Neuralink and the Brain’s Magical Future

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
https://waitbutwhy.com/2017/04/neuralink.html - https://archive.md/JyY81

Neuralink and the Brain’s Magical Future​


Last month, I got a phone call.

Call-1-768x491.png

Okay maybe that’s not exactly how it happened, and maybe those weren’t his exact words. But after learning about the new company Elon Musk was starting, I’ve come to realize that that’s exactly what he’s trying to do.

When I wrote about Tesla and SpaceX, I learned that you can only fully wrap your head around certain companies by zooming both way, way in and way, way out. In, on the technical challenges facing the engineers, out on the existential challenges facing our species. In on a snapshot of the world right now, out on the big story of how we got to this moment and what our far future could look like.

Not only is Elon’s new venture—Neuralink—the same type of deal, but six weeks after first learning about the company, I’m convinced that it somehow manages to eclipse Tesla and SpaceX in both the boldness of its engineering undertaking and the grandeur of its mission. The other two companies aim to redefine what future humans will do—Neuralink wants to redefine what future humans will be.

The mind-bending bigness of Neuralink’s mission, combined with the labyrinth of impossible complexity that is the human brain, made this the hardest set of concepts yet to fully wrap my head around—but it also made it the most exhilarating when, with enough time spent zoomed on both ends, it all finally clicked. I feel like I took a time machine to the future, and I’m here to tell you that it’s even weirder than we expect.

But before I can bring you in the time machine to show you what I found, we need to get in our zoom machine—because as I learned the hard way, Elon’s wizard hat plans cannot be properly understood until your head’s in the right place.

So wipe your brain clean of what it thinks it knows about itself and its future, put on soft clothes, and let’s jump into the vortex.

[DT: Article truncated due to the huge quantity of images - read the article at the original link or the attached PDF]
 

Attachments

This was written back in 2017, and even though I'd thought plenty about BCIs before this, this silly article full of stick figures written by a techno-optimist bugman was the first time I ever truly considered the extreme dangers they may pose to society.
 
>News
>2017
C'mon bro, it's been dead for a long time now.
I've never understood why people think that old news is useless nowadays. The Guardian actually have a little fucking warning that pops on their site. "This article is more than x years old."

What's up with that? Since when did society start normalizing the idea that you can't review articles from five or ten years ago, critically examine them, and place them in a modern context?

When I was a kid, people used to go to the library, and they used to sit hunched over microfiche machines, analyzing New York Times articles from the goddamn 1930s. When it comes to news, there is no such thing as too old.

In fact, there is something strangely dystopian and sinister about a media that insists that you do nothing but focus on the present.

Cool, does this mean I can become a Psyker from 40k and shoot lightning bolts from my fingers? No? Ok, don't care. GAY.
No, but it means you can have furry porn piped into your head. I think. It's kind of up in the air.
 
>2017
I'll be worried once they can actually point to how the brain works beyond "um, we think some stuff happens in this general area, probably"
 
The big thing is that they can pump endless advertising into your head - and you can bet your ass they won't allow any adblockers.
Can't find the quote from Diamond Age but it was something like "His one buddy got a virus that pumped Indonesian roach killer ads into his vision for a whole week, then he offed himself."
 
I've never understood why people think that old news is useless nowadays. The Guardian actually have a little fucking warning that pops on their site. "This article is more than x years old."
Oh, it can be very interesting to read old newspaper articles. When they are 60 years old, not 6.
 
Back
Top Bottom