💰 Grifter StoneToss (allegedly, formerly Red Panels)

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Robert James said:
A women literally got shot for saying all lives matter, if anything he's giving the BLM crowd too much credit.

www.nydailynews.com

Indiana woman shot dead after saying ‘all lives matter': family

An Indiana woman fatally shot earlier this month may have been targeted for saying “all lives matter,” the 24-year-old’s family said Sunday.
www.nydailynews.com www.nydailynews.com
Click to expand...
Holding up a sign and standing idly (cause stonetoss couldnt be arsed to draw a reaction) is a lot different than what really happened, which was somebody yelling a racial slur at the blm protesters, then getting into a shouting match, then the shoot out with both side participating. Did you even read the article you posted? Its ok i bet stonestoss didnt either
 
Last edited:
An Ghost said:
Holding up a sign and standing idly (cause stonetoss couldnt be arsed to draw a reaction) is a lot different than what really happened, which was somebody yelling a racial slur at the blm protesters, then getting into a shouting match, then the shoot out with both side participating. Did you even read the article you posted? Its ok i bet stonestoss didnt either
Click to expand...
>Saying "All Lives Matter" is a slur

Of course, we all know that All Lives Matter, but Some Lives Matter more than others, but whatever.
 
Dang Woodchucks! said:
>Saying "All Lives Matter" is a slur

Of course, we all know that All Lives Matter, but Some Lives Matter more than others, but whatever.
Click to expand...
Somebody in her group yelled a slur other than all lives matter according to the article, which started the altercation where they shot at each other.
 
An Ghost said:
Holding up a sign and standing idly (cause stonetoss couldnt be arsed to draw a reaction) is a lot different than what really happened, which was somebody yelling a racial slur at the blm protesters, then getting into a shouting match, then the shoot out with both side participating. Did you even read the article you posted? Its ok i bet stonestoss didnt either
Click to expand...
What, so just cap ‘em because they were being a retard?
 
Why do I keep expecting antifastonetoss to create anything worthwhile?



idplz.png


how.PNG


snip2.PNG


wtfNeedSignUp said:
My only problem with the strip is that the stone should be like 75% of its way.
Click to expand...
And the person about to be crushed should look like JK Rowling, or Jonathan Haidt or Steve Pinker.

---

Let's check some more antifastonetoss.

diversity1.PNG

ficki ficki.PNG

sit out.PNG
 
Lemmingwise said:
Why do I keep expecting antifastonetoss to create anything worthwhile?



View attachment 1453965

View attachment 1453969

View attachment 1453967
Click to expand...
I think you typically don't want a person who is in a country illegally to vote on said country's legislation. There's also countless methods of getting an ID if you lack one, including methods where you can get one for free if I remember correctly. Considering how ID is required for pretty much anything from healthcare to buying alcohol, there's no reason not to have one if you are eligible for it. So the only way you'd realistically encounter an issue getting one is if you're not supposed to be here.

Maybe I'm looking too deeply into this stupid edit made by somebody who will never read this, or maybe I'm not looking deep enough, but if you think voter ID laws only hinder low-income or minority groups, that seems to imply you believe a large majority of low income or minority groups are here illegally.
 
_01 said:
Maybe I'm looking too deeply into this stupid edit made by somebody who will never read this, or maybe I'm not looking deep enough, but if you think voter ID laws only hinder low-income or minority groups, that seems to imply you believe a large majority of low income or minority groups are here illegally.
Click to expand...
It's just the boilerplate excuse. Some will believe the boilerplate, but the people who invented it didn't care. They just didn't want to lose the votes, whether legal or not.
 
_01 said:
I think you typically don't want a person who is in a country illegally to vote on said country's legislation. There's also countless methods of getting an ID if you lack one, including methods where you can get one for free if I remember correctly. Considering how ID is required for pretty much anything from healthcare to buying alcohol, there's no reason not to have one if you are eligible for it. So the only way you'd realistically encounter an issue getting one is if you're not supposed to be here.

Maybe I'm looking too deeply into this stupid edit made by somebody who will never read this, or maybe I'm not looking deep enough, but if you think voter ID laws only hinder low-income or minority groups, that seems to imply you believe a large majority of low income or minority groups are here illegally.
Click to expand...
They only want to make voter IDs non-mandatory because it would get their party more votes.

If getting rid of voter IDs benefitted the right then the right would be pushing to get rid of them and the left would be defending it.
 
Pointless Pedant said:
Someone else could just make a similar comic. It's a very obvious idea (though I would have used the grim reaper banging on doors meme).
Click to expand...

Yeah which is why you're a basic bitch.
FACE.

An Ghost said:
Somebody in her group yelled a slur other than all lives matter according to the article, which started the altercation where they shot at each other.
Click to expand...

Everybody just take a moment and appreciate the absolutely retarded logic here and how most people think it's normal.
"This article said someone in that crowd said a bad word, so it makes sense that the black people would start shooting."

Lemmingwise said:
Why do I keep expecting antifastonetoss to create anything worthwhile?


View attachment 1453967
Click to expand...

It's funny how their entire argument is "why would they do that if it's so risky?" in response to "we should make voting at least a little bit risky for illegal immigrants." I mean I guess that's the reason zero illegal immigrants do drugs right? Why would they risk being arrested and deported by doing something so obvious? In fact why would these sensible people even try to cross the border if it's so dangerous? That just doesn't make sense.
 
Last edited:
Lemmingwise said:
Why do I keep expecting antifastonetoss to create anything worthwhile?
Click to expand...

I don't know, maybe you remember a time leftists had some understanding of media. I know I saw a cartoon parody and then a final panel full of words and my response is "NOOOOOO this isn't how you do this." I had to force myself to read it and while I agree with the general concept that ID laws are entirely deliberately an attempt to complicate the election process to favor Republicans (they statistically do this), this is not the medium to deliver that message.

You can't just hijack a Stonetoss strip and try to make a logical argument in it because that isn't how these strips work. Memes are not just "imitate this form and then insert your regular talking points into it like it's debate class." These "parodies" are like trying to graft the head of a cat onto a seal. The "left can't meme" meme is real because the people doing these things obviously don't understand the form or why Stonetoss is actually good as a cartoonist. His own message remains in the strip even when you cut and paste your own dumb text into it, because his message IS the medium.

Why does nobody seem to remember Marshall McLuhan these days even though he understood the Internet before it existed?
 
AnOminous said:
I don't know, maybe you remember a time leftists had some understanding of media. I know I saw a cartoon parody and then a final panel full of words and my response is "NOOOOOO this isn't how you do this." I had to force myself to read it and while I agree with the general concept that ID laws are entirely deliberately an attempt to complicate the election process to favor Republicans (they statistically do this), this is not the medium to deliver that message.

You can't just hijack a Stonetoss strip and try to make a logical argument in it because that isn't how these strips work. Memes are not just "imitate this form and then insert your regular talking points into it like it's debate class." These "parodies" are like trying to graft the head of a cat onto a seal. The "left can't meme" meme is real because the people doing these things obviously don't understand the form or why Stonetoss is actually good as a cartoonist. His own message remains in the strip even when you cut and paste your own dumb text into it, because his message IS the medium.

Why does nobody seem to remember Marshall McLuhan these days even though he understood the Internet before it existed?
Click to expand...
hi friend
 
AnOminous said:
I don't know, maybe you remember a time leftists had some understanding of media. I know I saw a cartoon parody and then a final panel full of words and my response is "NOOOOOO this isn't how you do this." I had to force myself to read it and while I agree with the general concept that ID laws are entirely deliberately an attempt to complicate the election process to favor Republicans (they statistically do this), this is not the medium to deliver that message.

You can't just hijack a Stonetoss strip and try to make a logical argument in it because that isn't how these strips work. Memes are not just "imitate this form and then insert your regular talking points into it like it's debate class." These "parodies" are like trying to graft the head of a cat onto a seal. The "left can't meme" meme is real because the people doing these things obviously don't understand the form or why Stonetoss is actually good as a cartoonist. His own message remains in the strip even when you cut and paste your own dumb text into it, because his message IS the medium.

Why does nobody seem to remember Marshall McLuhan these days even though he understood the Internet before it existed?
Click to expand...

AntifaStonetoss is the perfect example of why the Left can't meme. You can clearly see the argument they want to make, it's written clearly, but the setup is so simple that it literally makes no sense in the context. Due to the structure of the comic itself, the entire rant at the end ends up like it's parodying the type of person who would make it.
The message is literally "here are a bunch of easy things you need ID for which everyone has no problem with, and in this one very important case it makes no sense to demand less of people." Yes, Antifa, we agree ID laws make it harder for people to vote. It makes it harder for illegal immigrants to vote. That's the point. Black people have drivers licenses, you're more likely to find a black person with a drivers license than a high school diploma. These laws keep down the people they are supposed to.
"Did you know that anti-shoplifting laws make it difficult for low income people to eat?" Wow thanks Perry Mason we never thought of it like that before.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom