UK British News Megathread - aka CWCissey's news thread

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
https://news.sky.com/story/row-over-new-greggs-vegan-sausage-rolls-heats-up-11597679 (https://archive.ph/5Ba6o)

A heated row has broken out over a move by Britain's largest bakery chain to launch a vegan sausage roll.

The pastry, which is filled with a meat substitute and encased in 96 pastry layers, is available in 950 Greggs stores across the country.

It was promised after 20,000 people signed a petition calling for the snack to be launched to accommodate plant-based diet eaters.


But the vegan sausage roll's launch has been greeted by a mixed reaction: Some consumers welcomed it, while others voiced their objections.

View image on Twitter


spread happiness@p4leandp1nk
https://twitter.com/p4leandp1nk/status/1080767496569974785

#VEGANsausageroll thanks Greggs
2764.png


7
10:07 AM - Jan 3, 2019
See spread happiness's other Tweets
Twitter Ads info and privacy


Cook and food poverty campaigner Jack Monroe declared she was "frantically googling to see what time my nearest opens tomorrow morning because I will be outside".

While TV writer Brydie Lee-Kennedy called herself "very pro the Greggs vegan sausage roll because anything that wrenches veganism back from the 'clean eating' wellness folk is a good thing".

One Twitter user wrote that finding vegan sausage rolls missing from a store in Corby had "ruined my morning".

Another said: "My son is allergic to dairy products which means I can't really go to Greggs when he's with me. Now I can. Thank you vegans."

View image on Twitter


pg often@pgofton
https://twitter.com/pgofton/status/1080772793774624768

The hype got me like #Greggs #Veganuary

42
10:28 AM - Jan 3, 2019
See pg often's other Tweets
Twitter Ads info and privacy


TV presenter Piers Morgan led the charge of those outraged by the new roll.

"Nobody was waiting for a vegan bloody sausage, you PC-ravaged clowns," he wrote on Twitter.

Mr Morgan later complained at receiving "howling abuse from vegans", adding: "I get it, you're all hangry. I would be too if I only ate plants and gruel."

Another Twitter user said: "I really struggle to believe that 20,000 vegans are that desperate to eat in a Greggs."

"You don't paint a mustach (sic) on the Mona Lisa and you don't mess with the perfect sausage roll," one quipped.

Journalist Nooruddean Choudry suggested Greggs introduce a halal steak bake to "crank the fume levels right up to 11".

The bakery chain told concerned customers that "change is good" and that there would "always be a classic sausage roll".

It comes on the same day McDonald's launched its first vegetarian "Happy Meal", designed for children.

The new dish comes with a "veggie wrap", instead of the usual chicken or beef option.

It should be noted that Piers Morgan and Greggs share the same PR firm, so I'm thinking this is some serious faux outrage and South Park KKK gambiting here.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is what you get when you're 60 trying to look 40, it's a doomed struggle, there's a fine line between the tipping point of cougar to granny and she's well across it now.
She's famously said she wouldn't get any work done and wanted to age naturally. The problem is she's been spackled in glam makeup and then put unflattering lighting (and also your nose changes as you age).

If you look at this photo of her from last month where she's in much more pared back makeup
40875.jpg
You're not going to mistake her for a 40 year old sexpot, and she has a lot of wrinkles and fine lines, but if she wasn't famous and you saw her down your local supermarket you'd probably think she was younger than she is.
 
You're not going to mistake her for a 40 year old sexpot, and she has a lot of wrinkles and fine lines, but if she wasn't famous and you saw her down your local supermarket you'd probably think she was younger than she is.
I see people like this everyday, the men look far worse of course because if you ask them then most of them will think an exfoliation is a thing they do in Greece, but the full bodied dyed hair/well moisturized yet well weathered face combo is an "isn't quite accepting it yet" classic. She's really trying, god bless her, but it's a forlorn hope if ever there was one and just makes her look desperate even if she actually isn't.
 
She's famously said she wouldn't get any work done and wanted to age naturally. The problem is she's been spackled in glam makeup and then put unflattering lighting (and also your nose changes as you age).

If you look at this photo of her from last month where she's in much more pared back makeup
View attachment 8856836
You're not going to mistake her for a 40 year old sexpot, and she has a lot of wrinkles and fine lines, but if she wasn't famous and you saw her down your local supermarket you'd probably think she was younger than she is.
How many children does she have in her cauldron?
 
I see people like this everyday, the men look far worse of course because if you ask them then most of them will think an exfoliation is a thing they do in Greece, but the full bodied dyed hair/well moisturized yet well weathered face combo is an "isn't quite accepting it yet" classic. She's really trying, god bless her, but it's a forlorn hope if ever there was one and just makes her look desperate even if she actually isn't.
I get what you're saying, in that if you put her in a biddy haircut she wouldn't be trying to look youthful
40884.jpg
but I think she's got to stick to a certain "look" while maintaining her role on the BBC.
 
I get what you're saying, in that if you put her in a biddy haircut she wouldn't be trying to look youthful
View attachment 8856943
but I think she's got to stick to a certain "look" while maintaining her role on the BBC.
Maybe I'm overly harsh on Fiona, but she just doesn't radiate a level of confidence.
Gloria Hunniford kinda has the same thing going on, but she owns it Dolly Parton style and has been doing for longer than this website has been around, in that she's OLD and she knows it and doesn't care:
1776186073744.png
Bruce? She's got some sort of toupee woven in there I reckon, that's middle aged cope that is.
 
@femboy fart huffer

A lengthy rant in response to your lengthy rant a page or so back:

It’s not just that these are room temperature IQ subhumans coming from a place where rape isn’t a crime or even viewed negatively (though they are most certainly that).

It’s that their primary exposure to white women has been through porn - all kinds of porn, with ‘white women’ in their mind being a homogenous mass that will do just about anything, with a smile on their face, with any brown man.

They then arrive here, pitch up at the local kebab place or ‘mini mart’ with about eight of their mates/cousins, with phones dished out by the local government or NGO, download Snapchat/Tinder/Instagram/whatever the fuck and the images they see of white women there don’t really do anything to dispel the conception they’ve already got of them.

They see the students from the local uni, or just the local slappers of whatever town/city, wearing absolutely next to nothing, falling over drunk, shrieking about… I hopefully don’t have to tell you how far away this is from the ‘wearing a polyester postbox, won’t speak until spoken to’ women they’ve only ever known at home.

I’m not saying ‘White British women are asking for it’ (though some are clearly far too stupid to see the inherent dangers around them and confuse what they ‘SHOULD be able to do’ with what they actually should be doing). I am however pointing out that the introduction of millions of these savages couldn’t possibly have happened at a worse time in history.

Add in the commie infiltration of institutions, globalist judges/lawyers/NGO’s, natural self preservation instincts of the indigenous population having been all but erased via widespread social engineering beginning at primary school. It’s absolute carnage.

The rapists don’t think they’re doing anything wrong is what it comes down to, and there are complex factors coming together to protect and excuse them - and for what? Because some of them get a job at an Amazon warehouse or a call centre, and that’s ‘growth’?

The people to blame, as they have always been, are the ones that let them in. The rapists themselves should just be shot. Imagine any of the parties with any chance of gaining a seat at the next election saying any of that, then imagine what the response would be, to realise just how fucked the UK is.
 
I’m not saying ‘White British women are asking for it’ (though some are clearly far too stupid to see the inherent dangers around them and confuse what they ‘SHOULD be able to do’ with what they actually should be doing). I am however pointing out that the introduction of millions of these savages couldn’t possibly have happened at a worse time in history.
Just be honest and say they're asking for it. If you dress like a prostitute and get so off your face you fall unconscious you made a decision to do so. You're putting yourself in an extremely vulnerable position while titillating people with your slutty outfit. They are begging to be taken advantage of because they're provoking people (slutty outfit) and then lowering their defenses to literally zero.

If I put a sign outside my front door saying "I just bought a PS5, a new TV, and a gold watch I leave on my bedside table" then go out and leave my doors not only unlocked but wide open. Am I at fault for being robbed? Same situation is happening here. Don't flaunt your bits and lower your defenses to zero and expect a good outcome. Sexual assault and rape is a terrible thing, but you know it exists and you are willingly entering the lion's den while covered in barbecue sauce if you act like this.

Our country is no longer safe. Even rural areas now have to be careful because we've imported the third world. If you are too stupid to know this and decide to make bad decisions, you should be held accountable for those decisions.

Now I want some barbecue ribs for dinner.. Who's going to the take away?
 

One of the world’s largest insurance companies is suing six people alleged to have taken part in Palestine Action protests against the company.
Allianz is seeking damages of almost £300,000 for protests at its UK offices in October 2024 and March 2025, in what is believed to be the first civil case brought against people accused of involvement in direct action with the protest group.

Palestine Action repeatedly targeted the German insurance company over its provision of insurance to the UK subsidiary of Israel’s largest arms manufacturer, Elbit Systems. During the two protests that form the basis of the civil case, red paint was daubed over Allianz’s UK headquarters in Guildford, Surrey and its City of London office.
Palestine Action claimed to have occupied the Guildford office during the 2024 protest, while activists scaled the building with a flag reading “Drop Elbit” in last year’s action. Allianz ended its contract with Elbit Systems UK last year.
The six defendants, who have all been charged with criminal offences and pleaded not guilty, are applying to the civil court to stay the case brought by Allianz until after their criminal trials, which they say the insurer has refused to do.

An Allianz spokesperson said it did not comment on legal proceedings and respected the right to lawful protest, but added it would not tolerate alleged “intimidation of our staff, threats or any behaviour that endangers the safety and security of our people, business or property”. They added: “We reserve the right to take lawful action, including civil proceedings against individuals, to recover for damage caused to our buildings and business.”

Seren John-Wood, a 30-year-old community worker who is charged with criminal damage alongside two other defendants in relation to the City of London protest, said: “This is an unprecedented and unusual extra step that is being conducted parallel to criminal proceedings.
“The burden of proof is significantly lower in civil courts. We believe that in a criminal court we will be found not guilty. In a civil court, they will have an extremely unfair advantage; we are unable to afford legal representation whereas, according to their own annual report, they made a record operating profit of €17.4bn (£15.1bn) last year. There is no legal aid available for civil courts.”
Anna Letts, 44, a teacher charged in relation to the same protest, said: “We are people who work and volunteer with refugees and asylum seekers, in homelessness services, with children and young people and, like most working people in the UK, live paycheck to paycheck. Being forced to pay hundreds of thousands of pounds means decades of money being deducted from salaries that barely cover our rent as it is.”
George Elliott, a 29-year-old writer and performer charged with criminal damage, aggravated trespass and going equipped to lock-on alongside two other defendants in relation to the Guildford protest, said: “Allianz brought on its own reputational damage and embarrassment, as well as any other alleged harm to its business and/or employees, by opting to insure Elbit Systems.”
A decision to ban Palestine Action under the Terrorism Act was overturned in February by the high court, which ruled that it was unlawful. It remains in place pending the home secretary’s appeal, which will be heard on 28 and 29 April.

"You can't make us pay for vandalising your building!"
 
I hopefully don’t have to tell you how far away this is from the ‘wearing a polyester postbox, won’t speak until spoken to’ women they’ve only ever known at home.
Yea but if I went to the carribean and saw some woman in a coconut bra and frond skirt I wouldn't instantly start trying to squeeze at them for a tit milk pina colada. The idea that yea you just become a rapist from seeing something lewd when you haven't seen something like that before is retarded. Kids (at least used to) don't see that sort of lewd shit before being adults. That doesn't mean that the first time they go clubbing they'd rape the first woman wearing a crop top.

I can understand that yea for some creature that has never seen a woman before and has no impulse control or anything like that. I can get how it would be 'logical' in that situation. I just cannot understand how you can have such little impulse control or thinking in the first place. It's like a lobotomy. I just have no idea what the fuck that would be like. How are you meant to empathise with something like that? How do you put yourself in the shoes of something to understand their thoughts when the simple reality is that there are no thoughts?
 
Just be honest and say they're asking for it. If you dress like a prostitute and get so off your face you fall unconscious you made a decision to do so. You're putting yourself in an extremely vulnerable position while titillating people with your slutty outfit. They are begging to be taken advantage of because they're provoking people (slutty outfit) and then lowering their defenses to literally zero.

If I put a sign outside my front door saying "I just bought a PS5, a new TV, and a gold watch I leave on my bedside table" then go out and leave my doors not only unlocked but wide open. Am I at fault for being robbed? Same situation is happening here. Don't flaunt your bits and lower your defenses to zero and expect a good outcome. Sexual assault and rape is a terrible thing, but you know it exists and you are willingly entering the lion's den while covered in barbecue sauce if you act like this.

Our country is no longer safe. Even rural areas now have to be careful because we've imported the third world. If you are too stupid to know this and decide to make bad decisions, you should be held accountable for those decisions.

Now I want some barbecue ribs for dinner.. Who's going to the take away?
I assume you never did anything reckless or carefree in your youth that would make you cringe now. The eternal wisdom of Kofi, if only we could all be as wise as you.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FFH - If you want to try to "understand" the mentality, watch this - these things are what have been imported into Britain on an industrial scale.


The craziest thing is that some people in the Western world will watch clips like this...and still disagree with capital punishment.
 
I assume you never did anything reckless or carefree in your youth that would make you cringe now. The eternal wisdom of Kofi, if only we could all be as wise as you.
I did plenty of reckless stuff in my youth. But I always knew never to get black out drunk. I drank responsibly and I made sure the people I was with got home safely. I don't think flashing your fanny at people then blacking out is "cringe". I think it's bait for dangerous men to assault you.
 
Yea but if I went to the carribean and saw some woman in a coconut bra and frond skirt I wouldn't instantly start trying to squeeze at them for a tit milk pina colada. The idea that yea you just become a rapist from seeing something lewd when you haven't seen something like that before is retarded. Kids (at least used to) don't see that sort of lewd shit before being adults. That doesn't mean that the first time they go clubbing they'd rape the first woman wearing a crop top.

I can understand that yea for some creature that has never seen a woman before and has no impulse control or anything like that. I can get how it would be 'logical' in that situation. I just cannot understand how you can have such little impulse control or thinking in the first place. It's like a lobotomy. I just have no idea what the fuck that would be like. How are you meant to empathise with something like that? How do you put yourself in the shoes of something to understand their thoughts when the simple reality is that there are no thoughts?
Now if you’d never before had any interaction with coconut bra/grass skirt women, they were alien to you, you only had a vague concept of them as beings, and yet you’d drooled and gooned to and consumed endless porn of them for years leading up to that so you saw them as just these hypersexualised amorphous sluts distinct from your own kind… that’s what we have going on here.

Some people, not so much now unfortunately, but back in the day, could go their whole life never meeting a black or a brown but potentially only hearing vague tales of their savagery and misdeeds… how d’you think they reacted towards them upon first seeing or meeting one? It’s just another, more extreme version of that, mixed in with through the floor genetic I.Q and regressive cultural norms to which they’re accustomed.

Just be honest and say they're asking for it.
Not my words.

I try to have sympathy, difficult as it can be sometimes. They’re victims in every sense.

If you’re a kid from an abandoned British town, your parents are both useless, terminally stupid alcoholics, you’re surrounded by petty criminals and drug users, your tiny brain is being bombarded endlessly with ‘NIGGERS SEXY GOOD BAD BITCH WET ASS PUSSY BROWN ATHLETE HIGH STATUS RAPPER KIM K KYLIE BONNIE BLUE ONLYFANS MUM MILLIONS’ and the closest bit of respite you get in a day is from dragging on a fucking vape or chugging an energy drink… Oh, here’s thirty four year old Ackmed from the shop round the corner adding you on Snapchat, he can get you a vape… and vodka?

It’s an absolute fucking nightmare what successive self-serving, careerist, globalist politicunts have allowed to happen. Will they ever face justice? I don’t think there’s a single one of us that would confidently reply: ‘Yes!’ Which just shows how bad things are.
 
Last edited:
Yea but if I went to the carribean and saw some woman in a coconut bra and frond skirt I wouldn't instantly start trying to squeeze at them for a tit milk pina colada. The idea that yea you just become a rapist from seeing something lewd when you haven't seen something like that before is retarded. Kids (at least used to) don't see that sort of lewd shit before being adults. That doesn't mean that the first time they go clubbing they'd rape the first woman wearing a crop top.

I can understand that yea for some creature that has never seen a woman before and has no impulse control or anything like that. I can get how it would be 'logical' in that situation. I just cannot understand how you can have such little impulse control or thinking in the first place. It's like a lobotomy. I just have no idea what the fuck that would be like. How are you meant to empathise with something like that? How do you put yourself in the shoes of something to understand their thoughts when the simple reality is that there are no thoughts?
It's tempting to say it's just because they're low IQ (they are) but also, pretty much every tribal society ever understood the basic logic of pillaging rival peoples and raping their women. This is no different. Most societies eventually stopped, except in Islam because Islam is nothing but a loose codification of tribal laws made to organise a horde of rag-wearing goat fuckers.
 
How far off do you think I am?
I think Prevent are probably absolutely desperate for some real right-wing violence. I think they probably pray daily for a gammon to shoot up a mosque or a madrasa or something. Anything to redress the increasingly obvious balance and give them an excuse to really smash the boot down in a way that they never will in the opposite direction.
 
I did plenty of reckless stuff in my youth. But I always knew never to get black out drunk. I drank responsibly and I made sure the people I was with got home safely. I don't think flashing your fanny at people then blacking out is "cringe". I think it's bait for dangerous men to assault you.
Glad to hear you were such a gentleman. You always come across as such here.
 
Just be honest and say they're asking for it. If you dress like a prostitute and get so off your face you fall unconscious you made a decision to do so. You're putting yourself in an extremely vulnerable position while titillating people with your slutty outfit. They are begging to be taken advantage of because they're provoking people (slutty outfit) and then lowering their defenses to literally zero.
I did plenty of reckless stuff in my youth.
Welcome back RooshV, I'm sure they were all asking for it saaaaar.
1776197426631.png
 
Didn't RooshV end his 'career' by just marrying and settling down and writing a book about how pick up culture fucking sucks, and that he regrets it all? I may be thinking of another one of those guys. They all blend together in my head.

EDIT: He did, in American Pilgrim he said that ultimately it was an unfulfilling lifestyle, and that the only use for pickup stuff is to find a good woman to settle down with.
 
Last edited:
Didn't RooshV end his 'career' by just marrying and settling down and writing a book about how pick up culture fucking sucks, and that he regrets it all? I may be thinking of another one of those guys. They all blend together in my head.
They do indeed all blend together, because the exact same thing always happens: He got OLD, he hit the WALL, and he got SAD. It's amusingly parallel to how they hypothesize the fate of the wahmens. No happy endings or settling down either, he lasted 2 years as an Armenian Apostolic before apostatizing the faith of his ancestors because it was "too woke", last I checked he was in ROCOR, he's DFE'd now of course but is still childless and SAD to my knowledge.
The main value of stories like RooshV's is that hedonism is bad, and that's without even going into the whole "rape as a property offense" angle.
 
I did plenty of reckless stuff in my youth. But I always knew never to get black out drunk. I drank responsibly and I made sure the people I was with got home safely. I don't think flashing your fanny at people then blacking out is "cringe". I think it's bait for dangerous men to assault you.

One issue that's compounding the rape problem here these days is that, twenty or so years ago it used to be considered mandatory for men to walk their female friends home after leaving a nightclub to make sure they got home safely. Nowadays feminists won't allow that and will brand you a "creep" for having concern for your female friends, because you obviously were going to have your way with them instead of just wanting them to not be violated by some third world shitskins. Also it's considered sexist to shame women for drinking too much or wear revealing clothing, because apparently its yasss qween slay empowering to stagger around the street with your knickers round your ankles at 2am.
 
Back
Top Bottom