UK British News Megathread - aka CWCissey's news thread

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
https://news.sky.com/story/row-over-new-greggs-vegan-sausage-rolls-heats-up-11597679 (https://archive.ph/5Ba6o)

A heated row has broken out over a move by Britain's largest bakery chain to launch a vegan sausage roll.

The pastry, which is filled with a meat substitute and encased in 96 pastry layers, is available in 950 Greggs stores across the country.

It was promised after 20,000 people signed a petition calling for the snack to be launched to accommodate plant-based diet eaters.


But the vegan sausage roll's launch has been greeted by a mixed reaction: Some consumers welcomed it, while others voiced their objections.

View image on Twitter


spread happiness@p4leandp1nk
https://twitter.com/p4leandp1nk/status/1080767496569974785

#VEGANsausageroll thanks Greggs
2764.png


7
10:07 AM - Jan 3, 2019
See spread happiness's other Tweets
Twitter Ads info and privacy


Cook and food poverty campaigner Jack Monroe declared she was "frantically googling to see what time my nearest opens tomorrow morning because I will be outside".

While TV writer Brydie Lee-Kennedy called herself "very pro the Greggs vegan sausage roll because anything that wrenches veganism back from the 'clean eating' wellness folk is a good thing".

One Twitter user wrote that finding vegan sausage rolls missing from a store in Corby had "ruined my morning".

Another said: "My son is allergic to dairy products which means I can't really go to Greggs when he's with me. Now I can. Thank you vegans."

View image on Twitter


pg often@pgofton
https://twitter.com/pgofton/status/1080772793774624768

The hype got me like #Greggs #Veganuary

42
10:28 AM - Jan 3, 2019
See pg often's other Tweets
Twitter Ads info and privacy


TV presenter Piers Morgan led the charge of those outraged by the new roll.

"Nobody was waiting for a vegan bloody sausage, you PC-ravaged clowns," he wrote on Twitter.

Mr Morgan later complained at receiving "howling abuse from vegans", adding: "I get it, you're all hangry. I would be too if I only ate plants and gruel."

Another Twitter user said: "I really struggle to believe that 20,000 vegans are that desperate to eat in a Greggs."

"You don't paint a mustach (sic) on the Mona Lisa and you don't mess with the perfect sausage roll," one quipped.

Journalist Nooruddean Choudry suggested Greggs introduce a halal steak bake to "crank the fume levels right up to 11".

The bakery chain told concerned customers that "change is good" and that there would "always be a classic sausage roll".

It comes on the same day McDonald's launched its first vegetarian "Happy Meal", designed for children.

The new dish comes with a "veggie wrap", instead of the usual chicken or beef option.

It should be noted that Piers Morgan and Greggs share the same PR firm, so I'm thinking this is some serious faux outrage and South Park KKK gambiting here.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
think it's possibly tinged with a naivity of the public that they can't believe that their governments ( across both parties ) would betray them in such a way to knowingly and legally allow an invading force to infiltrate our land to the extent that they so negatively impact our way of life, making it unrecognisable in less than a generation - surely that must be illegal ? That nice Mr Blair would never have wanted this as an endgame, surely ?
They're not comfortable with the idea that the government can simply declare its own actions legal and that they're dealing with the national equivalent of Ron Swanson.

1755089057223.webp
 
Yvette Cooper insinuating those supporting Palestine Action are doing so because they're thick.
Yvette Cooper has said that some supporters of Palestine Action "don't know the full nature" of the group, following the mass arrest of more than 500 people at the weekend.
Defending the organisation's proscription, she stressed it was "not a non-violent organisation".
The home secretary said tens of thousands protested lawfully about the "horrendous events" in Gaza without involving Palestine Action, which was banned under terror legislation last month.
Palestine Action won permission to challenge the ban, with a hearing set for November, and Amnesty International described the arrests as "deeply concerning".


https://archive.ph/o/yKSWe/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cj4wwxz12jko
The proscription made membership of or support for Palestine Action a criminal offence, punishable by up to 14 years in prison, and happened after followers caused an estimated £7m of damage to jets at RAF Brize Norton.
On Saturday, hundreds of protesters simultaneously pulled out placards supporting Palestine Action outside Parliament at 13:00 BST. In all, 532 people were arrested.
The home secretary stood by her decision to proscribe Palestine Action, which she said had been "involved in violent attacks" and "major criminal damage against national security infrastructure".
She told the BBC: "There may be people who are objecting to proscription who don't know the full nature of this organisation, because of court restrictions on reporting while serious prosecutions are under way.
"But it's really important that no-one is in any doubt that this is not a non-violent organisation."
Cooper added there had been "clear security assessments and advice" ahead of the ban.
The human rights charity Amnesty International's chief executive Sacha Deshmukh suggested the response to the protest was disproportionate.
He said: "We have long criticised UK terrorism law for being excessively broad and vaguely worded and a threat to freedom of expression. These arrests demonstrate that our concerns were justified."
Asked whether there was any reconsideration of the decision to proscribe Palestine Action, the prime minister's official spokesman said it was based on strong security advice.
He told journalists Palestine Action had been considered to have committed three separate terrorism acts by the Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre, although he declined to say what these were.
"Palestine Action was proscribed based on strong security advice – following serious attacks the group has committed involving violence, significant injuries and extensive criminal damage," he said, adding: "Whilst many people may not yet know the reality of the organisation – those assessments are very clear."
The spokesman said the police had carried out their duties "without fear or favour", which he said was "a foundational principle of policing by consent".
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has warned Israel he will recognise a Palestinian state in September unless Israel takes "substantive steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza".
The move has been strongly criticised by Israel who said it "rewards Hamas's monstrous terrorism".
The UN's humanitarian agency said on Friday that the amount of aid entering Gaza continues to be "far below the minimum required to meet people's immense needs", and last month, UN-backed global food security experts warned the "worst-case scenario of famine is currently playing out".
Israel has continued to deny there is starvation in Gaza and has accused UN agencies of not picking up aid at the borders and delivering it.
Israel launched its offensive in response to the Hamas-led attack on southern Israel on 7 October 2023, in which about 1,200 people were killed and 251 others were taken hostage.
Since then, 61,430 people have been killed in Gaza as a result of Israel's military campaign, according to the health ministry.
Meanwhile the amount of people on indefinite benefits continues to rise
Universal Credit claimants have reached a record eight million, according to official figures published on Tuesday. This unprecedented number for July 2025 marks the highest level since the benefit's introduction in 2013.
The latest data reveals a significant surge of over a million people in just one year, up from 6.9 million claimants in July last year.
Universal Credit is a payment designed to assist with living costs, available to those in low-income employment, as well as individuals who are out of work or unable to work.


The steep rise in the past year has been driven almost entirely by people who are not required to work, with 3.7 million in this category in July – a rise of 39% or 1 million since the same time in 2024.
People in this bracket can include those in full-time education, over the state pension age, someone with a child aged under one, and those considered to have no prospect of work.

The Labour Government has previously said it “inherited a broken welfare system and spiralling, unsustainable benefits bill” from the Conservatives, and is working on reforms including tightening rules on who can claim UC.

The number of working people on UC rose to 2.2 million in July, up slightly from 2.1 million 12 months previously.
Of those more than 1 million were born overseas
Data showing the immigration status of those claiming universal credit (UC) - a benefit designed to help both employed and unemployed people with living costs - has been published for the first time.
In June, nearly eight million people received universal credit, 83.6% of whom were British and Irish nationals.
More than a million claimants were born overseas, including around 700,000 EU citizens who arrived in the UK before Brexit and have the right to live and work in the UK.
Around 1.5% of claimants were refugees and 0.7% had arrived in the UK via safe routes such as those for Ukrainians and Afghans.
More than 75,000 claimants who are in the UK temporarily and would typically not be able to receive benefits are also claiming UC.
The Department for Work and Pensions has said most foreign nationals can claim only after five years residency, but there are exceptions such as for victims of modern slavery.
The government produced figures going back to April 2022. In that time, the proportion of claimants who were born overseas has remained broadly level at between 15% and 17%.
During the same period, the total number of people on UC rose from 5.5m to 7.9m.
According to the most recent figures for May 2025, around half of EU citizens claiming UC are in employment, compared to a fifth of refugees.
The figures were published following pressure from some Conservatives and the independent MP Rupert Lowe.
A Downing Street spokesperson said the prime minister wanted to see the number of unemployed foreign nationals claiming benefits to go down and insisted the government was "toughening up the system" by doubling the time a migrant has to wait before qualifying for permanent - or settled - status in the UK.
They added that people in the UK illegally are not allowed to access UC.


https://archive.ph/o/In23Y/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c05l9y56773o
Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said the "staggering figures" were "clear proof that the Labour government has lost control of our welfare system".
"Under Kemi Badenoch, we've set out a clear, common-sense position. This is about fairness, responsibility and protecting support for those who've contributed to this country," he said.
The Conservatives have said foreign nationals should not get the personal independence payment (Pip) disability benefit or the health element of UC.
Lowe said the publication of the data was a "huge win" for those who had "relentlessly pushed for this".
He described the levels of foreign nationals claiming UC as "absolute insanity" adding: "We cannot afford it. The country is BROKE."
The government had hoped to slow the rise of the benefits bill, but had to backtrack on many of its plans following a rebellion among its own MPs.
Under the remaining measures, the health related element of universal credit will be reduced for new claims from April 2026.
Plod chief says people should be handling shoplifters themselves
The public has a duty to stand up to shoplifters rather than relying solely on police officers, a policing chief has said. Matthew Barber, the Conservative Police and Crime Commissioner for Thames Valley, said it was wrong to think that tackling thieves was just a job for police.
He said: “If you’re not even going to challenge people, you’re not going to try and stop them, then people will get away with it. That’s not just about policing. That’s a bigger problem with society, people who [don’t do anything] – you’re part of the problem.”

It comes amid growing pressure on the police to tackle a shoplifting epidemic, with a record high of nearly three thefts carried out every minute in the year to March.

Retailers have accused police of failing to do enough to tackle the problem. Last week, it was revealed that a store owner in North Wales who put up a sign criticising “scumbags shoplifting” was told by police to consider changing the wording because it was offensive.
It has also emerged that the Information Commissioner’s Office has advised retailers that putting up images of thieves in a local area “may not be appropriate” because it could violate suspects’ data rights.


Mr Barber insisted the public and retailers had a vital role to play in tackling the shoplifting epidemic alongside police.
Speaking at a meeting of the Thames Valley police and crime panel in June, he said he “wouldn’t for a moment” want to suggest that everyone should feel “obliged to take it upon themselves to rugby tackle every perceived criminal to the ground”.
However, he added: “We should all be responsible citizens in our community.”
“If you’ve got someone in your store now stealing from you, call 999. Also ideally try and stop them leaving, don’t just stand there and watch, which a lot of people do, which frustrates me.”

The remarks were heavily criticised by Joshua Reynolds, the Liberal Democrat MP for Maidenhead, in the Thames Valley Police area, who called them “irresponsible” and “dangerous”.
Asked by The Telegraph whether he stood by his statement, Mr Barber said he did. He added: “The idea that this is just a job for the police, citizens have no responsibility, put your head down, carry on, don’t get involved, I think that makes for a very poor society.”
The commissioner said his comments were not about “getting the public to step in where the police are not”, and that police clearly had to play their part in tackling crime.
He added: “But surely the alternative to intervening if a crime is happening in society, is you put your head down, get on with your life, ignore it, is that right?”
Organisations representing independent retailers and newsagents have also warned that they need to be proactive amid the shoplifting epidemic and lack of police action.


Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative leader, said the country would “never ever have enough police officers to do every single thing that needs policing”. She added: “We need the community as well to do that.”

Ms Badenoch said that “after conducting a very quick risk assessment”, she personally would intervene to tackle a shoplifter, adding: “That is the sort of person I am. I never liked the phrase have-a-go-hero because I think it is what people used to do as normal back in the day.”
It comes after police issued an appeal after two women were attacked while challenging a suspected shoplifter.
The incident, which happened last Thursday at an Iceland supermarket in Clifton, Nottinghamshire, saw a man put his hands around a woman’s neck and strangle her after she challenged him for putting items into his backpack.
A female member of staff then intervened, and he assaulted her as well, threatening to “kill her” if she got in his way.
He then left the store with another man, having stolen £70 worth of laundry products.
Viral videos circulating on social media accounts show people walking into stores such as Greggs on a daily basis, grabbing goods and walking out unchallenged.
Mr Barber criticised people who stood to one side and filmed, adding: “You’re the idiot standing there with a mobile phone. You’re not doing anything, either, are you? You’re not even challenging someone verbally. So there’s definitely a wider need for us all to just stand up a little bit.”

Earlier this week, a man died after being restrained by another customer at a shop in Torpoint, Cornwall, where he had allegedly assaulted staff.
In a report submitted to the Police and Crime Panel, Mr Barber praised the fact there had been a 22 per cent increase in reports of shoplifting from May 2024 to June this year, saying that showed more people were getting involved and reporting criminals.


Data shared on the Thames Valley Police website, however, showed that there had been an increase in the rate of shoplifting incidents across the region relative to last year.
For the year ending this June, the Thames Valley region saw 7.7 incidents of shoplifting per 1,000 residents, compared to 7.4 in the year ending last December.
James Lowman, the chief executive of the Association of Convenience Stores, said the shoplifting epidemic had reached “crisis point”. He added: “We know from feedback from retailers that posting screenshots of CCTV or naming and shaming persistent offenders can be an effective way of dealing with criminals in the absence of intervention from the police.

“While we wouldn’t recommend this as an official policy for any business, theft in some communities has reached crisis point so it’s unsurprising that business owners are doing everything they can to protect themselves and their colleagues.
“Retailers rarely see the police when they report theft, so are understandably frustrated when they are warned about identifying criminals in their store and on social media. The police need to focus on dealing with criminals that are committing offences rather than defending those who take offence.”
Hetal Patel, the president of the Federation for Independent Retailers, said businesses had a right to share pictures in a way that is “lawful, fair and proportionate”.
He added: “It’s understandable that, with shop theft spiralling out of control, retailers are posting photos of prolific offenders in their store windows.”
 
Lammy may be fined for not having his fishing loicense.

Guido (Link / Archive)

View attachment 7774197
I hope it comes out that he rented fishing gear and was told in writing that he needed to get a loicense and so it wasn't an oversight at all.

If anyone has seen the 360 mile cab driver thing Lammy just seems to chance everything to be a cheapskate.

 
They're not comfortable with the idea that the government can simply declare its own actions legal and that they're dealing with the national equivalent of Ron Swanson.

View attachment 7774244
Yes, people are used to the government at least pretending that they are following some sort of interruptible process. That they are going through these legal channels for doing X, and Y; and that if people really voted and lobbied the government would stop and say "Well the people have spoken, guess we can't do that!"

The reality that it's actually the government just coming at you with its trousers down, cock in hand and ready to rape, while saying "Hey, look, I'm going to do this, you can't stop me without just killing me, hahaha." is something most normal people find wildly unsettling.

Plod chief says people should be handling shoplifters themselves
Oh boy oh fucking boy. I would love to be able to legally drag shoplifters up and down the street on a chain behind my car. Sadly though, I think this faggot just means that he expects everyone to politely ask the dumb browns to stop stealing, and that he expects this deterrent behaviour will cause them to stop, rather than get violent. I assume because he's a fucking moron.

EDIT: You know, I look at what I write and think and do now; and compare it to when I was 25 (4 years ago). I've become extremely radical. I don't like this, at all. I don't actually like the idea of me being a violent man, but I'm out at the gym a lot, I've taken boxing lessons regularly, I go shooting four times a month. My politics have gone from "I am a right wing conservative type." to something a lot less pleasant than that. No more happy hobbit politics. Not very 'news' worthy, just kind of sad to reflect on that.
 
Last edited:
Have you been cooking in 30C+ weather this week?
Stressed about the climate emergency?

The government has a suggestion:
Naturally, the government is trying to encourage citizens to save water, and lists a number of very reasonable actions concerned residents can take to reduce their water usage. Measures such as collecting rainwater, fixing a leaky toilet, and using wastewater to water plants, alongside reducing shower times and not watering your lawn, can help reduce water usage. Finally, the article states, "Delete old emails and pictures as data centres require vast amounts of water to cool their systems."
 
Some news items (a smorgasbord today) :


Senedd Member Hefin David dies suddenly at 47 (his Father, Wayne David, was the MEP for South East Wales and is the current MP for Caerphilly):




'Cryptocrash king' Do Kwon pleads guilty to fraud:




Inside Australia's billion-dollar bid to take on China's rare earth dominance:




Wife of South Korea's jailed ex-president arrested:




Alexander Isak told he can 'NEVER play for Newcastle again' after antics in bid to force Liverpool move:




Politics LIVE: Keir Starmer rejects calls for immediate General Election as 700,000 deliver damning verdict on Labour:




GB News halted for major migrant 'breaking news' – it's brutal blow for Starmer:




M25 traffic: Massive vehicle fire shuts busy motorway as firefighters rush to put out huge blaze:




Sky Sports claims 'dodgy Fire Sticks' will cause removal of 3pm football blackout as companies lose billions:




Prince Andrew accused of launching into foul-mouthed rant: 'What the f**k are you doing?!':


 

I know the first reaction to this is probably going to be "Why are the police wasting time on this shit!" and for sure, I agree. However, I think that this is a way to make more money for the police. The police pulling people over to virtue lecture at them for catcalling hot female officers; but that's probably just a pretence to then find an easily justified on the spot fine.

Literally putting your female officers in gym shark booty shorts and sending them out to trawl for tips. At this point, why not just do a bikini car wash? It'd be more fun at least.
 
The problem, as I understand it, is that you can take whatever route you like to claim asylum. There are preferred routes, the ones we'd think of as legal, but a small boat crossing is just as valid. This loops back into most Brits thinking we have more illegal migrants than legal, because any sane person would think entering a foreign country by dinghy with the intent of immigrating would net you a night in jail and a swift deportation.
I think any asylum seekers coming from France would count as illegal by virtue of the fact that international asylum law mandates you stop at the first safe country. Which probably be Italy for a lot of them but it's certainly not Britain. But I'm not an Internationl Human Rights lawyer like Kier Starmer, so I'm sure he knows best.

Only a retard would measure a nation's prosperity by GDP. It has to be PER CAPITA.
As a footnote, GDP is a dodgy way to measure economic health anyway, despite that it's done routinely. It's just a measure of the volume and rate of exchange of currency. When your landlord puts your rent up, that's an increase in GDP. When house prizes rise, that's an increase in GDP. When the government takes the money you've saved and and gives it to a migrant, even that, probably, is an increase in GDP.

GDP is not meaningless, but it's not this "more better" metric that the governments of the world seem obsessed with presenting it as. If the rent goes up, that's only good for the landlord and the taxman.
 
The reality that it's actually the government just coming at you with its trousers down, cock in hand and ready to rape, while saying "Hey, look, I'm going to do this, you can't stop me without just killing me, hahaha." is something most normal people find wildly unsettling.
We must be dealing with very different gentle public. The public I know are well aware how fucked everything is and that the government doesn't care what the law says. Big Baz could tell you the governments got a prince albert and thinks it makes anal rape more fun for the victim at this point.

It's unsettling but everyone feels powerless to act. The majority of the general public hate the political class. They would genocide the entire establishment and start fresh if given the chance. The only reason they don't is they don't think any one else would join in. If things properly kick off you can expect a lot of normies to turn out to be just as angry and 'something less nice' as you are.

Literally putting your female officers in gym shark booty shorts and sending them out to trawl for tips. At this point, why not just do a bikini car wash? It'd be more fun at least.
Builders shouting NICE TITS LOVE is a core part of British identity. There's nothing wrong with it and trying to police it is stupid. The harassment women always claim to suffer is never a white bloke up a ladder. It's always brown men starting to stalk them and track their route home.

Shows you police priorities though. Whistling is more dangerous than 500 foreign men in a hotel near a playground.
 
libtard police.mp4
I know the first reaction to this is probably going to be "Why are the police wasting time on this shit!" and for sure, I agree. However, I think that this is a way to make more money for the police. The police pulling people over to virtue lecture at them for catcalling hot female officers; but that's probably just a pretence to then find an easily justified on the spot fine.

Literally putting your female officers in gym shark booty shorts and sending them out to trawl for tips. At this point, why not just do a bikini car wash? It'd be more fun at least.
Does this remind anyone else of the movie, The Warriors, in the park where the woman on the bench starts smiling at the guy, gets chatty with him, and then yanks out a whistle when he makes a move and policemen burst out?

Probably not the best comparison - a lass going for a run isn't actively seeking men approaching her. Though I do imagine some of the conversations down the station. "Our fines are low. Put Gwen out there. She looks great in lycra - will up our rates for sure." Or "Yeah, sorry constable, but that outfits not sexy enough. Lose the hoodie."

I remember twenty-something years ago, a female housemate of mine coming in all giggly and saying "I got papped". (Some guys beeped at her as they went by).

I wonder if they record the ethnicity of guys who make comments and how they select what areas to run in. Cause I know a few towns where a woman going out with bare skin would get a LOT of comments. I can recommend these to the police if they want to maximise the number of men they catch.
 
Probably not the best comparison - a lass going for a run isn't actively seeking men approaching her. Though I do imagine some of the conversations down the station. "Our fines are low. Put Gwen out there. She looks great in lycra - will up our rates for sure." Or "Yeah, sorry constable, but that outfits not sexy enough. Lose the hoodie."
If women don't want male attention don't dress in ways that will get it. Lycra running shorts that show your flabby arse jiggling around and a full camel toe is not how you should be dressing in public. There are ways you can dress to be cool in the summer and not look like a prostitute. We have lots of comfortable and modest summer clothing you can wear if you need it, which will not only make you look nicer but also stop men staring at your arse as you go to the shops.

I'm joking. I know you're all a bunch of sluts wanting the attention. And I'll laugh at how flabby your bum was when I get home and talk to the wife.

Oddly comforting.
People cannot say what they think without being arrested but many of them will post in the comment section.
 
If women don't want male attention don't dress in ways that will get it. Lycra running shorts that show your flabby arse jiggling around and a full camel toe is not how you should be dressing in public. There are ways you can dress to be cool in the summer and not look like a prostitute. We have lots of comfortable and modest summer clothing you can wear if you need it, which will not only make you look nicer but also stop men staring at your arse as you go to the shops.

I'm joking. I know you're all a bunch of sluts wanting the attention. And I'll laugh at how flabby your bum was when I get home and talk to the wife.


People cannot say what they think without being arrested but many of them will post in the comment section.
I kid you not, I saw one of these exact women with a camel toe that the cyclist behind her could park his bike in.

At least it wasn't a Raleigh bike so there's no jokes about choppers up her snatch...
 
Literally putting your female officers in gym shark booty shorts and sending them out to trawl for tips. At this point, why not just do a bikini car wash? It'd be more fun at least.
They're opening a new subscription service next: OnlyFilth. The only place where you'll be sure to see the police coming.
 
Literally everyone ITT anytime scantily clad ladies comes up;
1755093027555.webp 1755093253589.webp 1755093282940.webp
Come on guys, are you really complaining? :melchett:
I for one am not the type to mind lycra shorts, because I am neither muslamic nor homosexual. All you gotta do is not behave like a brown about it.
Anyone who fails the basic human decency test of not being a creep over clothing ought to be a castration candidate IMO.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom