- Joined
- May 14, 2024
"No, I don't think that's a rocket launch"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"No, I don't think that's a rocket launch"
This is just a vanity project for Bezos. Elons insufferable and a jeet simp, but at least he is autistically dedicated to his rocket space program more than his cars.I'd gain a bit of respect for this bald fucker if he'd just posted "FUCK"
You're probably right but also there's been no reason to actually try to fit the lander to any other rocket. Well, now there is. They need to fix this quickly.AFAIK, Blue Moon can only launch on New Glenn, so finding the root cause of this failure is on the critical path for that. It's maybe possible they could launch on Vulcan, but that rocket has its own problems (GEM-63XL nozzles).
Or maybe the ULA sniper struck again!I smell a smelly oriental sabotage. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that China launches a space mission and makes big claims about making it to the moon just days before this event.
Maybe I'm naive, but I've come to believe Bezos genuinely would like to see humanity living on O’Neill Cylinders.This is just a vanity project for Bezos.
"I have several verifiable actions contrary to the stated goal but he was able to act normal in one interview"Maybe I'm naive, but I've come to believe Bezos genuinely would like to see humanity living on O’Neill Cylinders.
I was annoyed by his shenanigans trying to patent landing rockets on boats, or trying to keep SpaceX out of 39A, or suing when NASA didn't pick Blue Origin for the first HLS contract. But at least in this interview, he seems like not a total turd;
I'm sure we'll know more in the morning, but the pad looks wrecked.
F3UjAywZ8oqsFlvn.mp4
I bet Boeing is breathing a sigh of relief today at no longer being the biggest fuckup in recent memory.
Edit:
View attachment 9069455View attachment 9069476View attachment 9069481
Scott Manley may have a point. At the very least, I bet it's the biggest explosion of its kind since Atlas Centaur AC-5 blew up on the same pad in 1965.
Blue origin took the more conservative and conventional approach to developing their rocket, rather than the rapid explosive iteration path chosen by spacex. Their engines are already in use on Vulcan Centaur. There's a lot to be said for both methods, but the thing that has to be said loudest is that rocketry is hard.I haven't followed Blue Origin much, but from what little I have seen they have had nothing but issues with their designs. At least when a SpaceX rocket explodes it's usually because they were trying to do something cool that went wrong.
Well at least they have a good engine design thenBlue origin took the more conservative and conventional approach to developing their rocket, rather than the rapid explosive iteration path chosen by spacex. Their engines are already in use on Vulcan Centaur. There's a lot to be said for both methods, but the thing that has to be said loudest is that rocketry is hard.
Yeah I can't be too hard on them. I remember I used to put stupid little fins that don't do anything half way up when I first started playing kerbals too.Blue origin took the more conservative and conventional approach to developing their rocket
Rocket fuel cant melt steel beams, yet they expect us to believe that jet fuel did?!