🐮 Lolcow Andrew Peter Carlson / Anaiah Carlson / Tamarlover / Xtamarlover - Jewish/Christian Wannabe Cult Leader, Stalker, Ugly af, dogfucker, mayor of spitsville

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Anaiah's thoughts on the whole "DKF" campaign fiasco?
Ive tried so much to get back on this site thia is the first ive been able to successfully get through.

Heres my thoughts. There are some horrible things about this website. But its not all bad. Further there are some very disgusting lolcow freaks that deserve harsh condemnation. By biblical standards some of these people are so disgusting they deserve the death penalty. So death vs a thread making fun, id take a thread mocking me for my actions than death for my repugnant actions.

For myself this site has been a double edged. On the one hand it had some negative impact on me. On the other hand it had some positive impact on me. I also got to have a voice and a place to voice my grievances and demand to be heard by people I have felt wronged by and boy was I heard. Overall I am not going to say my life is better per se with the website having a thread about me, but I am glad for tbe good things that came of it. I am sad about the bad things that came from it.

All in all, here is my take: the website should remain up but only if its seriously revamped. Here would be my suggestions. First of all no doxing of email addresses phone numbers or address of employment should be allowed. Second of all, statements encouraging people to kill themselves (such statements are technically illegal) and in general any violent illegal content should not be allowed to be posted. Third, threads about a lolcow should not include personal info about any friends or relatives of that person unless clearly relevant to the persons horrid behavior that the threads are focusing on.

Fourth, there should be no anonymity allowing for everyone to be accountable for things they say. How this would work is requiring every user who wants to comment in lolcow threads to verify their identity privately to the admins. This would require an id as well as a debit or credit card verification. By requiring a one time membership fee and linking it with the persons id it verifies their identity and gives the site some money. For the most part the anonymity remains in tact but if someone decides to take legal action they can get the info with a court order from the site since it will store all users information.

For those who want to stay anonymous or who dont want to pay any money, there can be a section of the site where those who have not provided id or money can still post but theyd only be able to post on famous peoples threads or about threads focused on topics rather than people. A test of this could be requiring the person to have a verified wikipedia page with at least 3 months of history which qualify them as a famous person.

While part of me wants the site taken down part of me doesnt. Final note is that taking down the site might be a slippery slope and thats worrisome in and of itself.
 
So death vs a thread making fun, id take a thread mocking me for my actions than death for my repugnant actions.
Don't be so dramatic! You can be a maladjusted creeper when you don't control yourself but you're not that bad for a lolcow. You're not a pedo, not a zoosadist and not a rapist so wishing you death is out of the question.
 
Don't be so dramatic! You can be a maladjusted creeper when you don't control yourself but you're not that bad for a lolcow. You're not a pedo, not a zoosadist and not a rapist so wishing you death is out of the question.
I would only wish a very stern talking to by a gruff but loving father figure upon him.
 
How would I know she is an excellent choice until after I choose? I believe most people are no faithful. They will not maintain a relationship half the time. Even with religious people the same lack of faithfulness holds. So until I choose someone and am with them for some time, I cant know if they are a good choice or not.
You
r submission to your black masters is coming soon, cavebeast....
 
(such statements are technically illegal)
They aren't in US.
First of all no doxing of email addresses phone numbers or address of employment should be allowed.
Why not? They put that shit out in public (like on FB) so why not here?
Second of all, statements encouraging people to kill themselves (such statements are technically illegal) and in general any violent illegal content should not be allowed to be posted.
Illegal content is already not allowed here.
Third, threads about a lolcow should not include personal info about any friends or relatives of that person unless clearly relevant to the persons horrid behavior that the threads are focusing on.
What counts as personal info? That aside, threads only include info about relatives as far as it is relevant. See, Russell Greer's thread, for example. We are aware of his family, but we barely even mention them, and the OP of the thread specifically refused to post Russ' address when the OP thought he was living at his parents house.
Fourth, there should be no anonymity allowing for everyone to be accountable for things they say.
Lol, no. Anonymity is what breeds Free Speech. As SCOTUS put it:
Anonymous pamphlets, leaflets, brochures and even books have played an important role in the progress of mankind. Persecuted groups and sects from time to time throughout history have been able to criticize oppressive practices and laws either anonymously or not at all.
Talley v. California, 362 U.S. 60 (1960).

You see what they're doing to the site right now? If there was no anonymity they'd try to do that to every one of our livelihoods, just because those fags are offended that we are allowed to have different opinions, or to criticize them.
For the most part the anonymity remains in tact but if someone decides to take legal action they can get the info with a court order from the site since it will store all users information.
What this does is make it easier for the users to be subject to frivolous lawsuits, something offended people seem more than eager to dish out.
A test of this could be requiring the person to have a verified wikipedia page with at least 3 months of history which qualify them as a famous person.
Why is Wiki the standard?
 
I wasnt saying being overly dramatic in reference to me. I was saying in my opinion some lolcows are so evil they ought to be dead in an ideal society and they are lucky and blessed that they only have a thread mocking them. If God had his ideal way, theyd be dead for their perverse disgusting lifestyles so the fact they merely have a kiwifarms thread rather than death that they deserve, they should count their blessings.

Ive had difficulty loading this site on .st

They aren't in US.

Why not? They put that shit out in public (like on FB) so why not here?

Illegal content is already not allowed here.

What counts as personal info? That aside, threads only include info about relatives as far as it is relevant. See, Russell Greer's thread, for example. We are aware of his family, but we barely even mention them, and the OP of the thread specifically refused to post Russ' address when the OP thought he was living at his parents house.

Lol, no. Anonymity is what breeds Free Speech. As SCOTUS put it:

Talley v. California, 362 U.S. 60 (1960).

You see what they're doing to the site right now? If there was no anonymity they'd try to do that to every one of our livelihoods, just because those fags are offended that we are allowed to have different opinions, or to criticize them.

What this does is make it easier for the users to be subject to frivolous lawsuits, something offended people seem more than eager to dish out.

Why is Wiki the standard?

I remember a news story where a guy committed suicide at the encouragement and instigation of his girlfriend. She was arrested and put on trial for murder. I think she was found guilty of some crime. It may be that merely saying as a troll to kill oneself isnt illegal but in my understanding based on that case it is illegal to actively encourage or talk someone into suicide.

People can find personal information about others but allowing it to be consolidated on a website like this encourages stalking like behaviors. Keeping off said personal info from the site would mitigate those behaviors.

So if you read carefully what I said, anonymity would be retained unless there was a lawsuit. No one but the admins would know identifying information about any users. But i also disagree that anonymity is necessary to breed free speech. I would say opposition to tyrannical authority is necessary to attain free speech. For example in a muslim country. As long as people in those countries accept the status quo and defer to anonymity they can never make the changes necessary for free speech to flourish. Anonymity can be good and have some pros but it can also lead to debauchery and lack of civility. On a site like this, anonymity encourages degenerate behavior. Anonymity is important for noble causes especially ones worth dying for or spilling blood for.

Well in my case i remember someone reaching out to one of my brothers because of his contact info posted on kiwifarms and they were harassing him and taunting him. My brother was very upset and stressed out by the whole ordeal. It didnt last long but maybe for a month or two and he was considering legal action but it ultimately wasnt needed. To be fair though i think it may have been a friend of Marshall and not a kiwi farms member who was doing the harassing. But the friend found the contact info cause it was posted on kiwi farms so indirectly the posting of my familys info led to negative consequences for my brother who had nothing to do with me and has never approved of my religious beliefs nor my antisocial behaviors or legally questionable choices ive made.

Ok so if those people were ruled against in court by a judge and slapped with sanctions that would put a stop to it. Lawsuits can also be expensive so i say if someone wants to bring a frivolous case and screw themselves over financially they will doom themselves. The only downside is if someone sued pays for a lawyer. But getting a lawyer is a choice and not necessary to win or get favorable rulings. So if you post about someone on the internet be prepared to defend yourself. But if you pay for an attorney i feel bad but at the same time your choice. At the end of the day, the legal fees and obstacles making successful litigation difficult means one need not worry too much about many people suing. Those suits most would likely get thrown out even before a trial would occur. And those people doing frivolous lawsuits would screw themselves over financially so let them shoot themselves in the foot. Letting it go to court too could redeem the reputation of people falsely accused as well as the sites reputation. It would allow healthy accountability. The unhealthy accountability would eventually be rooted out and exposed as frivolous and it would get banned in the courts.

Wikipedia doesnt have to be it, but it seems a much easier way to do it. Chances are if you dont have an article on there you arent famous. So wikipedia makes for an easy database of famous people to make such a process of determining who is famous easier to settle
 
I'd like to point out that I had responded before the forum roleback. Tldr was that Andrew was very naive and very wrong.
 
Isn't it, like, for children and intellectually disabled people with attention span of a fruit fly?
Na. Its got some really cool features like sound clips where you can see a bunch of random women doing specific sexy trends. And even non porn stars doing the sexy stuff.

I got this program that lets me download tiktok videos in mass. I have almost 1 tb of tiktok videos. Most tiktok videos are only a few mb long so gives you an idea of how many tiktok vids i am archiving for later. Its an addiction but its fun.
 
Back
Top Bottom