SJW Art and Extremes

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Why does Tumblr have an obsession with vitiligo?

  • Suicide Girl model and America's Next Top Model contestant have it, spread on Tumblr, that's why.

    Votes: 703 16.1%

  • Stop fucking asking this this question.

    Votes: 508 11.7%

  • I swear to God I will start deleting these posts.

    Votes: 154 3.5%

  • Goddammit.

    Votes: 409 9.4%

  • ACTUALLY IT'S PART OF A DEEP FALSE-FLAG OPERATION TO TURN ALL BLACK PEOPLE WHITE.

    Votes: 2,586 59.3%
  • Total voters
    4,359
Cynical said:
So it's not them poking fun at absurd armor in fiction, it's just a bunch of hideous SJW hobgoblins trying to shame people who don't look like walking pork lard because they are bitter they don't look attractive in sexy clothing.
Click to expand...
Eh, that's not entirely inaccurate, though I think it's overly negative. I think a lot of girls have body image issues because of overly stringent standards for women, so instead of taking the more mature option of "I'm just going to do my best and not worry about whether I look like Scarlett Johansen," they get bitter and feel like they have to fight back. I can understand why some of them feel the way they do, but the way they handle it makes them look about as mature as your average Loveshy.
 
Rin said:
Eh, that's not entirely inaccurate, though I think it's overly negative. I think a lot of girls have body image issues because of overly stringent standards for women, so instead of taking the more mature option of "I'm just going to do my best and not worry about whether I look like Scarlett Johansen," they get bitter and feel like they have to fight back. I can understand why some of them feel the way they do, but the way they handle it makes them look about as mature as your average Loveshy.
Click to expand...

There's a difference between being happy with your body and knowing that there's someone out there who likes you for who you are, and trying to attack and disparage anyone who's even a smidgen better looking than you.
 
Steamboat_Bill said:
There's a difference between being happy with your body and knowing that there's someone out there who likes you for who you are, and trying to attack and disparage anyone who's even a smidgen better looking than you.
Click to expand...
Basically, I think they don't understand the difference between fighting peer pressure and reversing peer pressure.
 
I saw this on my dash and I though it would be interesting to post here
a1.jpg

a3.jpg



a5.jpg

a7.jpg

a9.jpg


a11.jpg


a12.jpg

a13.jpg
I'll admit that I do like the lion king ones even If the yellow under Simba's eyes looks kind of weird.
 
That's pretty cool. The humans resemble their animal counterparts. I like it. I would rather not know the context of what the drawing's about, though
 
Honestly those designs really aren't that bad at all. I'm actually a bit fond of them. The animals from Africa are Africans as humans, the animals from India are Indian as humans, and the cats and dogs,save for the red one, are given skin tones that match or complement their furs. It's not great, but its a huge step up from the standard stuff on this board.
 
Thiletonomics said:
That re-design doesn't seem to be changing much, and it makes off as change just for the sake of it. And the shoes give me vibes of product placement.

Moving on, Go Make Me a Sandwich deemed the female character designs of Magic: the Gathering to be problematic. Lilliana seems to get most of the criticism about sexuality, and apparently, the art for Akroma's new artwork makes it look like she's going to hump her sword like a pole dancer. Umm, the sword is just on the opposite side compared to the other example, which is not the original artwork for Akroma, by the way. (She had three different artworks for the Wrath version, and two for the Fury "alter-ego".)
Click to expand...
Funny thing. I had to search a little to find this:
http://archive.wizards.com/Magic/magazine/article.aspx?x=mtgcom/daily/mc3

  • [*]Make an effort to illustrate a variety of races, genders, ages, and body types.
    [*]Feel free to paint beautiful women, as long as they're shown kicking ass. No damsels in distress. No ridiculously exaggerated breasts. No nudity.
    Click to expand...
This is a guideline for those who are interested in working as an illustrator for Wizards of the Coast*. They go out of their way to be as inclusive as possible.

*Notice me senpais!​
 
Ceci said:
Honestly those designs really aren't that bad at all. I'm actually a bit fond of them. The animals from Africa are Africans as humans, the animals from India are Indian as humans, and the cats and dogs,save for the red one, are given skin tones that match or complement their furs. It's not great, but its a huge step up from the standard stuff on this board.
Click to expand...
Yeah, at the very least there was some effort put into them. Which is more than I can say for most of the eye-seering things called "art" in this topic.
 
Mulligan said:
I saw this on my dash and I though it would be interesting to post here
View attachment 44637
View attachment 44638


View attachment 44639
View attachment 44640
View attachment 44641

View attachment 44642

View attachment 44643
View attachment 44644
I'll admit that I do like the lion king ones even If the yellow under Simba's eyes looks kind of weird.
Click to expand...
I don't think you guys got the point of my post, but that's 100% my fault since I didn't explain myself. It was like 1 in the morning when I posted that and I just woke up, words were not my friend at the moment. So allow me to explain myself right not, I don't actually hate these redraws, I genuinely like most of them.

There were a couple reasons why I posted these redraws despite them being considered good.
  1. As a palette cleanser, because the last couple of posts have been making my eyes bleed. So when I found some sjw art that didn't sear my corneas I knew I had to post it.
  2. Originally I was just going to post the last picture, then I decided to post the rest of the compilation as a reference. I don't actually think any of the other pictures are bad.
  3. To show case how the artist only redraw the characters as people of color(p.s I hate this fucking phrase so much). Notice how the artist only redrew characters that could be considered ethic and generally avoided Disney movies that were set in Europe, with the last two being the exceptions. It's really telling that the only charter that was draw as white was the one who original design was whiter than a ghost.
The particular drawing I wanted to call attention to was the last one. It boggles my mind why the artist drew Thomas like they did.

First of all they gave his skin color a Ganondorf-esque shade of black, which is really bizarre and off-putting. Especially since the character name is Thomas O'Malley, which is one of the most Irish things I have ever heard. Then I guessed inspired by the overly Irish name they gave him orange hair and freckles. And to top it all of they gave him vitiligo, which paired with his black skin and red hair, makes him look disturbing. Perhaps that was the intention but It really looks terrible, especially next to the others.

Also I love looking at the order of the pictures. Notice how the further you go down the more generic the drawings get(with the exception of the lion king ones). It's like watching the artists slowly descend into SJWness.
 
Last edited:
I was browsing some shitty Tumblr art and I noticed that they tend to draw female characters in their 20's as saggy wraiths with pronounced age lines and hunched posture. What's that all about? Part of SJW's ongoing war against anything attractive?
 
Ruin said:
I was browsing some shitty Tumblr art and I noticed that they tend to draw female characters in their 20's as saggy wraiths with pronounced age lines and hunched posture. What's that all about? Part of SJW's ongoing war against anything attractive?
Click to expand...

Anything that has tits, ass, and a beautiful face and figure is an SJWs worst nightmare. If a character makes them feel insecure about themselves or goes against their views, they'll scream MUHSOGGYKNEES.
 
Last edited:
Ruin said:
I was browsing some shitty Tumblr art and I noticed that they tend to draw female characters in their 20's as saggy wraiths with pronounced age lines and hunched posture. What's that all about? Part of SJW's ongoing war against anything attractive?
Click to expand...
They think that adding things like age lines, wrinkles, and hairy legs makes the characters more "realistic", but what they're really doing is making teenage or 20-something characters look like 50-year-old chain smokers.
 
Yaoi Huntress Earth said:
It's interesting how the ladies at BBAD will complain about people being uptight about women's designs when they're the ones that act bitchy and huffy when displeases them. Good ol' projection.
Click to expand...
They can't tell when people are joking either.

Ruin said:
I was browsing some shitty Tumblr art and I noticed that they tend to draw female characters in their 20's as saggy wraiths with pronounced age lines and hunched posture. What's that all about? Part of SJW's ongoing war against anything attractive?
Click to expand...
Sexually attractive fictional women are all created by and for men, obviously. Real Women™ hate aesthetics and appeal.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom