California bans state-funded travel to Georgia over transgender school sports law

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
California is banning state-funded travel to Georgia after the state passed a law allowing athletic associations to prohibit transgender girls from competing in girls’ interscholastic sports.

Georgia Republican Gov. Brian Kemp signed the law in April. Days later, the Georgia High School Association voted 62-0 to require high school athletes to compete according to the gender they were assigned at birth, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported.

The association’s vote reversed a 2016 policy that had allowed each school to set its own policies.

“Blocking transgender youth from playing sports isn’t just discriminatory, it’s government overreach — and it’s happening in states across the country,” Attorney General Rob Bonta said in a Friday news release. “Rather than protecting personal freedoms, state legislatures are going out of their way to invent a problem and target the rights of children.”

A spokesman for Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp responded in an email that “unless Attorney General Bonta plans on banning companies and film projects from moving to Georgia from California, this will have little impact on our state.”

Georgia will be the 23rd state to which California won’t pay for most travel under a 2016 law, Assembly Bill 1887. The law requires the attorney general to add states to the ban if they enact laws discriminating against lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender people.
Bonta announced in June that he planned to add Indiana, Louisiana, Utah and Arizona to the ban over new laws prohibiting transgender girls from competing in school sports according to their gender identities. Friday’s announcement said the Georgia ban will take effect immediately. The Attorney General’s Office expects to make Arizona the 24th entry on the list in September, when the state’s new law goes into effect.

Most of the states led by Republican legislatures and governors. Other states have been banned after passing measures that designate which bathrooms transgender people can use, allow doctors to deny medical care on religious grounds and restrict LGBTQ rights in other ways.

The California law has exemptions for serious government business, such as law enforcement, tax collection, and traveling to training events that are a condition of grants.

The University of California and California State University told The Sacramento Bee last year that their sports teams may still travel to states on the banned list, so long as the teams use money from donors and other sources that aren’t taxpayer dollars, tuition or revenues from fees.

 
Which states give water to California?

Please be as specific as possible.
Nevada and Arizona. Colorado and Utah, too, if you'd go so far as to blame them for not just rerouting the Colorado River (I wouldn't).
Yes, technically the federal government handles the water distribution IIRC but socal's population predominantly gets its water from sources originating out of state.
Yes, I'm aware the state as a whole doesn't depend on external water sources.
 
There was some post recently on r/CAguns posted by some nigger lover complaining about how some gun related incident in another goddamn state makes gun owners look bad lol.

Point is the federal government needs to buck break California otherwise it's retardation will not cease.

California is tracking attempts in all 50 states to stop CRT.

And conservatives with their "I got mine, fuck you" selling out to Californians deserve having their kids and grandkids pozzed up.
 
For the folks at home:

States Subject to AB 1887’s Travel Prohibition​

The following states are currently subject to California’s ban on state-funded and state-sponsored travel:

  1. Alabama
  2. Arkansas
  3. Florida
  4. Georgia
  5. Idaho
  6. Indiana
  7. Iowa
  8. Kansas
  9. Kentucky
  10. Louisiana
  11. Mississippi
  12. Montana
  13. North Carolina
  14. North Dakota
  15. Ohio
  16. Oklahoma
  17. South Carolina
  18. South Dakota
  19. Tennessee
  20. Texas
  21. Utah
  22. West Virginia
Basically the Confederate states of America and some Yankee states that became conservative from mass importation of foreigners(the type that will gladly toss groomers off the roof but also have congregated into a tight knit community and hate anyone that doesn't look like them or practice Islam but also still vote democrat because they promise free gibz all the time and never deliver except more taxes)
 
Nevada and Arizona. Colorado and Utah, too, if you'd go so far as to blame them for not just rerouting the Colorado River (I wouldn't).
Yes, technically the federal government handles the water distribution IIRC but socal's population predominantly gets its water from sources originating out of state.
Yes, I'm aware the state as a whole doesn't depend on external water sources.
There is talk about diverting some of the Mississippi River water to California.
 
seems like nothing will change then. any government travel will still get approval, and any sports events which must take place will probably still go to georgia with donations. seems like empty political posturing to me.
This is correct. There's no "middle class" in government, it's either the peons who were never going to travel anywhere on the public dime in the first place, or the big-shots who have a hundred ways around this already.

Brian Leiter has some coverage of it here from the academic standpoint:
Long story short: they're already old hands at dancing around this kind of thing.
 
Through a half dozen states that would be thrilled to have that water. Also, it would have to be pumped to a few thousand feet and flow back down again at least twice.

Show me an actual plan.
There was an article in the Sacramento Bee a month or so back.
The story pointed out what a nightmare the logistics would be, the cost of the pipeline and pumping the water and so on. The costs of pumping California Aqueduct water over the Tehachapis now is horrendous enough.
It doesn't seem feasible to me, but my state seems to be the champion of stupid, costly ideas.
Bullet train to nowhere, anyone?
 
There was an article in the Sacramento Bee a month or so back.
The story pointed out what a nightmare the logistics would be, the cost of the pipeline and pumping the water and so on. The costs of pumping California Aqueduct water over the Tehachapis now is horrendous enough.
It doesn't seem feasible to me, but my state seems to be the champion of stupid, costly ideas.
Bullet train to nowhere, anyone?
If it was the article I am thinking of, the TLDR was like "Pumping Water From The Mississippi Totally Retarded, The Bee Has Learned."
 
There was also talk of draining the Great Lakes so all those retards building swimming pools and irrigating lawns in the Arizona desert can make their retarded dream homes work. Same people who freak out about a 0.1 degree change in global temperature also think it's fine to destroy resources on immeasurable scales so we can build desert mansions and golf courses.
 
Back
Top Bottom