🎨 Artcow Iconoclast / Jonathan Mack Sweet - The Chris-Chan of Arkansas

[ToroidalBoat]

I still don't really know what eactly happened that made AJM pretty much close itself to the outside. From what I gather, Sweet made that one post to try and "rally the troops" against the Farms, and then the admins decided they didn't want attention from the Farms, so they made outsiders think the forums were closed for awhile, before turning them into their present state.

Here's Sweet Bro's YouTube playlist entitled "Favorites"

I literally said "Eww!" out loud.

Also, like I said earlier, he has an entire folder of favorites on dA with "fart and weiner jokes."

 

[AJMLurker]

So AJM is closed now? I thought it was just restricted access?

Since I revealed more than a month ago that the forum is restricted access, nothing has changed in the activity of the members. They haven't posted at all except for the couple of times they did to tip me off. Sweet's post count hasn't gone up since early June/late May. For a lack of a better word, AJM STUDIOS is closed down. It is not being used as a place for communication anymore.

 

[Bungleboy]

I honestly want Sweet to get a position as a columnist for amagazine just to see him fuck up again.

He's the Rembrandt of fucking up. He's so incompetent that he's made being a fuckup his artform. He could enter a race against a corpse, a geriatric in a wheel chair and a dude running the wrong way and he'd STILL finish last somehow.

 

[Dr. Merkwurdichliebe]

I honestly want Sweet to get a position as a columnist for a magazine just to see him fuck up again.

Forcing Jonathan to get a real job is part of the conservative progressive conspiracy. How could he track and harass seek justice from the people on his enemies list if he had to work? How could he continue to plagiarize carefully craft his homages to other writers if he has to punch a time clock? Who would draw those no-talent ass-clown racist freedom-loving, patriotic cartoons if Jon were chained to a desk (or, more likely, to a mop bucket at a highway rest stop)?

No one, that's who, you damned liberal!

Plus, who's gonna hire him? Maybe Stormfront will resume publication of Schlachthaus und Garten. Maybe the Klan will revive its much-missed biweekly, Southern Living Horror. Barring those unlikely events, The Onion is probably his only chance to obtain a wide readership. I have to admit that I can see his wickedly barbed -- and totally unintentional -- lampoons of the Republican Party and right-wing politics becoming quite a hit.

 

[Holdek]

Also, some of us aren't American.
I'm from Europe. Which means that by default I'm so far left it isn't even funny to the likes of Sweets.
Also, not debating about shit that's basically no-brainers to everyone. (Like, smoking ban? Of course we're banning public smoking in Europe. That was the one thing Hitler did right, along with his love of dogs. /evultroll)

Heh, well, to be fair smoking bans in Europe came a lot later than ones in America.

 

[Big Nasty]

Here's Sweet Bro's YouTube playlist entitled "Favorites"

https://archive.is/bEPLW

His interest in farting is totally not sexual, guys

"Female farting - Battle shits"

 

[Bungleboy]

You know who Sweet reminds me of?

Francis E. Dec.

They're both guys who completely lost their fucking minds after being kicked out of a position of responsiblity.

They're both racist in nonsensical ways

They're both obsessed with a bizarre, sweeping conspiracy to ruin them

What I'm saying is that if Sweet doesn't get some form of counseling or psych help he's going to start going on about the worldwide gangster computer progressives

 

[DrChristianTroy]

A sprinkling of Mixed Sweets!

View attachment 44793

Here's our hero commenting on some Robin Hood (Ur-furry version) fanart. He seems to think that the artist's work is reminiscent of a minstrel show, and links to a TVTrope (of course), but the latter section of his comment suggests he views this minstrelry as a good think - probably because he is an inveterate racist.

1- Well that was pretty racist.
2- I do wonder how he concluded that modernizing Disney= turning it into Menace 2 Society.
3- Does he realize James Brown doesn't work with his hood/ebonics stereotype?
4- Loved Straight Outta Compton but it now being the go to for wack ass people thinking of a "hood" movie saddens me.

 

[Ruin]

1- Well that was pretty racist.
2- I do wonder how he concluded that modernizing Disney= turning it into Menace 2 Society.
3- Does he realize James Brown doesn't work with his hood/ebonics stereotype?
4- Loved Straight Outta Compton but it now being the go to for wack ass people thinking of a "hood" movie saddens me.

Sweets probably thinks Don't Be a Menace to South Central is a realistic and gritty portrayal of life in the hood.

 

[NobleGreyHorse]

"Don't Be a Menace II South Central While Drinking Your Juice in the Hood." It satirized a whole slew of movies that came out about the same time and is probably Sweet's guide to the black American experience.

