📚 Megathread Trannies posting their L's Online - Heckin valid people posting their funny misfortunes on the internet

[Sean Andalou]

In convinced Reddits new “hide post history” feature was created by trannies for trannies so that other people can’t see the delulu stuff the regularly post.

I use that feature, but I never post about troons over there even though I snag troon stuff for posting here.
I do it to keep my tech support separate from my politics.
Back on track now.

---

Radical re-definition of the concept of "fetish".
Again .


Reddit -- Archive

Spoiler: Long rant in full.

TLDR: Boy mom.

From the day she found out my sex, while I was in the womb, she had already mapped out my entire life. To be a handsome strong man, to be popular with the ladies, to be sexual, to be a father figure.

Growing up she would use extremely inappropriate language manifest her fantasy onto me. Talking about my genitals like they're a status symbol, about being a womanizer, about awakening my sexuality. It's actually pretty confusing, because she would sometimes uphold healthy boundaries between us, but the next day sexualize me to hell and back. Like making a "joke" about my dad taking me to a brothel and glory holes. I don't know what her goal is.

She has also, unfortunately, done some things that I can only describe as incestuous. Like groping me repeatedly, calling me her man, making a joke (which sounded an invitation to me) about kissing her on the lips, looking at my groin, and honestly much worse things. Why did I have to be the one pulling back and assessing my boundaries? I was just a kid.

When I came out as trans, she wanted none of that. It would shatter her fantasy immediately. She was never ever going to listen to what I (or my psychiatrist) had to say. She continues to tell me to this day that I will destroy my life, make a fool out of myself, and to stop before it's too late. She has been making me feel guilty, but most of all, just incredibly anxious and depressed. As I grow older, she tries to compromise. "You can be gay without being trans" (even though she thinks being gay is an abomination). She's actively losing it.

I'm saying all this in text to ground and remind myself why she isn't a credible person. I know she sounds terrible in this post but in real life she looks and acts pretty normal. That's her way to manipulate my feelings and my opinion of her. I'm trying to stop it. But it's hard.

Key quote:

When I came out as trans, she wanted none of that. It would shatter her fantasy immediately. She was never ever going to listen to what I (or my psychiatrist) had to say. She continues to tell me to this day that I will destroy my life, make a fool out of myself, and to stop before it's too late. She has been making me feel guilty, but most of all, just incredibly anxious and depressed. As I grow older, she tries to compromise. "You can be gay without being trans" (even though she thinks being gay is an abomination). She's actively losing it.

The mother doesn't want her boy to be a eunuch so he gets a psychiatrist to help gaslight.

Top comment (792 upvotes)

My mom was the exact same way. Gave me a lot of weird feelings years later realizing how emotionally incestuous it was and how it made me internalized alot of my own self worth based off of her sexual preferences. It's gross and obviously not okay.

I cut my mom off years ago, it sucks but it had to be done.

Excerpt further down in comments:

Cishet parents do infinitely more sexual grooming of children than any other category. ...

More radical re-definition.
Raising a boy to be a man == "grooming".

Another:

When people use boy mom online as a term they’re generally referring to mothers who make it their entire obsession and personality that they’re the mother of a boy(s). Mothers who genuinely care for their children regardless of their gender aren’t what’s being talked about here, so you don’t need to feel bad.

The best anti-troon hate literature is their own writings.

 

[Anasa Tristis]

TLDR: Boy mom.

That one starts out almost semi plausible but then goes too far. A mother groping and coming on to her son? Talking about brothels and glory holes? Even in jest? X. Doubt.

His pornified brain came up with that reverse Oedipal tale as titillating wank fodder for him and his tranny pals to enjoy.

Mom as groomer/predator. JFC. The more I think about it, the grosser it (and he!) gets. Wow.

 

[Tragi-Chan]

Radical re-definition of the concept of "fetish".
Again .

So he’s saying he became trans after being sexually abused? Interesting.

 

[Shakira Flabbergasted]

"the Bible says nothing about trans people, therefore it's okay"

Sorry I'm but the Bible does say this:

Deuteronomy 22:5
The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman's garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the LORD thy God.

1 Corinthians 11:14-15
Doth not even nature itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him? But if a woman have long hair, it is a glory to her: for her hair is given her for a covering.

Genesis 1:27
So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

Basically, there are only two sexes: male and female, and they were created as such by God. Men should have short hair and wear men's clothing; women should have long hair and wear women's clothing. Not much room for interpretation there.

Of course, the Bible doesn't say anything about modern transgender surgeries or cross-sex hormones because it was written 2000+ years ago. The only option for people who wanted to be the opposite sex would have been to dress and cut their hair like the opposite sex, which is explicitly forbidden. Self-mutilation for pagan ritual purposes is also forbidden:

Leviticus 9:28
Ye shall not make any cuttings in your flesh for the dead, nor print any marks upon you: I am the Lord.

If the Bible forbids self-mutilation in mourning for the dead, why would self-mutilation for the purpose of altering the sexed body God gave you be okay?

Trans-identified "Christians" who claim the Bible doesn't speak on their perversion because it doesn't include the word "transgender" are willfully deluding themselves.

2 Thessalonians 2:10-12
And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.

 

[Sean Andalou]

Sorry I'm but the Bible does say this:

I thought we went over this, but it bears as much repeating as necessary.

Explicit Old Testament prohibition:
Deuteronomy 23:1 in the King James Version has it --

He that is wounded in the stones, or hath his privy member cut off, shall not enter into the congregation of the Lord.

Historical context --
To prevent the rise of a eunuch priesthood (quite common in that part of the world at the time).

Example --
Reference: https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Golden_Bough/The_Myth_and_Ritual_of_Attis

...
The greatest festival of the year at Hierapolis fell at the beginning of spring, when multitudes thronged to the sanctuary from Syria and the regions round about. While the flutes played, the drums beat, and the eunuch priests slashed themselves with knives, the religious excitement gradually spread like a wave among the crowd of onlookers, and many a one did that which he little thought to do when he came as a holiday spectator to the festival. For man after man, his veins throbbing with the music, his eyes fascinated by the sight of the streaming blood, flung his garments from him, leaped forth with a shout, and seizing one of the swords which stood ready for the purpose, castrated himself on the spot. Then he ran through the city, holding the bloody pieces in his hand, till he threw them into one of the houses which he passed in his mad career. The household thus honoured had to furnish him with a suit of female attire and female ornaments, which he wore for the rest of his life. When the tumult of emotion had subsided, and the man had come to himself again, the irrevocable sacrifice must often have been followed by passionate sorrow and lifelong regret. This revulsion of natural human feeling after the frenzies of a fanatical religion is powerfully depicted by Catullus in a celebrated poem.
...

So it's all there.
In current year terms -- Transgenderism as part of a cult and living to regret it.

 

[Shakira Flabbergasted]

I thought we went over this, but it bears as much repeating as necessary.

Sorry, yes I did see your post about the eunuchs from last month. It was very informative. I just wanted to add a few more verses to the pile, especially because some pooners might argue that they aren't eunuchs so it doesn't apply to them. I'm catching up on the thread after a month, so that's why I'm late to the party.

 

[Stan]

Basically, there are only two sexes: male and female, and they were created as such by God. Men should have short hair and wear men's clothing; women should have long hair and wear women's clothing. Not much room for interpretation there.

Of course, the Bible doesn't say anything about modern transgender surgeries or cross-sex hormones because it was written 2000+ years ago. The only option for people who wanted to be the opposite sex would have been to dress and cut their hair like the opposite sex, which is explicitly forbidden. Self-mutilation for pagan ritual purposes is also forbidden:

Bronze age proto Jews were aware of the existence of eunuchs but prohibited the practice even to livestock.
Some gender motivated theologians use the evidence of the Jews' awareness of eunuchs and the Christians' acceptance of eunuchs to mean Jesus would accept "gender non conforming people". Which would work great except eunuchs aren't really gender non-conforming. They became eunuchs for the following reasons:
1. As a slave, your master decides to go ahead with castrating you (as this makes you suitable to guard a harem, be a trusted confidant, soprano singer, etc.)
2. As a free person you choose castration for similar reasons (more common in Imperial China but happened occasionally in the Middle East.)
3. You are born with a DSD that makes you male but infertile and you don't go thru puberty (so called eunuchs by birth)

None of those classes of eunuchs ever really stop self-identifying as men. They are castrated men, yes, but they aren't women or some other third category. Chinese eunuchs would hang onto their severed dick and balls in a jar to be buried with them when they died so that they could be whole again in the afterlife. So when modern liberal theologians use Biblical anecdotes about eunuchs to prove that being trans is OK, it seems they are missing the point. By and large becoming a eunuch is something that happened to these men against their will when they were young, or something they chose to do because they were in abject poverty and have nothing left to lose.

 

[Bloo]

Troon tried dunking with the “if you wouldn’t fuck Trans Icon Buck Angel as a straight man then trans women are real women!” argument.
View attachment 8199993
Trans Icon Buck Angel disagrees.
View attachment 8199996

This is always the stupidest argument. No, I imagine Graham Lineham wouldn’t date every single female in existence for a plethora of reasons.

 

[Sean Andalou]

Shake that thing! Show us what you got!

Spoiler: Technically not porn, but NSFL

You guys like?

Reddit -- Archive

 

[toilet_rainbow]

Ingrate troon created a comic whining about how allies saying they care about trans people isn’t supportive enough








The included notes are not just classic contradictory narrative controlling, they get creepy immediately.

Spoiler: text

Oh no, she’s hot.

…is it weird that was my first thought as I was drawing her?

Something I want to avoid here is for a potential ally to read this and think that marginalized communities don’t welcome and aren’t thankful for support. We need all the help we can get and it’s wonderful when folks speak up for causes that don’t directly support themselves.

It’s bothersome however, when someone expects their good deeds to result in personal gain.

It’s *dehumanizing* when someone expects their good deeds to result in praise from the communities they speak out for.

I’ve had people snidely tell me that they’ve either spoken up for trans people or directly defended me in conversations that I wasn’t present. The folks in particular that come to mind said these things to me so rudely, so dripping with “ugh, I’m going out on a limb for you, you know” that they are offended that I don’t immediately drop to my knees and genuflect.

Being an ally is a good thing, but being an ally is the default.

If you think that members of marginalized communities should be grateful that you’re not a terrible human being, that means that you think you’re intrinsically worth more than they are.

That means you think they are lesser than you.

And that’s awful.

#trans #transgender #queer #genderqueer #lgbt #lgbtq #lgbtqia #comics #webcomics #imstillalex #transartist #queerartist #transcomics #queercomics #art #drawing #digitalart #ally #allyship #transrights #transrightsarehumanrights

 

[DYLAN ‘DIELAWN’ VOLK]

Being an ally is a good thing, but being an ally is the default.

That has literally never been true. Maybe online and in certain "spaces", but most of us were just being polite to what we thought were fags that wanted to get married and act like normal people. They are so delusional, they think they can just change reality by lying and drawing ugly pictures they apparently jorked it to.

 

[Sean Andalou]

Is this comic strip intended to rebuke any wishy-washy ally who might read it?
And motivate them to do better?

Don't actively hate trans people ... not cool to legislate them out of existence.

Said no self described "ally" EVAR.

Being an ally is a good thing, but being an ally is the default.

That has literally never been true.

What is unclear is just exactly what would be enough? Even as a fantasy?

 

[Sog Dog]

What is unclear is just exactly what would be enough? Even as a fantasy?

Literally nothing. Nothing would or could ever possibly be enough because these people live in a self-constructed worldview that REQUIRES them to be the heroic, blameless, ever-suffering victim and every one else to play their roles too. In the case of the "ally" it's the obsequious, fawning, imperfect yes-man who exists not just to validate the hero, but to demonstrate the perfection of the hero through their own imperfection. For the ally to achieve "enough" and become an equal would be to shatter their role, and thus, the entire grand delusion.

 

[Pickman's Modeling Agency]

Men should have short hair

I'm rating this dumb not for you, but for the belief itself. Men only get so many years of excellent hair and it is a crime that they are told to chop it all off. Stay strong, Fabiofags. Even a short man with great hair mogs a tall chrome-dome, imo. In fact, if I were tinfoil-minded, I'd even say that walled old men enforce short hair on young men due to envy.

 

[Shakira Flabbergasted]

I'm rating this dumb not for you, but for the belief itself. Men only get so many years of excellent hair and it is a crime that they are told to chop it all off. Stay strong, Fabiofags. Even a short man with great hair mogs a tall chrome-dome, imo.

I 100% agree with you, provided the guy actually has nice hair and knows how to take care of it. This one metalhead I know got sent home from Catholic school as a teenager for refusing to cut his hair short. They called his parents in the next day to talk about the hair issue and his dad showed up wearing a ponytail. Metalhead guy got to keep his mane.

 

[Uzumaki]

Nothing has hurt their movement more than their idea that “ally” means “enthusiastic untouchable slave”.

“If you support us the first thing you need to hear is you’re not doing enough and the second thing you need to hear is you’re an asshole for expecting any kind of reciprocal respect.”

 

[Waffle Iron]

Being an ally is a good thing, but being an ally is the default.

[..]

That means you think they are lesser than you.

Ironically they do the exact thing to "allies" they accuse allies of. As an ally you're lesser, you should always cape for trannies and always support whatever a tranny says.

Is this comic strip intended to rebuke any wishy-washy ally who might read it?

Like all things tranny, it is meant for self-fellation and browbeating. They get to cast themselves as the heroic victim, while harassing anyone supporting them for not being servile enough and daring to take an inch of the spotlight. Only a tranny is allowed to talk about his activism and receive praise for it.

I'm surprised they still use the word "ally". Whenever I see it used they use it to push supporters in the most demeaning position possible.
Feminist ally? Keep quiet and underwrite everything we say.
Black ally? Black kang is speaking, shut up and listen, and not a peep when we demand our 5th reparation.
Trans ally? Support us whenever we assault people online like a pack of hyenas, acknowledge our victimhood and give us access to your children.

Not only does it treat your supposed supporters like slaves, it also kills any self-cleansing capacity of a movement. You can't complain about blacks looting stores because that is racist, or say that trannies have no place in competitive sports. The most extreme position becomes unstoppable and ends up taking over.

 

[Pluciferous]

I'm rating this dumb not for you, but for the belief itself. Men only get so many years of excellent hair and it is a crime that they are told to chop it all off. Stay strong, Fabiofags. Even a short man with great hair mogs a tall chrome-dome, imo. In fact, if I were tinfoil-minded, I'd even say that walled old men enforce short hair on young men due to envy.

The last I checked, studies showed that long hair on a short guy makes him look shorter to the eye.

 

[Pickman's Modeling Agency]

The last I checked, studies showed that long hair on a short guy makes him look shorter to the eye.

I mean, I'll take your word for it, I just personally value luxurious hair over objective height.

 

[Pluciferous]

I mean, I'll take your word for it, I just personally value luxurious hair over objective height.

Back when I was willing to date a woman, I personally valued sexual intercourse, and women find short men repellent and repulsive. So I kept my hair short.

Now that I have discovered the wisdom of monk mode and don’t date anymore, I personally value shampoo efficiency. So the hair stays short.