Twitter: BBC objects to 'government funded media' label - Government funded media mad about being called “Government Funded Media”

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
1681071872332.png

By Adam Durbin
27 minutes ago
BBC News

The BBC is objecting to a new label describing it as "government funded media" on one of its main Twitter accounts.

The corporation says it is speaking to Twitter about the designation on the @BBC account to "resolve this issue as soon as possible".

In a statement, it said: "The BBC is, and always has been, independent. We are funded by the British public through the licence fee."

Twitter has been contacted for comment.

The level of the £159 ($197) annual licence fee - which is required by law to watch live TV broadcasts or live streaming in the UK - is set by the government, but paid for by individual UK households.

While the @BBC account, which has 2.2m followers, has been given the label, much larger accounts associated with the BBC's news and sport output are not currently being described in the same way.

The account primarily shares updates about BBC-produced TV programmes, radio shows, podcasts and other non-news material.

The label links through to a page on Twitter's help website which says "state-affiliated media accounts" are defined as "outlets where the state exercises control over editorial content through financial resources, direct or indirect political pressures, and/or control over production and distribution".

As the UK's national broadcaster, the BBC operates through a Royal Charter agreed with the government.

The BBC Charter states the corporation "must be independent", particularly over "editorial and creative decisions, the times and manner in which its output and services are supplied, and in the management of its affairs".
Twitter's new labelling of the BBC's account comes after it did the same to US public broadcaster NPR's handle.
Initially the social media firm described NPR as "state-affiliated media" - a label given to outlets including Russia's RT and China's Xinhua News.

The designation was later changed to the same "government funded media" tag now applied to the @BBC account. NPR had said it would stop tweeting from the account unless it was amended.

The licence fee raised £3.8bn ($4.7bn) in 2022 for the BBC, accounting for about 71% of the BBC's total income of £5.3bn - with the rest coming from its commercial and other activities like grants, royalties and rental income.
The BBC also receives more than £90m per year from the government to support the BBC World Service, which predominantly serves non-UK audiences.

The national broadcaster's output is also paid for through the work of commercial subsidiaries like BBC Studios, as well as through advertising on services offered to audiences outside of the UK
By law, each household in the UK has to pay the licence fee (with some exemptions) if they:
  • watch or record programmes as they're being shown on any TV channel
  • watch or stream programmes live on any online TV service - for instance, All 4, YouTube, or Amazon Prime Video
  • download or watch any BBC programmes on BBC iPlayer
Collection of the the licence fee and enforcement of non-payment is carried out by private companies contracted by the corporation, not the UK government.

TV licence evasion itself is not an imprisonable offence. However, non-payment of a fine, following a criminal conviction, could lead to a risk of imprisonment - "a last resort" after other methods of enforcement have failed.

Source (Archive)
 
TV licence evasion itself is not an imprisonable offence. However, non-payment of a fine, following a criminal conviction, could lead to a risk of imprisonment - "a last resort" after other methods of enforcement have failed.
Literally "we won't put you in prison for it, until we put you in prison for it"

The UK is honestly the clowniest of nations in a part of the world filled with clown nations.
 
Remember. "Goverment Funded" and "State Owned" media is reserved solely for China and Russia. Because, apparently, that is supposed to be a bad thing.
I mean, nobody ever said nor implied it was a bad thing until NPR and the BBC started crying about being labeled it.

Anyway, it's all about money. I've read comments about this article on other sites and yeah - It's not some clandestine pushback. Some dude just wants a bigger cut than the one he's already getting.
Literally "we won't put you in prison for it, until we put you in prison for it"

The UK is honestly the clowniest of nations in a part of the world filled with clown nations.

The UK is cirque du soleil, it's an interesting, thought provoking circus filled with weirdos.
America is the Big Top, plenty of rings, every type of clown and side show attraction you wanna see.
Canada is the freaky after dark-only Sideshow for both.
 
Remember. "Goverment Funded" and "State Owned" media is reserved solely for China and Russia. Because, apparently, that is supposed to be a bad thing.
I mean, nobody ever said nor implied it was a bad thing until NPR and the BBC started crying about being labeled it.
All media is bad, be it state or corporate sponsored, if anything at least state media is more truthful about bias. Journos like to make believe that they are some anti authoritarian Robin Hood when they are the tools of the tyrants and elites.
 
All media is bad, be it state or corporate sponsored, if anything at least state media is more truthful about bias. Journos like to make believe that they are some anti authoritarian Robin Hood when they are the tools of the tyrants and elites.
I bet most of these journos got their start reading Transmetropolitan. For all it's qualities it gets lost in the 'journos are heroes!!!' plotline.
 
I mean, the BBC is absolutely government funded media, which is fine. PBS is also publicly funded, and responsible for stuff like Mister Rogers and Frontline.

Where it does get murky, however, is with NPR. Yes, technically NPR does get government funding, but if you add up both the money it directly receives from government grants and the portion of membership dues paid by independent stations that comes from government grants, it's still only something like 8% of their total income. I'm not sure if that quite deserves the title. If we agree thought that NPR deserves the title, I think we should see what percentage of major cable news outlets' expenses are covered by tax subsidies and count those as government income. Just my personal opinion.
 
Here's a thought, stop taking funds from the government. If you're so great and independent, prove that you can make it on your own.

Also, imagine paying for a TV licence. Wtf.
 
Please, I'm not funded by the government, my money comes from millions of independent taxpayers.
 
What the fuck is in their twitter banner
1681075099220.jpeg
The long-running, award-winning drama series follows the day-to-day activity at Waterloo Road school, where lessons learned, it seems, have a way of extending beyond the classroom. Initially set at a rundown comprehensive school in Rochdale, England, before moving to an independent school in Greenock, Scotland, the drama revolves around the never-dull lives of the school's teachers and students, and its story lines address many attention-grabbing social issues such as sex, abortion, divorce, child abuse and suicide.
Wikipedia
 
The BBC also receives more than £90m per year from the government to support the BBC World Service, which predominantly serves non-UK audiences.
This is hilarious. Literal state sponsored propaganda broadcast to non-UK nations isn't government funded media now?

I'm a big fan of World Service, but nigga please.
 
News media is quite open with its demands to be treated as a privileged class
 
The level of the £159 ($197) annual licence fee - which is required by law to watch live TV broadcasts or live streaming in the UK - is set by the government, but paid for by individual UK households.
Claiming that you're not state-funded, people are merely forced by the state to fund you, is a really funny way of coping. It's not a meaningful difference, just a naked attempt at sophistry, but it shows how they have no actual grounds to dispute the label.
 
In a statement, it said: "The BBC is, and always has been, independent. We are funded by the British public through the licence fee."
We're not state owned! We're just entirely funded by the state via taxes directly collected from the population specifically to fund us! But we're totally independent guys! Nevermind that we were the literal state propaganda mouthpiece during ww2

Idiots
 
Back
Top Bottom