Liz Fong-Jones / 方禮真 / Elliot William Fong / @lizthegrey / Honeycomb.io Field CTO - 'Consent accident' enjoyer, ex-Google employee, nepotistic sex pest, Robert Z'Dar look-alike who wants authority over the Internet

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
Before this abhorrent waste of space began its campaign I merely wanted to just never hear about trannies. Now I hope they all rot.
 
I love how Lil-Dong is still doing the cringelord wannabe-machiavellian gayness, talking herself up while actually failing to do anything. She literally has to ask others to accomplish her goals for her and is acting like she is doing all the work lmao "we are becoming exceedingly efficient at it" (getting KF blocked). bitch you aren't getting good at anything other than whining over emails and @'s to people who actually have skills and power. christ.

i wonder if he ever has moments of lucidity where he realizes he was the triple-play diversity hire at google, his first real job (racial minority, trans, severe daddy issues) and was literally never considered for skill or merit. There are boatloads of people more qualified than him in his field of "expertise." I'm confident I know a few personally. Google put up with him because he looked good on paper for their quotas put in place by their diversity tzar and then pushed him out when he got too obnoxious and started fighting with management over trivial shit (he claims he quit but people who have big-corpo experience know exactly what I'm talking about and have likely seen people effectively be fired this way). His job at honeycomb is literally not even technically a tech job, it's more of a marketing job. For anyone that doesn't know: "Field CTO" = the person that ops or the c-suite sends over to big clients to make them feel important. "Wow they sent over a whole-ass executive? We must be a big deal." Doesn't actually do any work, people back at HQ do. Basically glorified field tech support person. Think slightly more refined than the guy on Office Space who angrily explains how he is the go-between for customers and programmers because he's a people-person and programmers aren't. Also in this case likely a diversity mandate hire and someone more qualified - possibly even a real woman - was passed over for him. He'll never be able to get away from that stigma lmao

This "haha im an elite hacker fighting the kiwifarmers" stuff is so laughably cringey. It's obvious her skillset hasn't progressed much at all since her "work the punchlist to restore service" days at a regional google DCops joint (working punchlists is mostly all a 'site reliability engineer' does - people above them, i.e. system engineers, have already defined how the systems work in detail and how to restore from outages, SRE's don't actually do anything important other than follow step-by-step guides to fix things written by the system and network engineers who designed and built out the datacenters).

edit: hell the temp worker choads (not sure for google but at my firm they were usually temp contract hires from local IT service providers) doing the hardware rack-n-stack on fresh datacenter builds probably understood the systems better than an SRE has to.

edit 2: I feel like emphasizing for laymen that SRE's are to datacenters what roughnecks are to oil rigs. They didn't build the rig, drilling equipment, or safety systems and don't know anything about how the tech works at a high level. They just have short spurts of intense labor where they follow a step-by-step procedure to do a specific thing when needed. Same for an SRE. The "E for Engineer" in their name is just to make them feel good and help pad the resume. In my firm we called em "swap jockeys" because that's mostly what they did - remove old hardware and put in new hardware which booted and configured itself automatically off the network (PXE and other protocols/software).

I respect roughnecks a lot more than I respect SREs.

Honestly I don't know why I'm so chalked over their resume, it's actually bugging even me that I'm writing so much on it. his attitude is just so grating. Nails-on-chalkboard personality and wholly undeserved ego. Why do so many people in tech act like this? Publicly? With their name attached?

I should focus on the stuff that's really annoying like how he thinks cops are likely to kill him if he interacts with them. Really love when non-black troons co-opt black narratives. Dong is Asian-American. I, as a white man, am more likely to be unjustifiably killed by a thug cop than he is. Eugh.
 
Last edited:
FuckedOffToff said:
Is this a personal experience, hearsay or just thinking out loud? The impression you give is of this being a true story, and I'm wondering if you have more.
Click to expand...
It's also mentioned in the Damore lawsuit: edit - link to article: https://archive.ph/tn8FP
pdf here: https://www.dhillonlaw.com/wp-conte...0418-Damore-et-al.-v.-Google-FAC_Endorsed.pdf

1667470354915.png

1667470364798.png



1667470411117.png


1667473528615.png
 
Last edited:
Liz Fong-Jones is a developer advocate, labor and ethics organizer, and Site Reliability Engineer (SRE) with 15+ years of experience. She is an advocate at Honeycomb.io for the SRE and Observability communities, and previously was an SRE working on products ranging from the Google Cloud Load Balancer to Google Flights.
Click to expand...

He literally can't even make himself sound like an expert in his own byline. It literally just reads like "I'm a labor commie and did menial DCops work for fringe google products. And now I do that same menial shit and some vague hand-wavy HR shit at a company that offers a product nobody wants or needs and BTW they hired me using money from a government equity grant because OF COURSE."

Just wow. Also gotta love how these people are taking basic principles from data science combined with software engineering and calling it "observability engineering" and acting like it's a fresh new field that they are on the cutting edge of, lmao. I swear O'Reilly book publishing deals have just become a way to advertise niche SaaS/IaaS products. Who wants to guess how much they jerk off and rely on their Honeycomb product in the pages of their totally-just-theory-instruction-textbook?
 
Last edited:
We’re on par with China level censorship of the internet for what reason? What exactly has this site done to be completely blacklisted in the U.S.? A gossip forum about discussing Chris chan (which Wikipedia refuses to mention, but mentions the “suicides”) is now a domestic threat? How long until Tier 1s just start blacklisting sites like 8kun and 4chan altogether, then it gets up to right-wing platforms such as Gab/Truth social? We’re in the midst of the beginning of political censorship like we’ve never seen before. The structure of the internet is now refusing to connect to sites that promote the idea of free speech. Kiwi Farms will remain online with the current setup, but it is a only matter of time until all Tier 1s just refuse traffic altogether. This has never happened before.
 
TitusOvid said:
Before this abhorrent waste of space began its campaign I merely wanted to just never hear about trannies. Now I hope they all rot.
Click to expand...
That's what I don't get about the "deplatforming works" tards. Do they genuinely think that we'll stop hating troons if the Farms goes away? If anything we'll hate them even more.
 
These miserable cunts have to force people to stop laughing at them, to create a safe space where they can gaslight each other into believing that they're women. No matter what they manage to do to Internet they can't do anything about their appearance or smell. This Farquaad ass nigga.
 
Neko GF said:
That's what I don't get about the "deplatforming works" tards. Do they genuinely think that we'll stop hating troons if the Farms goes away? If anything we'll hate them even more.
Click to expand...
We've all commented about people being terminally online. This is a reflection of that state. My opinion is that they think banishing people from their online space -- block, ban, deplatform, whatever -- means those people no longer exist.

It's a fascinating form of solipsism. I grant that ejecting a person from your awareness means they may have less input into your life. But it doesn't make them magically disappear.
 
I remember being made aware of this creature’s existence about 6 years ago. It was a collage of google employees which were of course full of troons and other queers. When I saw Elliot I thought to myself “Huh what a goofy but probably harmless character”

The jump from that to “Rapist trying to break the internet to cover up his crimes” was pretty dramatic
 
Bloatlord said:
Oh no Liz, looks like APNIC don't want to be associated with you. I thought everybody was on your side.
Click to expand...
He already tried to get them to drop null's ASN, through demands to the australian government under some sort of new censorship laws. IIRC he was ignored at the time.

The regional internet registries are, so far, not cucking to these demands. So far. However, they are a weakness in the system, in that they're centralised authorities who have final say over who can and cannot have IP addresses assigned to them. It's the underlying flaw in the entire IP system; even though routing is notionally peer-to-peer, someone has to assign the numbers. T1s can (eventually) be replaced, ISPs can eventually be argued down or legislatively required to route legal data, but if the RIR refuses your allocation request, then it's game over.
 
Dan Schneider said:
Kiwi Farms will remain online with the current setup, but it is a only matter of time until all Tier 1s just refuse traffic altogether. This has never happened before.
Click to expand...
Imagine Tiananmen Square guy except he's a small flightless bird yelling SNEED! before the tank rolls over him.
 
Capsaicin Addict said:
We've all commented about people being terminally online. This is a reflection of that state. My opinion is that they think banishing people from their online space -- block, ban, deplatform, whatever -- means those people no longer exist.

It's a fascinating form of solipsism. I grant that ejecting a person from your awareness means they may have less input into your life. But it doesn't make them magically disappear.
Click to expand...
It's like when a baby thinks when they close their eyes they're invisible.
 
Grub said:
It's like when a baby thinks when they close their eyes they're invisible.
Click to expand...
Except the baby is a huge male rapist monster flailing insanely at everything around him because he's blind.
 
How I sleep every night knowing that:
  • My genitals are fully intact and functional
  • I have perfect vision
  • My parents love and accept me
  • I am well respected among my peers and community
  • I have a fulfilling career that contributes positively to the world
  • My face is not grotesquely shovel shaped
And Dong Gone will never have any of these things ever again.
Home.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom