EU Pope blasts 'Nazi dictatorship' EU

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Link (Archive)

Pope blasts 'Nazi dictatorship' EU​

With England and France feuding, Russia mobilising and Brussels incurring the wrath of Rome, it all feels a bit 1530 in Europe at the moment. The latest Renaissance throwback has been the octogenarian Pope Francis coming out swinging against the European Union for its efforts to ban the word ‘Christmas’ among Brussels bureaucrats.

Hand-wringing pen-pushers have told their fellow Eurocrats to swap it instead to ‘holiday period’ as it could be offensive to non-Christians, as part of a guide on ‘inclusive communication.’ The document ordered staff to substitute saying ‘Christmas time can be stressful’ for ‘holiday times can be stressful.’ Naturally such talk did not go down well in the Vatican where Cardinal Pietro Parolin accused the EU of trying to ‘cancel our roots.’

Other EU suggestions include replacing Christian names such as Mary and John with ‘international’ names such as Malika and Julio in generic examples and using the word ‘man-made’ in place of ‘human-induced.’ Mr S would say ‘Lord, give me strength’ but such traditional patriarchal expressions of exasperation might offend the right-on Eurocrat brigade…

Fortunately though – in enjoyably punchy language reminiscent of the Old Testament prophets – Francis this weekend attacked the supranational entity in the strongest possible terms. The Holy Father declared the Brussels bloc was embarking on ‘the path of ideological colonisation,’ that ‘the EU document on Christmas is an anachronism’ of ‘watered-down secularism’ and that such efforts ‘throughout history’ have ‘not worked.’ He said: ‘In history, many dictatorships have tried to do these things. I’m thinking of Napoleon, the Nazi dictatorship.’

Guess that’s one list card on Ursula von der Leyen’s Christmas list – or should that be holiday list?
 
A bit of a weird point to finally draw lines, wouldn't you say?
 
Gee I wonder if it has anything to do with not offending all those muslim refugees you keep entreating them to take more of

'gee I JUST KNOW they'll convert once they see how much I simp for them'

sorry old man your religion and institution are in irreparable decline anywhere that matters and you're only accelerating things
 
"Hand-wringing pen-pushers have told their fellow Eurocrats to swap it instead to ‘holiday period’ as it could be offensive to non-Christians, as part of a guide on ‘inclusive communication.’ "

Let me be the first to say to any non-Christians reading this...

Merry Christmas.
 
Too late for that, you fucker. If you were truly compromised, like, say, Pius XII or St. John Paul II, you would have called them out as soon as you heard Habemus Papam in your favour.
 
This wouldn't be an issue if the Vatican hadn't been haranguing the EU for decades to import Muslims by the millions, right? Or if the Pope had maintained a hard line stance against the Jews and other blasphemy to prevent their spread. Or maybe if the Church hadn't weakened itself with hypocrisy and poor management until the people turned from it?

Yeah, if you want someone to blame look in a mirror.
 
"The Pope hates that anti-christ"
Colour me shocked
Actually I am a bit shocked, with color to match. Since when does Pope Francis care enough about this stuff to call his Uniparty friends Nazis over it?
Remember this is the same guy who took a live-and-let-live attitude toward idols at his prayer service. It's not really on-brand for him to suddenly care about whether the name of Christ shows up on government bureaucrats' desk calendars.
 
Globohomo good. Calling Christmas a holy day bad.

1530? How about 1527 instead?
 
Naturally such talk did not go down well in the Vatican where Cardinal Pietro Parolin accused the EU of trying to 'cancel our roots.
That's not the Pope (obviously), but the Secretary of State of the Vatican. This is the guy on the Vatican's side that does all the political and diplomatic functions, a very powerful position. Everytime you read about the Vatican sending a delegation to a country to mediate negotiations or to arrange for the Pope's visit, that's this guy. I know he was picked by Francis to take the position because he was squeaky clean regarding controversy, while his predecessor was filled with scandal. Don't know how cucked he is compared to Francis, but I do know he wasn't happy with Ireland's same-sex marriage law, where he called it not just a defeat for Christianity, but "a defeat for humanity".
 
Trad caths hate the EU, but they hate Francis too. This should be interesting.
 
Francis does a a lot. If there's something he approves of or only dislikes slightly, like abortion (witness the strategic silences and friendship with unrepentant abortionists like Emma Bonino), a histrionic bunch of words get uttered for form's sake. Likely Francis pre cleared it with them. They likely advised him to say something like that. There's only so much licking of migrant's feet and Masonic language people can endure.
 
A bit of a weird point to finally draw lines, wouldn't you say?
Not really. The current pope is all for secularisation and globohomo as long as the church - and by extension, himself - maintains cultural dominion at some level. That means European official culture has to appear at least superficially christian. Striking a line here preserves his powerbase.
 
Back
Top Bottom