Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Candidate No 7 said:
Amazing exchange on his last post:
- why is he working for JKR?
- why wouldn't he want to work on a beloved franchise?
- it's not beloved, she is hateful now!
Click to expand...
Meanwhile, outside of the bubble:

hp1.jpeg

hp2.jpeg

Highest popularity among contemporary fiction writers in the UK, 3rd in the USA. (Popularity is the % of people who have a positive opinion of a contemporary fiction writer.)

"hated."
 
It's a good thing sometimes that people are hyper consumers. They might like troons, but they also want their Hedwig plushie.
 
Tasty Tatty said:
It's a good thing sometimes that people are hyper consumers. They might like troons, but they also want their Hedwig plushie.
Click to expand...
This reminds me of this little girl who got on a plane with us last Christmas season. She was about eight or nine and holding a Hedwig plush and a well-worn copy of The Prisoner of Azkaban. She's not the only kid I've seen with HP merch, but something about how creased the spine of the book was, as well as it (sadly) being somewhat above the reading level of most kids her age, was really cute. It gives me hope for the newer generation and all that grumpy old person stuff.
 
Surfin Terf said:
Can you please show us the most egregious examples of JK Rowling demanding that we take in hordes of immigrants. A word of advice, a tweet saying that we should be nice to refugees or that she thinks refugees are fine won’t cut it, I’m going to need her being nasty to people who offer mild pushback or her calling for immigrants/refugees should be completely unrestricted and immune to the law. Something actually deranged and not a reasonable opinion that you disagree with.
Click to expand...
Can you please rate trolls 10/10 then move on
 
Kinda late to it again, but during the whole MeToo thing, did Emma ever said anything against Mr Weinstein?
I can't remember to be honest
My theories why...
...Harvey didn't have sex with her (which is the least plausible thing)
...Emma is more loyal to Harvey for whatever reason
...the sex with Harvey was great, so she doesn't complain about it
...she can't remember it, cause she was too drunk or on other substances when it happened


pursuitsnail said:
In Emma's defense, she and other child stars probably have such an overwhelming amount of suitors who are interested in marrying (and fucking) the character they played that pretty much anyone would get quickly put off by that dating/marriage pool.
Click to expand...
Was never a problem for Daniel afaik
 
AnotherGuy_thexthone said:
Was never a problem for Daniel afaik
Click to expand...
Apparently it was:
Procopius said:
There was a wonderful story in Popbitch some years ago. A young woman hooked up with Radcliffe in a bar and they ended up back at her place. Things started off OK, but then the thought went through her head "I'm fucking Harry Potter" and she couldn't get rid of it. She started giggling and just couldn't stop. Radcliffe asked her what was wrong and she was stupid enough to tell him the truth. He wasn't impressed. So much so that he just got up, got dressed and left.
Click to expand...
 
AnotherGuy_thexthone said:
Kinda late to it again, but during the whole MeToo thing, did Emma ever said anything against Mr Weinstein?
I can't remember to be honest
My theories why...
...Harvey didn't have sex with her (which is the least plausible thing)
...Emma is more loyal to Harvey for whatever reason
...the sex with Harvey was great, so she doesn't complain about it
...she can't remember it, cause she was too drunk or on other substances when it happened



Was never a problem for Daniel afaik
Click to expand...
Emma isn't going to say anything either way, because to admit it would be degrading. If you lost your career over it you can speak out, but if you still have a career to lose (or nostalgia over Hermione), you don't. How well do you think people would take it if Harvey raped Hermione was headline news, and how would they treat her, given how many people treat regular rape victims? Even worse if it wasn't rape and it was transactional. This is one thing I can't get mad at her about, even if she did it deliberately. It's social suicide.

Also, if genuinely nothing happened, with those photos a denial is going to sound like protesting too much. Maybe that's why he released them, to make her feel like she had nothing to lose and maybe something to gain because she was already tainted by association by people who knew, which was probably most of hollywood, especially a-listers.
 
AnotherGuy_thexthone said:
Was never a problem for Daniel afaik
Click to expand...
Being a shitlib, I don't kinkshame

...Except when posting on Kiwi Farms.

I don't think there's any amount of wooing and whatevering that could make me to do anything but vomit the second it even looked like that was the case. There would probably never be a time after that, that it wasn't in the back of my mind.
 
Tragon Dirtle said:
Emma isn't going to say anything either way, because to admit it would be degrading. If you lost your career over it you can speak out, but if you still have a career to lose (or nostalgia over Hermione), you don't. How well do you think people would take it if Harvey raped Hermione was headline news, and how would they treat her, given how many people treat regular rape victims? Even worse if it wasn't rape and it was transactional. This is one thing I can't get mad at her about, even if she did it deliberately. It's social suicide.

Also, if genuinely nothing happened, with those photos a denial is going to sound like protesting too much. Maybe that's why he released them, to make her feel like she had nothing to lose and maybe something to gain because she was already tainted by association by people who knew, which was probably most of hollywood, especially a-listers.
Click to expand...
This is sort of a tangent, but given everything we know about the modeling industry, especially in the '80s and '90s, the fact that the supermodels of the time like Klum and Crawford have never said anything about the stuff that the women who got discarded by that industry have said has always stuck out with me. I think some of this stuff is far more prevalent than people would ever willingly admit, and that a lot of it is maintained by the same code of silence that works in many other parts of society, if you have something to lose, you keep your mouth shut.

Maybe nothing ever happened to them and they truly never saw anything weird happened at any of the functions they were at, or maybe they're one of the success stories, and they're not going to blow up the system that makes them famous.
 
Tragon Dirtle said:
Emma isn't going to say anything either way, because to admit it would be degrading. If you lost your career over it you can speak out, but if you still have a career to lose (or nostalgia over Hermione), you don't. How well do you think people would take it if Harvey raped Hermione was headline news, and how would they treat her, given how many people treat regular rape victims? Even worse if it wasn't rape and it was transactional. This is one thing I can't get mad at her about, even if she did it deliberately. It's social suicide.

Also, if genuinely nothing happened, with those photos a denial is going to sound like protesting too much. Maybe that's why he released them, to make her feel like she had nothing to lose and maybe something to gain because she was already tainted by association by people who knew, which was probably most of hollywood, especially a-listers.
Click to expand...
Back during the big days of MeToo, she would have at least gotten the support of the media, that's for sure


Mellow Malevolent said:
This is sort of a tangent, but given everything we know about the modeling industry, especially in the '80s and '90s, the fact that the supermodels of the time like Klum and Crawford have never said anything about the stuff that the women who got discarded by that industry have said has always stuck out with me. I think some of this stuff is far more prevalent than people would ever willingly admit, and that a lot of it is maintained by the same code of silence that works in many other parts of society, if you have something to lose, you keep your mouth shut.

Maybe nothing ever happened to them and they truly never saw anything weird happened at any of the functions they were at, or maybe they're one of the success stories, and they're not going to blow up the system that makes them famous.
Click to expand...

No idea about Cindy Crawford, but I know that Heidi's career "started" in 1992, when she won a model competition in Gottschalk Late Night (it was the only competition that show ever did)
And Heidi's manager also happen's to be her father afaik
No idea, what else she did
She probably sucked some dicks here and there I guess (maybe Gottschalk's one)
 
Mellow Malevolent said:
if you have something to lose, you keep your mouth shut.
Click to expand...
I think you're right. Even militant, evangelical, crusading man-haters shout out to my legion will tell you that if you want to be the top AMW, you don't then complain about having to crawl to the top of a pile of AMWs. You buy the ticket, you take the ride.
That doesn't mean the existence of a Snowpiercer-esque groupie battle train is in any way ethical or even legal, but unless you were tricked into modelling because agents took advantage of your rube parents/had no other choice to feed your family in Siberia, you can't play the game and throw other women under the bus for years, then only decide to speak out once you yourself go under the wheels.
Hunter Thompson was right about the entertainment industry, but you'll be fine if you know your place. Don't get Mad At The Industry if Brad Pitt is out of your league. There are plenty of decent-looking, somewhat-talented women who are happy to be a mistress/side chick/secondary character on a niche TV show. It's more than what most NPCs could ever dream of, it's fun, and it's not so horrible having to admit that out of eight billion people on the planet you probably aren't one of the Angelina Jolies or Cindy Crawfords. You don't die from being just kinda famous.
Emma's due to get pushed out a window soon and when she starts fake-feminist-proselytizing she's going to lose all her female drug dealers.
AnotherGuy_thexthone said:
No idea about Cindy Crawford, but I know that Heidi's career "started" in 1992, when she won a model competition in Gottschalk Late Night (it was the only competition that show ever did)
And Heidi's manager also happen's to be her father afaik
No idea, what else she did
She probably sucked some dicks here and there I guess (maybe Gottschalk's one)
Click to expand...
She's never been dishonest about playing the game or the existence of a game to be played, but she's very popular because she's good at her job, so probably didn't have to do anything gross (many are jealous). Seems based, reading about her halloween party is always really fun. Having a dad manager likely helped her navigate the whole thing without getting molested.
 
Giggling at the idea of sex with HP is kinda weird because Harry is canonically a married man with kids within the books. And in the sequels if we ignore they're so bad.

Izdaja Slika said:
I don't care if Watson gets married or reproduces. But as has already been said in response, calling the general vibe that marriage and babies is encouraged 'violence' is the kind of problem you have to manufacture when you have no real problems.
Click to expand...
She needs to say so because she needs to look like she also cares for women's suffering as she's been accused of not caring. She just chose the most stupid and superficial cause to support.

AnotherGuy_thexthone said:
the sex with Harvey was great, so she doesn't complain about it
Click to expand...
That totally not happened.
 
Colress said:
I really just want to see Watson's reply to the screed. Rowling's takedown was beautiful, and brutal, and absolutely deserved.
Click to expand...

I do wonder if Rowling had that tweet drafted for years keeping it on hold just waiting for Watson to give her an opening....
I agree with Jo on the issue but women can be so catty...

draggs said:
The best part of her savaging Emma Bitchson was the indirect taunting. Rowling taunts Emma that the only reason she is anything is because of what Rowling created. And taunts Emma that she will NEVER have the amount of money or cultural power that she, JK Rowling, does. All without coming out and directly saying it. Well done
Click to expand...

I'd say they owe her as much as Sean Connery owed Ian Fleming his career or Christopher Reeve owed Siegel/Shuster his career. I mean Rowling created and remains by far the main source of canon and authority in the Potterverse. But (a) the franchise did branch out into films which made Rowling exponentially richer (something about humanity in general preferring to sit their asses and being shown what to think instead of reading words to imagine anything) and (b) movies are such a freaking collaborative effort: i.e., can give your best but if just one or two people in the team screw up, it may account for a crappy film. What I mean by this is that the cast wasn't just picked by JK alone, the casting director, the producers, Chris Columbus himself had a say into choosing and searching for talent. So Radcliffe, Watson, et al. owe their careers not just to Rowling.
But by the same token, because there's much more potential money to be made in film than books, Rowling also owes her fabulous wealth to the kids along with the whole cast and crew of the first movie(s), The chemistry between the kids did help towards the film's success. If they had cast someone else as Harry or Hermione the project might have perhaps failed.
So in recap; since movies often require some of the ingredients to be exactly right at the right time, we could argue that yes, the kids owe their careers to Rowling among others, but Rowling et al. also owe the kids for their services acting in the film.
 
FluffyJackal said:
But by the same token, because there's much more potential money to be made in film than books, Rowling also owes her fabulous wealth to the kids along with the whole cast and crew of the first movie(s),
Click to expand...
Autist that I am, I looked up whether Rowling made more money from books or films, and most sources suggest she has made overwhelmingly more from books. I can't find definitive sources, or I would cite them, but most accounts suggest books as the major source.
 
LateNightMuffin said:
Autist that I am, I looked up whether Rowling made more money from books or films, and most sources suggest she has made overwhelmingly more from books. I can't find definitive sources, or I would cite them, but most accounts suggest books as the major source.
Click to expand...
Stands to reason. The writer of a book gets the main cut of a book's sale price but only a tiny fraction of the price of a cinema ticket.
 
Adrenochrome Dreams said:
We should be able to say things such as the following without being jumped on by mindless idiots:
  • Being on benefits for one year, supported by wealthier friends, does not give JKR any right to speak for those in poverty
  • She’s a hypocrite for expecting very public repentance from the woke who tried to cancel her, when she behaved similarly about rapefugees and will never apologise for it
  • The last three Harry Potter books weren’t as good as the first.
Click to expand...

Since you're not going to bring sources I found some for you. Does this sound like she loves Islamic rapists?
Like she speaks as respectfully as she can when discussing troons so what do you expect? Purity policing is unbecoming, faggy, and retarded.

1000009581.png 1000009579.png 1000009580.png 1000009578.png

Edit to add: I think some of the A+H people who are peaking at the thread have forgotten that the stinkditch and beauty parlor both have a higher than average population of TERFs and jaded leftists. It's not Rowling Enslavement Syndrome, you're talking to the people who are the most fed up with purity policing.

Otis Mallebrok said:
If they do that, the memeing will be endless. The most evil wizard, created by the worlds leading transphobe, is suddenly a tranny. I mean, this entire plotline of him trying to recreate his body with Dark Magic and the blood of a child:smug:
Click to expand...
Pooner Voldemort would be fucking hilarious. Imagine the squeaky mickey mouse voice.
 

Attachments

  • 1000009578.png
    1000009578.png
    344.7 KB · Views: 153
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom