Clinton now wants a recount - after ridiculing Trump for undermining the democratic process should he have done the same.

  • Thread starter Thread starter RI 360
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Clinton Joining Recount Gets Sore Loser Jibe From Team Trump

Hillary Clinton’s campaign lawyer announced plans to participate in vote recounts of Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Michigan if they take place, drawing a sharp response from Donald Trump’s team that the Democrat is being a “sore loser.”

If Green Party candidate Jill Stein initiates recounts in those states as she intends, the Clinton campaign “will participate in order to ensure the process proceeds in a manner that is fair to all sides,” lawyer Marc Elias said Saturday in a post on the blogging website Medium.com. He added that he doesn’t expect the action to overturn Donald Trump’s election as president.

The move prompted a rejoinder from Trump campaign manager Kellyanne Conway, now a senior adviser to the president-elect.


“What a pack of sore losers,” Conway said in a statement to Bloomberg. “After asking Mr. Trump and his team a million times on the trail, ‘Will HE accept the election results?’ it turns out Team Hillary and their new BFF Jill Stein can’t accept reality.”

“Rather than adhere to the tradition of graciously conceding and wishing the winner well, they’ve opted to waste millions of dollars and dismiss the democratic process. The people have spoken. Time to listen up. #YesYourPresident,” Conway said.

Stein says on her website that she’s raised more than $5.7 million for her recount effort so far, with a $7 million goal. The funds raised so far will cover costs in Wisconsin and Pennsylvania.
No ‘Actionable’ Evidence
The Democrat’s campaign didn’t plan to initiate the recounts on its own because it hasn’t found “any actionable evidence of hacking or outside attempts to alter the voting technology,” Elias wrote.

A senior administration official, meanwhile, said in a statement that the government didn’t observe any increased level of malicious cyber activity aimed at disrupting the election on election day and believes the elections were free and fair from a cybersecurity perspective.

Elias also isn’t expecting the recounts to erase what he said was a 107,000 combined vote margin separating the candidates in the three battleground states and overturning the election of Trump, who is due to be sworn in as president in January.

Obligation to Voters


Cook Political Report shows Clinton ahead in the nationwide popular vote by about 2.2 million votes, 64.6 million to 62.4 million. In 13 swing states Trump received almost 22.2 million votes to Clinton’s 21.3 million. He won the Electoral College by 306 to Clinton’s 232.
 
...but she already conceded.

Come on Team Blue, it was funny for about a week, now this is just getting sad.
 

lol all of clinton's outrage when don said he might contest the result
 
https://youtube.com/watch?v=GB9rmaq822E
lol all of clinton's outrage when don said he might contest the result

It was dumb of Trump to scream rigged the whole time he was apparently winning anyway, and it was dumb of Hillary to have a shrieking tantrum about it. They both look like shit. But Trump can console himself with actually having fucking won even though apparently even he didn't expect to, otherwise why would he be tainting it by screaming rigged?
 
It was dumb of Trump to scream rigged the whole time he was apparently winning anyway, and it was dumb of Hillary to have a shrieking tantrum about it. They both look like shit. But Trump can console himself with actually having fucking won even though apparently even he didn't expect to, otherwise why would he be tainting it by screaming rigged?
Considering how dead people traditionally vote democrat I think screaming "rigged" was just prudent.
 
Am I missing something? What's the point of a recount if she already conceded?
 
So... I will admit this is a genuine Alex Jones-calibur "tinfoil-on-head" thought but...

What if... the DNC actually DID rig the ballot boxes in the swing states, and with Jill Stein's group looking into it, they're trying to buddy up to them, all in an effort to cover their own tracks...?

Am I missing something? What's the point of a recount if she already conceded?
I'm pretty much in the same boat. This defies all conventional logic that they would concede only to come back with this two and a half weeks later. Only other thing I can make a guess at is that Hillary didn't want to look weaker when compared next to a treehugger.
 
Can't these people just wait until the midterms or the next election? They're in the best spot politically because if Trump does majorly fuck up they get none of the blame. Which means a house republican bloodbath. Like just take the loss and shape up, you're not gonna get anything good out of recounting it.

2018 actually looks really bad for democrats. Most of the incumbents will be republicans which gives them a significant advantage.

Not to mention the fact that dem turnout in midterm elections is terrible.
 
Last edited:
They lost to Donald Trump. Rigging the election and fucking up so severely they give it all away away is about the level of competency I expect from the dnc now.

They're so fucking incompetent that if they tried to rig the election I'm sure somebody would have noticed them wheeling in actual dead bodies to cast votes like it's Weekend at Bernie Sanders'.
 
They're so fucking incompetent that if they tried to rig the election I'm sure somebody would have noticed them wheeling in actual dead bodies to cast votes like it's Weekend at Bernie Sanders'.
It would blend in with the retirement communities' semi moving semi corpses that instinctively punch the thing marked D.
 
So what happens if they do the recount and it turns out due to multiple voting/illegals voting/etc it turns out Trump won the popular vote as well? Could you even imagine the shitshow?
 
Jill Stein really couldn't care less if any of the states turn blue. She just wants to stay in the news and have people pay attention to her. That and get some extra dollars for her own political agenda.

View attachment 157052

She's just butthurt that the Libertarians are gaining ground out of all the smaller parties. Seriously, Jill just needs to say she doesn't what <Insert city from far flung pain in the ass 3rd world Middle Eastern country that nobody remotely even gives a shit about except for the media here> is and the media will be all over that.
 
She's just butthurt that the Libertarians are gaining ground out of all the smaller parties. Seriously, Jill just needs to say she doesn't what <Insert city from far flung pain in the ass 3rd world Middle Eastern country that nobody remotely even gives a shit about except for the media here> is and the media will be all over that.
Nah, that won't work because the Aleppo incident was major because it shattered a lot of people's hopes that Gary Johnson knew what he was talking about. No-one's ever had that hope about Jill Stein.
 
Back
Top Bottom