Science How Artificial Intelligence Is Fueling Incel Communities

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Link (Archive)

How Artificial Intelligence Is Fueling Incel Communities​

In late January 2024, X was flooded with graphic, deepfaked images of Taylor Swift. While celebrities have long been the victims of photo leaks and cyber-attacks, this time it was different because these were generated using artificial intelligence.

The images were quickly reported by the “Shake It Off” singer’s fanbase and taken down after being live on the poster’s profile for less than a day. However, it was enough time for them to go viral despite the platform having policies against non-consensual nudity. A report from disinformation research firm Graphika later found that the images had been created on 4chan, where users encouraged each other to generate sexually charged deepfakes in an attempt to skirt content policies surrounding nudity using famous female celebrities.

Unfortunately, Swift’s experience isn’t a one-off. Marvel actress Xochitl Gomez, who is only 17 years old at the time of reporting, said on the podcast The Squeeze that she struggled to get deepfakes of her taken down from X and shared the mental impact that had on her. Gomez and Swift are just two of the countless women who’ve recently become victims to deepfakes depicting them in sexual ways.

“People have always used media to try and defame people, that hasn’t changed. What’s changed is how accessible it’s now gotten,” Siwei Lyu, professor of Computer Science at the University of Buffalo, told The Daily Beast.

Late last year, AI image generation platform CivitAI became popular for its “Bounties” feature, which encouraged users to create deepfakes in exchange for virtual rewards. Almost all the bounties created were of women, according to reporting from 404 Media. Some included women who weren’t celebrities or public figures either, but rather private citizens.

Experts expect it to only get worse—especially as more and more incel communities online use these technologies. Henry Ajder, an AI and deepfake adviser and expert, told The Daily Beast that this has been a growing problem for years now and CivitAI is an example of a platform heavily linked to that kind of evolution.

He said that CivitAI has become a “hotbed for not just artistically created content, but also content that’s erotic. It’s a specific place to find specific knowledge and people have started using it for pornographic content.”

Ajder also describes the technology on the platform as “agnostic or dual use,” saying once it’s there it can be used in any way, “while, others are explicitly designed for creating pornographic content without consent.” The tools have only gotten popular within incel culture via platforms like Reddit and 4chan.

“There’s such a low threshold,” Hera Husain, founder of Chayn, a nonprofit supporting victims of gender-based violence and trauma, told The Daily Beast. “It’s an easy-to-access method which allows people to fulfill the darkest fantasies they may have. [...]They may feel it is victimless, but it has huge consequences for those people.”

It’s not just deepfakes that have penetrated incel culture either. There’s even research that shows that AI girlfriends will be making incels even more dangerous. With this tech allowing them to form and control their perceptions of a so-called “ideal woman,” there’s a danger that they may push those perceptions on real women. When they find themselves unable to do so or when a woman seems unattainable like in the case of Swift or Gomez, incels begin deepfake campaigns. At least, then, incels can make these women do what they like.

“Governments are simply trying to play catch-up; the technology has gone faster than their ability to regulate,” Belinda Barnet, senior lecturer in media at Swinburne University, told The Daily Beast.

This gets even more dangerous as we look at global contexts. Patriarchal norms in different nations often further endanger women who become victims to such campaigns. In many more conservative countries, even a deepfake of a woman can be enough for her family to ostracize her or, in extreme cases, use violence against her. For example, in late 2023, an 18-year-old was killed by her father over an image of her with a man which police suspect was doctored.

It doesn’t matter that the image is fake. The fact that their image is associated with such a depiction is enough for society to ostracize them. “It’s not so much about people believing the images are real as it is about pure spite. It’s a different kind of trauma to revenge porn,” Ajder explained.

With AI generation becoming more accessible, this also makes it an easier barrier to entry for global incels who may have struggled with language barriers. In South Asia, where Husain focuses much of her work, it also becomes harder to counter incel radicalization, both socially and on a policy level. “They don’t have as strong a counter to the radicalization they’re seeing in the incel community,” she explained.

Lyu says that policies regarding free speech and tech access across the world vary so there can be different impacts. “In the U.S., using AI generation tools to create content... is freedom of speech—but people can take advantage of that as well. Drawing that line becomes very hard. Whereas in China, there’s very strong limitations on the use of this technology, so that is possible but prevents positive uses of the same line of technology.”

Incel culture existed long before AI generation tools became popular. Now that they’re mainstream, these communities will be quick to adopt them to further cause harm and trauma. The issue is sure to get worse before it gets better.

“In terms of incel culture, this is another weapon in their twisted arsenal to abuse women, perpetuate stereotypes, and further make visceral the twisted ideas they have about women,” Ajder said.
 
The deepfake thing has to be one of the dumbest anti-ai copes of them all. Fake nude pictures of celebrities showing up when you search their names have been a thing almost as long as photoshop and search engines have existed and the ai versions of them are just as shitty and fake looking as the photoshop ones.
 
Yeah, plus it has elmo and enough fingers for innsmouth.

On the other hand, if it gets so good that your ex can do that deepfake, tattoos will become useful again.

Ai won't know I have Sonichu bent over with his ass having the belly button in the right place!:sonichu:
 
It’s pretty grim what happened to those girls. Having porn of you deepfaked is probably a very unpleasant thing to happen.
I imagine it can be legally dealt with under existing threat/stalking type laws or perhaps even defamation but that doesn’t fix the damage.
It’s clear that generative picture type AI is causing tptb to seethe. Tptb do not give one single solitary shit aboit some poor pleb getting her life ruined though do they? Nor do they care about ‘incels’ in the way they say
The points of the article are;
1. AI that makes pictures to prompts is a threat to those in power
2. Young disaffected men are a threat to power.
AI can be used to make visual propaganda at high speed - /pol/ had a really good set of threads a while back using that awful Alegria ‘art’ style that were genuinely subversive. Now anyone can make a striking visual image, it’s like memes on steroids. That’s the threat, losing control of propaganda. The other threat is a critical mass of young men who have no stake in the future and will happily burn it all down for laughs.
 
I imagine it can be legally dealt with under existing threat/stalking type laws or perhaps even defamation but that doesn’t fix the damage.
I see it as twofold. There’s the personal responsibility angle where one doesn’t put pictures of themselves on this Internet. If the deepfake was sourced from these pictures she herself posted, she’s shit out of luck and should be laughed out court. The other side is creepshots taken by other people, in which case I agree with the defamation and stalking arguments. I’m tired of courts trying to protect stupid, irresponsible people from themselves as if the option to choose privacy doesn’t exist.
 
I see it as twofold. There’s the personal responsibility angle where one doesn’t put pictures of themselves on this Internet. If the deepfake was sourced from these pictures she herself posted, she’s shit out of luck and should be laughed out court. The other side is creepshots taken by other people, in which case I agree with the defamation and stalking arguments. I’m tired of courts trying to protect stupid, irresponsible people from themselves as if the option to choose privacy doesn’t exist.
Okay, I see this line of argument, but as ever, there's a but. What if it's a face shot, though? One of those work profile shots, that compulsory corporate bullshit that's so popular? (One or more, I should say. That crap is horrifyingly popular now, as if I should give a royal fuck what my dentist should look like as opposed to their professional competence.)

That's the sort of "in the course of business" normal public exposure that I don't think should negate an enforceable right to privacy. If your estate agent/realtor has their headshot on the online profiles of houses in their portfolio, it seems fucking nuts that you should be legally A-OK to deepfake his head onto some gay painal clip on the basis he 'exposed himself to the internet'. (You can make a free speech argument, of course, and all that, I mean specifically on the argument that he had a right to privacy which is no longer enforceable because the poor dude's face is on a damn advertising board somewhere.)

I think there's probably a 'normal', business-related, level of public profile on the internet that is compatible with our existing social (and legal?) norms around privacy. We accept regarding stalking, to pick up your example above, that if you go get a McFlurry and are served by 'Sarah', you don't acquire a right to social interaction with Sarah that she doesn't want, just because in the context of her job, she was required by her employer to speak pleasantly to you and was required to wear a badge that disclosed her name. Sarah doesn't owe you shit just because she works a customer-facing job, once she's off the clock. I think you could probably get a similar level of public consensus that the same sort of "in the course of employment" (if it's normie employment) internet footprint doesn't blow off a general right to privacy.

I don't know. I feel a genuine deep unease at the idea that we lose all rights to protect our image and reputation just by wearing our faces in the course of our normal everyday lives.

I do think posting your own nudes on the internet is beyond retarded in any circumstance, though, and it definitely could (and in some jurisdictions, at least, currently does) weaken the extent to which you can assert a right to privacy. Tbh I do personally believe that having nudes exist of you in any form, regardless of how much you think you trust the intended recipient, is playing with fire in a dry forest. Information irresistibly tends towards dissemination.
 
Late last year, AI image generation platform CivitAI became popular for its “Bounties” feature, which encouraged users to create deepfakes in exchange for virtual rewards. Almost all the bounties created were of women, according to reporting from 404 Media. Some included women who weren’t celebrities or public figures either, but rather private citizens.
So is it the same as KF's kill count? I just use CivitAI to get models and Loras and don't interact with most of the site. But I wouldn't trust a word from a journo about a site's features or intentions.
 
Nothing. The powers that be want to ban/gimp AI because it threatens their power so they're having their buttbuddies in the media write propaganda trying to tie AI in with the most reviled and disliked demographic.
Wouldn't it make more sense for normies to want AI limited since it threatens to take away jobs? 'Learn to code' only can go so far nowadays.
 
Most of these deepfake sites are run by sketchy tech firms in Asian and Eastern European countries.

Stable diffusion isn't hard to set up locally with ComfyUI. You really don't need some sketchy website which is a big part of the problem, the cat's way out of the bag for trying to find some "solution".
Lol people were creating fake naked pictures of people before the internet, this isn’t an AI thing.
This, it's a pretty retarded mindset to act as if photoshop + effort can't do the same shit these programs do, and as if this is an entirely new problem.

If anything the proliferation of this technology will help retards who do send nudes and have them leaked as it'll be more believable that all nudes are faked the more common the usage of it becomes.
 
What do deepfakes have to do with being an incel?
"ChatGPT, write me an article using current buzzwords that scare women."
Wouldn't it make more sense for normies to want AI limited since it threatens to take away jobs? 'Learn to code' only can go so far nowadays.
Normies are coming to understand that complex Markov chain decision tree algorithms are here, they're useful, and that either the masses can have them or they can be monopolized, censored and weaponized by TPTB.
 
Yeah I think this will be mostly used by pornstars to say :
Oh gosh, it was all fake! I didn't deepthroat five cocks that was ai! Here, this is a picture of me fucking with Albert Einstein! See its all fake!
 
Back
Top Bottom