US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
He should have pretended to agree and then when the interview started, he conducts the interview as normal. That way, he can still maintain his image as a centrist while Kamala has nothing but lose-lose-lose choices to make:

1. Continues the interview. She then fumbles and says some commie or woke shit. Least damaging since Rogan will also softball the interview, so she just ends up sounding like a dumb politician.
2. Walk out of the interview and complain she was ambushed. Makes her look bitchmade.
3. Call Rogan out for changing the terms in the interview, thus breaking the pretense of being the least bit adaptable.

So, while backing out is not technically the worst decision she could have made, it's far from mitigation because now Trump has an interview and she does not.

Someone else in the thread had a better idea. He should have agreed to the terms with the pre-written questions, then during the interview he would pull out the printed list of questions and read them off in a stilted way. He could even start to ask follow-up questions to her answers and then suddenly stop, look at the papers and say "Oops, sorry, that's not on the list, never mind."

That more than anything else would melt her brain. She would realize on some level how damaging it is. But what to do? Complain? Stop the interview? Imagine seeing on video as her staffers invade the studio to drag her away. It could be filmed on a hidden backup camera as the staffers tell Joe "stop recording now and erase the video!"

But Joe probably likes being able to fly on small planes and move around in public outside of an armored SUV convoy formation with 20 armed bodyguards so he wouldn't do that.
 
It’s increasingly clear Biden only kept Kamala around as insurance. What other reason would you have for picking the first loser of the 2020 primaries.
Reminds me of House of Cards, when the Kevin Spacey character picks a doormat of a VP just so nobody tries to pull off the same move he did.
 
I was taking a shit and had a bit of a brainwave about political memes. The reason leftwing memes are so long and preachy is because they think you’re stupid and that you need to be explained to and told how to think in excruciating detail. This is how they learned to be good boys and girls in college, thus you will learn the same way. Right wing memes are to the point because they assume you’re smart enough to get the joke. They are laid back and casual and give you the intellectual credit for a simple idea. Just my 2 cents.
Don't forget the famous stonetoss vs Horsey meme that shows the shitlib mentality. It is in their mentality to look at their opponents as either dumb or evil. Where stonetoss humanizes his opponents but makes them seem silly.
 
6 Minutes of Big Mike telling fellow men you have to again do what women say. Gilead can't come soon enough:
View attachment 6565921
bigmike.mp4

Listen to the whole thing and it's just "nothing is more important that what women think, nag and destroy them into submission." So often I think of that one facebook or twitter post of the woman who held her boyfriend and just sat there, and he almost broke down crying because he had never been held like that in years if ever, and it made her realize how much men get shit on.


Poso's WH source says Joepedo knows it's over, and is only lucid when it comes to Kamablah's fuckups.
View attachment 6565920

View attachment 6565922
Maybe old Joe isn’t as demented as we think he was. Maybe he and Jill said you fucks want to fuck me over then I’ll fuck you harder than Andrew Jackson did to his salve girls.
 
If Trump has 54% support and that's above the margin of error he wins 1000/1000 simulations.
The 54% isn't his popular vote support, it's his chance of winning the electoral college. Going by the polls the most likely outcome for Trump is losing the popular vote but winning the EC, because even though the popular vote is at 48/49 or whatever it is today, Democrats need to have larger popular vote margins than that to have a solid chance of winning. Hell, in this election things are polarized enough that the chances of either candidate winning swings dramatically based entirely on their performance in one or two swing states.

This isn't a new thing either, it's what pretty much every poll aggregator has done for years.
 
So that bombshell Trump story they keep hyping up? Apparently it's morphed from "Trump groped a minor" to "Proof that the assassination attempt was a hoax". Which would be awkward since the FBI confirmed the attempt was real.

Obviously the "story" is complete fucking bunk but I think it's really fascinating how all these last minute revelations just keep changing. It's like someone's trying to gauge what would outrage people the most.
 
'Not masculine' for being fashion savvy and having thick eyelashes. Fuck off. Cunts.
This is an unironic political position I've found with feminine-wannabe types, both men and women: Having naturally full/long lashes absolutely FUCKS with them, and they tend to trend towards being the liberal feminist/lgbt types. I have literally no idea why, because it's such a small thing, and bringing it up is against their stated values (yes hypocrites lol I know). Is it just more seething over conventional attraction shit? Femcels/OFwhores? Jealous gay guys (who think everyone else should be gay) that don't look like chad mcchad with a full head of hair and long lashes that woo ladies?

Let me shorten the question, is having natural lashes the sign of nazism?
 
So that bombshell Trump story they keep hyping up? Apparently it's morphed from "Trump groped a minor" to "Proof that the assassination attempt was a hoax". Which would be awkward since the FBI confirmed the attempt was real.

Obviously the "story" is complete fucking bunk but I think it's really fascinating how all these last minute revelations just keep changing. It's like someone's trying to gauge what would outrage people the most.
They're false accusations with no facts backing them up. They are fluid and ever changing. It's a tactic they used for a long time, as even if nothing is concrete at least some of it will stick in the minds of those who want to believe it.
 
The site going down as soon as I pressed "Post Reply" to cyberbully that French asshole was pretty goddamn funny, but not something I'd want to happen again.

Let me shorten the question, is having natural lashes the sign of nazism?
Yes. If only because linking the two together will make a lot of dumb people genuinely believe it and start parroting it as a talking point. Like the okay hand symbol and Pepe being linked to nazis. And milk, somehow.
 
The 54% isn't his popular vote support, it's his chance of winning the electoral college. Going by the polls the most likely outcome for Trump is losing the popular vote but winning the EC, because even though the popular vote is at 48/49 or whatever it is today, Democrats need to have larger popular vote margins than that to have a solid chance of winning. Hell, in this election things are polarized enough that the chances of either candidate winning swings dramatically based entirely on their performance in one or two swing states.

This isn't a new thing either, it's what pretty much every poll aggregator has done for years.

It's fascinating because Trump's numbers have always been underestimated (because people hide their support) but yesterday for the first time in the history of him running he's actually taken the lead in the popular vote.

1730015975168.png


This has never happened before going into the election. Not in 2016 (Clinton +3.2), not in 2020 (Biden +7.2), and in those two elections RCP underestimated his voting turnout by around 4-5 points. They may have improved their methodology from 2020, but when you make supporting one candidate completely taboo in the mainstream you're not going to get accurate reporting. But even with the inaccurate reporting (and no reason to not expect them to get his support wrong again by a few points), Trump is actually the projected leader in the popular vote. Harris has got to be at defcon 1 right now, the prospect of losing to Trump again (when they "beat" him before and were finally free of that "nightmare") is going to absolutely break some of their brains.
 
Last edited:
6 Minutes of Big Mike telling fellow men you have to again do what women say. Gilead can't come soon enough:
View attachment 6565921
bigmike.mp4

Listen to the whole thing and it's just "nothing is more important that what women think, nag and destroy them into submission." So often I think of that one facebook or twitter post of the woman who held her boyfriend and just sat there, and he almost broke down crying because he had never been held like that in years if ever, and it made her realize how much men get shit on.


Poso's WH source says Joepedo knows it's over, and is only lucid when it comes to Kamablah's fuckups.
View attachment 6565920

View attachment 6565922
I wanna see that Twitter post about the boyfriend.
 
We are going through a massive shift again. Like how GG to 2016 the woke took over. From 2022-2024 the pendulum has swung back really hard. You could see this coming a few years ago where people aren't as afraid to speak up when Musk bought Twitter.
Moving forward anyone who values freedom of expression needs to remember the leftist reign of terror in their bones. Don't let it happen again and remember that anyone seeking status on the basis of pity deserves all the bullying they can possibly get. If someone says you should let them moderate your group because they wish they had different genitals, bombard them with most vicious mockery possible until they run away or rope.
 
There's a lot more. Snowden was nothing more than a computer janitor tasked with cleaning up data spillages. He read documents he didn't understand and made incorrect conclusions about them
Why yes, suuuure!

All those giant NSA server farms in Utah and elsewhere that cost billions of dollars, and were capable of holding unimaginable amounts of data, were just to spy on a handful of Al Qaeda folks!

Yes indeed folks! After all, you can TRUST the intelligence community. They’d never break the law. After all, it’s not like they’ve been spying on Americans for years, through a loophole where the Brits and Aussies intercepted data and shared it with the NSA.

Oh wait, never mind that.

Anyways, it’s all Kosher! After all they have a special court approving wiretaps. Totally not a rubber stamp kind of court that basically approves anything, and even approved spying on an American citizen who worked on the campaign staff of Donald Trump.

Oh shit, that’s right. Scratch that.

But that Snowden guy, he basically has no idea what he’s talking about. He just misunderstood things you see!

You can totally trust our spook friends, who’d never dream of violating your privacy.
Just ignore the fact that the PATRIOT act is somehow still around, despite the fact that the war on terror is over. Ignore the fact that they moved heaven and earth to get to Assange, and that the NSA employs over 40.000 people. They’re all busy spying on a few thousand Al Qaeda people. Yes!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom