GOP candidate said it’s “totally just” to stone gay people to death - "Well, does that make me a homophobe?... It simply makes me a Christian. Christians believe in biblical morality, kind of by definition, or they should."

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

A GOP candidate in Oklahoma is getting attention for comments he made several years ago when he justified the death penalty by stoning for gay people. When asked recently about it, he didn’t disavow his previous comments.

Scott Esk, 56, is running in the Republican primary runoff election tomorrow for a seat in the state house, and local media is bringing up some extreme comments he made in the past. He’s not handling them well.

In 2013, Esk was commenting in a Facebook conversation about the Pope saying that he couldn’t judge gay people. Esk posted some Bible quotations, including the part of Romans 1 where the Bible says that a long list of people who sinned is “worthy of death.”

Another person asked him: “So, just to be clear, you think we should execute homosexuals (presumably by stoning)?”

Esk responded: “I think we would be totally in the right to do it… Ignoring as a nation things that are worthy of death is very remiss.”

A year later, a journalist asked him about those comments. He said it was “totally just” to kill gay people.

“What I will tell you right now is that that was done in the Old Testament under a law that came directly from God,” he said at the time. “And in that time, there was, it was, totally just came directly from God.”

After those comments, he put out a long video where he claimed he “sets the record straight.” In those videos, he claimed he has “compassion on anybody in the grips of an insidious addiction, such as homosexuality.”

“Any Christian should be in the position to say that this is sin or this is good. If we don’t make that distinction, we’re not going to help people,” he said in the first video published in 2015.

In the another video, which was from earlier this year, Esk called a local TV news report on his comments a “hit piece on the fact that I had an opinion against homosexuality.”

“Well, does that make me a homophobe? Maybe some people think it does,” he said. “But as far as I and many of the people, the voters of House District A7 are concerned, it simply makes me a Christian. Christians believe in biblical morality, kind of by definition, or they should.”

He said that he is not in favor of “expanding the death penalty in Oklahoma for homosexuality,” he just wants everyone to know that gay people are so offensive to his god that his religion wants them dead.

“The fact is, that it’s much more offensive knowing what obscene things homosexuals do with each other than it is for somebody to hold the view that it is indecent,” he said in the second video.

Now that the runoff election is tomorrow, The Oklahoman asked Esk about those comments to see if his opinion has changed at all.

He refused to do an interview and pointed The Oklahoman to the two videos.

“I’ve stood up for what is right in the past, and I intend to in the future and I am right now,” he stated. “That’s got me in trouble. The media are not my friends, as far as I’m concerned.”

Earlier today, Esk posted a video to his YouTube channel entitled “Scott Esk sets the record straight for the 3rd time,” in which he calls The Oklahoman piece and a piece by News 4 “hit pieces” and says that the media is against him because they want his opponent Gloria Banister to win.

He also responded to being fired from his job as a data manager in 2011 because he was arrested after he allegedly threatened and harassed the leadership of his church. In the video, he calls those church leaders “snakes” and makes some opaque references to the divorce and custody battle he was going through at the time.

Whoever wins the primary tomorrow will run against the Democratic winner in November. The seat is currently held by state Rep. Collin Walke (D), who is retiring.
 
Based and always remember that these feculent piles of garbage known as "news sites" memory hole and or ignore every time a Muslim (or Jew) says the exact same fucking thing.
 
God gave them over to conduct befitting of death. Romans 1 does not say that we are to be the arbiters or executors of that death. God is the Judge. If he wants to talk about stoning, he should pull out Exodus or Leviticus.

Literally the very next verses:
You, therefore, have no excuse, you who pass judgment on someone else, for at whatever point you judge another, you are condemning yourself, because you who pass judgment do the same things. 2 Now we know that God’s judgment against those who do such things is based on truth. 3 So when you, a mere human being, pass judgment on them and yet do the same things, do you think you will escape God’s judgment?
Romans is about how mankind is saved through Jesus ransom, and without it, we would be as hopeless as those who’ve wilfully turned their backs on God. Therefore, we should not condemn them too much, because we ourselves are only saved through God’s mercy and not our own goodness.
 
Last edited:
I mean, these people post all the horrible ways that whitey or TERFs or Karens or whatever caricature is on their current shitlist should die all the time! The only difference is that he's based.
 
I'd have absolutely no qualms about stoning faggots into death, but that's why God, if God exists, created GRIDS.

God hates fags and fag-enablers

Fags doom civilizations

Muslims are shitskins, but at least they kill their faggots instead of just enabling their disgusting, abhorrent practices which include eating shit out of each other's assholes (when you "eat ass", most of the time you are going to consume microscopic fecal matter) and sticking their penises into shit. When you really get down to it, homosexual acts are fucking disgusting which is why I, for the life of me, do not understand Gen-Z's obsession with everything anal. The anus is not a sex organ, you cannot create a life by cumming in someone's asshole, onto their turds. The fact that a guy would want to fuck a woman in the ass, means that he is at least a closeted faggot at best.
 
I've been waiting for this to start happening, politicians with extreme right wing views to start coming forward. I'm curious to see how people react to this, because while I doubt most people are for stoning gays, I suspect many have become indifferent to this sort of rhetoric. Between the fiscal and social failures of the left, I'd bet many moderates would gloss over something like this if it meant a better economy and their kids not being molested at school. Now it's just a matter of seeing how pissed off normies are about the status quo, this will be a solid litmus test.
 
Last edited:
I went ahead to find the district's numbers (its District 87, not A7 as reported in the article) and it looks solid Dem though I've only found the old lines. So its a nothing story about a candidate who doesn't stand a chance in the general if he even does win the primary.
 
dang, I was hoping it was Sabatini
 
Based but also a really retarded misreading of that passage of Romans.
If you need a biblical verse to justify stoning faggots into death, look no further than Leviticus 18:20

"you shall not lie with a man as with a woman, it is an abomination"

Then you go two chapters later in Leviticus 20:13

"If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination, they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them"

I don't know how much more clear that it has to be, but churches are now going woke and permitting the sin of sodomy as "no big deal" when in antiquity, these people would have been killed for this shit.
 
This would appear to be an actual crazy person. Looking at some of his past interactions with his own clergy I'm surprised he doesn't have a thread here. This is America. Lunatics are allowed to run for office. Oddly the GOP is generally better at weeding them out and not electing them. Whereas the Dems tend to channel them into "safe" districts where they can be crazy to their hearts content. Can we maybe team this guy up with Ayana Pressley on a mutual policy to kill all the White Gays?
 
If you need a biblical verse to justify stoning faggots into death, look no further than Leviticus 18:20

"you shall not lie with a man as with a woman, it is an abomination"

Then you go two chapters later in Leviticus 20:13

"If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination, they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them"

I don't know how much more clear that it has to be, but churches are now going woke and permitting the sin of sodomy as "no big deal" when in antiquity, these people would have been killed for this shit.
Yeah, God puts them to death, not other stupid humans. Which is why Jesus said, "let he who is without sin," etc.
But also the old testament god is an evil demon named Yaldabaoth and also most religious types don't even read the Bible and just get The Good Word from their pastors.
 
Back
Top Bottom