Europe and the US have agreed on a Declaration for the Future of the Internet

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
https://cepa.org/leak-us-europe-agree-on-democratic-internet-declaration/

Europe and the US have agreed on a Declaration for the Future of the Internet, outlining a series of democratic principles.​


The initiative will be launched on April 28 at a hybrid ministerial meeting organized by the White House’s National Security Council.

Initially scheduled to be launched at last December’s Summit for Democracy, the declaration found new political momentum given Russia’s recent threat to disconnect from the internet. “We call for a new Declaration for the Future of the Internet that includes all partners who actively support a future for the Internet that is open, free, global, interoperable, reliable, and secure,” reads the draft.

The EU, UK, Japan, Canada and South Korea are scheduled to be initial signatories. According to a European diplomatic source, Ukraine may sign and President Volodymyr Zelensky may participate in the announcement.

The initiative was initially called an ‘alliance’, but the wording was removed as it was deemed too close to military terminology. Previous drafts included mentions of China and Russia, which have now been removed.

When EU diplomats discussed the proposal, Hungary opposed a reference to discrimination based on gender identity. That reference is still in the text, but the paragraph was redrafted to receive support from Budapest.

The declaration wants to reclaim ‘the promise of the internet’, intended to promote innovation and unlimited access to knowledge. A series of threats that have emerged to threaten these laudable goals, according to the declaration. These include increasing repression of freedom of expression, the rise of state-sponsored cybercriminals and disinformation, and Internet shutdowns designed to restrict access to information.

Several references support multi-stakeholder Internet governance. According to a source, the US wants a united Western front against the push from China and Russia in the UN’s International Telecommunication Union to create a more national-based internet under stricter state control.

“The partners in this Declaration intend to uphold a range of key principles, set out below, regarding the Internet and digital technologies,” the draft continues. These include respect for human rights, the rule of law, online and offline transparency, and a safe Internet without discrimination based on race, ethnicity, political beliefs, gender identity, and sexual orientation. Online safety should include forbidding gender-based attacks and child sexual exploitation.

Illegal and harmful content must be reduced while respecting pluralism and freedom of expression. The signatories should “refrain from blocking or degrading access to lawful content, services, and applications on the Internet, consistent with principles of Net Neutrality.” Government-imposed internet shutdowns should be banned.

The declaration condemns “misusing or abusing the Internet or algorithmic tools or techniques for unlawful surveillance, oppression, and repression that do not align with international human rights principles, including developing social scorecards or other mechanisms of domestic social control or pre-crime detention and arrest.”

Signatories commit to collaborate on research and standard-setting, share information on shared security threats, work together to fight cybercrime, and abstain from using the Internet to interfere with electoral or political processes. The protection of privacy and personal data must be balanced against the potential of free data flows and the need to protect consumers from online scams, unsafe products, and unfair commercial practices.

Luca Bertuzzi is Euractiv’s Digital & Media Editor.

Credit: Unsplash.

---------------------------------------------------

Some stuff in there actually sounds good, at least on the surface. But given that all this means government action in the end I'm basically shitting myself out of habit.
 
Can't they just leave the internet alone, to just be a place where autists can be autistic without having to deal with some government homo getting in the way?
HAHAHAHA

No they wont. You might ask yourself "why? What would they have to gain from this??"

Because the internet is something that's truly terrifying to authoritarian governments. Why do you think Middle Eastern nations shit themselves during the Arab Spring and China tries to lock down their own population in some self contained bubble on their own internet?

It's because it gives the common people power. Power that rebels in long fallen empires could barely dream of having. Whether you live right down the road, or you live 1000 miles away as soon as I click "post reply" you will see this message within ten seconds. You can do almost anything on the internet. That is just one of the many MANY things that gives the common citizen more power than they realize. I could download the vast majority of media that has recently existed without paying a single penny.

This is a problem to all governments, especially our current governments that are slowly but surely tightening the authoritarian noose around our neck. Having your people being able to instantly communicate, and potentially circumvent your laws undermines your authority. They don't care if you want to be just "left alone".

Unfortunately the internet also gives the established elite power as well. They can use it to peddle their propaganda to millions instantly. They love using it to spy on their own citizens and ostracize those that don't toe their line. This is why they want to control it as much as possible, and why they take the time to make all of this bullshit.
 
The problem with buzzwords like "discrimination" and the like is that they're interpreted so broadly that they can be used against any "wrongthink" in Clown World.

Because the internet is something that's truly terrifying to authoritarian governments.
When printing was invented, the monarchy of England really did not like that. To be able to spread information relatively quickly?

So what happened was that they invented the concept of "copyright" - which started as a royal privilege granted to print anything.

(Hopefully the day can come when tyranny is gone, but one shouldn't hold their breath.)
 
Just reverse the meaning of everything said here and you have what they actually want to do.
You don't even have to reverse it, just read it carefully
The declaration condemns “misusing or abusing the Internet or algorithmic tools or techniques for unlawful surveillance, oppression, and repression that do not align with international human rights principles
Unlawful surveillance, oppression and repression are all fine as long as they align with international human rights principles. Principles that you and I will not be consulted for.
 
"US and Europe have agreed...."
No, a few assholes in expensive suits have agreed, the public was never asked.
 
Well, it was a nice run and I’m gonna miss you all. You know what’s the funniest part? The useful idiots will assure themselves they’re on the right side of history up until the moment they’re left to die in a ditch because they’re too weak from starvation to work.
 
Resist today. Resist tomorrow. Resist until the last jannie soldier has been driven from our soil!
 
1651184135966.png


You are here
 
The declaration condemns “misusing or abusing the Internet or algorithmic tools or techniques for unlawful surveillance, oppression, and repression that do not align with international human rights principles, including developing social scorecards or other mechanisms of domestic social control or pre-crime detention and arrest.”
Snowden and Assange would beg to differ.
 
Ah yes, "agreed"

ak-fucking-a

"Our elites decided another thing without the input of the will of the people"

Hopefully this is just another "more bark than bite" shitshow to intimidate the mean old alt-right.
Can't they just leave the internet alone, to just be a place where autists can be autistic without having to deal with some government homo getting in the way?

You saying for the government to leave a place alone and not want to mindless take control of it? What fucking planet you think you are on.
 
You saying for the government to leave a place alone and not want to mindless take control of it? What fucking planet you think you are on.
Man, I know. I was just hoping they'd be too busy drone striking kids or beating people from trying to open a mom and pop shop during Covid or something. Just this once I was hoping the government would have more retarded shit to do than fuck around with the Internet.
 
a safe Internet without discrimination based on race

So this means the Democrats won't be allowed to promote their actual party platform where they support race-based hiring quotas, affirmative action and other race-based preferences?

Something tells me that won't be the case...
 
Back
Top Bottom