Marvel Cinematic Universe

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
The going theory is that they don't want to tread on Mr.Fantastic's toes when the F4 enter the MCU. Not sure I buy that considering Iron Man and War Machine co-existed just fine (among other examples). The crystalline effect does make for a more striking image at least.
Not the same scenario, War Machine isn’t stepping on Iron Man’s toes any more than Bucky is stepping on Steve’s by being a super soldier of roughly equal power level.

It’s probably just because they didn’t have the budget for realistic stretching effects. Green Lantern-style power constructs are much easier to make without looking “off”. And also because there are few people out there who are such die-hard Ms Marvel super fans that they would ditch the show for it. Essentially it’s an admission that despite all their bluster, they know that Ms Marvel is a Z-list hero that only gets attention for being a paki.
 
Not the same scenario, War Machine isn’t stepping on Iron Man’s toes any more than Bucky is stepping on Steve’s by being a super soldier of roughly equal power level.
It's a little different when Iron Man and Captain America come *first*
 
Forgive my annoying optimism, but I'll wait and see what happens before making any firm decisions on its quality. Not that I don't agree with your cautious attitude re: Disney. Better to keep them at arm's length most of the time.
I admit to my cautious attitude towards the rodent. But in the specific case of DD, Charlie Cox himself talked about how a PG-13 Daredevil might work (it's around March). After Kingpin, I can't trust them with this one bit.
 
I admit to my cautious attitude towards the rodent. But in the specific case of DD, Charlie Cox himself talked about how a PG-13 Daredevil might work (it's around March). After Kingpin, I can't trust them with this one bit.
Other than not being as violent I didn't see much of a difference in Kingpin's portrayal in Hawkeye vs DD Netflix. Granted, I thought it was too soon to introduce him anyway. Should've left it for Echo and kept it as a tease otherwise.
 
So there's this Variety interview with the She-Hulk series' head writer (the ex-Rick & Morty writer) who says:

When we got into the writers’ room, inevitably things change as you’re developing the show and as you start writing. And one thing that we all realized very slowly was none of us are that adept at writing, you know, rousing trial scenes.

Why would you out yourself and others as totally uncreative brainlets? Also, there are several She-Hulk comics featuring her working legal cases published over the years they could have adapted, so what the fuck?
Why would you admit that
WHY WOULD YOU ADMIT THAT
YOU'RE WRITING A SHOW ABOUT A LAWYER!

Insanely embarassing.
 
Last edited:
So there's this Variety interview with the She-Hulk series' head writer (the ex-Rick & Morty writer) says:



Why would you out yourself and others as totally uncreative brainlets? Also, there are several She-Hulk comics featuring her working legal cases published over the years they could have adapted, so what the fuck?
Why would you admit that
WHY WOULD YOU ADMIT THAT
YOU'RE WRITING A SHOW ABOUT A LAWYER!

Insanely embarassing.
I hope this show flops.
 
So there's this Variety interview with the She-Hulk series' head writer (the ex-Rick & Morty writer) says:



Why would you out yourself and others as totally uncreative brainlets? Also, there are several She-Hulk comics featuring her working legal cases published over the years they could have adapted, so what the fuck?
Why would you admit that
WHY WOULD YOU ADMIT THAT
YOU'RE WRITING A SHOW ABOUT A LAWYER!

Insanely embarassing.
They don't even bother to watch
y'know, any crime drama like Law and Order?
or even Better Call Saul for inspiration?
Are they fucking lazy?
 
Phoenix Wright...
Don't give Hollywood ideas, they might make a live action out of it.

W6WuuPaN_400x400.jpg
 
I admit to my cautious attitude towards the rodent. But in the specific case of DD, Charlie Cox himself talked about how a PG-13 Daredevil might work (it's around March). After Kingpin, I can't trust them with this one bit.
Makes sense in theory. Unfortunately, Disney is anathema to exploring darkness these days.
 
The PR for this show has been really bizarre and feels like self-sabotage at times. That said, I'm not sure if it's true that they never looked at law-based shows once it was clear that court scenes were mandatory. That would be pretty suicidal.
 
The PR for this show has been really bizarre and feels like self-sabotage at times. That said, I'm not sure if it's true that they never looked at law-based shows once it was clear that court scenes were mandatory. That would be pretty suicidal.

It is weird, once again another show where the promotion and planted articles are attacking fans who apparently will dislike the show because woman.


She-Hulk is Marvel’s most relatable superhero and she’s not going to take any crap We all know certain types of fans are belligerent and awful. And Marvel’s latest project isn’t going to stand for them.

She-Hulk engages directly with fan culture and contemporary pop cultural dynamics.

There’s a minor character, a colleague to Jen, who is so deluded in his entitlement and self-aggrandisement, he actually believed he was dating a very well-known celebrity instead of a shapeshifter.

His comments about women in the workplace are appalling and you can’t help but feel that’s She-Hulk’s writers, led by creator Jessica Gao, making a very pointed comment about the types of people who exist in the fandom and in the wider world – and who have (to be generous) antiquated views about 50 per cent of the world’s population.

There’s a montage of in-universe public reactions to the revelation of Jen and her alter ego which is distressingly familiar – but also hilarious in how it bitingly captures the real discourse around female superheroes.

She-Hulk makes a convincing argument – not that we still need to be mounting those defences – about the place of women in public spaces, including in superhero movies and TV shows.

And it powerfully comments on female rage through a character that supposedly “hulks out” when they’re angry. There’s a “yes, yes, yes” moment in the first episode that directly tackles what every woman has said and felt at many points in their lives.

This is what makes She-Hulk specific and relatable.


Yet ultimately despite the girl power, toxic fans approach to selling the show. Concludes with

It may still be a little loose and unfocused on a narrative level – it certainly doesn’t seem to be in much of a hurry to establish the season’s story arc – but the character and Maslany’s performance are so appealing, it almost doesn’t matter.

I don't see how with the press and "positive" word we can't assume the show isn't very good and all the positives is the "social" good because apparently women didn't have places in public spaces until this show.

Where they are literally telling people that only terrible people who dislike women won't like the show. Even though they don't like it. They just praise the "social good."
 
So I was wondering why they had to CGI Shulkie's green skin instead of using green body paint. Green body paint's existed for 60 years at least. In fact, in Star Trek, they kept editing out the green skin on the Orion slave girl until they were told she was supposed to be green.

Then, it hit me.


Just about every production uses compositing, so if she did wear green paint, she'd blend into the background and it'd be too difficult to edit her back into the scene. Even if it's an office scene or a court scene, it'd still be green-screen because fuck mundane practical sets.
 
Back
Top Bottom