- Joined
- Jul 11, 2025
Except its not. Its not accurate or true. And youre coping and seething because people can watch fifteen minutes of a four hour video, observe a lot of bullshit presented inaccurately and framed incorrectly, and justifiably tune out.But the content in the video is accurate and presented in an accurate way. It’s just.. true. I don’t know what else to say. He lines it all out perfectly.
There may have been true things said in parts I didnt watch! He may have made great points I didnt see! But he is not entitled to my viewership of the entire video when I observed a lot of bullshit in the sections I care about (how the copyright lawsuits are discussed, which I post at length about in the relevant thread here on the Farms). When someone is bullshitting you on topics you know a lot about, you dont trust them on the things you know less about.
Edit to Add:
Like, yesterday we literally observed someone watch the Kilo video and be actively misinformed on the copyright case in-real-time. Pretending Kilos video is good on this topic is just outrageous.
this kinda destroys his entire copyright case against denims and frogan and damages his case against Noah (ignore the annoying jew in the corner
So if you watch a few seconds after he explicitly states that wholesale reuploading of his content isn't protected, just clipping channels. And either way, the lawsuit hinges much more on frogan/denims statements and actions, not Ethan's.
How? The thumbnail says the podcast, not his channel. This sounds out of context, so i searched this video (a randomass video with 263 views) to see the whole thing and Ethan says right after that this that he's only talking about channels uploading clips of his podcast, if you steal entire vods then he will not allow it.
Besides, this was years ago and if ethan said he changed his mind about it any point then it's null and void. Regardless, the content nuke was on h3h3 channel which isn't the podcast so it wouldn't count anyway.
If the video person didn't post the whole clip then he took it maliciously out of context. Ethan saying that clearly did not save kaceytron.
Ethan is a jew with a actual copyright case experiences and who planned this from the start, i'll take a polite guess and say he is a bit smarter than people using redditor lawyer logic.
I'm so frustrated by Kilo regurgitating misleading Snarker talking points and continuing to confuse the issue. And the implied license topic is something I HAVE DISCUSSED on Kiwifarms as Denims's BEST argument in August of last year! But presenting it as anything other than a remote likelihood of success is retarded.
I mean sure, its generally the cheapest/fastest, etc. but not when it's not such a clear case of infringement (at least accepting the facts as pleaded, I think her only remotely reasonable defense on direct infringement is something related to implied license/consent from prior statements by Ethan).
Your boy's video was misleading. I don't have to watch more than enough to see it is bullshit. And you are an idiot if you think anything else is the case
Last edited: