💼 Careercow Jack Russell Scalfani / Cooking With Jack / Jack on the Go Show / jakatak - YouTube "Celebrity" "Chef", Living Encyclopedia of Gluttony-Induced Maladies, Salmonella Elemental

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

When will Jack drop dead?

  • February-March 2024

    Votes: 6 0.4%
  • April-May 2024

    Votes: 6 0.4%
  • June-July 2024

    Votes: 17 1.1%
  • August-September 2024

    Votes: 34 2.2%
  • October-November 2024

    Votes: 37 2.4%
  • December 2024

    Votes: 44 2.8%
  • Sometime in 2025

    Votes: 258 16.6%
  • Sometime in 2026

    Votes: 252 16.2%
  • Jack lives forever. The Wendigo Must Consoom

    Votes: 904 58.0%

  • Total voters
    1,558
He got sued?? Anyone have more info on this?
I think theyre talking about how he was using that like copper omelette cooker and it popped open while in use, and he made a really dramatic video on it and was harping on how it was super dangerous (I do believe it came out that the company did have to modify the product or release a version with an updated instruction manual on its use, but the thing was, Jack hadnt read the instructions anyway) and the company ended up at least threatening to sue him. He ended up having to retract the video I believe.

I've never been to a Red Robin in my life but how full does Jack expect a boomer-y chain restaurant to be on whatever night this is? Dude eats out every single night it seems so a Tuesday being like this is not at all surprising and isn't the fall of civilization like he thinks it is. No way he tipped more than 10% either.
I was gonna say, he goes to these boomer ass mega chains that frankly were notoriously struggling even before covid, basically only even coasting on holdover inertia and only staying open because of the fact theyre all owned by like billionaire restaurant management groups or whatever--frankly Im surprised they were even around at all.
He can't honestly believe simply removing the bun from a bacon cheeseburger and replacing fried potatoes with fried zucchini is healthy? He simply cannot.
lol Have you not paid attention to like 70% of people who "do keto"? My dad tried it once, not only do a lot of people think that you can have "cheat days/meals" on it, they also think that like replacing breading with crushed up porkrinds on something youre going to bake/fry, that thats healthier because all they do is look at the carbs or sugar.
 
Last edited:
Rate me late but was this ever mentioned on this thread:
https://www.quora.com/profile/Jack-Scalfani
Everyone needs to read this^^^
Nigger, you make BBQ sauce!
Screenshot_2021-03-09-10-00-31-1.png
Wtf are you on about? Who puts condiments on the outside?
Screenshot_2021-03-09-10-01-46-1.png
Lynching worthy.
Screenshot_2021-03-09-10-01-08-1.png
 
profile by sanford is not "sponsoring" jack. he's just a retard who doesn't know what the word means and thinks that him giving them and .store a shoutout in his videos=they're sponsoring me

his dumb ass also STILL thinks that crumbl cookies made his and tammy's cookies and gave them away to another customer. can't wait to see what lie he comes up with to try and hide the fact that he ate at least two of those cookies
 
Some interesting stuff in this lawsuit (direct link to pdf). Amazingly, I have to defend Jack completely on this one, but I am not an attorney.

The lawsuit is an extreme lolsuit and Telebrands is a corporate lolcow. It's almost the cliche example of why anti-SLAPP exists in many states. They essentially just argue that Jack shouldn't have said their product explodes since it doesn't literally burst into a ball of fire. If your instructions are bad and molten hot half-cooked egg fly all over the kitchen, I'd say it explodes, and so would virtually everyone. The closest they get to making a fair point is saying that Jack shouldn't have overlaid a cheesy explosion cartoon gif over their product, although I don't see a big problem with it.

Jack didn't do anything wrong in that video. Arguing with a straight face that it violates the lanham act and represents unfair competition is ridiculous. It's just a cut-and-paste suit that's clearly just calculated to remove a critical video off the internet. They've probably filed dozens if not hundreds of them. It'd be nice if someone countersued when these pop up, but I imagine telebrands is intentionally going after people without the resources to do so.

They did say that Jack's company, GiveMe, is essentially a fake company and indistinguishable from Jack. They're stating something we all know, but it's fun to see someone say it in a legal document.

edit:fixed link
 
I think theyre talking about how he was using that like copper omelette cooker and it popped open while in use, and he made a really dramatic video on it and was harping on how it was super dangerous (I do believe it came out that the company did have to modify the product or release a version with an updated instruction manual on its use, but the thing was, Jack hadnt read the instructions anyway) and the company ended up at least threatening to sue him. He ended up having to retract the video I believe.
Pretty much how it went. I'd suggest going to this post and this post for some reading on it. There is also above your post where the lawsuit info is.
Since Jack copyright claimed the original video off YouTube and you can't have enough backups, here's an archive I got of both.

Red Copper 5 Minute Chef Explodes!!!! [YouTube]



5 Minute Chef (Redo) [YouTube]




Some interesting stuff in this lawsuit (direct link to pdf). Amazingly, I have to defend Jack completely on this one, but I am not an attorney.

The lawsuit is an extreme lolsuit and Telebrands is a corporate lolcow. It's almost the cliche example of why anti-SLAPP exists in many states. They essentially just argue that Jack shouldn't have said their product explodes since it doesn't literally burst into a ball of fire. If your instructions are bad and molten hot half-cooked egg fly all over the kitchen, I'd say it explodes, and so would virtually everyone. The closest they get to making a fair point is saying that Jack shouldn't have overlaid a cheesy explosion cartoon gif over their product, although I don't see a big problem with it.

Jack didn't do anything wrong in that video. Arguing with a straight face that it violates the lanham act and represents unfair competition is ridiculous. It's just a cut-and-paste suit that's clearly just calculated to remove a critical video off the internet. They've probably filed dozens if not hundreds of them. It'd be nice if someone countersued when these pop up, but I imagine telebrands is intentionally going after people without the resources to do so.

They did say that Jack's company, GiveMe, is essentially a fake company and indistinguishable from Jack. They're stating something we all know, but it's fun to see someone say it in a legal document.

edit:fixed link
I was in the process of pulling the lawsuit and backing that up as image files as you posted that. Here's the docket in image form.
gov.uscourts.njd.364019.1.0-01.jpg
gov.uscourts.njd.364019.1.0-02.jpg
gov.uscourts.njd.364019.1.0-03.jpg
gov.uscourts.njd.364019.1.0-04.jpg
gov.uscourts.njd.364019.1.0-05.jpg
gov.uscourts.njd.364019.1.0-06.jpg
gov.uscourts.njd.364019.1.0-07.jpg
gov.uscourts.njd.364019.1.0-08.jpg

gov.uscourts.njd.364019.1.0-09.jpg
gov.uscourts.njd.364019.1.0-10.jpg
gov.uscourts.njd.364019.1.1_2-1.jpg
gov.uscourts.njd.364019.1.1_2-2.jpg
gov.uscourts.njd.364019.1.1_2-3.jpg
gov.uscourts.njd.364019.1.2-1.jpg
gov.uscourts.njd.364019.1.2-2.jpg
gov.uscourts.njd.364019.1.3-1.jpg
gov.uscourts.njd.364019.1.3-2.jpg
gov.uscourts.njd.364019.1.3-3.jpg
gov.uscourts.njd.364019.1.3-4.jpg
gov.uscourts.njd.364019.1.4-1.jpg
gov.uscourts.njd.364019.1.4-2.jpg
gov.uscourts.njd.364019.1.4-3.jpg
 
EIGHT cookies? Jesus fucking christ! There are only four people in that house... even "if" Jack is lying about his diet (of course he is) and "if" he's actually eating some of them (we all know he is) that's still 2 gigantic cookies for each of them, on average.

These are cookies that really should probably just be shared between two people; that's how large they are. Their website calls each cookie a "container" and says they're 5-7 servings each... I mean, come on. That's not fooling anybody.
  • Raspberry Cheesecake: 550 kcal, 75g carbs. 7 "servings."
  • Ultimate Peanut Butter (2x): 510 kcal, 55g carbs. 5 "servings."
  • Milk Chocolate Chip (2x): 550 kcal, 63g carbs. 5.5 "servings."
  • Nutella Mudslide: 640 kcal, 70g carbs. 6 "servings."
  • Macadamia Nut: 560 kcal, 63g carbs. 5.5 "servings."
  • Chilled Sugar: 600 kcal, 82g carbs. 5.5 "servings."
4,470 kcal. Of cookies. Even if it's for four people, that's ridiculous.

The site does say that they also have "mini cookies," but needless to say those aren't the mini cookies.

edit: they actually even sell a cookie cutter that cuts one cookie into 4 pieces so that it can be shared.
For what it's worth, the mini cookies are available only for catering events, so you have to buy a bunch.
 
Since we’re on the topic of Jack’s past accounts, here are some blogs he launched and gave up on:
  1. All That Bugs! “A blog about stupid people, stupid places and stupid things” goes as far back as 2003.
  2. Blog & Cookies, which we’ve discussed previously.
  3. Need Prayer Now, where Jack doxes emailers and occasionally replies to them.
In an entry dated 2008, he indicates that he suffered some health event that paralyzed his body's right side.

paralyzed.png
jack-01.png

jack-02.png

jack-03.png
 
Some interesting stuff in this lawsuit (direct link to pdf). Amazingly, I have to defend Jack completely on this one, but I am not an attorney.

The lawsuit is an extreme lolsuit and Telebrands is a corporate lolcow. It's almost the cliche example of why anti-SLAPP exists in many states. They essentially just argue that Jack shouldn't have said their product explodes since it doesn't literally burst into a ball of fire. If your instructions are bad and molten hot half-cooked egg fly all over the kitchen, I'd say it explodes, and so would virtually everyone. The closest they get to making a fair point is saying that Jack shouldn't have overlaid a cheesy explosion cartoon gif over their product, although I don't see a big problem with it.

Jack didn't do anything wrong in that video. Arguing with a straight face that it violates the lanham act and represents unfair competition is ridiculous. It's just a cut-and-paste suit that's clearly just calculated to remove a critical video off the internet. They've probably filed dozens if not hundreds of them. It'd be nice if someone countersued when these pop up, but I imagine telebrands is intentionally going after people without the resources to do so.

They did say that Jack's company, GiveMe, is essentially a fake company and indistinguishable from Jack. They're stating something we all know, but it's fun to see someone say it in a legal document.

edit:fixed link
yeah, others mentioned how that company (telebrands) has filed hundreds and hundreds of similar ridiculous suits. their issue with jack's video was clearly his use of the word "EXPLODES" in his video title, as well as the fact that jack (of course) failed to read the directions and locked the latch while it was cooking which led to it blowing open

that's why he was pretty much forced to make that hilarious redo video where it looks like someone from telebrands is pointing a gun at him behind the camera and forcing him to read off a script. stupid thing to actually file a lawsuit over but gotta love jack finally getting some punishment for his years of failing to properly follow directions and blaming the product when it doesn't work the way it should
 
5 Minute Chef (Redo) [YouTube]
The settlement between Jack and Telebrands isn't available, but I guess redoing the video and giving the product a good review was part of it. He essentially replaced a very negative review warning people the product was unsafe with a commercial. It's ok to agree to take the video down to just make things easier for you, but don't agree to replace it with something glowingly positive. It's like he signed the first settlement offer they made him. What a fucking dickless cuck.

Just found this on his YouTube channel. TeleBrands likely wouldn't be happy that this is still up and that he violated the terms of his settlement agreement. The video should start at the relevant part.
 
Last edited:
Some interesting stuff in this lawsuit (direct link to pdf). Amazingly, I have to defend Jack completely on this one, but I am not an attorney.

The lawsuit is an extreme lolsuit and Telebrands is a corporate lolcow. It's almost the cliche example of why anti-SLAPP exists in many states. They essentially just argue that Jack shouldn't have said their product explodes since it doesn't literally burst into a ball of fire. If your instructions are bad and molten hot half-cooked egg fly all over the kitchen, I'd say it explodes, and so would virtually everyone. The closest they get to making a fair point is saying that Jack shouldn't have overlaid a cheesy explosion cartoon gif over their product, although I don't see a big problem with it.

Jack didn't do anything wrong in that video. Arguing with a straight face that it violates the lanham act and represents unfair competition is ridiculous. It's just a cut-and-paste suit that's clearly just calculated to remove a critical video off the internet. They've probably filed dozens if not hundreds of them. It'd be nice if someone countersued when these pop up, but I imagine telebrands is intentionally going after people without the resources to do so.

They did say that Jack's company, GiveMe, is essentially a fake company and indistinguishable from Jack. They're stating something we all know, but it's fun to see someone say it in a legal document.

edit:fixed link
Actually he did do something bad because he didn't read the instructions and then instead of going back and seeing if he was wrong he just doubled down on the product being unsafe.

Then when he did a redo of the device, post lolsuit, he couldn't praise it strong enough. Mushbrain was scared of being sued and losing his multi-million dollar sauce company that is going to pay off any day now...
Quora truly highlights Jack’s inner sperg.
It's not just that. He created a "technology" forum on Quora where he's the only member and made 1 post.
 
In an entry dated 2008, he indicates that he suffered some health event that paralyzed his body's right side.
This whole post is pretty remarkable. Jack is the type of patient that doctors and emergency personnel dread -
- Had stroke symptoms. He was pissed that doctors couldn't tell him exactly what the problem was after four hours. Those types of symptoms are hard to diagnose at times. It could take days.
- He wanted to know NOW NOW NOW NOW what the problem was, yet didn't want to take more tests. You can't complain about both.
- He says that if he was admitted for the night, he wouldn't consent to more blood tests. Why did you even go to the hospital?
- He didn't take the medication they told him to take. Why ask for medical help and then decline it? (The pills were for high blood pressure, which Jack says he doesn't have. Someone with Jack's diet who is short and weighs more than 300 pounds almost certainly has chronic high blood pressure. Even if he didn't, your blood pressure can spike during health problems. They're not giving you a pill just for the hell of it and lying about your symptoms. Take the fucking pill.)
- After the hospital visit, he bitches to the health insurance company for weeks over a $100 bill he received. Depending on what tests and scans he received, it's extremely possible that the insurance company spent more than $10 grand on this visit. They spent it because Jack is fat, doesn't take care of himself, and doesn't care about his health. And he has the balls to complain about $100 when the entire visit was his fault. He fights it for months because you have time for silly shit like this when you don't have normal responsibilities like a job or providing for your family. Guess what? He ultimately pays the bill. (It'd be hilarious if he stubbornly refused and wrecked his credit because of a chronically late $100 medical bill though.)
 
I'm glad Jack is warning his audience about the serious issues facing this country.
Oh no! Mushbrain Jack won't get his free chips and salsa!

Tortilla chips aren't keto and depending on what's in the salsa it might not be keto either so what the fuck is he complaining about? Oh right, he's not really on a diet and just pretending to be. Gotcha.
 
ffffv.PNG

Don't worry, Jack. It's not like you care any more than they do.

llllllk.PNG

Considering his recent Crumbl Cookie postings, this really aged well.

He'd really be less hateable if he would just own what he is and run with it- an abject glutton with a food addiction that nothing can compete with. Family? Forget it- if the two strokes haven't resonated enough for him to change his ways so he can spend more time with them, then all is lost. God? Eh, truly following Him would require a departure from his gluttony and deception- Jack would rather use a sharpie for his Bible highlighter so he can ignore all the inconvenient scriptures, thereby creating his own milquetoast idea of God's will to rationalize all the excuses and sinning that's sending him to Hell.

At least JoeysWorldTour understands that he's a meme to fat-fuckery and plays that up to the max. He knows that if he were to be untrue to himself and start posturing about health like Jack, while continuing his unhealthy behavior, he would lose whatever positivity he manages to attract, and hate-watchers would fill the vacuum. Jack doesn't get this- he's unable to see, that while broadcasting one's journey to better health and self-improvement attracts admiration, you have to *truthfully* do the actual work to get the admiration, not play pretend. True to style, the Lazy Man just wants the reward without doing the actual work.
Jack attracts the disgust that he does because, among other things, the lying to people's faces over the course of years that you're "dieting"/making "healthy" choices, when simultaneous CWJ/JOTG postings speak otherwise is just...detestable. Labeling other foods as "poisons"/"the enemy" and discouraging their consumption by others in an attempt to sound intelligent re: nutrition while consuming them yourself doesn't help either. And while I know there are many people out there who are genuinely illiterate on matters related to healthy eating/lifestyle, doing it this wrong for this long goes far beyond being simply misinformed. Yes, the no-carb dieting fad has led many down a misguided path, but most people I see doing this do something to the effect of ordering a quadruple bacon cheeseburger without the bun, NOT digging into a fatty trough of pizza toppings. At this point, Jack is being willfully ignorant- he WANTS to believe that his version of KETOOOOO is healthy when, deep down, there's that little whisper in the back of his head reminding him that he's lying to himself and that what he's eating is a forkful of heart failure. He'll try to ignore it and shove it away, but it always comes back.

TL;DR: Jack is a gluttonous cunt who's hated (in part) because he willfully lies to try and get people to think he's something that he isn't. He wants to be a self-improvement success story that people will be proud of, but instead of earning it, he'd rather lie poorly in the hopes that the gullible will buy it.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom