📚 Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Edit: Found the full 15 minute Matt Walsh vs the Enbys on Dr Phil segment

yt5s.com-Both Sides of the Gender Pronoun Debate.mp4

So I clicked on the full link and ALREADY the retards are contradicting themselves. The retarded bearded clown says that gender and sex is different, but still tries to force the idea that TW are WoMeN. The normal dude was right when he said the queers are trying to appropriate womanhood and turn it into a costume. These people are retarded and so full of shit. I hope more and more people start challenging the transborg. These people are retarded.
 
This was really funny to watch.


View attachment 2903959

Same dude.
E6B7DA88-A069-4DD2-8D81-FF9221CB13C8.jpeg
Same dude. Engaging in SaTiRe
 
Ya know, if you're too lazy to clean or your background in videos just looks awful or distracting a photography background and stand will only set you back about $40. There are tons of backdrops available on Amazon, or if you don't mind waiting forever to save a ton of money, go to Aliexpress.

But the background will need to be steamed to get the creases out, and based on all the tranny flags we see with creases we know they wouldn't do that!

The reason these people all show off filth ridden rooms though is because they are so used to living in those conditions that it's normal to them. They really don't see the clutter and filth. It's just background noise they've filtered out.
This is mostly off-topic, but for anyone using backdrops, tapestries, or any lurking troons with creased flags: if you can’t shell out for steaming or the material won’t allow it, cheap, small fishing weights clipped evenly along the bottom after you hang it will get that shit out much quicker than hanging it up and letting it go.
 
TRA arguments will never not look stupid

yt5s.com-Matt Walsh Challenges Trans Activist Who Can’t Define the Term ‘Woman'.mp4

Also, a huge thank you to Lia Thomas for bringing about positive change!







TFW even Caitlyn Jenner shit talks you

segment30.mp4

Edit: Found the full 15 minute Matt Walsh vs the Enbys on Dr Phil segment

yt5s.com-Both Sides of the Gender Pronoun Debate.mp4
If they really believed that "man" and "woman" have no set definition, why is he choosing to grow a beard and long hair? Why choose those two physical signifiers, specifically, for his "non-binary" status? Why is she, similarly, choosing that hair cut and beard?

They can't actually believe anything they are saying, and choose the image they are projecting. The physical manifestation of their "non-binary" status depends entirely on the gender binary to read the way they want it to. It's fucking absurd that these people try to make these bullshit, post-structuralist definitions of gender when their own fucking bodies betray that they think women have long hair and men have beards. They pretend not to define gender, but actually define it entirely by surface level indicators. Their definition is by far the most stupid and childish.

Someone in another thread said it, but simulacra, forms without meaning. Best way to describe what these people are trying to become.

E: Found the quote
Baudrillard calls this the 'precession of simulacra.'

...the age of simulation thus begins with a liquidation of all referentials - worse: by their artificial resurrection in systems of signs, which are a more ductile material than meaning, in that they lend themselves to all systems of equivalence, all binary oppositions and all combinatory algebra. It is no longer a question of imitation, nor of reduplication, nor even of parody. It is rather a question of substituting signs of the real for the real itself; that is, an operation to deter every real process by its operational double, a metastable, programmatic, perfect descriptive machine which provides all the signs of the real and short-circuits all its vicissitudes. Never again will the real have to be produced: this is the vital function of the model in a system of death, or rather of anticipated resurrection which no longer leaves any chance even in the event of death.​
 
The solution is staring right at them, just drop the fucking trannies!

2022 could be most anti-trans legislative years in history, report says​


Transgender Americans could face a historic year of legislation that will further erode their rights as advocates brace for roughly 280 proposals in statehouses across the country aimed at some of the most vulnerable members of the LGBTQ+ community.

That's according to a comprehensive study released Thursday by the Human Rights Campaign, one of the country's largest lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer civil rights groups, which looked at dozens of proposals pushed by lawmakers last year.

In its State Equality Index scorecard, the group says state legislatures last year sought more measures than ever before that specifically targeted the transgender community across a range of issues.

While 2020 saw 79 different anti-trans measures dealing with education to athletics and healthcare to bathroom access, in 2021 that count nearly doubled with 147 proposals aimed at transgender Americans.

LGBTQ+ activists are already tracking roughly 280 bills that have been filed ahead of or during 2022 legislative sessions, with South Dakota being the first state to pass an anti-transgender bill this year putting limits on transgender women and girls from competing in school sports.

"The uptick is deeply unfortunate, and what that tells me is that our opposition is getting increasingly desperate to turn back LGBTQ equality," said Cathryn Oakley, state legislative director and senior counsel for the Human Rights Campaign.

Many forms for anti-trans bills​

State legislation targeting the trans community took several forms, according to the group's findings, with many bills carrying over from 2021 to this year.

There were roughly 80 proposals in 2021, for instance, aimed at preventing transgender youth from playing in school sports consistent with the gender identity of their choice.

Among them was a Texas bill pushed through the Republican-controlled legislature requiring student athletes play on sports teams that correspond to the sex listed on their birth certificate.

Supporters of such laws have argued the Lone Star State's proposal, which became law on Tuesday, and others like it are necessary to protect cis-gendered women in athletic programs from unfair competition from trans student athletes.

A USA TODAY investigation last year of roughly three dozen states that proposed similar bans, however, found few examples of transgender athletes seeking to participate in sports and even fewer complaints about them.

"The lack of examples just goes to show that they’re grasping for straws here," Chris Mosier, a U.S. triathlete and transgender advocate, told USA TODAY last summer.

"There is not a problem, and there is not a problem at the scale they’re trying to make it. There’s not a problem that would warrant any types of laws against these young people."

1642699890059.png

Another 43 bills, according to the Human Rights Campaign's report, were also proposed last year to prevent transgender youth from receiving age-appropriate health care that affirmed their gender identity choice.

In early 2021, for instance, Arkansas and Tennessee became two of the first states to enact laws banning doctors from providing gender-confirming hormone treatment to minors.

The Arkansas ban applied to anyone under 18 years of age while the Tennessee version blocks such treatment for prepubescent minors.

Human Rights Campaign officials are warning allies of how 2022 is poised to eclipse last year in terms of those same conservative legislators leaning into an "intentional, coordinated attack" on the transgender community, particularly youth who are grappling with their gender identity.

"The support for transgender people, and I think particularly transgender youth, is absolutely continuing to grow," Oakley told USA TODAY in an interview. "And the opposition has no choice but to really go after kids. They couldn't pick on some of their own size."

Activists hold grim outlook for 2022​

Of the 147 proposed measures last year, the HRC's index says by the end of the 2021 legislative sessions, a record 13 bills "attacking transgender youth" were enacted into law.

That is putting LGBTQ+ activists on edge for what could happen in a pivotal year leading up to the mid-term elections. For starters, advocates believe 2022 will worsen the trend as Republicans seek to give their base fuel by November.

"What we're seeing in 2022 is just the newest iteration of the same conversation," Oakley said. "Our opposition is just looking for the place where they can spread enough fear and misinformation that they're able to confuse fair-minded people long enough to get some bills passed."

Oakley said that this year will be marked by hard fights to defend progress in certain states while fending off efforts in others to expand anti-LGBTQ+ discrimination into law.

In Texas, for instance, state Rep. Valoree Swanson — who sponsored the ban on trans student athletes that took effect this week — indicated she wanted to expand the restrictions to the collegiate level.

"It's not fair that biological males can claim to be girls and take over and ruin our girls sports—it's just not," Swanson, a Republican, told members of the conservative-leaning group Texas Values.

She said cis-gendered girls from across the state and country have come forward in support of the new law, and want it to go further.

"We have got to come back and protect our college girls in the next sessions," Swanson said.

1642699863686.png


The Human Rights Campaign's scorecard lists Texas among the 22 states in its lowest-rated category, where it argues LGBTQ+ people, especially transgender individuals, have yet to achieve basic equality in employment, housing and public accommodation protections.

These states, such as South Dakota and Montana, are more likely to have religious refusal laws that allow medical care providers to refuse to provide certain services if they assert a religious justification.

Fights in some of those states will certainly take on a political tenor during the 2022 mid-terms, as among those roughly two dozen states are Arizona, Michigan and Georgia, which Democrats flipped to their column in the last presidential contest versus the 2016 election.

In those key swing states at least five bills aimed at transgender Americans have already been pre-filed in 2022, ranging from blocking gender reassignment to participation in school athletics, according to Freedom for All Americans, a bipartisan LGBTQ+ civil rights group.

'Incredible progress' in these states​

Despite the grim outlook in states where the GOP has a chokehold on the legislature and governor's mansion, the scorecard provides a glimmer of hope to LGBTQ+ advocates.

The Human Rights Campaign lists at least seven states in its categories as either building or solidifying equality, meaning progress is being made on anti-discrimination laws.

Those include swing states such as Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, but also solidly red state like Florida, Utah and Kansas.

JoDee Winterhof, a senior strategist at the Human Rights Campaign, said 2021 saw a "record-breaking amount of states step up for LGBTQ+ equality" by passing robust non-discrimination laws covering housing, healthcare and public accommodations.

"It is clear that considerable effort has been, and continues to be made, to prevent anti-LGBTQ+ legislation from becoming law," Winterhof said.

The group's scorecard shows there were 44 new pro-equality measures passed into law last year alone. It lists 21 states, and the District of Columbia, in its highest-rated category of creating "innovative equality," meaning a stat has enacted a broad range of protections.

Those states include California, Colorado, Illinois, Iowa, Maryland, New Mexico, New York and Virginia.

Those laws range from ensuring that utility companies allow consumers to change their names and pronouns to ensuring that places of public accommodation have gender-neutral bathrooms and making it easier to update birth and death certificates with correct names and pronouns.

Oakley said one of the things LGBTQ+ rights activists learned from the fight for marriage equality was how changing attitudes in the culture are tied to legislative and judicial victories.

"People are much more willing to support equality for LGBT people when they have an LGBT person in their life," she said. "It stops being hypothetical and starts being real."

Polling shows a growing share of Americans know someone who is transgender or who goes by a gender-neutral pronoun.

About 42% of adults said they personally know someone who identifies as trans, according to a July 2021 survey by the Pew Research Center. That is up 5 percentage points/ compared to a similar poll conducted five years ago.

But the same survey found Americans remain split on using gender-neutral pronouns to describe a person. About 48% said they would feel very or somewhat uncomfortable doing so compared to roughly 50% who were said they were comfortable.

Those views skew heavily when measured along partisan lines, with 68% of Republican feeling uncomfortable and 67% of Democrats feeling comfortable.

"All of that discrimination is coming from the same root, which is basic fear and misunderstanding of what it means to be trans," Oakley said. "And so we have got tomake sure that people understand that being trans is just the way some people are — it's not a threat to you, it's not a threat to anybody — it just is people's reality."

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2022/01/20/2022-anti-trans-legislation/6571819001/

https://archive.md/yh1Y1

lol new gender just dropped

1642700273533.png


 
Last edited:
Based mother protecting her kid from the trans menace in public.

"Some mother thought I was some sort of psyho/pedo"

Reddit link


She definitely WASN'T offering you dipshit.

Oh yeah, he couldn't just de transition into a hunky man, guys. You know, not even just a man. Be sure to know he's a hunky one. Even if true, a pretty frame don't mean anything if the painting is shit.



This was really funny to watch.


View attachment 2903959

Same dude.

Why can't he just unload his jizz in an elegant way?

Like a water fountain or something.
 
Why can't he just unload his jizz in an elegant way?
It’s all self hate. Men are brutish, hunky, Frankenstein pedophile coomers. Women are elegant, feminine, cute. He’s trying to distance himself from what he considers inherently male, when he’s actually repulsed by who he inherently is, irrespective of gender, as proven by how he fails to embody the virtues of either gender.
 
LGBTQ+ activists are already tracking roughly 280 bills that have been filed ahead of or during 2022 legislative sessions, with South Dakota being the first state to pass an anti-transgender bill this year putting limits on transgender women and girls from competing in school sports.
It so weird to me that to troons, equality for everyone is the same as being anti-trans. Like, despite there being new scientific evidence being pushed out everyday on how TiMs do retain advantage in sport, that puberty blockers are harmful, and that sex reassignment surgeries don't lead to happiness, troons still want to privilage their experiences over everyone else's. It's so obvious these people aren't seeking equality, but complete control and compliance.
 
This is mostly off-topic, but for anyone using backdrops, tapestries, or any lurking troons with creased flags: if you can’t shell out for steaming or the material won’t allow it, cheap, small fishing weights clipped evenly along the bottom after you hang it will get that shit out much quicker than hanging it up and letting it go.
Kiwifarms: come for the milk, stay for the lifehacks!
 
It so weird to me that to troons, equality for everyone is the same as being anti-trans. Like, despite there being new scientific evidence being pushed out everyday on how TiMs do retain advantage in sport, that puberty blockers are harmful, and that sex reassignment surgeries don't lead to happiness, troons still want to privilage their experiences over everyone else's. It's so obvious these people aren't seeking equality, but complete control and compliance.
This reminded me of an insane article by a tranny who claimed the fact his axe wound would cause him pain and suffering for the rest of his life was no good reason to stop him, and that it was his human right to inflict this mistake upon himself in the pursuit of "being taken seriously." Cuckoo.


Screenshots and article since it's behind a paywall.

A1800A44-A6D8-4BED-91D3-CEE09B56011E.jpeg
04AE3491-0606-46BC-A88D-C172D5AB2AE8.jpeg
59614B79-C753-4BA7-83AC-177005468876.jpeg

Next Thursday, I will get a vagina. The procedure will last around six hours, and I will be in recovery for at least three months. Until the day I die, my body will regard the vagina as a wound; as a result, it will require regular, painful attention to maintain. This is what I want, but there is no guarantee it will make me happier. In fact, I don’t expect it to. That shouldn’t disqualify me from getting it.

I like to say that being trans is the second-worst thing that ever happened to me. (The worst was being born a boy.) Dysphoria is notoriously difficult to describe to those who haven’t experienced it, like a flavor. Its official definition — the distress some transgender people feel at the incongruence between the gender they express and the gender they’ve been socially assigned — does little justice to the feeling.

But in my experience, at least: Dysphoria feels like being unable to get warm, no matter how many layers you put on. It feels like hunger without appetite. It feels like getting on an airplane to fly home, only to realize mid-flight that this is it: You’re going to spend the rest of your life on an airplane. It feels like grieving. It feels like having nothing to grieve.

Many conservatives call this crazy. A popular right-wing narrative holds that gender dysphoria is a clinical delusion; hence, feeding that delusion with hormones and surgeries constitutes a violation of medical ethics. Just ask the Heritage Foundation fellow Ryan T. Anderson, whose book “When Harry Became Sally” draws heavily on the work of Dr. Paul McHugh, the psychiatrist who shut down the gender identity clinic at Johns Hopkins in 1979 on the grounds that trans-affirmative care meant “cooperating with a mental illness.” Mr. Anderson writes, “We must avoid adding to the pain experienced by people with gender dysphoria, while we present them with alternatives to transitioning.”

In this view, it is not only fair to refuse trans people the care they seek; it is also kind. A therapist with a suicidal client does not draw the bath and supply the razor. Take it from my father, a pediatrician, who once remarked to me that he would no sooner prescribe puberty blockers to a gender dysphoric child than he would give a distemper shot to someone who believed she was a dog.

Naturally, a liberal counternarrative exists, and it has become increasingly mainstream. Transgender people are not deluded, advocates say, but they are suffering; therefore, medical professionals have a duty to ease that suffering. In this view, dysphoria is more akin to a herniated disc — a source of debilitating but treatable pain. “Gender dysphoria can in large part be alleviated through treatment,” states the World Professional Association for Transgender Health in its Standards of Care. Dr. John Steever, an adolescent medicine specialist at the Mount Sinai Center for Transgender Medicine and Surgery in New York City, told The Times last month that a gender-affirming approach seeks to “prevent some of the traditional horrible outcomes that transgender or gender-nonconforming youth have ended up with,” including increased rates of depression, suicidal ideation and substance abuse.

A gender-affirmative model will almost certainly lead to more and higher-quality care for transgender patients. But by focusing on minimizing patients’ pain, it leaves the door open for care to be refused when a doctor, or someone playing doctor, deems the risks too high. This was the thrust of a recent Atlantic cover story in which the journalist Jesse Singal used the statistically small number of people who have come to regret their medical transitions to argue that transitioning is “not the answer for everyone.” There was a dog whistle here: Hormones and surgery can and should be withheld from patients who want them when such treatments cannot be reasonably expected to “maximize good outcomes.”

Mr. Singal is Mr. Anderson’s liberal doppelgänger. Both writers engage in what we could call “compassion-mongering,” peddling bigotry in the guise of sympathetic concern. Both posit a medical duty to refrain from increasing trans people’s suffering — what’s called nonmaleficence. Neither has any issue with gatekeeping per se; they differ, modestly, on how the gate is to be kept.

Buried under all of this, like a sober tuber, lies an assumption so sensible you’ll think me silly for digging it up. It’s this: People transition because they think it will make them feel better. The thing is, this is wrong.

I feel demonstrably worse since I started on hormones. One reason is that, absent the levees of the closet, years of repressed longing for the girlhood I never had have flooded my consciousness. I am a marshland of regret. Another reason is that I take estrogen — effectively, delayed-release sadness, a little aquamarine pill that more or less guarantees a good weep within six to eight hours.

Like many of my trans friends, I’ve watched my dysphoria balloon since I began transition. I now feel very strongly about the length of my index fingers — enough that I will sometimes shyly unthread my hand from my girlfriend’s as we walk down the street. When she tells me I’m beautiful, I resent it. I’ve been outside. I know what beautiful looks like. Don’t patronize me.

I was not suicidal before hormones. Now I often am.

I won’t go through with it, probably. Killing is icky. I tell you this not because I’m cruising for sympathy but to prepare you for what I’m telling you now: I still want this, all of it. I want the tears; I want the pain. Transition doesn’t have to make me happy for me to want it. Left to their own devices, people will rarely pursue what makes them feel good in the long term. Desire and happiness are independent agents.

As long as transgender medicine retains the alleviation of pain as its benchmark of success, it will reserve for itself, with a dictator’s benevolence, the right to withhold care from those who want it. Transgender people have been forced, for decades, to rely for care on a medical establishment that regards them with both suspicion and condescension. And yet as things stand today, there is still only one way to obtain hormones and surgery: to pretend that these treatments will make the pain go away.

The medical maxim “First, do no harm” assumes that health care providers possess both the means and the authority to decide what counts as harm. When doctors and patients disagree, the exercise of this prerogative can, itself, be harmful.

Nonmaleficence is a principle violated in its very observation. Its true purpose is not to shield patients from injury but to install the medical professional as a little king of someone else’s body.

Let me be clear: I believe that surgeries of all kinds can and do make an enormous difference in the lives of trans people.

But I also believe that surgery’s only prerequisite should be a simple demonstration of want. Beyond this, no amount of pain, anticipated or continuing, justifies its withholding.

Nothing, not even surgery, will grant me the mute simplicity of having always been a woman. I will live with this, or I won’t. That’s fine. The negative passions — grief, self-loathing, shame, regret — are as much a human right as universal health care, or food. There are no good outcomes in transition. There are only people, begging to be taken seriously.

A rebuttal from a tranny who takes offense to the brutal honesty of the article.
042C8501-5BAB-44E6-84E3-8CA6566CE591.jpeg
 
Even if you have this (it's not that uncommon, but it's mostly Asians AFAIK) it's still a good idea to wear deodorant because 1) you aren't 100% smell-free, you just have much, much less smelly sweat so it's good to know that you're covered even if some freak does shove their nose right up to your pits after a long, sweaty day 2) not all sweat is the same and as far as I know this mutation does not seem to apply to stress sweat at all.

Also, it's 100% genetic and so if you don't have it to begin with then HRT won't give it to you.
Fun fact: the main gene coding for sweat's smell is the same for the earwax texture -> smelly = moist / less or no smell = dry

I simplified a little but it's the general idea.
 
@Gay Mouth

Oh, and I cannot state this enough, I HATE Chu. I read that article when it came out a couple years ago and i read the book he wrote where he states that sissy porn made him realize he was a woman and that being a woman is the same as being a submissive gapping hole to be used. Recently, there was a whole bunch of stink when it was announced he was going to be a book reviewer for The New Yorker (?).

Long Chu is a fucking pathetic soy boy from a conservative background who felt that because he was a failed man, as per traditional standards, that meant he was a woman.
 
I personally dont like or care for this decision, because of this:
While trans females were previously allowed to compete in women’s events after undergoing one year of hormone-suppression therapy, the new policy will bring U.S. collegiate sports in line with national and international governing bodies and with the international Olympic movement.
In the case of swimming, this means that NCAA athletes will be governed by USA Swimming regulations regarding transgender participation. While USA Swimming does not have a formal policy regarding transgender athletes, the organization follows IOC medical criteria that states: “Trans female athletes must demonstrate a total testosterone level in serum below 10 nmol/L for at least 12 consecutive months prior to competition and must remain below this threshold throughout the period of desired eligibility to compete in the female category in any event.”
They went from "one year of HRT" to "one year of HRT, where your testosterone level is still 8 times that of women elite athletes". NCAA is just passing the buck. Quite a few scientists think that the IOC criteria is still unfair and not scientific. As per usual, the people making decisions are cowards or benefit from this.

I dont need to explain why pregnant people here is dumb, but I want to take the time to say to any women reading this: theres something wrong with this vaccine. I took the booster a month ago because I live around an immunocompromised relative and Ive been on my period since then. Ive gone through a shitton of pads and bled through as much clothes as a preteen experiencing her first period. Menstruation is the easiest window to a woman's fertility, so I would not be surprised if somehow this impacts women's fertility and there will be a lawsuit a few years from now. Dont give a fuck about what the news says, dont take that fucking vaccine while pregnant.

Anyways, lets see some sideshows.
About a week ago, Twitter found out about the webtoon Boyfriends. by refrainbow. It is about four college students that enter a poly relationship and all become boyfriends with each other . It is, and I cannot emphasize enough, total cringe. Below is an actual youtube ad for the webtoon.
...Yea.
Now I'm sure some of you were on tumblr and indulged in yaoi manga/fanfics years ago. This webcomic is exactly like those fanfics. You got the strong jock dude, the preppy and effeminate gay guy, the broody goth boy (who is ftm and a self insert), and the coomer koreaboo uwu boi. Their names are canonically Jock, Prep, Goth, and Nerd, but when other characters mention them directly in the webtoon, Refrainbow just draws their chibi head in place of a name.
1642703266761.png
The character interactions are cringe and very anime like..
1642703510026.png

1642703670196.png

coomer like...
1642703576269.png 1642703597296.png
1642705780423.png
(this is the only panel in the whole comic that made me laugh, because of how stupid Jock looks in the virgin killer sweater as it does not flatter his shape at all)

and sometimes the art is fucking weird and screams fujo.

1642703695138.png
A friend has told me that the shape of the back is a trope in fujo art. Ive never noticed it but now that I see it, its everywhere. Its a bit similar to yaoi hands.

Anyways, twitter thinks it was dumb because it straight up fetishizes gay relationships. Apparently people initially thought it was written by a cis straight woman who fetishizes gay relationships, but the artist is just a trans gay man whos poly and based the comic off of his own experiences! So therefore its all okay and the antis are just transphobic. (archive is taking a while to do its thing, so I'll just post screenshots)
1642704376542.png 1642704412573.png

To that I say, there is literally no difference between the two. Gay FtMs fetishizes gay relationships so much harder than your run of the mill fujos that they want to be in the gay relationship. This webcomic is a very good example of autoandophilia. To drive the point home that this is for straight girls, Webtoons main demographic is preteen girls to young adult women and the merch for Boyfriends are things girls and women would have for their fave. 1642707322295.png 1642707280201.png

Before I want to hate on something, I try to have a good reason for doing so. So I read the whole damn webcomic (it wasnt long). One thing I want to mention is how... interesting the characters are portrayed. All of the boys have some degree of femininity or sexualization to them... except for Goth. I said earlier that Goth is the self insert character of Refrainbow and you can see in how Goth is treated that this is true. Goth is the most dominant out of the four. She is stoic, smokes, plays shooters for hours a day, doesnt give a shit about college, and dresses more masculine than all of them, including the Jock character. Goth is never sexualized: the closest we get was when Nerd fantasized about the other three shirtless:
1642704872088.png
(the afab in the most girliest panties? thats not very woke of you, Nerd...)
Goth is portrayed as the top out of the four of them by the creator constantly:
1642705051824.png 1642705190670.png
Goth also canonically is an artist. Refrainbow featured a special episode that was an offshoot of The Little Mermaid. That is explained by the fact that Nerd commissioned a fanfic from a friend (who is in a lesbian polycule with three other women and they all follow the Goth, Prep, Jock, Nerd tetrad) and Goth drew the art for it.
1642705640820.png
Yes, Nerd did commission an fanfic of himself and people he is dating IRL, which is peak cringe.
The only good things from this webcomic are the girls that are in a polycule (albeit unrealistic, as i do not know of any lesbians who are poly - its always men that bring up the idea of poly relationships) as they are cute and, unlike like gay polycule, are accomplished people outside of their relationship:
1642706133654.png 1642706395544.png 1642706062622.png 1642706168756.png 1642706196974.png
and this fucking cat:
1642706333432.png
(Sidenote: I speculate that Jock GF is actually an MtF because she is Jock BF's sister and is taller than him when Jock BF is the tallest of the gay polycule. Jock BF also stated that most of his clothes are handmedowns from his sister. I dont know if that would include shoes, but Jock BF's shoe size is a Mens size 11, which is Womens size 12.5. Thats insanely large for a woman. Even if they werent sharing shoes, his size shows that he is a tall and well built guy. Jock GF being MtF would be a spicy development, as Jock GF plays women's college basketball and would have crushed all of those other girls in the finals)

In closing, I hate this webcomic. Apparently Refrainbow did some nonwoke shit before. I dont know the exact deets of that though, so this is just about her shitty webcomic.
 
I'll take malignant lowlife narcissism for $2000, Amy:


View attachment 2904401View attachment 2904405
lol ... how to handle a customer "misgendering" you in the US? Suck it up whiny pants, and do your fucking job. Or quit and go find some kind of work where you don't have to deal with the public and can just inflict your disgusting self on your unfortunate coworkers.
 
@1440p Curved Monitor can't reply directly, if there's any consolation a statement was only released this week criticizing the IOC's tranny rules:

 

Attachments

Back
Top Bottom