By Any Means Necessary (BAMN) - ANTIFA Cult Leaders, NAMBLA supporters; Shanta Driver, Leland Sanderson, and Yvette Felarca

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Updated the OP with the NAMBLA stuff.

And to think before @GethN7 paged me to this thread I was amusing myself with bad fanon wikis and then discovered this shit.
 
RockVolnutt said:
I get the impression that they're saying they're only anarchists because they didn't get the outcome they wanted which is still dumb.
Click to expand...
This is a niche of autism I'm familiar with and they do legit think they're anarchists, in their version all hierarchies (divisions of labor) are immoral, and so is owning property.
 
entropyseekswork said:
This is a niche of autism I'm familiar with and they do legit think they're anarchists, in their version all hierarchies (divisions of labor) are immoral, and so is owning property.
Click to expand...

What is even worse is when you ask them how they will implement these ideals and they stare at you slack jawed because they have no idea or tell you to fuck off cause asking questions is "fascist".

I have yet to meet one communist, socialist, or anarchist that can coherently explain how they will not only implement a societal change, what they will do with "dissidents" or how the new government will be constructed.
 
Ok been looking for stuff that bamn and may found one that shows older organizers in action.


Donna stern.

We have another attorney, Joyce schon.
 
Ol' Slag said:
I have yet to meet one communist, socialist, or anarchist that can coherently explain how they will not only implement a societal change, what they will do with "dissidents" or how the new government will be constructed.
Click to expand...

My Communist penis will fix everything through a constant process of rape.
 
Ol' Slag said:
What is even worse is when you ask them how they will implement these ideals and they stare at you slack jawed because they have no idea or tell you to fuck off cause asking questions is "fascist".

I have yet to meet one communist, socialist, or anarchist that can coherently explain how they will not only implement a societal change, what they will do with "dissidents" or how the new government will be constructed.
Click to expand...
lol anarchists across the spectrum to some extent believe violent revolution in unavoidable. The libertarian kind weren't shy about saying that like a decade ago.
 
AnOminous said:
My Communist penis will fix everything through a constant process of rape.
Click to expand...

So how is that working for ya?
xxo00gzsf04oe5iorg.jpg
 
Any discussion about the different schools of anarchism is irrelevant because the only people who take their ideology outside of edgy online discussions and into the streets are the commie variety.
 
Ol' Slag said:
What is even worse is when you ask them how they will implement these ideals and they stare at you slack jawed because they have no idea or tell you to fuck off cause asking questions is "fascist".

I have yet to meet one communist, socialist, or anarchist that can coherently explain how they will not only implement a societal change, what they will do with "dissidents" or how the new government will be constructed.
Click to expand...

There's two camps to these "communists" - There's the rich Trust-Fund kiddies, like Moldylocks/Snatchsquatch, and then there's poorer legit gutter punks. The rich kids have always had rich parents to cater to their demands, in Moldylocks' case, her daddy gave her a bunch of money to setup a wine/coffee shop, that failed, and she doesn't care. The gutter punk type communists are legit poor people that see agitating for communist ideals a way for them to get things for free.

Mostly it's a type of LARPing when they go out and riot, and "fight the man" by breaking daddy's bank windows, or burning trashcans. The most you'll get out of either camps is that they're "fighting the system", but it rarely goes beyond that.

Take the Occupy in New York City. Daily Show did a surprisingly honest interview with both camps. You had the literal bongo beating hippie/gutter punks in the park, then the rich, trust fund kids meeting in the Deutche Bank building. The interview showed that outside of "fighting evil Wall Street", no one had any good ideas on what to do next.

The whole thing sounds more like a cult, especially when you listen to former BAMN members. Generally asking a cult leader things like "So how exactly will you get to planet Autism and achieve enlightenment?" you'll get a blank stare, or some "well, we're working on it" type of answer. Communist/socialist propaganda is really appealing for utopian and gullible people, especially if a group proposing such things takes them in, gives them food, shelter, Et Cetera...
 
Last edited:
RockVolnutt said:
I get the impression that they're saying they're only anarchists because they didn't get the outcome they wanted which is still dumb.
Click to expand...

Pretty much. It's just a massive temper tantrum, but with the sad twist they are willing to hurt people and destroy property in the process.

The hurting people and destroying stuff is really dense because the only times racking up a body count and mass property damage is effective is during a war, which these idiots think they are fighting.

Problem is that they have have no grand strategy, no organization on anything other than very low level tactical level, and these morons want to use the organs of the very state they want to smash when it serves their purposes, much like Confederate slave owners wanted the North to still honor the Fugitive Slave Act even during the Civil War.

Worse, they really don't have the support of enough people to even be a reasonable threat. In a true fascist society, there would already be a mountain of dead wannabe rebels piled up in the streets already, and it's only the fact they DON'T live in a fascist society that has allowed them to continue, but if they are declared a terrorist movement that constitutes insurrection against public order, Trump could effect the same level of zero tolerance in a democratic society (with the assent of Congress) and squash these fools like bugs.

There are two reasons he won't, at least so far.

The first is that they aren't really big enough to be a threat on a scale big enough mass crackdowns would be needed. The second is that these jackasses are serving as free advertising for why Trump's attempt to enforce our own laws is a good thing, and every person they assault and every window they break only makes him look good for stopping them instead of gaining them any sympathy.

They are cannon fodder for both the idiots inciting them to lawlessness, and for the people who would profit on cracking down on them.
 
entropyseekswork said:
>call themselves anarchists
>autistically screech for more government.
Click to expand...
Considering people who I've seen that are like this want

More Modern welfare, which was created by Fascists who they say they hate
Basic Income, which was created by some Nazi Economist in the 1920's (Forgot who). Again people they say they hate.
Fully Automated Luxury Gay Space Communism, which was created by some Capitalists. Once more who they say they hate.

Safe to say they have no fucking idea about anything.
 
Deadwaste said:
tenure
Click to expand...
AnOminous said:
Lol I'm probably in their list somewhere. If not, I'm disappointed at their level of effort.
Click to expand...
In one of their big composite gallery images, I did see "Duerst the Wuerst" from YouTube, who was there video documenting and interviewing and very much anti-Antifa. I do wonder how many "innocents" they've swept up, and I'd like to be optimistic that they'll be properly selective with their doxing etc. One of the advantages of dressing up like a jingo Casey Jones is not being mistaken for the other side.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom