'Quantum superchemistry' observed for the 1st time ever - Study included.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Article
Archive

'Quantum superchemistry' observed for the 1st time ever​

1691892003928.png
Quantum superchemistry has been observed by researchers for the first time.

For the first time, researchers have observed "quantum superchemistry" in the lab.

Long theorized but never before seen, quantum superchemistry is a phenomenon in which atoms or molecules in the same quantum state chemically react more rapidly than do atoms or molecules that are in different quantum states. A quantum state is a set of characteristics of a quantum particle, such as spin (angular momentum) or energy level.

To observe this new super-charged chemistry, researchers had to coax not just atoms, but entire molecules, into the same quantum state. When they did, however, they saw that the chemical reactions occurred collectively, rather than individually. And the more atoms were involved, meaning the greater the density of the atoms, the quicker the chemical reactions went.


"What we saw lined up with the theoretical predictions," Cheng Chin, a professor of physics at the University of Chicago who led the research, said in a statement. "This has been a scientific goal for 20 years, so it's a very exciting era."

The team reported their findings July 24 in the journal Nature Physics. They observed the quantum superchemistry in cesium atoms that paired up to form molecules. First, they cooled cesium gas to near absolute zero, the point at which all motion ceases. In this chilled state, they could ease each cesium atom into the same quantum state. They then altered the surrounding magnetic field to kick off the chemical bonding of the atoms.

These atoms reacted more quickly together to form two-atom cesium molecules than when the researchers conducted the experiment in normal, non-super-cooled gas. The resulting molecules also shared the same quantum state, at least over several milliseconds, after which the atoms and molecules start to decay, no longer oscillating together.

"[W]ith this technique, you can steer the molecules into an identical state," Chin said.

The researchers found that though the end result of the reaction was a two-atom molecule, three atoms were actually involved, with a spare atom interacting with the two bonding atoms in a way that facilitated the reaction.

This could be useful for applications in quantum chemistry and quantum computing, as molecules in the same quantum state share physical and chemical properties. The experiments are part of the field of ultracold chemistry, which aims to gain incredibly detailed control over chemical reactions by taking advantage of the quantum interactions that occur in these cold states. Ultracold particles could be used as qubits, or the quantum bits that carry information in quantum computing, for example.

The study used only simple molecules, so the next goal is to attempt to create quantum superchemistry with more complex molecules, Chin said.

"How far we can push our understanding and our knowledge of quantum engineering, into more complicated molecules, is a major research direction in this scientific community," he said.
 

Attachments

Neat. It's good to see interesting stuff like this in A&N instead of constant doom and gloom about the horrors of clown world.
 
I'm probably just ignorant, but what use would we have for quantum computing, exactly? You'd think that the processing power we have would be adequate enough.
 
I'm probably just ignorant, but what use would we have for quantum computing, exactly? You'd think that the processing power we have would be adequate enough.
Defeating all current encryption, for one.

Quantum computing isn't making computers that are really fast. It's making computers that can test a large number of outcomes at once. Good for some specific things, but you won't be playing Crysis on it.
 
I'm probably just ignorant, but what use would we have for quantum computing, exactly? You'd think that the processing power we have would be adequate enough.
Well... people said that about the analog computers, then the first computers, then home computers... MORE POWER is extremely handy since you can just brute force a lot of nasty scientific conundrums. Brute forcing messages is how we broke open ENIGMA after all, the US ultimately building over 120 Bombe machines. The British would of course build Colossus, arguably the world's first electronic computer, to break the Lorenz code the Wehrmacht used.
 
I'm probably just ignorant, but what use would we have for quantum computing, exactly? You'd think that the processing power we have would be adequate enough.
It's good for complex simulations, possibly. Which means it could be the next step for big supercomputers that are used to discover drugs, fold proteins, simulate nuclear explosions, etc. Quantum computing could eventually make its way into consumer applications like gaming if it can ever be done at "room temperature". It could be included as a separate accelerator on a chip alongside the CPU, GPU, NPU/ML...

I don't think the high performance computing people will ever stop demanding more processing power, and any development that makes computing more efficient (operations per watt) is welcome too.

Funny that quantum superchemistry is potentially useful for computing, but not... chemistry. Unless they discover some kind of economically viable chemical reaction that requires the ingredients to be near absolute zero.
 
I would have been more impressed if it was a reaction between dissimilar atoms. Using the same element for both atoms really simplifies the entire thing, as well as the fact that they were making a diatomic molecule, the simplest molecule that could possibly be formed. Doing it this way basically guaranteed if the models were correct that it would work, which is a rather low bar. Hopefully the next diatomic molecule they make will be heteroatomic instead. Now that would really be a breakthrough and prove the rigor of their models.
 
So this is just min/maxing on a physics-scale? The more shit that is similar and acts the same, gets a buff and set-bonus added to it?

Molecule breaks down; if 3 similar sets of molecule are equipped, molecule breaks down +30% faster.

At least the creators of the simulation were old school RPG nerds.
 
Back
Top Bottom