Marvel Cinematic Universe

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Product Placement said:
Marvel just doesn't plan shit out and want to be able to change things as they feel like it. What you are asking for taking planning and more time in preproduction two thing Marvel will never let happen. You would think painting her would be faster, but in terms of shooting it wouldn't, it would just make post production faster which is something Marvel already doesn't care about.

I personality think making She-hulk CGI makes sense as she is meant keep a similar personality between transformations, so having the same actress do both makes sense and there is also a physical change which couldn't be done with the same actor without CGI outside maybe a muscle suit I guess. However on a TV budget and TV length with Marvel production practices it was just asking for trouble to even make this a show. Mean the Hulk himself really doesn't look much better than She-hulk in terms of cgi in this show.
Click to expand...
It's frustrating that the execs do this. They don't realize all the work and time and money it takes to get realistic CG and they think just because it's computers, it can happen instantaneously (that's why Rhythm and Hues went bankrupt when making Life of Pi). They realized this with practical effects back in the day because you can see the models and explosives experts actually building or rigging something up in real life. When they walk in an office full of computers, they don't see that, they see people at computers and think it's a simple code or a click of a button because they hear several mice clicks in a second. They probably don't bother looking over their shoulders to see what they are actually doing. But that's all post-production. The fact that they don't care about concept art and storyboards is fucking the whole system over.
 
Last edited:
Gar For Archer said:
Why the fuck would they go and heal Bruce’s arm? The Hulk, a character whose entire schtick is basically being indestructible, getting permanently and severely crippled by undoing the Snap was a good sign of the gravity of the situation. God forbid actions have any consequences, or that victory come at a cost.

It’s not like Hulk’s gonna get much development after this anyways, due to the rights issues regarding solo Hulk movies. There is literally no compelling reason to uncripple him.
Click to expand...
That's the thing though. The Hulk does have regenerative abilities. He's had his chest blown open by Centurion to where we could see inside his ribcage and it just healed over. The main thing about the Hulk that the MCU always forgot about was the Hulk's becomes more dangerous the longer a fight drags on for as not only does he get stronger, but his healing ability ramps up with it too.

As bad as the Ang Lee film was, at least that film never forgot that basic point to the Hulk's powers.
 
StevieLasVegas said:
That's the thing though. The Hulk does have regenerative abilities. He's had his chest blown open by Centurion to where we could see inside his ribcage and it just healed over. The main thing about the Hulk that the MCU always forgot about was the Hulk's becomes more dangerous the longer a fight drags on for as not only does he get stronger, but his healing ability ramps up with it too.

As bad as the Ang Lee film was, at least that film never forgot that basic point to the Hulk's powers.
Click to expand...
If you think about it, Ang Lee's Hulk was actually smart when it came to combat. It shows during the desert scene. Hulk is dodging shots, leaping into action, taking out choppers with their own missiles, preventing crashes, always thinking on his feet while being a menace. He can tank all that considering he deep-throats a missile in the film, but he chooses not to take unnecessary damage. Hell, he even takes care of preventing human casualties. You can still tell it's Banner the scientist in there, even if he's a roided up baby with seething rage.


He also had a sense of speed & agility to him. He also felt more powerful cause he got bigger the more he fought.
 
There is something kinda insulting about her lecturing Bruce about how she’s had it harder because “I’m a woman” catacalls when he was literally on the run from the military for a large part of his life and canonically was so depressed at one point he put a gun in his mouth only for the Hulk to stop it from killing him, among other things.

But sure, random guy on the street sexualizing you is so much worse.

Also, the lady who wrote this is the same woman who wrote a good chunck of Season 3’s Rick & Morty. Including “Pickle Rick”.
 
Last edited:
Miller said:
Isn't she also the writer who wrote creepy tweets about Trump's teenage son?
Click to expand...
That I don’t know. I just knew about her writing the episodes of R&M where the women were suddenly smarter and more capable than Rick and made sure to spend time doing the “women have it harder” moments.
 
Oats12345 said:
Also I was confused when she said Steve didn't have a girlfriend in the 1940s. I'm what does Peggy Carter not ring a bell
Click to expand...
The Nothingness said:
To be fair, the first Captain America movie didn't really establish Steve and Peggy were in a relationship.
Click to expand...

Xenomorphs Are Cute said:
There were hints tho. Like casual flirting & the whole dance thing. There was nothing to call it platonic either.
Click to expand...
Ohhh, you haven't seen the what the Stucky fans have been saying, have you?
Yeah, they think Fiege or whoever in charge of this mess is trying to straight-wash Steve.
 
S@credC said:
Ohhh, you haven't seen the what the Stucky fans have been saying, have you?
Yeah, they think Fiege or whoever in charge of this mess is trying to straight-wash Steve.
Click to expand...
Oh Jesus fucking Christ….

“All men’s friendship is really just them being super duper gay for each other! …but only if they’re attractive.”

I hate social media, I really do.
 
S@credC said:
Ohhh, you haven't seen the what the Stucky fans have been saying, have you?
Yeah, they think Fiege or whoever in charge of this mess is trying to straight-wash Steve.
Click to expand...
What the fuck!? I thought these people watch Endgame religiously. You know the ending where Steve goes back in time to be with Peggy?
 
SteelPlatedHeart said:
There is something kinda insulting about her lecturing Bruce about how she’s had it harder because “I’m a woman” catacalls when he was literally on the run from the military for a large part of his life and canonically was so depressed at one point he put a gun in his mouth only for the Hulk to stop it from killing him, among other things.

But sure, random guy on the street sexualizing you is so much worse.

Also, the lady who wrote this is the same woman who wrote a good chunck of Season 3’s Rick & Morty. Including “Pickle Rick”.
Click to expand...
As well as Dana Schwartz who is a twitter celebrity who made some dumb tweets about like men or something or trying to act moral superior despite working for Disney the antisemitic nazi company
 
SteelPlatedHeart said:
Oh Jesus fucking Christ….

“All men’s friendship is really just them being super duper gay for each other! …but only if they’re attractive.”

I hate social media, I really do.
Click to expand...
Screenshot_20220819-160237_Twitter.jpg
Why is this always the rhetoric?
Because it's (kinda) true.
I lurked in online fandoms since the Harry Potter days, and I know enough to spot a bunch of yaoi fangirls in the wild. They will pair just about any two guys together. If they're as attractive as Chris Evans and Sebastian Stan, it was practically inevitable.
And yes, it's irritating AF. At least back in the 2000s people were honest about why they wanted to pair all the male characters together. Now they just hide behind SJW representation rhetortic and act like it's more than what it really is.
 
S@credC said:
View attachment 3622232
Why is this always the rhetoric?
Because it's (kinda) true.
I lurked in online fandoms since the Harry Potter days, and I know enough to spot a bunch of yaoi fangirls in the wild. They will pair just about any two guys together. If they're as attractive as Chris Evans and Sebastian Stan, it was practically inevitable.
And yes, it's irritating AF. At least back in the 2000s people were honest about why they wanted to pair all the male characters together. Now they just hide behind SJW representation rhetortic and act like it's more than what it really is.
Click to expand...
You know now that I think about it. There was a time when people online admitted that they wanted two hot guys to fuck because it was their fetish. Now they act like it's a bigger reason.

Funny to think Wokness made people less open about their fetishes
 
Oats12345 said:
Funny to think Wokness made people less open about their fetishes
Click to expand...
Which given how many subforums Kiwifarms haves on some of those fetishists. Ignorance is indeed bliss when some of those people stay in the closet. On the other hand Wokeness is harming society by preventing some of other of those people from alerting everyone of their existence and you need to get away from them at least if the shoot, shovel shutup routine isn't an option for reasons.
 
S@credC said:
Ohhh, you haven't seen the what the Stucky fans have been saying, have you?
Yeah, they think Fiege or whoever in charge of this mess is trying to straight-wash Steve.
Click to expand...

SteelPlatedHeart said:
Oh Jesus fucking Christ….

“All men’s friendship is really just them being super duper gay for each other! …but only if they’re attractive.”

I hate social media, I really do.
Click to expand...
Yaoifags are so sexless & starved of touch that these people will take things like camaraderie & brotherhood into faggotry. What's funny is, Anthony Mackie actually talked about this once.
1658951316439428.png
It's actually sad I have to rely on pajeet kinos to still have that vibe.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom