Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Local government is responsible for their own shit first. Fed intervention is suppose to be a last resort.
 
87EE1106-7240-4DD6-86B9-BA35383A32E2.jpeg
 
Iron Hamster said:
Where are the Bundys and their 3 cent militia heroes in all this? Seattle a little too hot compared to a wildlife sanctuary?
Click to expand...

Abuses of top-down power bring them out, abuses from "bottom up" don't. Some probably don't even recognize this as an issue because Horseshoe Theory says they and the CHOP morons support the same idea: abolish all structured law and law-enforcing institutions in favor of person-on-person social contract to be nice. The only difference is the CHOPs think it can be enforced with social shaming and good vibes while the militia nuts think it can be enforced with "No Step on Snek" flags, pocket copes of the Constitution and everyone being armed to the teeth.

Besides, they want to fight da guvment (tm), not police the dummies at worst or kindred souls at best. They don't see it as noble to fight and die for.. hippies, rappers and dangerhair landwhales....

Some of them probably silently approve of "sticking it" to the corrupt system that is civic government, they'll never swoop in to rescue a politician let alone a DEMOCRAT after all. They may hate the Kommie Kids Klub, but they despise elected officials.

They might even see the CHOPites as useful idiots who will desensitize the populace to the idea of local autonomy, and, once such has popular nation wide support, the kiddies can be swept aside and the Twoo Patwiots can rule all at last...


But that's only 10% of it, the other 90% is indeed cowardice, same as why everyone is flocking to the CHOP and making it fail faster, the anonymity of the crowd emboldens that 10% who THINK this is the happening.... (It's why LeVoy Finnicum was the only one to get perforated during the Bundy Siege, he was the only one willing when push came to shove to ram a police roadblock).


trent said:
Individualism is a bad thing now?

I thought we were supposed to celebrate our differences?
Click to expand...

You're only allowed to celebrate the ways we're all different when it comes to conforming to the progressive dogma, bigot.

Leftist "individuality" is that you can have a favorite flavor ice cream, but, you can't NOT like ice cream or you're evil and need canceled.

You can have a favorite troon character on TV, but, you can't NOT watch TV just for the troons... etc etc etc

That "Obliteration of the Self" - kill the enemies in your head, cleanse yourself of the ability for wrong ideologies to manifest bullshit? It is a direct lift from 1984.... by the way.... implied to be the way the Eastasian power bloc operates: total absolution of self as a personal crusade, as opposed to INGSOC, which has the same goal and same methods of internal self-destruction, but frames it as devotion to the state.
 
Last edited:
TowinKarz said:
You're only allowed to celebrate the ways we're all different when it comes to conforming to the progressive dogma, bigot.

Leftist "individuality" is that you can have a favorite flavor ice cream, but, you can't NOT like ice cream or you're evil and need canceled.

You can have a favorite troon character on TV, but, you can't NOT watch TV just for the troons... etc etc etc
Click to expand...
Spot on! Exactly! Also, they love it when you're "diverse," but god forbid that you're a minority who thinks for yourself. It's all fine and dandy if you do stupid superficial shit like dyeing your hair, joining a fandom, or openly declaring your newfound sexuality, but how dare you question the "right side of history," or live where you want, think for yourself, or do things your own way without the D stamp of approval!
 
Steamboat_Bill said:
It's almost like these people who talk up a big game about this shit run and turn tail when things get too real for them...
Click to expand...
We saw what happened in New Mexico. Guy defends himself lawfully from being stabbed to death and the Antifa were sent free while all his friends were jailed by cops. They'd rather protect their own neighborhoods and balkanize than sacrifice themselves for a system that wants them dead.
 
Shaka Brah said:
To control a people you must first control what they think about themselves and how they regard their history and culture. And when your conqueror makes you ashamed of your culture and your history, he needs no prison walls and no chains to hold you. - John Henrik Clarke
Click to expand...
Oh shit, this guy invented "African studies". The BLM guys probably read him!
 
Piga Dgrifm said:
Every time I see the word "Folx" I physically cringe. "Folks" is already as neutral as it gets, why the hell do they insist on misspelling it?
Click to expand...

The don't know why they do anything, they just parrot what they are told without understanding the reasoning behind it. They lack sapience, in a profound and foundational way. They are literally NPCs, devoid of inner workings.

Such a zombie would be indistinguishable from a normal human being but lack conscious experience, qualia, or sentience. For example, if a philosophical zombie were poked with a sharp object it would not inwardly feel any pain, yet it would outwardly behave exactly as if it did feel pain.
Click to expand...
 
Piga Dgrifm said:
Every time I see the word "Folx" I physically cringe. "Folks" is already as neutral as it gets, why the hell do they insist on misspelling it?
Click to expand...
I asked someone about it once, and they said it was a way of "centering, or at least acknowledging queer individuals". I thought I'd misunderstood, so I asked how "folks" is already not inclusive, and they said it was an "active" way of acknowledging "queer folx" since it was a term used commonly in that community. I pressed further and got a "I have been told as an ally that this is the thing to do and here are some resources to educate yourself."
Like, bitch, seriously? You just straight up admitted you're only doing it because someone told you to!
 
NoReturn said:
I asked someone about it once, and they said it was a way of "centering, or at least acknowledging queer individuals". I thought I'd misunderstood, so I asked how "folks" is already not inclusive, and they said it was an "active" way of acknowledging "queer folx" since it was a term used commonly in that community. I pressed further and got a "I have been told as an ally that this is the thing to do and here are some resources to educate yourself."
Like, bitch, seriously? You just straight up admitted you're only doing it because someone told you to!
Click to expand...
So it's all a big self-reinforcing LARP that some troll probably concocted, and it gained a life of its own as a shibboleth?
 
NoReturn said:
I asked someone about it once, and they said it was a way of "centering, or at least acknowledging queer individuals". I thought I'd misunderstood, so I asked how "folks" is already not inclusive, and they said it was an "active" way of acknowledging "queer folx" since it was a term used commonly in that community. I pressed further and got a "I have been told as an ally that this is the thing to do and here are some resources to educate yourself."
Like, bitch, seriously? You just straight up admitted you're only doing it because someone told you to!
Click to expand...
How do queer folx differ from queer folks, though?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom