Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Marvin said:
If you're male and you don't have a hormonal deficiency, you're not asexual, you're celibate.

Libido in males is more or less a direct consequence of having healthy levels of testosterone.

All the special snowflake guys claiming to be asexual usually still experience sexual arousal. They just choose to abstain from sex, which is just called celibacy.

But I guess that boring, normal label for it doesn't come with a pride flag, so I guess that's out..
Click to expand...
What if we shortened it? They aren’t “celibates,” they’re “cels.” Sounds a lot cooler.
 
The mental illness expert has logged on:

1744020349176.png
I have seen a LOT of people suggesting this indicates that Rowling in mentally ill.
It’s not mental illness, it is fanatical hatred with an esprit fasciste.
Click to expand...

Obligatory reminder that this is what Mark/Natacha actually looks like (8-year old + picture):


natacha kennedy recent avatar.jpg Natacha Kennedy for real.jpeg

The show-biz expert has also... well he is always logged on.

1744021157575.png
if I were an author and I had a big TV adaptation in the works I prolly wouldn’t tweet that ace people can fuck off on asexual awareness day AND the day the creator of one of the biggest shows on a competing network came out as ace, but clearly I lack the Brains Genious of jowling kowling rowling
Click to expand...

Well you clearly do Oliver. That is why she is a giga-selling author and scriptwriter and you make YouTube videos.

They all still go on about the mould they hallucinated.

1744021274144.png

The taste advisor has also logged on (with his 35th account):

1744021480998.png
Joking about knife crime with a porn/gimmick account that targets transgender people . Noted
Click to expand...

(This is Fredo Wallace who drunkenly told Helen Joyce during an attempt at a debate that TERFs are just bitter because their husbands would rather fuck trannies. )
 
Candidate No 7 said:
1744021157575.png

Well you clearly do Oliver.
Click to expand...
Dude, normal people don’t know or care about “asexuals.” If you told them they would think it was crazy. They’re not some massive consumer block HBO is afraid of alienating.

Who is the creator who came out as asexual, out of curiosity?
 
Last edited:
Who the fuck is he talking about?

Also. I love to see libshits pretending Harry Potter is a nothing (while desperately hiding their own Harry Potter tattoos, even if it means a big black square on their body lol), but be for fucking real. The second it comes out, nothing is in its league. There is no competition. Like what show would be? Whichever ridiculous GoT spinoff whatever shit they have on that has a lot of plain looking I'm-not-a-womenz and niggers with white hair?
Aaaaaand the fact there is no competition is the fault of Thorndick and his kind....

EDIT: AHAHAHAHA VIVIZIEPOP. The grown ass woman who still thinks striped scene skunk hair and x marks are character design.
Bitch, you can't be serious!!!!!!!!! They are different formats (live action vs cartoon), different age ranges (family friendly vs for edgy womanchildren and homosexuals), vastly different levels of fame and cultural influence....
 
Surfin Terf said:
What the fuck does it mean to be “on the Ace spectrum”? I’m actually willing to entertain the notion of asexuality, but if it does indeed exist then everyone is on the ace spectrum because everyone has moments where they don’t want to fuck
Click to expand...
I took these names from a "Happy #AsexualityDay" post I've seen asexuals reblogging, and googled some of the meanings: some notorious sexualities under the "ace spectrum" are "demisexuals" (they only feel sexual attraction to someone after forming an emotional bond with them), "acefluxes" (they experience shifting sexual and romantic orientations), "graysexual" (they experience limited sexual attraction), "aegosexual" (they experience sexual attraction but feel a disconnect from the idea of sexual activity).

I'd be willing to entertain the notion of asexuality too, but politically and socially it's been a self-contradictory mess. There's also been a lot of debate over whether asexuals count as "not straight" (even those asexuals that are "heteroromantic", meaning they'd only have romantic and sexual —because aces can still want and have sex, even if they don't feel sexual attraction— partners of the opposite sex). Going from the replies to Rowling's tweet, it seems the side of "asexuals are queer because it's not a normal sexuality" has won that one.
 
Surfin Terf said:
What the fuck does it mean to be “on the Ace spectrum”? I’m actually willing to entertain the notion of asexuality, but if it does indeed exist then everyone is on the ace spectrum because everyone has moments where they don’t want to fuck
Click to expand...
I'm gonna jump in and explain because I've learned a bit about asexuality in the past. Disclaimer: I think it is normal to have varying levels of sexual libido, especially as you move through ages in life or physical and mental health statuses. I don't think we need a special snowflake label for everything.

Essentially asexuality and all of it's sub categories of sexualities attempt to explain the concept of sexual drive using primary sexual attraction and secondary sexual attraction and sexual attraction as a spectrum.

Primary sexual attraction is based on instantly available information: appearance and scent. Say you meet a lady at a bar, she is attractive and she smells good, and you could hook up with her that night or that moment, zero information gathered. You don't even need to know her name. That is an example of having a primary sexual attraction to that person (in non gay terms: a sexual drive). Same with women who could hook up with men, or gay people who hook up with the same gender. If you can fuck them, no questions asked, you have a strong primary sexual drive.

Secondary sexual attraction is based on characteristics that are not identifiable at first glance, such as personality, emotional intelligence, the connection formed over time, etc. Say instead of wanting to fuck this chick you met at a bar that night, you decide you want to get her number instead. You have no desire to fuck her right there, you want to know her. You take her on a date, you learn about her past and her dreams, you build intimacy over time, then suddenly you are super horny and want to be with her. That is your secondary sexual attraction (in non gay terms: you've formed a bond with her, now your sexual drive for her is high since you know her and like her).

On the asexual "ace" spectrum, means you could have varying levels of either of these sexual attraction. A very asexual person would not want to sleep even with a partner because they have low primary and secondary sexual attraction for others. My understanding of real asexuals is that they usually just have sex to satisfy their partner, but have no actual interest in the act itself. People in the middle, where you get a lot of the subcategories, build up secondary sexual attraction over time (i.e. dating someone and building a connection). And on the far end of this spectrum, whatever the opposite of asexual is, probably are fine with one night stands and hooking up with strangers they meet online or at the bar. They do not need a relationship or connection or even a name to have the sexual drive to fuck someone. That doesn't mean they do these things, just that they have the sexual drive and capacity to if they chose to because they experience high primary sexual attraction to others.

Anyways, I hope this was informative for you. Please don't negative react if you think it is faggotry. I'm not defending the asexual snowflakes, I just am explaining what I have learned. My opinion is that varying levels of sexual libido is normal and not everything needs a label and a flag.
 
huesofmercury said:
View attachment 7189807
Click to expand...
Oh please, mocking asexuals when they try to score oppression points has a long tradition outside of the "queer" community. Her comment is mildy teasing at most but they're mad because they know she's right. Who the fuck gets oppressed for not having sex?

But Toob trying to sell Hazbin Hotel as some major show that could ever even be close to the same ballpark as HP really was the funniest thing I've read today. Tranny delusions are truly next level.
 
Der weiße Teufel said:
Oh please, mocking asexuals when they try to score oppression points has a long tradition outside of the "queer" community. Her comment is mildy teasing at most but they're mad because they know she's right. Who the fuck gets oppressed for not having sex?

But Toob trying to sell Hazbin Hotel as some major show that could ever even be close to the same ballpark as HP really was the funniest thing I've read today. Tranny delusions are truly next level.
Click to expand...
The gap between the reality of what she does (a few sarcastic tweets every now and then when she's done with other things) and the way they picture her (sustaining a frenzied hate campaign 24/7 from the high tower of a mouldy castle) couldn't be larger, much like the gap between their own imagined and real identities I guess.
 
huesofmercury said:
View attachment 7189807
Click to expand...
Asexuals (or "asexuals", because most of them are spicy straight people who can't get laid) might not be as much of a dangerous plague to society as trannies, but they deserve to be mocked just as much as troons. I'm glad Rowling is now contributing to the literal genocide of asexuals just like she already contributes to the literal genocide of trannies.

The truth is that nobody ever gave, and still doesn't give, enough of a shit about people who can't get laid to oppress them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom