UK British News Megathread - aka CWCissey's news thread

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
https://news.sky.com/story/row-over-new-greggs-vegan-sausage-rolls-heats-up-11597679 (https://archive.ph/5Ba6o)

A heated row has broken out over a move by Britain's largest bakery chain to launch a vegan sausage roll.

The pastry, which is filled with a meat substitute and encased in 96 pastry layers, is available in 950 Greggs stores across the country.

It was promised after 20,000 people signed a petition calling for the snack to be launched to accommodate plant-based diet eaters.


But the vegan sausage roll's launch has been greeted by a mixed reaction: Some consumers welcomed it, while others voiced their objections.

View image on Twitter


spread happiness@p4leandp1nk
https://twitter.com/p4leandp1nk/status/1080767496569974785

#VEGANsausageroll thanks Greggs
2764.png


7
10:07 AM - Jan 3, 2019
See spread happiness's other Tweets
Twitter Ads info and privacy


Cook and food poverty campaigner Jack Monroe declared she was "frantically googling to see what time my nearest opens tomorrow morning because I will be outside".

While TV writer Brydie Lee-Kennedy called herself "very pro the Greggs vegan sausage roll because anything that wrenches veganism back from the 'clean eating' wellness folk is a good thing".

One Twitter user wrote that finding vegan sausage rolls missing from a store in Corby had "ruined my morning".

Another said: "My son is allergic to dairy products which means I can't really go to Greggs when he's with me. Now I can. Thank you vegans."

View image on Twitter


pg often@pgofton
https://twitter.com/pgofton/status/1080772793774624768

The hype got me like #Greggs #Veganuary

42
10:28 AM - Jan 3, 2019
See pg often's other Tweets
Twitter Ads info and privacy


TV presenter Piers Morgan led the charge of those outraged by the new roll.

"Nobody was waiting for a vegan bloody sausage, you PC-ravaged clowns," he wrote on Twitter.

Mr Morgan later complained at receiving "howling abuse from vegans", adding: "I get it, you're all hangry. I would be too if I only ate plants and gruel."

Another Twitter user said: "I really struggle to believe that 20,000 vegans are that desperate to eat in a Greggs."

"You don't paint a mustach (sic) on the Mona Lisa and you don't mess with the perfect sausage roll," one quipped.

Journalist Nooruddean Choudry suggested Greggs introduce a halal steak bake to "crank the fume levels right up to 11".

The bakery chain told concerned customers that "change is good" and that there would "always be a classic sausage roll".

It comes on the same day McDonald's launched its first vegetarian "Happy Meal", designed for children.

The new dish comes with a "veggie wrap", instead of the usual chicken or beef option.

It should be noted that Piers Morgan and Greggs share the same PR firm, so I'm thinking this is some serious faux outrage and South Park KKK gambiting here.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Posted this morning on the official Labour party twitter page

1740399605466.png

Why is it that the UK specifically is going all in on Ukraine? Has Starmer actually gone completely mental? Why are we hell-bent on perpetual war in Ukraine, no matter the consequences?
 
Support for Ukraine is a pretty popular position. Labour think they can use it to ride out all their scandals.
 
That will mean a by-election. Either he resigns willingly now or there will be a recall petition which should easily pass the threshold of signatories.
It'll go to recall. He won't resign, Labour will be hoping that the 10%threshold won't be reached.

He's also only going to serve 40% of his sentence. So remember, assaulting members of the public (if you're an MP) 4 weeks in prison. Hurty words on the internet 4 years.

Enjoy the chants of two-tier Kier, they're not going away any time soon.
 
Last edited:
Another deportation challenge pritected by the ECHR, from the Guardian this time. NHS employee cheering on Hamas on October 7t
Well, she should be departed and the judge should read her own words back to her, Dr Menatalla Elwan, 34, who worked at an NHS trust in Liverpool, reposted footage of music festivalgoers running from Hamas terrorists and wrote “if it was your home, you would stay and fight”, accompanied by a smiling face emoji.
Again, most time I have to apply for a new job I have to provide five to seven years of employment history that is checked by the firm to make sure I wasn’t lying. Why aren’t simple checks like this in place for people wanting to be politicians? Why the hell aren’t they carried out before offering them cabinet positions?
Assuming some of them have elevated security clearances as well? They should be checked by the intelligence services surely? I know a couple of people who got jobs at GCHQ and what have you and they all had their lives fine through with a fine tooth comb. They were mathematicians and even the people they’d met and done a random student poster with in their class they had investigated because they were Russian. I cannot believe that intelligence don’t background check prospective MPs?? I mean of course they do, right? Which means they simply don’t care about the lies and deception. That is to me a far worse thing because we all know politicians are grubby little wretches with their snouts in the trough but intelligence allowing them to lie like that? That’s a big deal.
 
The final solution to the g**se problem has always been to charge the bastards while flapping you arms and reeeeeeeing, never not worked for me just don't try it with llamas unless you want a headbutting.
That will mean a by-election. Either he resigns willingly now or there will be a recall petition which should easily pass the threshold of signatories.
What do we reckon the odds are the whatsapper MPs (at least 2 so far) get slapped with wrongthink charges and recalled? Grannies are getting doorstopped by detectives for "I hope you die" facebook pooosting so it'd only be fair and consistent.
I wanna see some good by-electoral humiliations before final death cascade so I can enjoy saying I told you so for longer.
 
I don't think Kemi will even last a full year, to be honest. The problem is having the position now is a poison chalice and anyone worth their salt will steer clear. I can see a lot of the less problematic Tories defecting, I would like to see Hunt defect there as he was a sound Chancellor. The blessing in disguise for Reform is that with both parties floundering they are getting crushed under their enormous admin costs. We are in a reality where the Conservatives could go bankrupt meaning they cannot afford to mobilize their campaigns.

His Ukraine policy is stupid and ill-timed because like always he can never read the room. A lot of people especially Reform supporters tend to be speculative of Zelensky but also the futile nature of Ukraine. Zelensky has shown his entitlement when it comes to the USA's contributions to the war. The truth in the matter is Trump knew they were contributing the most and decided to take away the credit card because he knew the Europeans were not in the position to bankroll it but also did not have the appetite except Starmer.

There are some by-elections and Reform will most likely sweep hard, Starm if in power will probably face no-confidence shit like this always triggers no-confidence votes. I predict this is when the Torie defections will start or in April. People forget when there are times of strife political scape goes fast and this will be Labour's issue just everything will weigh on them to the point they cannot escape the magnifying glass and then they buckle. This Labour is very different to the Blair Labour who were edited to a degree, these MPs are very sloppy and irrational along with their leader.
 
Last edited:
The final solution to the g**se problem has always been to charge the bastards while flapping you arms and reeeeeeeing, never not worked for me just don't try it with llamas unless you want a headbutting.

What do we reckon the odds are the whatsapper MPs (at least 2 so far) get slapped with wrongthink charges and recalled? Grannies are getting doorstopped by detectives for "I hope you die" facebook pooosting so it'd only be fair and consistent.
I wanna see some good by-electoral humiliations before final death cascade so I can enjoy saying I told you so for longer.
I think they’ll just take the whip off them and hope they doesn’t resign as MPs so they can rejoin in the future as the last thing they want is Reform winning a by-election.
 
Well, she should be departed and the judge should read her own words back to her, Dr Menatalla Elwan, 34, who worked at an NHS trust in Liverpool, reposted footage of music festivalgoers running from Hamas terrorists and wrote “if it was your home, you would stay and fight”, accompanied by a smiling face emoji.

Assuming some of them have elevated security clearances as well? They should be checked by the intelligence services surely? I know a couple of people who got jobs at GCHQ and what have you and they all had their lives fine through with a fine tooth comb. They were mathematicians and even the people they’d met and done a random student poster with in their class they had investigated because they were Russian. I cannot believe that intelligence don’t background check prospective MPs?? I mean of course they do, right? Which means they simply don’t care about the lies and deception. That is to me a far worse thing because we all know politicians are grubby little wretches with their snouts in the trough but intelligence allowing them to lie like that? That’s a big deal.
Honestly, if elected politicians had to pass enhanced clearance, they.... couldn't. Modern day politics is a game of getting into bed with some very very fucking dubious people for money, clout, or both. MI5 more or less exists to collect info on our elected politicos, and has done for many decades. The state knows these people are all bought and sold, and who by. But the alternative - blacklisting the 'security unacceptable' - is such a base level sodomisation of our democracy that we can't live with that. It would bar forever the members of any populist, insurgent or just generally awkward cunt party from election, and their voters from representation in the political process. If you think democracy and getting to vote for whoever you actually want to vote for has any function, any moral value, then you have to let dodgy bastards run for elected office. Then of course you have to keep a close fucking eye on them. But our political class is much, much too stupid to have much if any conception of quite how fucking close an eye MI5 has on them. These are people who mostly think Rory Stewart isn't MI6, for fuck's sake.
 
Expecting her to be on time is a micro aggression and white supremacy.

So is asking if she can swim. The answer will be no but we still can’t ask.
All the other leaders at the G7 Summit are going to have to hold their tongue when Olukemi arrives 2 hours late because "I 👏🏿 AM 👏🏿 TIRED!"
 
The conservatives are so back! This thread was right, based black lady is a totally awesome front-runner for the tories! It doesn't matter that she's a white-hating, lip-smacking, lazy arse nigger, that's just racism and she is totally going to deport all of the wogs.
I would like to see Hunt defect there as he was a sound Chancellor.
Hunt is a cunt and a wef puppet. He should have been fired out of a cannon long ago.
His Ukraine policy is stupid and ill-timed because like always he can never read the room
I've got a different take. I think, Starmer thinks, he can out negotiate Trump.

  • America want to pull out of Europe
  • America want Ukraine Mineral rights
  • Starmer volunteers France and UK to 'defend' Ukraine
  • America starts mining.
  • Starmer threatens to withdraw all troops unless Trump does X.
It would be a good plan, if Starmer wasn't the Machiavellian equivalent of a downs-syndrome porkie pig with brain damage.
 
But our political class is much, much too stupid to have much if any conception of quite how fucking close an eye MI5 has on them
Yeah I agree. And I agree that we don’t need them to be spotless in some ways.
What puzzles me is why nobody took anyone on cabinet aside and said ‘this will come back to bite you; correct it now.’ This is basic stuff that there’s no need to not correct. She already had the job, the lowest risk thing to do would be ‘oh sorry that’s a typo, must have been a cut and paste error let me fix that.’ Leaving the lie there gives someone an edge over her. Which maybe is the point. But it’s just odd.
This would have been picked up in any review, even the most casual pleb level reference check would pick this up. but nobody did anything with that knowledge. Is this the kind if minor but embarrassing thing they deliberately don’t fix to have a minor bit of kompromat? Or do they not give a shit at government level and told mi5 to bog off? I’m just very curious how this went down.
@Bog-standard Poster trump would just do the ‘brave American citizens under threat, weak limeys and surrender monkeys wimped out, we are sending people.’ I don’t think that’d be enough leverage.
 
Why is it that the UK specifically is going all in on Ukraine? Has Starmer actually gone completely mental? Why are we hell-bent on perpetual war in Ukraine, no matter the consequences?
Support for Ukraine is relatively popular and he hopes to massage his numbers that way, rather than doing anything domestic because his domestic agenda is all widely unpopular.
 
Back
Top Bottom