A gay Jew (?) has been whining about Graham Linehan noting how he wants a witches' museum to include transwomen. He's a queer historian and he is 'evidence based'.
Twitter.
Also, if you're a patron of the arts or master-at-arms, you're really gay.
View attachment 2905815
Here is another photo.
View attachment 2905823
He works at a Birmingham museum. The UK kind, not the hick kind. Here is another photo.
View attachment 2905834
This was the same queer who said a witches' museum would be fine by him if it included gender diverse 'women', AKA males.
Here is him acting all scared that those transphobes are going to give him a bad review:
View attachment 2905840
Yes, 'evidence based history' includes calling master-at-arms, a military term, a euphemism for faggots and cowering like a child when women call out your blatant disregard for the sheer shit women accused of witchcraft went through.
Website. Here is an example of his fair and balanced historical articles.
I just love how they talk about how import gender nonconformity is while saying that if you are gender nonconforming you MUST be trans or non binary.
The flak he got for his trans witches thing was pretty tame, and well deserved. Here is a gay man highlighting how his gayness and his maleness is important, while erasing female history.
Historians like him deserve to be called out, because he is not only lying by omission, he's lying straight up.