UK British News Megathread - aka CWCissey's news thread

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
https://news.sky.com/story/row-over-new-greggs-vegan-sausage-rolls-heats-up-11597679 (https://archive.ph/5Ba6o)

A heated row has broken out over a move by Britain's largest bakery chain to launch a vegan sausage roll.

The pastry, which is filled with a meat substitute and encased in 96 pastry layers, is available in 950 Greggs stores across the country.

It was promised after 20,000 people signed a petition calling for the snack to be launched to accommodate plant-based diet eaters.


But the vegan sausage roll's launch has been greeted by a mixed reaction: Some consumers welcomed it, while others voiced their objections.

View image on Twitter


spread happiness@p4leandp1nk
https://twitter.com/p4leandp1nk/status/1080767496569974785

#VEGANsausageroll thanks Greggs
2764.png


7
10:07 AM - Jan 3, 2019
See spread happiness's other Tweets
Twitter Ads info and privacy


Cook and food poverty campaigner Jack Monroe declared she was "frantically googling to see what time my nearest opens tomorrow morning because I will be outside".

While TV writer Brydie Lee-Kennedy called herself "very pro the Greggs vegan sausage roll because anything that wrenches veganism back from the 'clean eating' wellness folk is a good thing".

One Twitter user wrote that finding vegan sausage rolls missing from a store in Corby had "ruined my morning".

Another said: "My son is allergic to dairy products which means I can't really go to Greggs when he's with me. Now I can. Thank you vegans."

View image on Twitter


pg often@pgofton
https://twitter.com/pgofton/status/1080772793774624768

The hype got me like #Greggs #Veganuary

42
10:28 AM - Jan 3, 2019
See pg often's other Tweets
Twitter Ads info and privacy


TV presenter Piers Morgan led the charge of those outraged by the new roll.

"Nobody was waiting for a vegan bloody sausage, you PC-ravaged clowns," he wrote on Twitter.

Mr Morgan later complained at receiving "howling abuse from vegans", adding: "I get it, you're all hangry. I would be too if I only ate plants and gruel."

Another Twitter user said: "I really struggle to believe that 20,000 vegans are that desperate to eat in a Greggs."

"You don't paint a mustach (sic) on the Mona Lisa and you don't mess with the perfect sausage roll," one quipped.

Journalist Nooruddean Choudry suggested Greggs introduce a halal steak bake to "crank the fume levels right up to 11".

The bakery chain told concerned customers that "change is good" and that there would "always be a classic sausage roll".

It comes on the same day McDonald's launched its first vegetarian "Happy Meal", designed for children.

The new dish comes with a "veggie wrap", instead of the usual chicken or beef option.

It should be noted that Piers Morgan and Greggs share the same PR firm, so I'm thinking this is some serious faux outrage and South Park KKK gambiting here.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Nvrm I have to update my last post - failed asylum seekers will be given up to 10 grand per person to leave the UK. I'm going to start wearing blackface and swimming from France to get my fucking yearly rent and then some. Why can we not just kick them out, what???
The Home Office is launching a new pilot where up to £10,000 per person will be given for people who cooperate with the system.

Around 150 families - including children - are expected to take part in the trial, to see if it can help save money.
They hope that if rolled out more widely, it can save the Home Office up to £20million a year.
LBC spoke with the Home Secretary about the plans last week on a visit to Copenhagen, Denmark, where she took inspiration from the Danes for our migration system.

They pay families up to £30,000 in order to leave quickly.
She said she wanted to pay people more than the £3,000 they're currently getting in a bid to try and encourage more to leave, quicker.

Aaaand there's a powercut in my ends now. Feels like it started south of here in the morning and began 'rolling' up across the region from Gloucestershire up to B1, Nat Grid says its a 'high voltage line fault'.
 
the instagram crowd under stress.
Not British. If you don't display British characteristics, not one of us.
I'm beginning to think under my requirements for Britishness, the population would be quartered.

Mahmood lectures us on Britishness and then offers a nice big bribe to the illegals at our expense

I don't know how Mahmood does it. Does she genuinely believe she is British ? Couldn't possibly see the irony of lecturing the rest of us on what it means to be British and how to defend "our" borders ? You've got to have some brass neck to do that on a national level. I would call her a traitor, but as I understand it, you actually have to be one of us to begin with to qualify the definition.

Her name, of arabic origin, means "praise worthy"....perhaps everything about her is contradictory. How praise worthy is it to pay families of illegal immigrants £40k to leave ? What's the average wage of a British person paying the taxes that fund this massive Brucie bonus ?
I suppose it's not even half of a MP's wage........
 
Nvrm I have to update my last post - failed asylum seekers will be given up to 10 grand per person to leave the UK. I'm going to start wearing blackface and swimming from France to get my fucking yearly rent and then some. Why can we not just kick them out, what???


Aaaand there's a powercut in my ends now. Feels like it started south of here in the morning and began 'rolling' up across the region from Gloucestershire up to B1, Nat Grid says its a 'high voltage line fault'.
Asylum seekers can't be fucked-off because of "laws". Same reason why the French just let them loiter in Calais more or less because domestic and international laws say they can't be touched.

What's annoying is I legit think just paying people to fuck off forever with their families isn't so bad just as long as they never come back.
They should open it to those here legally and with the asterisk they lose their citizenship.
10 grand x 10 million = 100 billion.
That seems like a worthwhile trade to get rid of every "Asian" in the UK. Cut that by a 3rd or half if it's per family.


1772717165068.png
 
Evacuation flights from Oman fail to take off. Don't know if this is strictly the government's fault but its still a major L.
A passenger said it was a "total shitshow" with people banging on windows and having panic attacks as repeated delays forced the pilot to rest
Photo of the evacuation:
1772718923919.png

Mass remigration is inevitable now.
Unless Farage becomes PM.

What's annoying is I legit think just paying people to fuck off forever with their families isn't so bad just as long as they never come back.
Probably need some sort of embedded microchip to ensure you don't get the same person coming over and over. Got a microchip or scars where it was? No admittance. But in all honestly I don't think even in that unlikely system it would solve the problem you'd create which would be get someone to go over, collect their winnings, return and split the money with your trafficker. Who cares if you stop the same person coming twice, there's an unlimited supply of people to do it with.

It might work, but only in conjunction with strict controls on those arriving.

EDIT: I also note that in their photograph, it's 80% women migrants whilst the actual figures are majority men. Just an observation.
 
Nvrm I have to update my last post - failed asylum seekers will be given up to 10 grand per person to leave the UK. I'm going to start wearing blackface and swimming from France to get my fucking yearly rent and then some. Why can we not just kick them out, what???


Aaaand there's a powercut in my ends now. Feels like it started south of here in the morning and began 'rolling' up across the region from Gloucestershire up to B1, Nat Grid says its a 'high voltage line fault'.
Imagine what you could do with 10 grand. How much good could you do with 10 grand in your community? I bet you could fix a lot of pot holes. You could do a damn good clean up of your town. Probably even put some of it towards helping the natural parts around you. Build a small pound or put in a football pitch right? Stuff your kids would get a better life from.

What do we gain from giving these faggots even more money? Take their DNA and either shoot them in the face or throw them into a prison camp in whatever African shit hole Starmer hasn't given away yet. We can easily build camps in Africa and deport them there.
Probably need some sort of embedded microchip to ensure you don't get the same person coming over and over. Got a microchip or scars where it was? No admittance
Can we tattoo numbers on them..?
 
Asylum seekers can't be fucked-off because of "laws". Same reason why the French just let them loiter in Calais more or less because domestic and international laws say they can't be touched.

What's annoying is I legit think just paying people to fuck off forever with their families isn't so bad just as long as they never come back.
They should open it to those here legally and with the asterisk they lose their citizenship.
10 grand x 10 million = 100 billion.
That seems like a worthwhile trade to get rid of every "Asian" in the UK. Cut that by a 3rd or half if it's per family.


View attachment 8656774
Get rid of the laws and throw them all into an old used quarry. I'm sure per-person you could reduce it to a few hundred to pay for the fuel and wages.

View attachment 8656925
Yes YEs YEs YES!!!!! ^_^
With cases like this, they are never gay. It's just a retarded excuse they give so they can't get deported.
 
Get rid of the laws and throw them all into an old used quarry.
I mean it's not like Dr Who is using it anymore.

I see the whole pay them to leave thing as a rung on a ladder of escalation.
Rung one is encourage them to leave of their own accord. If that doesn't work then it's rung two, forcible deportation to a country willing to take them. If that doesn't work, then there is a final solution to the migrant question. End of the day we can't let them stay forver, if we did let them push the UK gov around then democracy would fail.

Rupert Lowe's idea of a "deportation NATO" where countries collectively deport and sanction to reduce immigration is based as fuck though.
 
Last edited:
Keir is sending 4 more Typhoons to Qatar.
Speech highlights. He says we should ''come together in this moment''. He says Trump has ''plunged the region into chaos'' and then admits he hasn't spoken to the Don since Saturday. I suppose Kier knows all about being left on read by his boyfriends
"So I want you to know: your Government is resolute in its response. We will do everything we can to protect British lives, uphold British values and safeguard the national interest"
"Those citizens that are stuck in the region come from all backgrounds [No dipshit, they are all Iranian/Persian] The Armed Forces who protect them come from all backgrounds too. We are united by our common humanity and our love for this country"
"My focus is providing calm, level headed leadership in the national interest... it means having the strength to stand firm by our principles, no matter the pressure to do otherwise"
Unarchived video clip but look how fat the sign language translator is. Does dear sneeder like fat bitches even if they are Bri'ish?
 
Rupert Lowe's idea of a "deportation NATO" where countries collectively deport and sanction to reduce immigration is based as fuck though.
It would also provide an actual legal framework to which other right wing nations can point to and say "Actually, dickhead, this says I can in fact bulldoze them into the PVP server in Africa". I dislike the fact that we as a country sit there and gargle on the balls of international law; but if we must interact with the system, then it is better to build a fig leaf of easy respectability than to try and brush through it.
 
I see the whole pay them to leave thing as a rung on a ladder of escalation.
It's just throwing them more money. 10 grand is a very lot of money in the third world. It's just going to encourage more people to come here to get the hand out. Multiple times. Oops I spent it all time to go back to the UK, six months in a holiday and get my bennies refill.

Weak men and women try to bribe. The type of men who have no power to enforce their will. And all it does is cost more and more and more until you're bled dry. You have to project power, not weakness. And this just projects a nation too weak to fight back so it pays the protection money to the niggers invading it.

And that's before "Oops he did a legal at the last second. We can't deport him before his case has been heard' and an extra 3 years of free hotels, benefits and rape gang access.

We are now at war with Iran. We have enabled the US to use our assets. We have had our national territory bombed by a foreign power. Use "we're at war" to deal with all of this. The gloves come off. The border snaps shut and international law is done with.
 
I feel like we're going to get a bomillian Arab refugees under Starmer regardless of whether we actually enter this war or not, so at this point why not make it worth our while by bombing Iran?
 
It's just throwing them more money. 10 grand is a very lot of money in the third world. It's just going to encourage more people to come here to get the hand out. Multiple times. Oops I spent it all time to go back to the UK, six months in a holiday and get my bennies refill.

Weak men and women try to bribe. The type of men who have no power to enforce their will. And all it does is cost more and more and more until you're bled dry. You have to project power, not weakness. And this just projects a nation too weak to fight back so it pays the protection money to the niggers invading it.

And that's before "Oops he did a legal at the last second. We can't deport him before his case has been heard' and an extra 3 years of free hotels, benefits and rape gang access.

We are now at war with Iran. We have enabled the US to use our assets. We have had our national territory bombed by a foreign power. Use "we're at war" to deal with all of this. The gloves come off. The border snaps shut and international law is done with.
I'm not against spending money to get rid of the filth, but paying them to leave really is just a 'wog-geld' and it would be rapidly integrated into the large and sophisticated network of QUANGOs as an extra revenue stream...to be used to bring in even more browns. You can't pay a jackal to fuck off from eating you, at best it'll just take the money and eat you regardless.
 
Sweden does something along these lines. The amount is far lower and I believe uptake has been minimal. But there were plans to up the amount by a lot to something like $34,000 which is a fortune in many of the countries migrants are from. Though less than it costs to feed and house a migrant so in theory it's a netgain. However, big risk of Danegeld effect. Or 'Give a Mouse a Cookie', depending on how intellectual you are. Honestly, unless combined with some very strong new measures to discourage immigration, I see this as incentivising more immigration.

There are two things here. The first is that @LXXVII Brigade idea of an escalating system is, imho, slightly off. You don't want escalation, you want pincer. Or carrot and stick. If you do this at all you look at the way Trump's administration is doing this in the USA where you both create an environment of risk for staying and provide a safe and incentivised way to leave voluntarily. Or if you prefer, the same principle as the "cauldrons" Russia uses in Ukraine - surround but leave an exit route, because the enemy leaving voluntarily is less costly for you than if they fight. Never surround an enemy and leave them no escape route because they hunker down. That's the role of a policy like this - not to rely on it as an inducement but as a greased exit ramp that people will use to escape other measures. Otherwise they just go to ground and it can take a long time to winkle them out. It has to be part of a wider plan but is not necessarily a bad idea in itself.

The other thing is that there's a Solomon's Wisdom aspect to this, liken to when he threatened to cut the baby in half. The real asylum seekers can't go home. Economic migrants can. This is a very effective way to distinguish between the two. What you do with that information afterwards is another thing but it's worth noting.
 
I feel like we're going to get a bomillian Arab refugees under Starmer regardless of whether we actually enter this war or not, so at this point why not make it worth our while by bombing Iran?
Yeah but then they have the epic steelman of it being our responsibility because "we bombeded them : (" like they did with all the other sand wars.
 
The real asylum seekers can't go home
Deafest attitude and a disgusting one. Only fit for a woman.

They can go home. You just say "not our problem, fuck off" and drop them else where. I don't give a fuck about any one else, I don't care if they want to suck dick and get thrown off a building. We have too many problems and until we've sorted them, fuck the lot of them. Too much has already been wasted and throwing good money after bad is retarded. We have mass transport and we have guns. That's all it takes. Every "refugee" left is another rape gang. How many little kids do you want to see raped before it's too many and they all have to go immediately?
 
Back
Top Bottom