Math Homework Can End Up Doing More Harm Than Good, Study Shows

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
(Article, archive)
Giving pupils math homework can sometimes do more harm than good, according to a new study – particularly when the tasks involved in the work are too complex for kids to complete even with the help of their parents.

The researchers, from the University of South Australia and St Francis Xavier University in Canada, interviewed eight Canadian families, asking questions about their experiences with mathematics homework and its effects on the family.

All the families had a child in grade 3, typically aged 8 or 9, the age at which the first standardized math tests are introduced in the area where the survey was conducted. Overall, math was talked about as a subject that wasn't liked, and that involved too much extra work.

"Homework has long been accepted as a practice that reinforces children's learning and improves academic success," says Lisa O'Keeffe, a senior lecturer in mathematics education at the University of South Australia.

"But when it is too complex for a student to complete even with parent support, it raises the question as to why it was set as a homework task in the first place."

The issues identified by the study included homework being too difficult – even with parental help – as well as the work pushing back bedtimes, crossing over into family time, and causing feelings of inadequacy and frustration.

As with many subjects, approaches to teaching and learning mathematics can change over time. Parents who, as children, had been taught how to tackle problems in a different way to their kids was another frustration noted by the researchers.

As with many subjects, approaches to teaching and learning mathematics can change over time. Parents who, as children, had been taught how to tackle problems in a different way to their kids was another frustration noted by the researchers.

"Like many things, mathematics teaching has evolved over time," says O'Keeffe. "But when parents realize that their tried-and-true methods are different to those which their children are learning, it can be hard to adapt, and this can add undue pressure."

This can lead to "negativity across generations", the researchers say. Mothers in the study tended to be mostly responsible for helping with the homework – and when they also find the assignments tough, that can reinforce negative stereotypes about mathematics not being a subject in which girls "naturally excel", according to the study authors.

These negative stereotypes can have lasting impacts on their grades and career aspirations, other studies show.

Of course, the coronavirus pandemic is still fresh in everyone's minds – a time when children were often asked to study at home, and parents often had to help out when it came to completing assignments.

While this study uses a small sample of participants, the researchers say its findings match common narratives in education. They want to see more done to make sure math homework is set in an appropriate way, and that it doesn't end up putting youngsters off the subject at an early age.

"The last thing teachers want to do is disadvantage girls in developing potentially strong mathematical identities," says study author Sarah McDonald, an education lecturer at the University of South Australia. So "we need a greater understanding of homework policies and expectations."

Homework is often thought to have non-academic benefits, such as fostering independence and developing organisational skills and self-discipline, McDonald adds, although the family experiences captured in their study don't necessarily back that up.
 
Ultimately, being "good" or "bad" at math is mostly about how quickly you intuitively understand what's going on. Once you have that you can do division a hundred different ways and get the same answer. This gay common core stuff is aimed (to be charitable) at getting kids to develop this kind of understanding, but it basically just confuses them and the parents. Practicing these a few dozen times is important for internalizing what you're doing, although you don't have to assign hours of work outside of school to get that.

So many people wouldn't hate math if they had good grade school teachers. "Yes Billy, counting on your fingers is a fine way to do division, but we're also practicing the faggy house model so we can do it lots of ways; if you like counting on your fingers, do each problem both ways and see if you get the same answer!"
Being good or bad at maths is, or used to be, a matter of if you understood the preceding steps on the journey. If you're studying history and you're sick the week you learn about Bismark, it doesn't mean you can't learn about Hitler the week after. You might miss some significance here and there but the point is you're just absorbing a wide array of knowledge. Maths isn't like that, Maths is on a track. There are a handful of tracks running parallel at the school level where not everything is fully dependent on the preceding thing but for the most part if you don't quite get some step right away when the rest of the class does and the teacher moves on, you literally cannot understand everything built on top of it. You might be able to struggle through trying to emulate the method maybe but you wont understand it. And you wont know why. You will only know that you are "bad at maths" because everyone else seems to get it and you don't and the teacher doesn't notice or doesn't bother to run you back up the track a few yards, show you the step you missed and then help you catch up. You live the rest of your maths life missing a piece that everybody else has.

Of course people vary in intelligence but school age maths isn't that advanced. For the most part people who are "bad at maths" say so because this exact thing happened in a class. They don't even have to be stupid. Even for smart people not everything clicks right away. But if I tell you that Hitler's original name was Schicklgruber you're not going to struggle to absorb that information just because you don't know that Bismark's first name was Otto.

Now of course the conversation takes a different path if we talk about Common Core where it is deliberately designed to run counter to understanding and hobble smart children. But the above is true of traditional maths teaching. The correct response to telling Billy who is trying to do division on his fingers (!) is to tell him "but what if you want to divide something larger than ten?"
 
I think at least part of it is poor grade math teachers. I hated math in school because of how it was taught and how unclear the teachers always were. Once I became an adult I decided to just start from the beginning with Khan Academy and a textbook and it just clicked for me. I wasn't learning it because I had to, I was learning it because I wanted to.
i agree whole heartily the only time math and division really clicked for me was when i got into the real world and had to apply it to my jobs. I learned a lot from being a tight arse in my 20's trying to make my shit apprentice wage go further, not when i was 15 and hated school, compounded being the in "dumb" class for math the teacher was disinterested at best.

Honestly homework is a load of horse shit at best no one really absorbs stuff after hours anyway.
 
$100 a month for 36 months is better than $26,000 right now - it’s $100 (small number) a month instead of $26,000 (large number). Anything else is just too complicated for poor Shaniqua. And she gets monthly checks anyway so why bother with white supremacy math?
$100 x 36 = $3600
 
Back
Top Bottom