiplying faster, ergo the inequity seems greater.

The trash of America today enjoys a luxury of standards of living that even the well paid 70 years ago could hardly dream of.

We’re all doing pretty OK regardless of the luck of the silver spoon for some. If we run out of talent here we can always import it and those happy to be unskilled here can still have a standard of living that by our regional standards are poor but are more than decent by global standards.

What white trash fear is immigration not because of different races being here but because it sends them further down the totem pole. Immigrants often out produce lazy fat retards that are happy with garbage.
 
It's at least partly related, but don't underestimate the changes in relationships and general social fabric. I know more than one gainfully employed, reasonably attractive millennial man who simply can't find ANY kind of relationship.
Again, women fucking suck.
Again, wonder why you can't get laid. Truly a mystery for the ages.
Because I don't sugarcoat shit for the sake of pussy, which is le bad now, because most men are womanbrained via social conditioning and horomonal decline. Which is why wearing plastic bags on your cock and murdering infants is normalized in white countries.
 
Isn't rabies 100% fatal?
Not technically true. If treatment is applied soon after infection, the patient can (and almost always does) survive. If not treated early enough, death is certain and horrible, one of the most painful ways to go there is. There are medical videos available online, horrific stuff. I'm morbid enough to have watched one. Best argument for euthanasia I can find. In its end stages, death would be a mercy.
 
I mean come on; being replaced is a little dramatic. Because a person decides to have one child with a good income means I’m destined to be replaced by the bottom or top? My child will have passed onto them far more resources than the guy down the road with 5 kids and no money. And as for being replaced by the top I doubt that because my work is used by the top and I’m paid decently for it. Probably my child will do the same.

The odds are in my favor (but never assured) that in all likelihood my child will grow up well, have sufficient resource and will do pretty good.
This is peak midwitclass cope and is somewhat embarrassing to even read.
The lineage (of the lower class) has multiplied by an order in the last 125 years but there are restricting factors that make that projection over the next 100 years virtually impossible.

Wealth accumulation appears to be getting smaller (the lauded 1%) but really their reproductive rate has been merely less than the lower class so while it this true to say the percentage of ultra wealthy and wealthy is getting smaller it is actually still numerically growing but is eclipsed by the garbage that is multiplying faster, ergo the inequity seems greater.

The trash of America today enjoys a luxury of standards of living that even the well paid 70 years ago could hardly dream of.

We’re all doing pretty OK regardless of the luck of the silver spoon for some. If we run out of talent here we can always import it and those happy to be unskilled here can still have a standard of living that by our regional standards are poor but are more than decent by global standards.
You make a good point in the first line, but the second seems like it only applies on a global scale, i.e. African birthrates compared to places like Japan. Elon Musk has 10 kids yes but the lower class in America, even if they have way less on average, have well above a replacement birthrate.
What white trash fear is immigration not because of different races being here but because it sends them further down the totem pole. Immigrants often out produce lazy fat retards that are happy with garbage.
Fuck you and the reddit account you rode in on. I also have no issue with (certain) immigrants, I actually miss the days when it was actual field worker Mexicans who came here instead of Mexican cartel members, wetback welfare office colonists, and South America's garbage. Hopefully though these superior hard working immigrants you speak of enrich you with Funky Town hospitality.
 
brainwash women with an endless deluge of media and marketing that fulfillment in life can only come from a career or being a giant pleasure seeking whore for attention and be surprised when most look down their nose at motherhood until their eggs start drying up and their mentally healthy friends with families have all moved on; many such cases.
 
The amount of both men and women I've met who think a simple "hi my name is x" is creepy and predatory is insane. I've heard people even say bars and clubs are off limits for approaching women.

How is babby supposed to happen if the first fucking date never even happens?
This doesn't get anywhere near enough emphasis in the birthrate/marriage discussion. Trying to even FLIRT without a Chad card is outright hazardous to your employment (and thus, not being homeless and starving) if your boss sees her Facebook post about the 'creep' who dared to hit on her.

That leaves online 'dating' apps where the 90/10 rule is in full effect. So how the fuck are we men even supposed to get close to a modern empowahd wymmin?
 
This is peak midwitclass cope and is somewhat embarrassing to even read.

You make a good point in the first line, but the second seems like it only applies on a global scale, i.e. African birthrates compared to places like Japan. Elon Musk has 10 kids yes but the lower class in America, even if they have way less on average, have well above a replacement birthrate.

Fuck you and the reddit account you rode in on. I also have no issue with (certain) immigrants, I actually miss the days when it was actual field worker Mexicans who came here instead of Mexican cartel members, wetback welfare office colonists, and South America's garbage. Hopefully though these superior hard working immigrants you speak of enrich you with Funky Town hospitality.
Don't you think the idea that we need even more people sounds just kinda stupid? I really don't even know why it is a story, a falling birthrate, it's like they are bemoaning a recession in child births.

The media likes to complain about job losses, lay offs and automation, and then they come out with stories about how we need more bodies. Seems like a silly conversation, like whining about China's birthrate. Immigrants, they add flavor to the scenery. I can't complain about a small percentage of them anymore than I can complain about the small percentage here that are just as bad. I'm not an open border guy, but I appreciate the hard working nature of most immigrants - illicit drug costs have crashed and for that, It thank them greatly.
 
Gee, when the jobs got shipped overseas, the plants closed down, and America moved to a 'service economy' (THat's a GOOD thing, bigot, industrialization economy is a thing of the past!), people suddenly didn't want to have kids because they now didn't have jobs, rent was increasing, and CPS was getting involved if you took away your kid's toys.

Lots of people I knew in my generation wanted a lot of kids. I know people who got married right after high school who are still married.

It's just, right as Gen-X got old enough to join the work force in a meaningful way, NAFTA and the rest of 'outsourcing' happened and nobody had jobs.

Deport all the illegals, hang the investors like Blackrock and Gates, get rid of H1B, and allow Americans to get hired and maybe, just maybe, they'll want to have more kids.
Killing all the major shareholders of multinational corporations and all the big investment bankers/asset speculators really is the only chance we have as a species of surviving the next 500 years.
 
The amount of kiwis who have kids but aren't revealing it is interesting when compared to the amount of niggas that lost their old accounts because the password/email was unrecoverable. It's not perfect OpSec but it's solid and you shouldn't change a thing.
 
This doesn't get anywhere near enough emphasis in the birthrate/marriage discussion. Trying to even FLIRT without a Chad card is outright hazardous to your employment (and thus, not being homeless and starving) if your boss sees her Facebook post about the 'creep' who dared to hit on her.

That leaves online 'dating' apps where the 90/10 rule is in full effect. So how the fuck are we men even supposed to get close to a modern empowahd wymmin?
You're only creepy if you're ugly. Stop being ugly.
 
Last edited:
Step 1. Make everything unstable through reckless....Everything.
Step 2. Require stability for any meaningful advancements in life.

Like fuck, we've gotten to the point where "living beyond your means" simply means you want to have Cable, Internet, a Phone and a Car at the same time. Heaven help you if you're welfare or public assistance. You'll get trapped in the system unable to get off of it. Need public assistance for a month? You'll be paying it back for 4 months. Meanwhile, immigrants and jewish welfare queens pumping out more babies than hispanic women get a free ride and a free check every year. But we're not supposed to discuss that. We're supposed to look at the black community and blame them for the problems.
 
I am honestly glad that certain people in this thread will not breed.
Their brand of retardation better stay unique and not be diluted.
 
Back
Top Bottom