If this is actually true, then it really does prove all his talking points are just regurgitated shit spewed by all his other retard cronies. How the hell is he forming all of his opinions if he’s never actually read a history book?
You see this phenomena all the time. With people like Hasan and people with an overreliance on "experts" (i.e. scientists, historians, reviewers, and so on) they think they can skip the effort of actually engaging/consuming something and rely on the interpretation of a 3rd party to give them an opinion to parrot. You know that thing people warn about with regards to AI/LLMs, where using them to essentially think for you will eventually degrade your own ability to think? Well that's an actual think that's happened to people like Hasan and has been going on for much longer than ChatGPT has been around. If you've ever been a fan of something, then watch someone regurgitate an opinion/viewpoint of that something which indicates they haven't actually engaged with the content they're talking about, you'll soon realise how common it is. It's just egregious with the likes of Hasan because he's regurgitating shit he's
supposed to be clued in on. It's like when I see a historian define Fascism as "vibes" (Umberto Eco) because it gives away that they're not actually immersed in their field. If Hasan actually was a Communist/Socialist he'd live humbler than he does, and the fact he doesn't gives away the fact he's a grifter.
I'm no Communist, but I've read Marx's manifesto and a handful of his essays, and some associated French writers who inspired him. As much a freeloading Mooch Marx was IRL, he did legit live like a bum despite having rich industrialist parents and Engels patronising him. From reading his shit, he considered the hyper wealthy bourgeois as being prone to degeneracy and hedonism and only considered the chronically unemployed and otherwise worthless dregs of society as being equal to them in terms of fickleness and capability of evil. It is genuinely bizarre reading Marx expelling vaguely based platitudes (often immediately undercut by equally cringe rejoinders) but then see the calibre of people who claim to be his disciples in the present. Socialism/Communism isn't "when no house", as the Hasan fans put it, it's a rebuke by those who provide some actual value/worth to society that is then unjustly taken advantage of by those at the dead bottom or those at the dead top. Hasan exists both at the bottom and top simultaneously. He adds
nothing of value to society through his labour (or lack thereof), but also extracts value off of the labour of others (react content, donations, etcetera) and profits from it.
Basically, under Marxism, Hasan's very existence is anathema. He would be considered,
at best, disposable. In most other scenarios, especially in the likes of the Soviet Union or China or the dime-a-dozen African revolutions, he'd be emblematic of capitalism's worst excesses and they'd make a spectacle out of depriving him of everything if not outright kill him.
If you work any job where labour sees you paid a wage, you're already, baseline, more of a communist/socialist intrinsically through your very existence than Hasan is ever capable of being at this point in time. If you've ever watched an anime, not even One Piece, you're more a fan of One Piece than Hasan.