Porn and Porncows

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
For those who don't know, landmine women are called like that because if you take a wrong step, they will blow up on you. They got really popular in jap media as of late
All Japanese people are somewhat "landmine" due to their culture, when you're expected to keep your opinions to yourself most of the time, the slightest thing can set someone off so long as the person they're going off on is an equal. It's usually women going off on their husbands and boyfriends. I live with one so I've experienced this multiple times.

The actual "landmine girl" subculture is just this behavior cranked all the way up. I think it's a fetish for masochistic men (not in short supply over there) and the girls who do it do it because they can act spoiled and get whatever they want from their personal simp.
 
It's usually women going off on their husbands and boyfriends. I live with one so I've experienced this multiple times.
"Multiple times"? Why the fuck did you tolerate it even once? You don't actually have to be an angry violent aggressive male to put shit like this on ice. A deep voice raised in anger should be enough to put the fear of god in women if used correctly.
 
Back in the day some men would extort women I think this was around 2014. Using Google reverse image search to link her porn/escort bio to her real social through facial recognition. But the major sites seemsto have plugged that now and some governments have finally caught up and introduced laws to protect women from people trying to expose their secret side hustle.
You mean like the girls going wild stuff back in the day
 

Screenshot 2026-05-14 at 04-16-27 Site Announcement MOTHERLESS.COM.png
Sites claiming to be "voluntarily" taken down to identify content that doesn't "align with our rules" but avoids claiming that they were intentionally hosting illegal content. Iirc, former Lost Prophets singer, convicted pedophile, and current corpse Ian Watkins had an account on Motherless. Good riddance, I hope they don't recover from this.

Problem with this is it's part of a much larger push for Internet censorship. Motherless is a fantastic target to really get the ball rolling.
Normally, I would be inclined to agree with you. I don't condone the types of porn games that the Australian feminist group was trying to get removed, but I'm even more opposed to them weaponizing payment processors to pressure Steam into curating the store to their liking. However, this shutdown came as a result of a CNN investigation into men who were drugging and raping their passed out wives and uploading the videos to Motherless. This isn't just degeneracy, it's criminal.
 
"Multiple times"? Why the fuck did you tolerate it even once? You don't actually have to be an angry violent aggressive male to put shit like this on ice. A deep voice raised in anger should be enough to put the fear of god in women if used correctly.
Well, it wasn't threats or anything, or violence, just women meltdowns, and she stopped once she realized 1. I wasn't going to lay down and take it, and 2. This is America and you can actually tell others what you want out loud.
 
Does anyone else find all of those no fap challanges and whole "cult" around no fap being a complete bullshit? Im not saying that jerking 4x a day is good or anything like this but some people are portraying act of not touching your willy for X amount of time as some kind of mythical expierence that will completly change your life, becoming a chick magnet or some other lifecoaching garbo. Its not even like they are talking about porn addiction, just jerking itself. No one is telling other people to stop having sex when they feel like doing it so why healthy man should stop jerking if he has high libido?
 
Does anyone else find all of those no fap challanges and whole "cult" around no fap being a complete bullshit? Im not saying that jerking 4x a day is good or anything like this but some people are portraying act of not touching your willy for X amount of time as some kind of mythical expierence that will completly change your life, becoming a chick magnet or some other lifecoaching garbo. Its not even like they are talking about porn addiction, just jerking itself. No one is telling other people to stop having sex when they feel like doing it so why healthy man should stop jerking if he has high libido?
It's reddit
 
This isn't just degeneracy, it's criminal.
Unless you can prove Motherless was commissioning, supporting or encouraging that activity, and/or were covering it up or refusing to remove such content when discovered and reported, no, it's not criminal. This is literally the entire purpose of the DMCA's safe harbor provisions. If hosts are held liable for their users' actions, there could be no hosts. Great demonstration of the camel getting its nose into the tent though.

Does anyone else find all of those no fap challanges and whole "cult" around no fap being a complete bullshit? Im not saying that jerking 4x a day is good or anything like this but some people are portraying act of not touching your willy for X amount of time as some kind of mythical expierence that will completly change your life, becoming a chick magnet or some other lifecoaching garbo. Its not even like they are talking about porn addiction, just jerking itself. No one is telling other people to stop having sex when they feel like doing it so why healthy man should stop jerking if he has high libido?
They're retarded, that's all. What happened to "my body, my choice" anyway? I don't answer to anybody concerning what I do with myself when the lights go out (ooh baby!). Fortunately I don't discuss it either, so that probably spares me some grief no matter what my choices are. :story:
 
Unless you can prove Motherless was commissioning, supporting or encouraging that activity, and/or were covering it up or refusing to remove such content when discovered and reported, no, it's not criminal. This is literally the entire purpose of the DMCA's safe harbor provisions. If hosts are held liable for their users' actions, there could be no hosts. Great demonstration of the camel getting its nose into the tent though.
I understand that. I was referring to these men raping their wives, recording it, and uploading it to there. That is criminal. If CNN publishes an article showcasing this, then they and the entire world has been made very aware and they're understandably in a panic. You can only ignore the nigger in the woodpile so long.
 
Last edited:
I understand that. I was referring to these men raping their wives, recording it, and uploading it to there. That is criminal. If CNN publishes an article showcasing this, then they and the entire world has been made very aware and they're understandably in a panic. You can only ignore the nigger in the woodpile so long.
Going offline to clean house and improve vetting to resolve that issue would, of course, be the most reasonable and responsible thing to do, yes?

I'm being deliberate about pointing this out because I dislike the sideways narrative -- "they allowed user X to upload Y and didn't instantly delete/ban, ergo they must be naughty meanie ebil people, also I happen to hate them because of other stuff that gets hosted there that I don't like, but that's totally got nothing to do with my current enthusiasm to paint them with a broad stroke that will conveniently address that other thing too."

This is reminiscent of the "never apologize to SJWs" wisdom of old; no act of contrition ever absolves, no method exists to adequately prove innocence, i.e. the only course of action you can take that will satisfy the critic is "lay down and die," which is what they want and all they will settle for, regardless of whether they're right or not.

This exact argument is literally still used today against KF. If any defense is available to us that we expect the world to accept, so too must the same be true for other hosts of "unpalatable" content.

As far as punishing the criminal act, I certainly hope CNN has pursued their identities and local authorities on that end with the same zeal as they did the owner of the metal box where some chats and videos were stored. That'd be the right thing to do, right? I mean, to actually stop the criminal behavior (y'know, the rape part).
 
Going offline to clean house and improve vetting to resolve that issue would, of course, be the most reasonable and responsible thing to do, yes?
Agreed!
As far as punishing the criminal act, I certainly hope CNN has pursued their identities and local authorities on that end with the same zeal as they did the owner of the metal box where some chats and videos were stored. That'd be the right thing to do, right? I mean, to actually stop the criminal behavior (y'know, the rape part).
Agreed!
other hosts of "unpalatable" content.
Let me clarify, I don't believe in banning "unpalatable" content as I said in the original post talking about Steam being pressed by the credit networks. If I don't like a certain type of content, I don't consume it and that's that. The issue is with specifically illegal content which bring me to this:
This exact argument is literally still used today against KF.
You know why this ship stays afloat despite having so many enemies? Because Null has a zero tolerance policy for illegal content and activity. No porn so there's no risk of illegal forms of it, no copyright violating content, no harassing the cows, no fedposting, etc. Its only way a website with such infamy can stay alive, everything is by the letter of the law.

My point is that pro-active "Good Samaritan" moderation on behalf of websites helps ensure S230 stays for the long run. After a certain point, negligence becomes compliance and then the politicians get ammunition to push for controls under the banner of "protect the chilluns".
 
After a certain point, negligence becomes compliance and then the politicians get ammunition to push for controls under the banner of "protect the chilluns".
Yeah, I get that. I think we actually agree on this :)

I guess what I'm saying is I'm not (yet) convinced Motherless is deliberately allowing the stuff to stay online. I'm happy to admit being wrong if it's proven otherwise; it just seems like right now people are hopping aboard the usual train of thought that justifies censorship rather than stopping actual crimes.
 
Yeah, I get that. I think we actually agree on this :)

I guess what I'm saying is I'm not (yet) convinced Motherless is deliberately allowing the stuff to stay online. I'm happy to admit being wrong if it's proven otherwise; it just seems like right now people are hopping aboard the usual train of thought that justifies censorship rather than stopping actual crimes.
The sites been around for a while and I don't imagine they have a huge team, I just think of this from an ownership/personal responsibility sort've lens. If I found out through fucking CNN that my website has such a huge problem with illegal content I would be livid. Clearly the apparatus in place isn't working, content isn't getting flagged, mods aren't doing their jobs. Unacceptable. Something clearly went wrong here and I'm the one looking like an asshole for it.
 
Something clearly went wrong here and I'm the one looking like an asshole for it.
Yeah, you kinda are. You don't shut down a data center because someone uploaded child porn onto a computer hosted there. I thought were were getting somewhere, but you'd rather climb on up there on that cross to nail yourself to it, so please don't let me stop you. :story:
 
Back
Top Bottom