US THE DEMOCRAT CONVENTION ENDS... FINALLY.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I didn't watch any of that shit.


THE DEMOCRAT CONVENTION ENDS...
FINALLY.
By Mike Huckabee
August 21, 2020
The Democrats’ virtual convention ended Thursday at nearly midnight, and never has the phrase, “Thank God it’s Friday,” held so much meaning.

I’m too burned out (and frankly, after four days of this dour, angry, bitter convention, just too weary and relieved it’s over) to go into detail about all of night four.

If you saw any of the first three nights, it was mostly more the same. Lots of Trump-bashing and gloom and doom about America, with hardly a word about China or the shocking violence in the streets of Democrat-run cities. So I’ll concentrate on the “big reveal”: Biden’s acceptance speech. There was a lot of buzz beforehand, not so much about what he would say but how he would say it, or if he would get through it at all. So here are the two most important points:

1. He did a surprisingly good job of presenting the speech. It was a long speech (maybe too long), but he presented it well with no major gaffes and without wandering off-topic or the stage. He was emotional, at times angry (maybe too angry), but controlled and professional. He definitely allayed any fears that he might not be able to perform at least the Presidential function of reading a speech off a Teleprompter. That sounds like a low bar to clear (although it was Obama's chief skill), but it’s not meant as an insult: a lot of people were genuinely concerned that he couldn’t clear it, and he obviously did. I’m sure a big sigh of relief could be heard in the control room and in every Democratic household in America.

2. The substance of the speech is where the many problems lay. It was a mess of contradictions of things we all have lived through and of everything his fellow Democrats have said over the past three nights. Probably the most stunning “What the...?!!” moment was Biden’s claim that when he heard Donald Trump say there were “very fine people” among the violent neo-Nazis in Charlottesville, “at that moment, I knew I had to run.” Problem: Trump never said that.

Trump said he was sure there were fine people on both sides of the debate about removing a statue of Robert E. Lee, but as for neo-Nazis and white nationalists, they should be “condemned totally.” The quote Biden cited as the motivating factor for his run has long been verified even by liberal “fact-checkers” as fake news. So does this mean he’ll pull an Emily Litella; say, “Never mind!”; and quit the race?

This was especially stunning, considering much of Biden’s speech was an attack on Trump for allegedly not caring about “facts.” Biden’s speech was also rife with other claims that are wildly at odds with known facts.

For instance, he claimed that Trump’s tax cut only benefited the rich (most of the benefits went to the middle class)…that he will ensure equal pay for women (we already have laws requiring equal pay for women)…that he will create a good-paying job through government investment in rebuilding our infrastructure and creating green energy (we heard that from Obama; it cost us hundreds of billions of dollars and even Obama admitted there were no “shovel-ready” jobs)…and that he will help workers by strengthening unions (that’s code for passing a national version of the widely-hated California law that’s destroying the state’s gig economy, putting musicians out of work, and killing Uber and Lyft in the state.).

He also backs doubling the minimum wage, which has cost jobs and shuttered small businesses everywhere it’s been instituted. Real facts: under Trump, wages were rising for the first time in years, and the gains were greater among the bottom half of earners than the top half. That is, until a Chinese virus and Democrat Governors shut down the economy.

Perhaps Biden’s most stunning claim was that he will be a fighter to end the outsourcing of American jobs. This was the major issue that got Trump elected. Trump is actually bringing back jobs after years of outsourcing under Obama/Biden and previous Administrations. Fact: Biden was one of the biggest boosters of job-exporting legislation. He supported and promoted NAFTA, which cost us at least 5 million jobs and 50,000 manufacturing plants, including a Chrysler plant in Delaware that he’d promised would increase hiring.

He supported normalizing trade with China, which cost us 3.4 million jobs. And he was pushing Obama’s Trans-Pacific Partnership that would have sent even more of our jobs to Asia if Trump hadn’t killed it.

He claimed that Trump has done nothing about the COVID-19 (Chinese) coronavirus except hope for some miracle to make it end (first time I’ve ever heard standard herd immunity described as a “miracle,” but okay.) Reminder: Biden criticized Trump for shutting off travel from China quickly, which was the most important factor in slowing the infection spread until we could prepare for it. Democrats predicted deadly shortages of ventilators and hospital rooms, which didn’t happen because of Trump’s actions; and a death toll of 2.2 million. Yes, there have been 170,000 deaths, which is horrible, but that’s the fault of China (and in large part, certain blue state Governors – two of whom were featured convention speakers - who insisted on putting coronavirus patients into nursing homes.) The US does not have the worst death toll in the world per capita, and we only have the largest number of deaths because we have a population of 320 million, and China is plainly lying about their death toll.

Biden claimed Trump does not listen to science. From Dr. Anthony Fauci: "The President has listened to what I have said... When I've made recommendations he's taken them. He's never countered or overridden me."

As for Biden’s bold plan to stop the virus – developing a test and forcing everyone to wear masks – there are already such tests (I drive down the street and see “Free COVID-19 tests” signs in front of every medical clinic), and he has no Constitutional authority to order everyone to wear masks. Also, five million people have NOT lost their health insurance. But a lot of people lost their policies when the Democrats passed Obamacare.

Biden claimed that kids suffer a “daily fear of being gunned down in school.” Putting aside that most kids aren’t even in school at the moment, thanks to teachers’ unions, school shootings are actually extremely rare. Although they might become less rare if Democrats defund the police and remove officers from schools. Right now, it’s far less dangerous to be in school than it is to venture into certain areas of any city that’s been run by Democrats for decades.

Biden claimed that he would not put up with foreign interference in our voting. Fact: Russia interfered in the 2016 election, and Obama and Biden did practically nothing. Well, they apparently did collude with some Russians to try to undermine the results of the election, but that’s another story.

Biden claimed that Trump will do away with the payroll tax, which will lead to cuts in Social Security. Fact: Trump has only called for a temporary suspension of the tax to help people get through the virus shutdowns. That would not affect Social Security, which has a $2.9 trillion surplus. Trump does want to do away with the tax permanently, but Congress would have to do that and arrange alternate funding.

Biden blamed Trump for this dark atmosphere of hate and negativity, even though it was the Democrats who started the “resistance” rhetoric the second Trump was elected, who have refused to accept his election, who attack him and his family 24/7/365, and who had just spent three and three-quarter nights relentlessly and hatefully bashing Trump, putting down America and its history, and painting anyone who opposes them as an angry, misinformed, racist, sexist, homophobic, Islamophobic, transphobic xenophobe. It was a pleasant surprise to hear Biden say he wants to reach out and be the President of all Americans, considering how many of us are the white supremacist spawn of an oppressive, unjust nation that’s responsible for all the evils of the past 400 years. And I’m glad he says he wants to help even those who didn’t vote for him. However, he’s running on a platform that will absolutely devastate most of those people.

One thing I learned when debating Trump myself in 2016 is that he doesn’t attack people who don’t attack him first. I followed Reagan’s 11th commandment and didn’t attack my fellow Republicans, and Trump didn’t attack me. Even though I’ve had occasion to criticize some of his comments and policies, we remain on good terms.

It seems to me that Democrats hate him with the searing heat of a thousand suns for two real reasons: they can’t get over that Hillary lost, and Trump refuses to be a “typical Republican” and just stand there and take their unfair attacks. They would have us believe that he’s another Hitler, but they’ve compared every Republican President or nominee to Hitler or the Nazis since Truman did it to Thomas E. Dewey (only Eisenhower escaped it, but that was because he actually defeated Hitler, so even the Democrats didn’t dare try it.)

Trump actually punches back when he’s attacked, and Republicans aren’t supposed to do that. They’re supposed to be docile punching bags. That’s not Trump’s style, and frankly, it’s a big part of why the base supports him. They’re sick of being slandered as racists and fascists by people who really do act like racists and fascists. That’s where we got the term “crybullies.” Leftists love to attack others, but they cry “Bully” when anyone punches them back.

If today’s Democratic leaders really do care about all Americans and are willing to work across the aisle, then why is Nancy Pelosi citing ridiculous nonsense like the “Disappearing Mailbox Conspiracy” as a feeble excuse not to get back to work and pass extended coronavirus relief?

Speaking of Trump fighting back, here’s his response to Biden’s speech: "In 47 years, Joe did none of the things of which he now speaks. He will never change, just words!"

It is telling that, as several commentators pointed out, Biden has been in national politics for nearly half a century, but the Convention was all about the huge things he’s going to do, with almost nothing said about what he’s actually accomplished in all the years before.





 
Meh, I tuned in occasionally and heard a lot of questions on how a candidate would do things differently than Trump. I don't really care because I don't think your vote matters at all, given the many voter fraud angles(hacked voting machines, Russian bots, millions of illegal immigrants, dead people doing mail-in, electoral college supersedes popular vote).

Were I to vote, I'd vote the most entertaining candidate. Kanye 2020 all day, the actual first black president.
At the end of the day I think what will decide the election will be who has the most trucks full of last-minute mail-in ballots for their candidate in key states. The conditions are ripe for voter-fraud on both sides and both parties are going to take advantage of it to ensure their candidate win at all costs.
 
Supposedly the polls are where they were just about when Hillary was running. I no longer have any faith in the American electoral process.
If anything I would think this should increase faith in the electoral process. The people of the United States still have the power to tell the entire establishment to go fuck themselves. I will be exercising this power in November.
 
One common line I've heard during one night of the Democratic convention was "The new President/Vice President of the United States: Joe Biden/Kamela Harris!"

Have they ever heard of counting your chickens before they hatch? So annoying.

I don't see how people can willingly watch this stuff. Politics suck now.
 
"Vote for the creepy guy who strokes girls' hair or vote for the other creepy guy who talks about wanting to fuck his daughter and walking in on Ms America contestants changing"

Not sure this is the hill that Trump supporters should die on

Yes I do wonder if Trump has autism or something similar. Saying you think your daughter is hot is something you think, not you say. And while he speaks plainly and simply, like a construction foreman, every investigation thrown against him has made him look like if you recommended him to the Vatican for Sainthood, most of the investigation work was done already by the Democratic party and the media.
 
One common line I've heard during one night of the Democratic convention was "The new President/Vice President of the United States: Joe Biden/Kamela Harris!"

Have they ever heard of counting your chickens before they hatch? So annoying.

I don't see how people can willingly watch this stuff. Politics suck now.
Eh, candidates have always done that. "When I'm president...", etc.
 
One good thing that has came out of that whole convention:
https___cdn.cnn.com_cnnnext_dam_assets_200819215409-hillary-clinton-dnc-2020-0819.jpg

Seriously, I love that outfit.
 
they’ve compared every Republican President or nominee to Hitler or the Nazis since Truman did it to Thomas E. Dewey (only Eisenhower escaped it, but that was because he actually defeated Hitler, so even the Democrats didn’t dare try it.

Ok, that was actually funny. I chuckled.
 
Not american and dont know shit about politics, but if people voted for trump in 2016 because they did not prefer the policies and actions of the democratic party and their supporters back then, why in the world would they vote democrat now?

Given the behaviour and proposals from the democrats the last 4 years, especially the last few months, I cannot fathom how they could possibly gain any votes for this election.
 
One common line I've heard during one night of the Democratic convention was "The new President/Vice President of the United States: Joe Biden/Kamela Harris!"

Have they ever heard of counting your chickens before they hatch? So annoying.
To be fair, both parties do this every time their candidate isn't the incumbent. (You goddamn zoomer. Get off my property.)

Not american and dont know shit about politics, but if people voted for trump in 2016 because they did not prefer the policies and actions of the democratic party and their supporters back then, why in the world would they vote democrat now?

Given the behaviour and proposals from the democrats the last 4 years, especially the last few months, I cannot fathom how they could possibly gain any votes for this election.

Sometimes it's not just about policies, but about the personalities of the candidates. There may be voters who were turned off by Clinton but will be willing to get out the vote for Biden, and vice versa. And then, of course, in re-election campaigns, the performance of the incumbent is up for judgment. There will be some voters who voted for Trump but disapprove of his performance enough to vote against him this time, and there will be some that voted against him last time but thought he did a good enough job to vote for him this time. Then there's more external factors such as the behavior of other elements in the candidates' parties, the state of the country in terms of economy, popular or unpopular wars, etc.

It's important to note that 2016 was a close election; Clinton actually won the popular vote, meaning she got more votes than Trump did, but due to constitutional quirks I won't try to explain, the presidential election isn't a direct vote and Trump still won the mechanism of the election that actually matters. (The Dems were really surprised and angry about this, despite this also having happened in 2000, and some spent years jabbering about how we need to switch to a popular vote to elect the president, but legislation to do so has never got off the ground.) But this year I think Trump has been just barely competent enough, Biden/Harris just barely unappealing enough, and the broader social issues just barely insane enough that I think Trump will clearly win the popular vote this time around too. Call it a hunch.
 
Given the behaviour and proposals from the democrats the last 4 years, especially the last few months, I cannot fathom how they could possibly gain any votes for this election

Not only that, but I have a feeling the riots, and the Democrat politicians virtue signaling support for the rioters, are really going to hurt the Democrats (nationally) at the ballot box. Everyone who isn't a violent criminal prefers "law and order" over lawless violence, and the legacy media has done a poor job providing arguments to counter/justifications for the copious riot footage they refuse to air. Or the stories of those murdered during the riots. Or the skyrocketing violent crime rates in the cities where the "defund the police" bullshit is happening. Or the absurd, insane demands being made by the rioters.

None of that will help Joe get into office. You would have to be a full on member of the SocJus cult to willfully ignore all of what I just mentioned and instead hallucinate a Democratic party that hasn't completely lost it.
 
Biden is more ahead in the swing states than Hillary was. Although there's still a ways to go and it's way too early to project anything

No he’s not. That NYT Document Server leak gave away the game. They’re weighting the polling 36% Dem vs 26% GOP. When the actual voter base in most states is almost always a fairly even30/30 split(With the last 40% block being independents or fringe lunatics or Libertarians). The overweighting of Dem “likely voters” in polling is the same trick they used in 2016. If you were to go back into 2016’s polls, and reweight them to proper balance you get exactly the same Trump victory that played out in real life. It’s a shady technic used to force a narrative onto the polling in order to drum up artificial momentum. It sometimes works, if you have a charismatic and capable candidate.
 
No he’s not. That NYT Document Server leak gave away the game. They’re weighting the polling 36% Dem vs 26% GOP. When the actual voter base in most states is almost always a fairly even30/30 split(With the last 40% block being independents or fringe lunatics or Libertarians). The overweighting of Dem “likely voters” in polling is the same trick they used in 2016. If you were to go back into 2016’s polls, and reweight them to proper balance you get exactly the same Trump victory that played out in real life. It’s a shady technic used to force a narrative onto the polling in order to drum up artificial momentum. It sometimes works, if you have a charismatic and capable candidate.

Plus that was old data, right after the VP pick, they ran the numbers again expecting a big bump.... and got results that showed Trump was now within the margin of error for all those battleground state polls. The best media spin they could put on it was "Trump slightly closes gap" when, according to the MoE, he's probably in the lead in at least one of them now.... the pick of Harris DIRECTLY caused an 8 point swing....

Even using tainted Dem numbers I don't really trust due to the "we're obviously more popular" weighting that doesn't reflect reality, the gap still closed to nothing overnight.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom