Autphag
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2016
I wasn't being literal, fucktard.You do it. Autistics are good at math.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I wasn't being literal, fucktard.You do it. Autistics are good at math.
Do the math, Judeomasonic dearest.
It means that because we call other cows "autistic" so much, it's a brilliant, never-before-seen form of trolling when he calls us autistic.So what does it mean, then?
But isn't that the autistic, and therefore superior, way of doing things? Taking everything literally?I wasn't being literal, fucktard.
You said pages ago that a doctor denied the fact that you're a tranny. So, no, it's not that far from "projection".You mean, you don't know what you're talking about, and projecting your own rejection from a clinican re: such issues onto me.
You'd infiltrated a number of retards into our "diagnosis", itself a fraudulent concept. Concreteness is directly proportional to the cases with the lowest intelligence. Normal intelligence spergs are, if anything, more abstract than the general population, if the large fluid/verbal intelligence disparity is indicative of anything.But isn't that the autistic, and therefore superior, way of doing things? Taking everything literally?
Yes, but denial doesn't have to be reasoned when you're in a position of essentially politically buoyed power disguised under a medicinally legitimate veneer. Spastic.You said pages ago that a doctor denied the fact that you're a tranny. So, no, it's not that far from "projection".
When are the dick pics?
Stop insisting you are autistic. It's very clear that you are, in fact, a paranoid schizophrenic and are misdiagnosing yourself.You'd infiltrated a number of retards into our "diagnosis", itself a fraudulent concept. Concreteness is directly proportional to the cases with the lowest intelligence. Normal intelligence spergs are, if anything, more abstract than the general population, if the large fluid/verbal intelligence disparity is indicative of anything.
where. are. the. dick. pics.Yes, but denial doesn't have to be reasoned when you're in a position of essentially politically buoyed power disguised under a medicinally legitimate veneer. Spastic.
Unfortunately that is, ironically, my official diagnosis, with any speculation of schizophrenia merely rooted in your misgivings about the capabilities of autism. Most autistics I personally know aren't drooling Chris-chanoids with vidya obsessions, they're anti-Zionist anti-internationalist "conspiritards" (lol as if the empiricists aren't the 'tards), with wide vantage perspectives on a number of philo-political matters of import.Stop insisting you are autistic. It's very clear that you are, in fact, a paranoid schizophrenic and are misdiagnosing yourself.
So in other words, learning disabilities cannot possibly occur at the same time as any other condition.You'd infiltrated a number of retards into our "diagnosis", itself a fraudulent concept. Concreteness is directly proportional to the cases with the lowest intelligence. Normal intelligence spergs are, if anything, more abstract than the general population, if the large fluid/verbal intelligence disparity is indicative of anything.
>Better at abstract thought.You'd infiltrated a number of retards into our "diagnosis", itself a fraudulent concept. Concreteness is directly proportional to the cases with the lowest intelligence. Normal intelligence spergs are, if anything, more abstract than the general population, if the large fluid/verbal intelligence disparity is indicative of anything.
I never said cannot possibly, I said it's a confluential factor in that one particular symptom. Learn to read. God, this is from the fucktard who had attacked a number of times my comprehension abilities last night.So in other words, learning disabilities cannot possibly occur at the same time as any other condition.
"I'm sorry, Billy, you don't have cancer. You're just retarded."
You'd infiltrated a number of retards into our "diagnosis", itself a fraudulent concept. Concreteness is directly proportional to the cases with the lowest intelligence. Normal intelligence spergs are, if anything, more abstract than the general population, if the large fluid/verbal intelligence disparity is indicative of anything.
Yes, but denial doesn't have to be reasoned when you're in a position of essentially politically buoyed power disguised under a medicinally legitimate veneer. Spastic.
No, you think that the "time zone paradox" can't exist because you literally think it's just a nominal index, rather than an esoteric secret ever since the establishmet of Stonehenge had declared Greenwich-centricism a phenomenon.>Better at abstract thought.
>Thinks crossing the International Date Line is literally time travel.
No. When I use it (against you), it means something different to either your ascription of it to me, or my ascription of the phenomenon in itself.
No, you think that the "time zone paradox" can't exist because you literally think it's just a nominal index, rather than an esoteric secret ever since the establishmet of Stonehenge had declared Greenwich-centricism a phenomenon.
I never said cannot possibly, I said it's a confluential factor in that one particular symptom. Learn to read. God, this is from the fucktard who had attacked a number of times my comprehension abilities last night.
>thinking there's such a thing as time zone paradoxNo, you think that the "time zone paradox" can't exist because you literally think it's just a nominal index, rather than an esoteric secret ever since the establishmet of Stonehenge had declared Greenwich-centricism a phenomenon.
I know I'm going to regret this, but...No, you think that the "time zone paradox" can't exist because you literally think it's just a nominal index, rather than an esoteric secret ever since the establishmet of Stonehenge had declared Greenwich-centricism a phenomenon.
It is the noun form of the adjective: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/confluentSeeing as "confluential" is not a word, I can't imagine why anyone would think you had problems with English.