Disaster Tons of U.S. Babies Are Now Getting Named After Marvel & Star Wars Villains

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Baby names in the United States have consistently evolved over the years. Baby Centerrevealed that popular names such as "Liam" and "Emma" have been a consistent choice for parents in recent times, but the continued dominance of superhero movies and franchise entertainment could turn the tide as more babies are being named after popular characters.

In 2017, Metro revealed that baby names inspired by Marvel characters are slowly gaining momentum, with a good chunk of them now accounting for a significant portion. Marvel heroes, such as Parker (Peter Parker), Wade (Wade Wilson), and Natasha (Natasha Romanoff) were confirmed to be at the top of the list.

Now, it seems that certain villains not just from Marvel but also in Star Wars are also taking the spotlight under the baby name umbrella.

Parents Are Naming Their Babies After Villains (Really)​

Based on a new study from OrganicBabyFormula.com, via Comicbook, several Marvel and Star Wars villains have prospered on the rising popular baby name list of children born in the United States.

The graph below from the Social Security Administration's Name Popularity Index gives an exact overview of how certain Disney names have risen to the ranks of popular baby names:

7168FA92-8E04-4450-95D9-095040672E00.jpeg

Quill, who is based on Chris Pratt's Peter Quill, is the name that has jumped the most on the leaderboard, with a whopping 8,457-spot increase. The names after Quill are Kristoff, Rey, Aladdin, Merida, Belle, Simba, and Olaf.

On the villain front, Thanos has risen to 2,892 spots while Star Wars names Kylo and Anakin grew similarly with 2,344 and 1901 spots, respectively. At the lower end of the spectrum, Loki has risen to 71 spots.

Why Do Parents Prefer Names Tied to Superhero Movies?​

The dominance of Marvel and Star Wars in pop culture is further cemented by the latest data about baby names.

There are many good reasons why parents decide to name their babies after popular on-screen characters. It's possible that they choose to do so due to the fact that they want to have a memorable name for their babies while also being associated with such iconic individuals.

The inclusion of Thanos in the list might be surprising for many, considering that the character served as a relentless villain during the MCU's Infinity Saga. Despite that, there's no denying that Thanos is such a unique name that babies from the US would stand out if they have such a label.

In MCU canon, there are actually those who believed that Thanos was right for his actions during Avengers: Infinity War, with Hawkeye even referencing this belief as a hilarious Easter egg. There's a slight chance that those parents who named their babies after Thanos might be believers in the Mad Titan's actions as well.

Looking ahead, it's reasonable to assume that a prime candidate for a popular baby name in the future would end up being Kang as the Marvel villain is poised to become an overarching threat of the Multiverse Saga.
 
Click to expand...
I want to say it's mildly better than Sephiroth. But if you think about it hard enough, it really isn't.
 
Jesus, the only names on that list that make sense to give a kid are Luke and Leia, both being normal ass names anyway, with the latter just being a novel spelling. Wanda and Kristoff are close seconds, but are pretty stale names for a reason. Everything else on that list is bonkers, and should qualify as child abuse.
 
I have a libtard acquaintance IRL who named their baby girl "Leia" about 2 years ago. Their older child in their teens is a fat female currently in the "enby" stage of transitioning, probably will claim to be male soon. Coincidence?
 
I can't find the post, but I remember someone making this huge post on Reddit about how they were sick of their parents forcing them to deal with all of their soy consooming proclivities and started to rebel against them.
 
not only is it cringe to name children based on pop culture, especially dinsey shit. but i have always maintained that kylo is a shitty name. if i ever have a child i wil teach them to bully any kid with a name like kylo.
 

Why Do Parents Prefer Names Tied to Superhero Movies?​

Because they are retarded consoomers.
Poor little Kylo and the like are going to have some time of it when they go to school.
 
I'm going to be so pissed off if I get murdered in 20 years by some asshole named Aladdin. My last words to my son Thanos will be "Avenge(rs) me!"

Olaf is a strong name though; if that's who ends me, so be it.
 
I know a couple that named their kid Loki, and they're the exact overweight dyed hair autists you'd picture a couple who names their kid Loki being.
 
The names after Quill are Kristoff, Rey, Aladdin, Merida, Belle, Simba, and Olaf.

On the villain front, Thanos has risen to 2,892 spots while Star Wars names Kylo and Anakin grew similarly with 2,344 and 1901 spots, respectively. At the lower end of the spectrum, Loki has risen to 71 spots.
Click to expand...
I think I figured out why so many kids shoot up their school.
 
Wouldn't Aladdin and Simba be cultural appropriation if you are white?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom