- Joined
- Dec 20, 2021
Paramount stays woke until the day I see kurtzmann's head mounted on a pike.Yes. Why? If it has to do with Paramount and the recent Star Trek shows, Ellison only became CEO in August. Anything before that is the old regime.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Paramount stays woke until the day I see kurtzmann's head mounted on a pike.Yes. Why? If it has to do with Paramount and the recent Star Trek shows, Ellison only became CEO in August. Anything before that is the old regime.
Kurtzman's contract is up in 2026, so we'll see then. Paramount just announced they have no interest in the Kelvin films and want to go in "Another Direction" with the films. So, they just cut one tie from the JJ/Kurtzman Era.Paramount stays woke until the day I see kurtzmann's head mounted on a pike.
I watched some episodes from S1 and while it was a bit silly, you could see that not only the people there really loved HP, they were quite talented.I was in a restaurant earlier, and a promo for this Food Network show that I’ve never heard of showed up on the TV. Obviously, it made me smile because I could just sense the massive amounts of troon seethe it surely set off.
I think this highlights another reason the troons can’t win. Harry Potter is this world of fun and whimsy that’s full of colourful concepts and places to explore. What the troons are basically doing is saying, “No, you can’t have that. You are a Nazi for enjoying this fun thing.” No one likes a party pooper.I watched some episodes from S1 and while it was a bit silly, you could see that not only the people there really loved HP, they were quite talented.
View attachment 8133894
View attachment 8133898
View attachment 8133900
Consider that they're doing these in a hurry, and they still look impressive.
Bitching and complaining about literally everything is the only form of entertainment these slugs even have. No wonder they off themselves so much.It is the same old "we just want to be left alone" with "No, we NEED to be included and be insufferable the whole way through". Who would want to entertain such rotten people?
And unlike Rowling, where people desperately search for reasons within HP to cancel her (Cho Chang’s name, and the goblins being anti semitic), Gaiman actually has written shit like Snow, Glass, Apples, where a CHILD Snow White is a vampire seduces a man and is depicted NUDE repeatedly in the graphic novel adaptation. And this was side-eyed even before he was outed as a sex pest, and yet his career continues to survive relatively unscathed. You’ll never convince me that the backlash against Rowling isn’t just a bunch of nerds being big mad that Mummy refuses to cuddle them anymore.I'm noticing that they don't treat Neil Gaiman the same way, and are only 'recently' discovering his shit had a lot of creepy things regarding teenage girls. His books are still loved and no one is condemning the actors of Good Omens for starring in a work co-written by a sex pest. David Tennant is already pro troon and can be seen wearing t-shirts with 'protect trans kids' on it. Nothing about Michael Sheen (no relation to Martin Sheen). Gaiman is in every way worse than JKR but since JKR is a woman who cannot be cancelled due to her money, they get extra hostile towards her.
I wonder if people prefer to enjoy the pew pew guns and fire-breathing dragons or debate whether trans identity would exist in a world with magic and whether magical stairs that lead you to your single sex dormitory would allow a transwoman to enter the women'sAnd if the troons are known for something is how they suck out all the fun of everything.
"I wasn't aware of that the author is linked to the franchise she created", how fucking dumb can you be.If anyone remembers the whinging Vancouverites in Canada had over the installation of the after-dark Harry Potter experience, it seems ticket sales are going strong ( Archive ), and that's with presale.
Relevant article:
Backlash against a new Harry Potter-themed attraction in Stanley Park has one Park Board commissioner looking into cancelling the contract.
“I have learned a great deal in the last five days about the linkage of the Harry Potter franchise with J.K. Rowling and I am very surprised at what I’ve learned and I was not aware of the reputational risk of bringing a Harry Potter-themed event to Vancouver at the time that I approved this in camera,” Tom Digby told Global News.
“Now I’m just speaking as one Park Board commissioner, one out of seven, that I do not speak on behalf of the Park Board...
- McSneaks
- Replies: 33
- Forum: Articles & News
Reactions:x 9
x 1
x 1
I don't think that is a limit you want to test. These people hold real, actual power."I wasn't aware of that the author is linked to the franchise she created", how fucking dumb can you be.
At the start of the evening, tickets are C$86 for ages 13 and up, and C$70 for children ages three to 12. For the final entry slots of the night, prices drop to C$43 and C$27, respectively. There are also other prices for family and adult bundles, larger groups, students, military, and seniors (ages 65 and up).
In on of his books Ocean at the End of the Lane, there is a scene where the protagonist witnesses his father having sex with the nanny (who is some seductress worm creature). The fucking huevos on a man who fucked nannies in the presence of his infant son to put this in a book.And unlike Rowling, where people desperately search for reasons within HP to cancel her (Cho Chang’s name, and the goblins being anti semitic), Gaiman actually has written shit like Snow, Glass, Apples, where a CHILD Snow White is a vampire seduces a man and is depicted NUDE repeatedly in the graphic novel adaptation. And this was side-eyed even before he was outed as a sex pest, and yet his career continues to survive relatively unscathed. You’ll never convince me that the backlash against Rowling isn’t just a bunch of nerds being big mad that Mummy refuses to cuddle them anymore.
one of his kids is retarded so not surprising. Unfortunate, but not surprising.