r/mendrawingwomen - "STOP DRAWING WOMEN THE WAY YOU WANT TO"

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
just remember that this thread exists
anyway some people getting upset at a edit
Screen Shot 2021-05-20 at 6.22.12 PM.png

also someone posted about puppychan but I already posted that in the puppychan thread
 
Man that's an old edit, i'm sure i remember it from when the controversy surrounding Dragon's Crown was around, still the editor did a good job if people are still getting upset over it.
 
One account haranguing is called "TFCaroline," so a fetish account for transgenderism probably, and it's been permanently banned by admins. The other one is called "VRsexBOBomb" (which is a Scott Pilgrim reference) and all he did was complain on /r/movies and white knight Brie Larson. The posts are really a trip. This guy hates porn of her, but he clearly wants to fuck her or he wouldn't be getting that upset over people thinking she's a shit actress.

His profile: https://archive.md/qsEln

Meanwhile the image_incorporated guy is still making Marvel porn comics and posting them on /r/marvel. He did some minor trolling of /r/mendrawingwomen too.
 
I’m getting the very strong suspicion that the people who post on this reddit are trannies or they’re dead eggers. I’d like to think the majority aren’t even real women.
 
I’m getting the very strong suspicion that the people who post on this reddit are trannies or they’re dead eggers. I’d like to think the majority aren’t even real women.
Don't forget men who want to earn brownie points with women by pretending they don't like sexy women.
 
Reading through the thread, I've only now realized that nobody has ever mentioned that Uzaki-chan's male lead, a retired competitive swimmer, was also pretty sexualized.
Uzaki-Chan Wa Asobitai! - Chapter 57_ Kouhai And Kouhai's Brother 2 - 10.png
 
So have these prudes ever critiqued furry art? Cos it seems that other than men obviously, furries (of both genders) are usually exempt from these anti-sexualisation/anti-objectification types’s rants & ravings even though a good chunk of furry art is of curvaceous, well-endowed animal women.
 
So have these prudes ever critiqued furry art? Cos it seems that other than men obviously, furries (of both genders) are usually exempt from these anti-sexualisation/anti-objectification types’s rants & ravings even though a good chunk of furry art is of curvaceous, well-endowed animal women.
Talking about furry art implies that you look up furry art. So unless a furry is popular like that one bunny chick from space jam, they probably won’t mention it in case of embarrassment.

By my guess I’d say at least one in every four is a furry, possibly more, maybe less
 
So have these prudes ever critiqued furry art? Cos it seems that other than men obviously, furries (of both genders) are usually exempt from these anti-sexualisation/anti-objectification types’s rants & ravings even though a good chunk of furry art is of curvaceous, well-endowed animal women.
I would think they view them as more animal than human so it doesn't really count.
 
So have these prudes ever critiqued furry art? Cos it seems that other than men obviously, furries (of both genders) are usually exempt from these anti-sexualisation/anti-objectification types’s rants & ravings even though a good chunk of furry art is of curvaceous, well-endowed animal women.
I think considering everything ELSE going on in furry art, the chicks having tiddies is probably an afterthought compared to the 'oh my god that six-titted panther centaur is shoving a dude into his Prius-sized dick'.
 
It's wild to think I live in an age where it's 100% socially acceptable for women to be whores on Onlyfans, but it's not okay to draw pictures of them like whores on Onlyfans.

what a time to be alive
 
It's wild to think I live in an age where it's 100% socially acceptable for women to be whores on Onlyfans, but it's not okay to draw pictures of them like whores on Onlyfans.

what a time to be alive
I've just stopped assuming that the world is operating on any sort of logic anymore.
 
So have these prudes ever critiqued furry art? Cos it seems that other than men obviously, furries (of both genders) are usually exempt from these anti-sexualisation/anti-objectification types’s rants & ravings even though a good chunk of furry art is of curvaceous, well-endowed animal women.

Probably they even know that attempting to criticize furry art is a fool's errand, for starters the characters aren't human so the "realism" argument they use as the standard measuring stick to beat on the anatomy of sexy women goes out the window. For example, imagine how would the argument of "where are her organs?" land when they criticize a drawing of a female character with a thin waist and the character happens to be an anthropomorphic wasp?
 
Back
Top Bottom