 

[kinetic]

Finally made it through this whole thread. There's something about Jon that is so horribly compelling. It might be the fact that he is normal-IQ (unlike Chris and Len) but so staggeringly bereft of any social knowledge or theory of mind.

I'm still mulling over the fact that that Jon's former advisor sys that Jon "admitted" to plagiarizing the SNL sketch, yet Jon swears up and down that such a sketch does not exist (going so far as to suggest that some Kiwis hired Michael Palin, Lorne Michaels, and John Cleese to fake it). I don't see much reason to doubt the advisor's account, though it is unfortunate that we can't contact this person and find out more about what went down. This contradiction suggests two possibilities:

1) Jon genuinely did not plagiarize, but when confronted by the newspaper staff he panicked and admitted to it, perhaps thinking that it would make it blow over sooner.
2) Jon did plagiarize and he's lying about everything.

The first theory sounds pretty plausible — I have no doubt that Jon would melt down when faced with authority figures carefully scrutinizing both him and his work. It would explain why we've never heard a detailed account of his actual dismissal from the paper: if there was a way to use that story to portray himself as a victim, he would. But it'd be difficult to do so if, in a moment of panic, he confessed to the very ethical breach for which he was being punished.

What really kills me about Jon is his total lack of curiosity about the world around him. He is aware, in a way that Chris and Len aren't, of the breadth and depth of his ignorance, but as far as I can tell he has never sat down and taught himself anything. When someone suggested he use Dropbox for managing his files, he angrily retorted that he didn't know how to use it - but dropbox.com has a whole host of instructions on how to use their product. They're right there on the front page. He is perfectly capable of learning it, and it would have taken less than five minutes out of his entirely-empty day to do so, but he chose not to. He seems dead set on only acquiring knowledge that others are willing to spoon-feed him. His world is so tiny. It'd be heartbreaking, if he wasn't so racist, sexist, and belligerent.

 

[DrJonesHat]

Finally made it through this whole thread. There's something about Jon that is so horribly compelling. It might be the fact that he is normal-IQ (unlike Chris and Len) but so staggeringly bereft of any social knowledge or theory of mind.

I'm still mulling over the fact that that Jon's former advisor sys that Jon "admitted" to plagiarizing the SNL sketch, yet Jon swears up and down that such a sketch does not exist (going so far as to suggest that some Kiwis hired Michael Palin, Lorne Michaels, and John Cleese to fake it). I don't see much reason to doubt the advisor's account, though it is unfortunate that we can't contact this person and find out more about what went down. This contradiction suggests two possibilities:

1) Jon genuinely did not plagiarize, but when confronted by the newspaper staff he panicked and admitted to it, perhaps thinking that it would make it blow over sooner.
2) Jon did plagiarize and he's lying about everything.

The first theory sounds pretty plausible — I have no doubt that Jon would melt down when faced with authority figures carefully scrutinizing both him and his work. It would explain why we've never heard a detailed account of his actual dismissal from the paper: if there was a way to use that story to portray himself as a victim, he would. But it'd be difficult to do so if, in a moment of panic, he confessed to the very ethical breach for which he was being punished.

What really kills me about Jon is his total lack of curiosity about the world around him. He is aware, in a way that Chris and Len aren't, of the breadth and depth of his ignorance, but as far as I can tell he has never sat down and taught himself anything. When someone suggested he use Dropbox for managing his files, he angrily retorted that he didn't know how to use it - but dropbox.com has a whole host of instructions on how to use their product. They're right there on the front page. He is perfectly capable of learning it, and it would have taken less than five minutes out of his entirely-empty day to do so, but he chose not to. He seems dead set on only acquiring knowledge that others are willing to spoon-feed him. His world is so tiny. It'd be heartbreaking, if he wasn't so racist, sexist, and belligerent.

He ripped off the idea from the sketch. If he'd just said something like "Inspired by the SNL sketch" he'd probably be fine. Yes his article was racist, but if he'd credited the original source, he would would have been fine. His article was different enough from the original that crediting the inspiration would have been sufficient, in my opinion.

 

[Le Bateleur]

I hadn't really noticed this passage from the most recent BelchBlog:

I'm generally a live-and-let-live type. But there are some people, some annoying, petty little people, who mistake this easygoing attitude for weakness and start thinking they can come in, start making my decisions for me, bury me under rules, pick my life apart, and start taking my stuff from me. Now when they start doing that, I get angry and start talking about destroying them. Please note there is a world of difference between "destroy" and "kill". With enough money and resources at my disposal I could tear apart someone's life and take away everything they love without harming a hair of their head. I want people to know this so no one ever makes the mistake of thinking they can hurt me with impunity ever again.

Let's set aside the time that Sweet Bro went to jail for attempted assault against his own brother, or the occasion he threatened to douse us in petrol and set us on fire, or when he made terroristic threats against staff from ASU. Here we have a convicted criminal with possible outstanding warrants, openly declaring that - if he had money and resources - he would use them to "destroy" other peoples' lives. Isn't it a good thing that nobody buys his terrible, racist books and comics? And isn't it a service to society to let people know what sort of a man he really is?

Null really should see if he can get a tax deduction for our server costs

 

[Dr. Merkwurdichliebe]

I hadn't really noticed this passage from the most recent BelchBlog:

Jonathan Mack Sweet said:
I'm generally a live-and-let-live type. But there are some people, some annoying, petty little people, who mistake this easygoing attitude for weakness and start thinking they can come in, start making my decisions for me, bury me under rules, pick my life apart, and start taking my stuff from me. Now when they start doing that, I get angry and start talking about destroying them. Please note there is a world of difference between "destroy" and "kill". With enough money and resources at my disposal I could tear apart someone's life and take away everything they love without harming a hair of their head. I want people to know this so no one ever makes the mistake of thinking they can hurt me with impunity ever again.

Let's set aside the time that Sweet Bro went to jail for attempted assault against his own brother, or the occasion he threatened to douse us in petrol and set us on fire, or when he made terroristic threats against staff from ASU. Here we have a convicted criminal with possible outstanding warrants, openly declaring that - if he had money and resources - he would use them to "destroy" other peoples' lives. Isn't it a good thing that nobody buys his terrible, racist books and comics? And isn't it a service to society to let people know what sort of a man he really is?

Null really should see if he can get a tax deduction for our server costs

Yeah, he's made that "I'm a live-and-let-live type" claim before. He frequently denies ever threatening to harm anyone, apparently forgetting the posts about hiding an ax under his bed with the intention of chopping his brother into either cutlets or kibble, depending on which message you read. And, of course, we're just being overly literal when we cite his plans to incinerate us. He also doesn't regard using his comics to display the the graphic and brutal murders of the people on his enemies list as threatening. In this, he is mistaken.

I also really like this statement from the latest chapter of his manifesto:

Jonathan Mack Sweet said:
Whether it means actually returning to ASU or renting some space to erect my own little version of it on the outside for my friends and followers, I will find a way to live my life the way I see fit.

As usual, he fails to address the obvious questions: What friends? What followers? How can he fail to notice that these groups simply do not exist? Jonathan's compound, with its underground bunkers and tunnels, is going to be a very lonely place.

 

[Big Nasty]

"Don't Be a Menace II South Central While Drinking Your Juice in the Hood." It satirized a whole slew of movies that came out about the same time and is probably Sweet's guide to the black American experience.

To Jon, black peoples' primary purpose in life is to relentlessly mocked.

 

[The I Scream Man]

To Jon, black peoples' primary purpose in life is to relentlessly mocked.

Funny, I thought that was his.

 

[AJMLurker]

Funny, I thought that was his.

Seeing Sweetness in action could get a white supremacist to reconsider their stance.

"Female farting - Battle shits"

And just think, this guy probably shits himself purposely on the regular and gets off to it. I could see Sweet admitting this in his next blog entry.

 

[He Sets Me On Fire]

Seeing Sweetness in action could get a white supremacist to reconsider their stance.


And just think, this guy probably shits himself purposely on the regular and gets off to it. I could see Sweet admitting this in his next blog entry.

Ah, yeah, about that: After getting a load of his yt faves, I think I may finally have found out what the Sneeze Game is about. If I'm wrong, good. But if I'm right ... eugh!!!

 

[The Mountain]

With enough money and resources at my disposal I could tear apart someone's life and take away everything they love without harming a hair of their head.

Seeing as money requires a job and resources, while a broad term, tends to require other people, and we all know Icky's employment history and how many friends he has (zero), I'm not exactly scared. What he's saying here is essentially is that he's impotent, has always been impotent, and will continue to be impotent until the day he dies a sad, impotent mess.

 

[ToroidalBoat]

Some people of interest seem to think they can get people in trouble, or in Sweetish, "destroy their lives," just for making fun of them on the internet. If Sweet wants to do that, then I guess Sweet doesn't have much respect for the freedom of speech of others... like he thinks of progressives - "live and let live" my ass. And even if Sweet wanted to destroy the lives of Kiwis, how could he track anyone down? This is a guy who couldn't figure out a printer/copier.

Also, I see his life plans have remained unchanged. I wonder if he still wants to set up that half-past 1997 commune in that abandoned building resembling barracks near ASU?