UK British News Megathread - aka CWCissey's news thread

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
https://news.sky.com/story/row-over-new-greggs-vegan-sausage-rolls-heats-up-11597679 (https://archive.ph/5Ba6o)

A heated row has broken out over a move by Britain's largest bakery chain to launch a vegan sausage roll.

The pastry, which is filled with a meat substitute and encased in 96 pastry layers, is available in 950 Greggs stores across the country.

It was promised after 20,000 people signed a petition calling for the snack to be launched to accommodate plant-based diet eaters.


But the vegan sausage roll's launch has been greeted by a mixed reaction: Some consumers welcomed it, while others voiced their objections.

View image on Twitter


spread happiness@p4leandp1nk
https://twitter.com/p4leandp1nk/status/1080767496569974785

#VEGANsausageroll thanks Greggs
2764.png


7
10:07 AM - Jan 3, 2019
See spread happiness's other Tweets
Twitter Ads info and privacy


Cook and food poverty campaigner Jack Monroe declared she was "frantically googling to see what time my nearest opens tomorrow morning because I will be outside".

While TV writer Brydie Lee-Kennedy called herself "very pro the Greggs vegan sausage roll because anything that wrenches veganism back from the 'clean eating' wellness folk is a good thing".

One Twitter user wrote that finding vegan sausage rolls missing from a store in Corby had "ruined my morning".

Another said: "My son is allergic to dairy products which means I can't really go to Greggs when he's with me. Now I can. Thank you vegans."

View image on Twitter


pg often@pgofton
https://twitter.com/pgofton/status/1080772793774624768

The hype got me like #Greggs #Veganuary

42
10:28 AM - Jan 3, 2019
See pg often's other Tweets
Twitter Ads info and privacy


TV presenter Piers Morgan led the charge of those outraged by the new roll.

"Nobody was waiting for a vegan bloody sausage, you PC-ravaged clowns," he wrote on Twitter.

Mr Morgan later complained at receiving "howling abuse from vegans", adding: "I get it, you're all hangry. I would be too if I only ate plants and gruel."

Another Twitter user said: "I really struggle to believe that 20,000 vegans are that desperate to eat in a Greggs."

"You don't paint a mustach (sic) on the Mona Lisa and you don't mess with the perfect sausage roll," one quipped.

Journalist Nooruddean Choudry suggested Greggs introduce a halal steak bake to "crank the fume levels right up to 11".

The bakery chain told concerned customers that "change is good" and that there would "always be a classic sausage roll".

It comes on the same day McDonald's launched its first vegetarian "Happy Meal", designed for children.

The new dish comes with a "veggie wrap", instead of the usual chicken or beef option.

It should be noted that Piers Morgan and Greggs share the same PR firm, so I'm thinking this is some serious faux outrage and South Park KKK gambiting here.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just by way of comparison, here's how BASED BORIS was talking about the grooming gangs at a time when he had a massive majority and EPIC FARAGE had endorsed him as the saviour of Brexit:

View attachment 8882163
Does LBC still employ that piece of shit Mike Graham? Back when people were trying to raise more awareness about the grooming gangs he was very vocal in dismissing it and blaming the parents and the victims. He loves to play the "cancel victim" and the Right Wing pundit but when it actually matters he's just a grifter which is why sometimes he makes a big misstep and shows what he really thinks of his audience.

mike_graham.png
 
Even a stopped cock is right twice a day.
So the fact that we didn't join the war ( what the fuck were we going to do if we did "join" the war anyway ? Send a squadron of pea shooters out there ? ) is seen as a good thing......

There seem to me to be a lot of people here looking at it from a moral standpoint. I don't want to see my fellow countrymen die for something pointless, but I'm not convinced we're lining up with the winning team.
There is definitely a shift in world politics from globalism towards nationalism at the moment.

We're now moving away from an alliance with America, currently a right wing country, to allign ourselves more closely with Europe, a left leaning coalition of countries, that has no army, has Russia at its door ( and consequently is prepared to fund the bottomless pit that is Ukraine ) and treats us as a cash cow and a place to dump the scum of the world to leech off our state.
So at a time when countries are going their own way, we're trying to align ourselves with the team that has no strength, is draining our resources, won't trade with us, is at the very least facilitating our Islamic invasion and has enemies at its door ?

If we side with America ( even so far as allowing them to use our air bases, expertise in military strategy and just showing loyalty to a state that has been our ally - i.e. appease Trump as much as possible, without actually joining ) we are on the side that has the resources, is exporting oil ( the thing thanks to Bacon Sandwich Man Miliband we don't have ) and a huge army.

I'm not sure I understand why the consensus seems to be that Starmer has got this one right ? The path we're on seems to be aligning with Sanchez and sucking off Xi. Largely driven by Starmer wanting to rejoin Europe and not upset the hordes of our little brown friends that have invaded us, that he thinks are going to vote for him.
Perhaps I just have Starmer derangement syndrome....
 
So the fact that we didn't join the war ( what the fuck were we going to do if we did "join" the war anyway ? Send a squadron of pea shooters out there ? ) is seen as a good thing......

There seem to me to be a lot of people here looking at it from a moral standpoint. I don't want to see my fellow countrymen die for something pointless, but I'm not convinced we're lining up with the winning team.
There is definitely a shift in world politics from globalism towards nationalism at the moment.

We're now moving away from an alliance with America, currently a right wing country, to allign ourselves more closely with Europe, a left leaning coalition of countries, that has no army, has Russia at its door ( and consequently is prepared to fund the bottomless pit that is Ukraine ) and treats us as a cash cow and a place to dump the scum of the world to leech off our state.
So at a time when countries are going their own way, we're trying to align ourselves with the team that has no strength, is draining our resources, won't trade with us, is at the very least facilitating our Islamic invasion and has enemies at its door ?

If we side with America ( even so far as allowing them to use our air bases, expertise in military strategy and just showing loyalty to a state that has been our ally - i.e. appease Trump as much as possible, without actually joining ) we are on the side that has the resources, is exporting oil ( the thing thanks to Bacon Sandwich Man Miliband we don't have ) and a huge army.

I'm not sure I understand why the consensus seems to be that Starmer has got this one right ? The path we're on seems to be aligning with Sanchez and sucking off Xi. Largely driven by Starmer wanting to rejoin Europe and not upset the hordes of our little brown friends that have invaded us, that he thinks are going to vote for him.
Perhaps I just have Starmer derangement syndrome....
I think the main issue is that we're moving away, with seemingly no actual, real plan. If I ran a business, and decided I wanted to pivot away from service, to...fucking, screwdriver production. I would first invest in producing the screwdrivers, and then slowly ramp up by liquidating my previous business piecemeal. I would not blow it up, then assume I can just start making screwdrivers.
 
I'm not sure I understand why the consensus seems to be that Starmer has got this one right ?
The weird thing is, Starmer publicly stated that he was refusing the use of UK bases for bombing missions, but then they kept taking off from RAF bases anyway. It's pretty clear that he's said one thing in public and another in private, which means he's made himself look like a dithering idiot. Again. All he had to do was say nothing and get some basic naval coverage to Crete, and that would have satisfied just about everyone. Instead, he had to run his mouth like he always does. Like I said before, he has an unerring ability to always choose the position that is most personally damaging in any given situation.

Anyway...

Looks like the SNP are blowing up again.

Bombshell Salmond text messages reveal high ranking SNP figures ‘conspiring’ against ex-leader

tl;dr SNP leadership (which would include nicola sturgeon) conspired to gin up a few monir incidents into a narrative that Salmond was a virtual rapist for decades, in order to force him out and destroy his life. They basically killed him.
 
So the fact that we didn't join the war ( what the fuck were we going to do if we did "join" the war anyway ? Send a squadron of pea shooters out there ? ) is seen as a good thing......
My take is that Starmer has, as usual, managed to pick the absolute worst path - annoying Trump by not joining in fully, but still being regarded by Iran et Al as joining in "a bit" by eventually letting the US use our bases. So they still think we're culpable, while the US regards us unreliable and not a real ally. Wonderful.

So, that being the case, at least we haven't blown a load of money and manpower by actually joining in properly. It's like, the one saving grace, rather than me congratulating Kier for getting something (anything) right.

The shift from unipolar to multipolar and all the fallout that's going to come afterwards? Well above my pay grade mate! I'm just out here enjoying a few pints in the sun at our local St George's Day festival.
 
I'm not sure I understand why the consensus seems to be that Starmer has got this one right ? The path we're on seems to be aligning with Sanchez and sucking off Xi. Largely driven by Starmer wanting to rejoin Europe and not upset the hordes of our little brown friends that have invaded us, that he thinks are going to vote for him.
Perhaps I just have Starmer derangement syndrome....
A well-written post that deserves a reply.

I have to say first that what you cover in one sentence with "there seem to be a lot of people looking at it from a moral standpoint" is not a small issue. There are. And I think it's good that there are. Without wanting to whitewash the Iranian regime - nor needing to as we are not required to be World Police - they were largely just sitting there from our point of view. Shipping could pass freely and its' our "allies" the gulf states and Turkey that largely fund Islamism in the UK and new mosques. Much has been made of "enriched uranium" but they started doing that openly in response to Trump unilaterally withdrawing from the treaty with them and imposing sanctions for little reason anybody else could see. The enrichment was essentially a response to that and lifting sanctions would likely end it. Besides most of the information about how much of a threat Iran is comes from Mossad which, well, is hardly without motive to colour things here. The real point is that very few of us actually regard Iran as a threat. Certainly not here in the UK and even more certainly to the USA. This is absolutely a war of choice. So when the US starts it, and when Trump declares he's going to wipe out an entire culture, honestly, yes - moral objections are a real thing. And I'm comfortable with that. I don't see it as naivety. Anyone who wants to tell me it is can happily debate me on why they want to single Iran out rather than other things I consider much more of a threat to us which seem to get a pass.

But there is more to it than the moral angle, you're right. I have concerns there also. @Chunky Salsa has succinctly pointed out the lack of any real plan so far as others can see. The USA's goals appear to change daily. First it was this (very optimistic) idea that there would be some popular uprising - no doubt Mossad has people in place, but it did not work. Trump cannot bare to lose face so he had to switch to other reasons. He flip flops around all over the place on what they are. I think he just wants anything he can say shows he achieved something, but Iran isn't giving him that. War isn't won by who kills the most of the other side. If it were, the USA would indeed have won day one. But it's actually won by who achieves their objectives and the USA seems to have no definable ones and Iran's is merely to survive. Iran's are a lot more achievable at this point.

Iran is twice the population of Afghanistan, more industrialised, has more allies both regional and global than Afghanistan. And for the ethnowarriors of the forum, a pretty good average national IQ. Persia has a history of some good scientific minds, despite that Mossad has spent years assassinating any they can. What I'm saying is that if the USA spent two decades, a couple of trillion dollars and actually put boots on the ground, and still left Afghanistan with their tail between they're legs, they're not going to accomplish a puppet government in Iran with far less.

So that's the non-morality argument against it. We're not convinced the USA is the winning side. It wont be the losing side - Iran can't hit back except economically. But Trump might be the loser even if the nation is militarily secure. This is tanking his support and normal people react with horror at his talking about effectively genocide, or starving the Iranian people into submission (which is what blockading the ports actually attempts as they import a lot of food). Unless he pulls off some big turn around (possible but not certain) then he has fucked himself bigly for the midterms. It's a mess. And as @AssignedEva put it succinctly in another thread: you can't bomb the strait open. I personally think this either goes boots on the ground (political disaster and years of Iraq/Afghanistan style warfare) or the USA backs down for practical purposes.

In short, I think the USA wont win because they have no winnable objectives. They'll kill many times more Iranians than the Iranians kill of them. Some of the Iranians they kill will even be adults. But... I'm just not convinced they'll "win". The best result for us as Bongs, is for this to settle down again. And to that end, not joining in will probably hasten that more than piling on to America's poorly planned war. The moment the uprising that I suspect Trump was promised didn't happen, the USA has been improvising. Which is bad.

My take on it, anyway.
 
Is the UK ready for cervix-grower David Lammy (who, in the face of very strong competition, is perhaps the stupidest man ever to rise to the office of Deputy PM) to pratfall into the role of interim Prime Minister? Because I think Starmer will be gone by the end of the week (maybe even tomorrow) perhaps citing ill health as among the causes. On top of everything else, on the 27th of this month, we finally get the trial of the Ukrainian twinks who set fire to his former residence. I have a feeling that, if there is anything tasty, then the people involved will have been warned to keep their mouths shut, but who knows?
 
Is the UK ready for cervix-grower David Lammy (who, in the face of very strong competition, is perhaps the stupidest man ever to rise to the office of Deputy PM) to pratfall into the role of interim Prime Minister? Because I think Starmer will be gone by the end of the week (maybe even tomorrow) perhaps citing ill health as among the causes. On top of everything else, on the 27th of this month, we finally get the trial of the Ukrainian twinks who set fire to his former residence. I have a feeling that, if there is anything tasty, then the people involved will have been warned to keep their mouths shut, but who knows?
1000035450.jpg
WEY DOWN DEEP IN DI MIDDLE OF DI CONGO
A HIPPO TOOK AN APRICOT A GUAVA AND A MANGO
HE STUCK IT WITH THE OTHERS AND HE DANCED A DAINTY TANGO
DI RHINO SAID I KNOW WE'LL CALL IT UM BONGO!
 
I'm hearing there was a big anti-immigration march in Manchester again this weekend.
It was Britain first, I think it was for Saint George's day?. I didn't keep up with it much, but apparently it went alright. Supposedly just over a 1000 for there side, I don't know the numbers for the counter-protestors that were there though. It was the usual faces, like Stand up to Racism(the pre-printed sign guys that get coached in) and the pally, communist flag waving students.
 
Is the UK ready for cervix-grower David Lammy (who, in the face of very strong competition, is perhaps the stupidest man ever to rise to the office of Deputy PM) to pratfall into the role of interim Prime Minister?
Please don't speak that into existence.

I do also think it's optimistic to think Starmer will go soon. I'm willing to eat my hat if I'm wrong, but Boris set the precedent that if you stick your fingers in your ears and say "lalalala I'm not listening", you don't actually have to resign over otherwise career-ending things unless you run out of Ministers. Labour also doesn't have a 1922 Committee, they need to rally round a leader first, so it's a lot harder for them to topple a leader.
 
Much has been made of "enriched uranium" but they started doing that openly in response to Trump unilaterally withdrawing from the treaty with them and imposing sanctions for little reason anybody else could see.
The JCPOA was a piece of crap. It expired in 2030, had dubious means of monitoring since the IAEA had extremely limited access to military and missile sites, and it let Iran get right up to the edge of weapons-grade uranium. When it was being discussed I saw some estimates of about six months from JCPOA limit to enough HEU for a nuke. Obama was also so fucking desperate to get them to sign it and cement his legacy as a grand peacemaker he killed the DEA's investigation into Hezbollah's involvement in the LatAm drug trade. Oh, and that's not getting into the immediate uptick in proxy warring that happened right after that plane load of cash arrived in Tehran.

They were never, ever going to play fair.
 
We're not convinced the USA is the winning side. It wont be the losing side - Iran can't hit back except economically.
I mean haven't they already lost in that sense? As you say it seems entirely aimless for america. Yet they have dumped God only knows how much money worth of bombs and shit and gotten what from it? They've spent billions to receive? What exactly? Not only that but obviously these things don't just materialise, that's not money that was wasted, it's their military stockpile, that doesn't take money to replenish, it takes time and labour and materials, something which you can't just buy an instant replacement for. I am sure I do not need to explain why that would be especially bad for a country that shut down most of it's steel factories and cannot even fully produce it's own tanks without relying on other countries. We simply do not have the production to fight a war. Hell we don't even fucking have the production to run a country.

Why should we help them anyway? If they were actively being attacked by iran then yes I would expect the UK to join in the defence and any counterattack. But america just randomly decided to bomb them because idk israel or some shit. We should help our allies, helping our ally's ally in a non defensive war is just retarded and I hope that america wouldn't be expecting us to join in on that. Though admittedly global politics? I can barely fucking remember what's happening in England let alone everywhere else.

Personally I think he was expecting a quick in and out flip. I think trump was just expecting maduro 2.0 and got a bit cocky because of how well that went.
>"Starmer may be leaving" mentioned again.
That's it. I'm getting the fucking sign!
Why would the police need to pull him out? Just get an adult woman with a dog to maintain eye contact with him and he'll run off by himself.
 
Because I think Starmer will be gone by the end of the week (maybe even tomorrow) perhaps citing ill health as among the causes.
Is there a reason you think this? I’d be delighted if starmer resigned (and then committed suicide in shame, which is an emotion I don’t think he’s capable of feeling but a girl can hope) but I don’t see any signs of it. You got some inside info here?
 
There was meant to be a gathering in Dumfries on Saturday after some school girls were followed by migraints from the Mecure hotel. Police gave out rape alarms.

Only around 30 turned up. Lots of talked of being scared to speak out.

Dumfries is a weird place with old school Tories and an artsy fartsy liberal scene, smack heads and single Mums who've pissed in more sinks than they've washed in.

Interested to see what happens in Dundee with the axe girl but I'm fairly sure Scotland is fucked.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20260419_174851_X.jpg
    Screenshot_20260419_174851_X.jpg
    183.4 KB · Views: 104
The one and only good thing Kier has done, is not jump into this Iran debacle when Trump told him to. But I doubt that's out of any moral reason or sudden discovery of a backbone, so much as he can't imagine doing anything without the UN telling him its okay.
I know a lot pf people have made better points already but this article helps with some of what I feel about what Kier's doing. It's the "coalition of the willing" all over again.
The UK and France will lead a multinational mission to protect commercial shipping routes in the Strait of Hormuz, Sir Keir Starmer has said.

Speaking after a meeting of 51 countries, the prime minister underlined the work would be "strictly peaceful and defensive" and would only be put in place once fighting in the region ends.

Iran effectively blocked the waterway since the US and Israel attacked the country in late February, driving up global energy and fuel prices.

On Friday, Iran's foreign minister said the route was now "completely open" and US President Donald Trump made a similar announcement and criticised Nato for being "useless when needed".
Trump said he received a call from Nato offering help on Friday but, in a post on Truth Social, he wrote that he "TOLD THEM TO STAY AWAY, UNLESS THEY JUST WANT TO LOAD UP THEIR SHIPS WITH OIL".

The US president has repeatedly criticised Nato, and more specifically the UK, during the Iran war.

Sir Keir's position has been that the UK would not be "dragged" into the conflict and he previously said the UK would not support the blockade.

Meanwhile, the UK prime minister said dozens of countries had offered to "contribute assets" to the joint mission with France.

"This will be strictly peaceful and defensive, as a mission to reassure commercial shipping and support mine clearance," he said alongside French President Emmanuel Macron.

"We invite all nations with an interest in the free flow of global trade to join us. Some have already indicated their readiness to contribute."

Sir Keir confirmed more details of the mission will be announced next week, following a military planning conference in London.

Tehran promised the Strait of Hormuz will be completely open to commercial vessels until the middle of next week, when a temporary ceasefire between the US and Iran will end.

Trump said his own naval blockade of vessels moving in and out of Iranian ports would remain in force.

While there was a flurry of shipping activity in the Gulf throughout Friday, maritime tracking services showed very few vessels transiting through the strait.

Macron said that the closure of the strait has had "very severe consequences" on "the whole of the planet and the global economy".

"Recent events are encouraging, even if we have to remain prudent," he said.

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said that Germany "stands ready to play its part in ensuring freedom of navigation".

Speaking after the multilateral meeting, he also said that it would be "desirable" for the US to be involved.
This and the Mandelson situation show Keir's debatably biggest flaw as a leader, if we could put aside his hatred of those who elected him, his subservience to globalists, his-I'm getting side tracked.

Keir is a middle manager who never wants to be the one responsible for something. Be it the law, the ECHR, other politicians or civil servants he needs to have someone who is actually to blame for every single one of his fuckups. Which can be a good trait in someone at the mid point of a management structure but he is ostensibly the top of his country and showing that he actually is not willing to take responsibility is fairly pathetic.

He's two steps away from shrieking, "Tony told me to do it!" at this point and if I thought he actually was dim enough to let the curtain fall and expose that the British PM has no independent thought I'd want him to remain. Instead he is hurling people under the bus left and right and is desperately trying to crawl up the EU's ass in the hope they can be the shield for all his failings.
 
I mean they want literally everything else the government gives out and more but for some reason not rape alarms?
They don't know what 'rape' is.

More arson against Jews in London. Counter Terror Police say group Ashab al-Yamin claimed responsibility for the attacks online, including ones around Europe. The Met is now investigating the group’s links to Iran. I think the 'Iranian' links are just 'they are Muslim, and are doing it because the West is fucking up the holy land of the goatfucking dirtfarmers again', rather than actual Iranian sponsored terrorism or an organised group ala ISIS, but they can't just point fingers and say the muzzies did it.
These attacks are also impressively stupid, suggesting to me some low iq kebab did it. Attacking a building that wasn't even Jewish anymore but had been a Jew charity sounds like Abdul felt the call of the 72 virgins and attempted to Four Lions' it but he'd only ever seen a Jew walking past some old community centre and didn't really bother to google. We are also in the age of 'lone wolf terrorism', but I'll save you the sperg and just say that terrorism groups are soooooo two-thousand-and-late. Article below.
The Jews complaining 'Britain is a fundamentally different country now', lmfao.
Counter-terror police are investigating the “firebombing” of a synagogue in north London, the latest in a “terrifying” spate of arson attacks on the Jewish community in London.
Police were called to Kenton United Synagogue in Shaftesbury Avenue, Harrow, at around midnight after a bottle containing an accelerant was thrown through a window.

It caused smoke damage, but there were no injuries and no significant structural damage.
The Chief Rabbi called the attack “cowardly” and said “a sustained campaign of violence and intimidation against the Jewish community of the UK is gathering momentum”.
It follows follows similar recent incidents targeting the Jewish community in Finchley, Golders Green and Hendon.
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said he was “appalled” by the “recent attempted antisemitic arson attacks”.
The Campaign Against Antisemitism, posting on its account on X said: “ Last night, another Jewish synagogue in London was firebombed, this time in Kenton.
“This is the third such attack in as many days, and also comes after the recent ambulance arson attack and a supposed drone threat against the Israeli embassy in London this week.
“This is now becoming a terrifying spate of daily arson attacks on the Jewish community. It betrays a cataclysmic failure of the state – politicians, police chiefs and prosecutors – to tackle antisemitic extremism in this country, which has gone largely unchecked for two and a half years.
“Britain is fundamentally a different country now. “
It posted a video showing the aftermath of the incident with police and the London Fire Brigade on the scene.
The incident overnight follows a string of arson attacks in north London in recent days and weeks.
Counter-terror police have launched an investigation after an arson attack on Friday a building formerly used by a Jewish charity in Hendon.

The incident is being treated as an antisemitic hate crime.
Counter-terror police are also investigating attempted arson attacks on a Persian language media organisation and a synagogue in Finchley, as well as ambulances belonging to a Jewish charity set alight in Golders Green last month.
A Met Police spokesperson said: “At around midnight on Sunday, 19 April officers on deterrence and reassurance patrols following a series of incidents in north west London noticed damage to a window of the Kenton United Synagogue in Shaftesbury Avenue, Harrow.

“On further inspection they saw smoke inside a room and evidence that a bottle with some sort of accelerant had been thrown through the window.“
“The London Fire Brigade was called and firefighters searched the building to confirm that there was no further fire risk.
“The incident is being treated as arson and an investigation is underway led by Counter Terrorism Policing London, supported by local officers.

Responding to the latest attack the Chief Rabbi Sir Ephraim Mirvis said in the statement shared on X, formerly Twitter: “Last night yet another synagogue, this time in Kenton, was targeted in a cowardly arson attack.

“It follows the attack in Finchley on Wednesday and the attempted attack on what was the Jewish Futures building in Hendon on Friday night, making three Jewish sites attacked in London in less than a week.
“A sustained campaign of violence and intimidation against the Jewish community of the UK is gathering momentum.
“This sustained attack on our community’s ability to worship and live in safety is an attack on the values that bind us all together.


“Thank God, no lives have been lost, but we cannot, and must not, wait for that to change before we understand just how dangerous this moment is for all of our society.”
In a statement posted on X, the Prime Minister said: “I am appalled by recent attempted antisemitic arson attacks in North London.
“This is abhorrent and it will not be tolerated. Attacks on our Jewish community are attacks on Britain.
“We are increasing visible policing and those responsible will be found and brought to justice. We will not rest in the pursuit of perpetrators.

The president of for umbrella jewish body The United Synagogue called on Sir Keir to declare “an epidemic of anti-Jewish hate” in the wake of a series of the arson and attempted arson attacks.


Saul Taylor said: “The Government and local police forces have responded well to the recent appalling attacks including Heaton Park Hebrew Congregation and Hatzola ambulances, but it is clear that more must be done to prevent these attacks occurring at all.
“The Prime Minister should declare publicly what the Jewish community has known for some time: this is an epidemic of anti-Jewish hate.”He added in the statement: “A synagogue is not just a building, it is a place of worship, community and – theoretically – safety.
“To target it in this way is a deeply disturbing act that strikes at the heart of Jewish life.“Thank God no one was hurt and we are grateful to the emergency services and Community Security Trust for their swift response today.”
Reacting to the spate of attacks, Richard Verber The United Synagogue’s chief communications officer, said: “Whilst most British Jews don’t want to be thinking about ‘where else am I going to live if Britain is not safe?’, that is a conversation that is certainly now beginning to happen.”
He was asked if there had been discussions at the Kenton synagogue about security concerns, given the similar attacks at Jewish sites in recent weeks.
He told the Press Association: “It’s a tragic answer that I’m going to give you… these conversations have been happening not for days or weeks or months, but for years.
“I don’t know if you’ve ever had the opportunity to visit a Jewish school or a synagogue, but it can sometimes feel there’s less security getting into a prison in the UK – the amount of security guards, cameras, barbed wire.”
A spokesperson for the Community Security Trust charity, that protects Jewish communities, said: “We are aware of another attempted arson, this time targeting a synagogue in north London,
“On this occasion there was minor smoke damage to an internal room, but there were no injuries and no significant structural damage.
“We want to thank the Met Police and London Fire Brigade for responding quickly and for all they are doing to protect the Jewish community during this unprecedented period.
“We are supporting the affected location and are working closely with the police as they investigate and seek to identify those responsible.
“We urge people to remain vigilant and to report any suspicious activity, at any time of day or night, to the police immediately on 999 and then to CST.”
 
Back
Top Bottom