- Joined
- Aug 13, 2022
It seemed pretty blatant to me.
The cited numbers are probably bullshit/misunderstood but yeah it's a curious trend.
📚 Megathread Trannies posting their L's Online - Heckin valid people posting their funny misfortunes on the internet
- Thread starter Meiwaku
- Start date
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
MaximKnight76
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2024
Why do leftists like to ignore the legal and literary definition of murder? This is the same shit they did during the Kyle Rittenhouse discourse.
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2021
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2019
Could say the same about rightoids calling very early term abortions murder though, TBF.
What is it with people in general from both sides of the house ignoring definitions these days? Each extreme is as guilty as the other, just about different things.
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2023
Of course that's what they are doing and not trying very hard to hide it.
But the "Oppression Olympics" is just the current convenient pretext.
If the terminology of the allegedly leftist ruling class changes, they will find a new pretext.
Metal Slime 20x6
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2023
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
Man voluntarily has his penis and testicles removed and even refers to his disgusting wound as "her" (LOL)
I'm glad us penised individuals can still enjoy Taco Bell.
![LinkinParkxNaruto[AMV]](http://uploads.embed.kiwifarms.st/data/avatars/l/61/61177.jpg?1699571951){kind=avatar}
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2020
indeed, Reitz is the unicorn jelly tranny. Notable how he was a computer programmer ultra-weeb tranner decades before that became the stereotype
- Joined
- May 10, 2019
I miss finding crazy lolcows like this.indeed, Reitz is the unicorn jelly tranny. Notable how he was a computer programmer ultra-weeb tranner decades before that became the stereotype
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2023
Every stereotype has an origin.
I think this stereotype has less to do with the prevalence of the type as it does the type being well placed for self-promotion. It is a deliberately self-generated stereotype.
TheSunSets
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2023
Passing my arse mate. Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with these retards.
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2023
It absolutely sucks when you discover a friend is a piece of shit. But this reaction is just a tad hysterical:
link | archive
We are two of the most skilled jewelers in a large shop, and work closely together. When I came out I was afraid he would have issues. He seemed cool with it, and our working relationship didn't really change. As far as I knew we liked and respected each other. I found out through a few different people that he intentionally misgenders and dead names me when talking to others. When they call him out on it he scoffs at my identity and basically calls me mentally ill or sick. Finding this out has devastated me. I don't know who else is like this behind my back. I was so happy that my work place accepted me, but now I am wondering if they really do. How many others are mocking me behind my back? How many people are chuckling to each other after I am out of ear shot? I love my job, but I don't know if I can go back there now. I don't even know if I can ever leave my house again at this point. I don't think I have ever felt this small and afraid before. I just want to curl up into a tight ball and cry.
link | archive
I found out that someone I thought was a friend and ally has been mocking me behind my back the whole time.
TRIGGER WARNINGWe are two of the most skilled jewelers in a large shop, and work closely together. When I came out I was afraid he would have issues. He seemed cool with it, and our working relationship didn't really change. As far as I knew we liked and respected each other. I found out through a few different people that he intentionally misgenders and dead names me when talking to others. When they call him out on it he scoffs at my identity and basically calls me mentally ill or sick. Finding this out has devastated me. I don't know who else is like this behind my back. I was so happy that my work place accepted me, but now I am wondering if they really do. How many others are mocking me behind my back? How many people are chuckling to each other after I am out of ear shot? I love my job, but I don't know if I can go back there now. I don't even know if I can ever leave my house again at this point. I don't think I have ever felt this small and afraid before. I just want to curl up into a tight ball and cry.
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2023
Candidate No 7
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2023
Well there is a range of solutions really. I mean, here is one off the top of my head.
EDIT as per request. But I mean, honestly, who can even tell the difference?
Last edited:
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2018
Alright someone post the pictures that show the man looking like a man.
Candidate No 7
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2023
Yup, gotta get those trans-periods going as soon as possible.
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2017
Tumblr trannies have declared Total Retard War against the platform and are attempting to organize a class action lawsuit for *transmisogynistic discrimination* (and that this alleged en masse banning is a direct violation to conditions Tumblr was given in a 2022 settlement regarding the porn ban algorithm)
first user archive / second user archive
Because text is small af after inserting caps:
So I believe we'd want to get in touch with the human rights commission in san fransisco instead. I don't know fuckall about this kind of legal thing though, so someone who either knows more or is better at research should figure out if it's worthwhile to bring this to the CCHR given that All This Shit is a pretty overt violation of the terms of their settlement with them, even if they are now headquartered elsewhere.
---
I need eyes on this. I can't do this alone, but we SUPER have this together. Come on, let's combine our autism and fire the transgender laser directly at tumblr headquarters. Via
LEGAL ACTION
---
screencap of tags:
#I AM LISTENING OP WHAT DO YOU NEED US TO DO #GIVE ME INSTRUCTIONS/gen #HAPPY PRIDE LET'S TAKE OUR WEBSITE BACK
Right now? Legal research. I think a good move right now would be to contact the CCHR and just, ask about what the protocol is here. Tumblr made the settlement with them, and i'm kind of sure they've violated the terms of it? That's what we need to clarify. If they have, we need to then find out what to do about it. If this is like, a closed case, we need to find the equivalent office in san fransisco and file a complaint with them.
I gotta emphasize I do not know how this legal stuff works, but getting in touch with an office to ask these kinds of questions is generally the correct first move here, and does not constitute Starting A Whole Process on its own.
---
screencap of a reply from user teslafactory:
you want to contact a lawyer/firm with a history of representing class action lawsuits, preferably one in sanfran. it might to help to see if any crossover with the legal team from the previous lawsuit. if someone cold emails them there's a chance they will happily give us some tips or advice moving forwards.
And there it is, folks! We're on a lawyer hunt. You ever reblog a post like "tumblr owes every trans woman $1000 dollars" this is it. This is our chance to make tumblr actually pay every trans woman on or run off this website actual money. Lets Fucking Go
---
what you need for a class action suit:
- a lawyer willing to work pro-bono (unlikely in this case) or thousands of dollars
- significant amounts of time to reach out to all eligible parties, make court arrangements (many of which will need to be in person in the relevant state, or mailed in which can be very slow)
- enough people who can directly prove their blog was deleted even though they did not violate the terms of service (not just people who believe this happened)
- a judge who isn’t going to say that a platform is entitled to delete blogs as they see fit because users agree to the terms of service when they make an account, which state the terms of service can be changed at any time,and could be tailored specifically to fit the deletion of blogs that didn’t originally violate the terms of service
it would be very, very hard to prove that something illegal is happening here. it would be even harder to find enough people with any evidence their blog was deleted despite NEVER violating the terms of service. it doesn’t matter how insignificant a violation was, it is grounds for deletion according to the terms of service everyone agrees to when they sign up for an account.
the second problem here is proving that the moderators knew they were deleting the blogs of trans women, which is required to prove it was discrimination. it wouldn’t be hard for them to say they didn’t even know who ran the blogs that were being deleted. my guess for their biggest argument would be ‘how could they discriminate if they didn’t know they were even targeting a certain group?’ i think most people agree there’s a lot of cases where the moderators were aware of a person’s identity, but this is hard to prove when the blog was deleted and there’s no evidence they ever indicated their identity.
in my (not a lawyer) opinion, the best option here isn’t a class action suit, but contacting an organization like the aclu. no clue if they’d take a suit like this, especially since it’s hard to prove there’s significant harm involved at all, but that’s probably better than trying to organize a class action suit.
(The 2022 lawsuit that they are referencing to in this is about the Tumblr porn ban being challenged as a "human rights violation" against queer people due to how the algorithm deciding what to ban worked, btw (archive to Verge article))
Here are some screencaps that I have from February 20 where Matt (the admin of Tumblr) addresses the banning of popular troon pedestrogen after he sent him (and staff) death threats that involved a hammer and a car. I thought I had capped the actual threat (or a cap of it), weird. Oh well. Figured they'll be interesting considering this is what really set the troons off. These interactions with Matt prove that no matter how hard you try to coddle troons, they'll always find a way to spit venom in your face.
Predstrogen under a sock:
Troon crying "RETALIATION"
And more of similar
Edit: more timeline info, including a callout document that Tumblr troons are particularly salty about for exposing their bad behavior offsite
first user archive / second user archive
Because text is small af after inserting caps:
So, I'm looking into the whole Tumblr discrimination suit thing.
They settled with the CCHR in 2022 because, at the time, they were headquartered there, I believe, but that's no longer the case. Automattic Inc., and by extension, Tumblr, are headquartered now at 60 29th Street #343 San Francisco, CA 94110So I believe we'd want to get in touch with the human rights commission in san fransisco instead. I don't know fuckall about this kind of legal thing though, so someone who either knows more or is better at research should figure out if it's worthwhile to bring this to the CCHR given that All This Shit is a pretty overt violation of the terms of their settlement with them, even if they are now headquartered elsewhere.
---
I need eyes on this. I can't do this alone, but we SUPER have this together. Come on, let's combine our autism and fire the transgender laser directly at tumblr headquarters. Via
LEGAL ACTION
---
screencap of tags:
#I AM LISTENING OP WHAT DO YOU NEED US TO DO #GIVE ME INSTRUCTIONS/gen #HAPPY PRIDE LET'S TAKE OUR WEBSITE BACK
Right now? Legal research. I think a good move right now would be to contact the CCHR and just, ask about what the protocol is here. Tumblr made the settlement with them, and i'm kind of sure they've violated the terms of it? That's what we need to clarify. If they have, we need to then find out what to do about it. If this is like, a closed case, we need to find the equivalent office in san fransisco and file a complaint with them.
I gotta emphasize I do not know how this legal stuff works, but getting in touch with an office to ask these kinds of questions is generally the correct first move here, and does not constitute Starting A Whole Process on its own.
---
screencap of a reply from user teslafactory:
you want to contact a lawyer/firm with a history of representing class action lawsuits, preferably one in sanfran. it might to help to see if any crossover with the legal team from the previous lawsuit. if someone cold emails them there's a chance they will happily give us some tips or advice moving forwards.
And there it is, folks! We're on a lawyer hunt. You ever reblog a post like "tumblr owes every trans woman $1000 dollars" this is it. This is our chance to make tumblr actually pay every trans woman on or run off this website actual money. Lets Fucking Go
---
what you need for a class action suit:
- a lawyer willing to work pro-bono (unlikely in this case) or thousands of dollars
- significant amounts of time to reach out to all eligible parties, make court arrangements (many of which will need to be in person in the relevant state, or mailed in which can be very slow)
- enough people who can directly prove their blog was deleted even though they did not violate the terms of service (not just people who believe this happened)
- a judge who isn’t going to say that a platform is entitled to delete blogs as they see fit because users agree to the terms of service when they make an account, which state the terms of service can be changed at any time,and could be tailored specifically to fit the deletion of blogs that didn’t originally violate the terms of service
it would be very, very hard to prove that something illegal is happening here. it would be even harder to find enough people with any evidence their blog was deleted despite NEVER violating the terms of service. it doesn’t matter how insignificant a violation was, it is grounds for deletion according to the terms of service everyone agrees to when they sign up for an account.
the second problem here is proving that the moderators knew they were deleting the blogs of trans women, which is required to prove it was discrimination. it wouldn’t be hard for them to say they didn’t even know who ran the blogs that were being deleted. my guess for their biggest argument would be ‘how could they discriminate if they didn’t know they were even targeting a certain group?’ i think most people agree there’s a lot of cases where the moderators were aware of a person’s identity, but this is hard to prove when the blog was deleted and there’s no evidence they ever indicated their identity.
in my (not a lawyer) opinion, the best option here isn’t a class action suit, but contacting an organization like the aclu. no clue if they’d take a suit like this, especially since it’s hard to prove there’s significant harm involved at all, but that’s probably better than trying to organize a class action suit.
(The 2022 lawsuit that they are referencing to in this is about the Tumblr porn ban being challenged as a "human rights violation" against queer people due to how the algorithm deciding what to ban worked, btw (archive to Verge article))
Tumblr and New York City’s Commission on Human Rights (CCHR) have settled discrimination allegations related to the company’s 2018 adult content ban, which city regulators say disproportionately affected LGBTQ users. The settlement requires Tumblr to revise its user appeals process and train its human moderators on diversity and inclusion issues, as well as review thousands of old cases and hire an expert to look for potential bias in its moderation algorithms.
The settlement, which did not involve a formal legal complaint and was signed last month, marks one of the first times that regulators have reached an agreement to change a social network’s moderation policies based on algorithmic bias issues. It resolves an investigation that the CCHR began in December 2018, shortly after Tumblr banned explicit sexual content and nudity — and enforced its rules with a comically inaccurate automated takedown system.
In an interview with The Verge, CCHR press secretary Alicia McCauley says the agency became interested after reports that the ban would have an outsized effect on Tumblr’s LGBTQ user base. McCauley notes that New York City’s Human Rights Law provides broad protections against bias based on categories like gender identity and sexual orientation. “If someone is doing business in New York City, we have the authority to investigate if it’s negatively affecting people,” she said.
The settlement gives Tumblr 180 days to hire an expert on sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) issues and provide related training to moderators. It must also hire someone with experience in this area as well as expertise in image classification, who will review Tumblr’s moderation algorithms to see if they’re more likely to flag LGBTQ content. As part of an overall review, Tumblr will reexamine 3,000 old cases where a user successfully appealed a takedown, looking for patterns that could indicate bias.
The deal appears to have happened largely because of WordPress.com owner Automattic, which acquired Tumblr from Verizon in 2019 and apparently cooperated closely with the CCHR. “I think that was a turning point in the investigation,” says CCHR attorney Alberto Rodriguez. Automattic had revised the original system to add more human oversight even before the settlement. Under its ownership, Tumblr has also attempted to reconcile with LGBTQ users that departed as part of a larger community exodus.
Rodriguez believes the Tumblr settlement could be an early step in a larger nationwide regulatory movement. “I think it’s inevitable that social media companies are going to come under more government regulation and that more of these enforcement actions are going to come about,” he says.
Bias allegations against social media platforms have rarely succeeded in court, and today’s settlement seems to be bolstered by Automattic’s desire to overhaul Tumblr’s moderation and restore trust with the LGBTQ community. (Automattic is also a very small company with fewer legal resources than “Big Tech” giants.) The CCHR didn’t provide details about the evidence backing up its claims of discrimination, so it’s difficult to evaluate the details of that case. But far larger platforms like YouTube and Instagram have also faced accusations of discriminatory moderation without regulatory action, and YouTube, in particular, has beaten two lawsuits from LGBTQ and Black video creators who alleged algorithmic discrimination.
Rodriguez says that unlike in those cases, the CCHR’s city-level rules don’t require a specific intent to discriminate. But courts have also given social platforms broad latitude to moderate content under the First Amendment and Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, and a CCHR lawsuit would have to stand up to that scrutiny. “Section 230 applies equally to federal, state, and municipal laws and enforcement,” notes Jeff Kosseff, author of comprehensive Section 230 history The Twenty-Six Words That Created the Internet.
But the larger issue of algorithmic race and gender bias has become an increasing priority for regulators, particularly in cases where it might affect people’s housing and employment options. And even without legal complaints, some companies like Twitter have reviewed their moderation algorithms under public pressure — sometimes making troubling discoveries along the way.
The settlement, which did not involve a formal legal complaint and was signed last month, marks one of the first times that regulators have reached an agreement to change a social network’s moderation policies based on algorithmic bias issues. It resolves an investigation that the CCHR began in December 2018, shortly after Tumblr banned explicit sexual content and nudity — and enforced its rules with a comically inaccurate automated takedown system.
In an interview with The Verge, CCHR press secretary Alicia McCauley says the agency became interested after reports that the ban would have an outsized effect on Tumblr’s LGBTQ user base. McCauley notes that New York City’s Human Rights Law provides broad protections against bias based on categories like gender identity and sexual orientation. “If someone is doing business in New York City, we have the authority to investigate if it’s negatively affecting people,” she said.
The settlement gives Tumblr 180 days to hire an expert on sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) issues and provide related training to moderators. It must also hire someone with experience in this area as well as expertise in image classification, who will review Tumblr’s moderation algorithms to see if they’re more likely to flag LGBTQ content. As part of an overall review, Tumblr will reexamine 3,000 old cases where a user successfully appealed a takedown, looking for patterns that could indicate bias.
The deal appears to have happened largely because of WordPress.com owner Automattic, which acquired Tumblr from Verizon in 2019 and apparently cooperated closely with the CCHR. “I think that was a turning point in the investigation,” says CCHR attorney Alberto Rodriguez. Automattic had revised the original system to add more human oversight even before the settlement. Under its ownership, Tumblr has also attempted to reconcile with LGBTQ users that departed as part of a larger community exodus.
Rodriguez believes the Tumblr settlement could be an early step in a larger nationwide regulatory movement. “I think it’s inevitable that social media companies are going to come under more government regulation and that more of these enforcement actions are going to come about,” he says.
Bias allegations against social media platforms have rarely succeeded in court, and today’s settlement seems to be bolstered by Automattic’s desire to overhaul Tumblr’s moderation and restore trust with the LGBTQ community. (Automattic is also a very small company with fewer legal resources than “Big Tech” giants.) The CCHR didn’t provide details about the evidence backing up its claims of discrimination, so it’s difficult to evaluate the details of that case. But far larger platforms like YouTube and Instagram have also faced accusations of discriminatory moderation without regulatory action, and YouTube, in particular, has beaten two lawsuits from LGBTQ and Black video creators who alleged algorithmic discrimination.
Rodriguez says that unlike in those cases, the CCHR’s city-level rules don’t require a specific intent to discriminate. But courts have also given social platforms broad latitude to moderate content under the First Amendment and Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, and a CCHR lawsuit would have to stand up to that scrutiny. “Section 230 applies equally to federal, state, and municipal laws and enforcement,” notes Jeff Kosseff, author of comprehensive Section 230 history The Twenty-Six Words That Created the Internet.
But the larger issue of algorithmic race and gender bias has become an increasing priority for regulators, particularly in cases where it might affect people’s housing and employment options. And even without legal complaints, some companies like Twitter have reviewed their moderation algorithms under public pressure — sometimes making troubling discoveries along the way.
Here are some screencaps that I have from February 20 where Matt (the admin of Tumblr) addresses the banning of popular troon pedestrogen after he sent him (and staff) death threats that involved a hammer and a car. I thought I had capped the actual threat (or a cap of it), weird. Oh well. Figured they'll be interesting considering this is what really set the troons off. These interactions with Matt prove that no matter how hard you try to coddle troons, they'll always find a way to spit venom in your face.
Predstrogen under a sock:
Troon crying "RETALIATION"
And more of similar
Edit: more timeline info, including a callout document that Tumblr troons are particularly salty about for exposing their bad behavior offsite
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2017
Oh come on now. That's just absurd, it is pure fantasy that anyone thinks he is a woman. That five head, jesus.
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2023
No Tumblr ban on troons. No ban on discussing or promoting troonery. So what's the beef?
Algorithmic bias.
Does that mean Tumblr allows their posts to be voted down?
Or what exactly?
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2022
I love a good public sideshow that gets fully documented in publicly-accessible records. Any lawyer taking this case on is taking these genderspecials for a ride