So, the Green Party, who used to be all about environmentalism and saving the polar bears, has morphed into something extremely harmful. And it's my opinion that they represent an existential threat to Britain and also to the wider global prosperity. So, this video is part one in what will become a multi-part video series debunking and exposing the Green Party ideology because I think it's extremely important that we stop the Green Party from ever taking power in Britain and make sure that people understand what their ideology and policy positions would actually result in in the United Kingdom.
So, as I said, this is the first video in a series. And this first video is going to be on their migration policy. And to get an understanding of their migration policy, I didn't just want to look at the headline statements that they put out that are popularised. I wanted to go a level deeper. So, I pulled their latest migration policy document. It's this one. It is the Green Party of England and Wales migration policy background paper. So, this is the paper that goes into detail. And I've read it, but what I'm going to do is I'm just going to pull out some key points here and it will give an overview of what they intend to do to the United Kingdom.
Let's start with this headline statement. So, they say the Green Party wants to see a world without borders. Now, this is the direction that they're heading in. They do say that they will have a controlled migration policy until they get to that utopian state of open borders, which I fundamentally disagree with. But just keep in mind what they're calling for is open borders. What open borders means is there is no more United Kingdom because if you don't have borders, you don't have a country, you don't have a nation state, it's just open, right? Okay. And one big open world. Now, I want to start by saying I fundamentally disagree with this. And I disagree with it because that does not produce a utopia. A utopia that does not produce. So when you think about the way that human beings actually function, right? We function at multiple different levels of society. We have ingroup belongings in multiple different levels, in multiple different ways. This is not just human beings, it's all of nature. Okay?
So think about how lions will operate in a pride, you know, or just how sort of animals will take care of their children. So families, okay, so families are a good example. Families are an ingroup that is prioritised. It's a small unit of people that are prioritised. Now you can move from the family unit up to the society, the community, the local community and then you move out again right to the nation state and then you can move out to the continent etc. So at a very fundamental level, I do not agree with this principle of open borders because if you create a world with completely open borders, the way that human psychology and behaviour works, just the way that life works on planet Earth, okay, in reality, not in their fantasy, the way that it actually functions is that other human beings will take advantage. So other human beings will form groups to take advantage of another group. That's the way that life works.
Not just human beings, but all life on planet Earth. I'm sorry. You might have a fantasy about how you love things to work. It might be a really nice dream for you in your brain, okay? But that's not the way that it actually works. So, if you take this utopian fantasy that is very popular with students, of course, because they are largely naive and not immature, not mature enough yet, and then you extend it and actually make it policy, then it is disastrous. It will produce disastrous results. It would produce human suffering. It would cause people in this country to suffer. So I wanted to dig in on that just from a high level to begin with before we go through more detail because the rest of everything is based on this principle. This is what they believe in and they are dead wrong.
And now have a look at this. They say the Green Party believes that migration is not a criminal offence under any circumstances. So in other words again it's open borders. So it doesn't matter who comes here. It doesn't matter how they come here under any circumstances whatsoever, any kind of migration, it's never a criminal offence. So if you don't have rules, right, and you basically if you can't enforce rules, you can't enforce borders and there's no offence that's occurred from anybody going wherever they want, then ultimately it's open borders. So this is what they believe. Now again, just going back to that metaphor of the family, right? It's like I have a house and nobody can ever be stopped from coming into that house and taking what they want and doing whatever they want. There can be no rules because everybody's equal. They're equally entitled to my house. They're equally as important as my family. Okay? So, if you then extend that to a larger group and then you've got society and a nation state, right? So, I mean, it's just ridiculous all of this.
Now, have a look at this because this is really interesting. The Green Party will treat all migrants fairly and humanely without discrimination. Okay. Now, I really want to dig in on this word discrimination because there is this idea that tolerance is always virtue. Tolerance is always good, right? And therefore, discrimination is always harmful. This is a complete fallacy. It is a philosophical fallacy and it's incorrect because we don't tolerate bad behaviours in society. That's what laws are about. We have to punish people who cause harm. Yeah. We have to punish them. So we cannot tolerate certain behaviours. Then with regard to discrimination, we absolutely should discriminate against people because we always discriminate in our daily lives. We discriminate on the basis of how people behave. And so people behave differently in different groups, don't they? And those groups are often associated with countries that have their own cultures and history and language and behaviours and customs. And so of course you have to discriminate because there is difference that exists. That difference then produces different results. Okay.
Now I looked into a crime related to illegal migration as an example. I made a full video on this and what I found was that when I looked at the data from Denmark and I looked at the data, what shoddy data we have for the United Kingdom, what I found was that people migrants from Afghanistan commit sexual offences an order of magnitude more frequently than native British citizens and other people from other countries. Okay. So we do see differences and as a result of there being differences then we have to discriminate accordingly. That is just rational. It's sensible to do so. If you don't do so, you're not acting in accordance with the way that reality functions, with the way that human beings function. So, not discriminating is again based on a fantastical worldview that imagines this pure lovely world where everybody is a bunch of cuddly teddy bears who all want what's best for everybody else and who all act perfectly. But that's not the way the real world works.
Right now. When you're children, you can believe that kind of thing, but if you grow up and you still have those beliefs, then yeah, you're kind of failing, aren't you, as a human being, in my opinion, because you haven't actually grown up and faced reality. And if you then implement, right, those fantasies, those incorrect beliefs, that causes harm. That causes harm. So, what the left will do, the Green Party will do is they'll often say, well, the right are just mean, right? They're just really mean and say really mean things. It's like children with parents. Parents set rules and they act according to reality because they know if a child makes a mistake or does a certain thing, it's going to cause them harm. It's like the child looking at the adult who says no, this is the way it has to be because you know that to protect you and then blaming the parents like the child blaming the parent. Okay? Just because they're bursting the bubble of this fantasy. So that's the way that I view all of this basically. Okay. So let's move on.
The Green Party is opposed to forced migration and forced repatriation unless standard exclusions apply. What they mean by standard exclusions is if someone commits some kind of offence, but even if they commit offences, we can't actually deport them. This is what we're actually finding out. The way the legal system works now, but what they're basically saying is if someone comes, well, we should never force them out. Doesn't matter how they get here. They're not illegal. They can stay. Anyone can stay. They have just as much right as anybody else to stay. Now again, there's something really broken about this ideology because as a parent, I prioritise my children. That's the way life works as I've said. Yeah. And so my children are going to get an inheritance from me and that's right. And this applies at the nation state level. Basically, the next generations are inheriting work that the older generations within that specific country have produced for them. This is just a purely natural thing to happen. But what the Green Party is saying is no, no, no. Everybody else is entitled just as much as you are to anything that your ancestors produced.
Now, the Green Party go on to clarify by saying, “We propose deporting only those who have committed a serious crime or are a threat to national security, but only if they are not settled or not citizens.” Okay. Now with regard to the national threat, okay, so that or are a threat to national security. Now, as I said previously, as we see in a lot of data from a lot of governments, we see a national threat from individuals from certain countries that commit certain kinds of crimes in order of magnitude than from other countries, including native-born British citizens. That's the reality. And in my opinion, what they're doing is just pretending that that's not the way things are.
Now, this next one's interesting. All visas can be applied for on entry while in the UK or before entry. Okay, so that's a fundamental change to the way migration works. It means anyone can just roll up in Britain and then they can apply for a visa once they're here. Okay, so just come on, no problem. And then you can apply for a visa and then we'll give you a certain amount of time and then you can apply for other visas and then because they fundamentally believe that everyone in the world has a right to a British standard of living, British life here in Britain. And the Green Party very kindly clarify this again. They say we view having different rules for different nationalities as racial discrimination. We do not agree that the Home Office should be exempt from the obligations of the Equality Act of 2010 blah blah blah. Okay.
Now think about this. Let's say hypothetically, hypothetically let's say, and this is aligned with reality, let's say there is one nation, nation X. Okay. So nation X, the people from nation X have a certain culture. Yeah. A certain culture. Let's say it's very patriarchal culture and it really doesn't respect women and they behave in very different ways right and they have like a long history of not being aligned with liberalism with the ideas that the Green Party believes in for example let's just say country X okay and let's say that we've seen evidence that people from country X just come here and then they commit harms, they commit crimes, right? Like way, way, way more than any other country. Well, would it be racial discrimination to point that out and say we should protect ourselves because we care about the women in our community and we care about our children here? Would that be racial discrimination? No, it's just pure common sense. It's rationality because there could be people with the same ethnicity as exists in country X and they don't produce the same results. So, it's not about race, it's just about reality. It's about culture. All right, moving on.
So, minimum income requirements will be removed from all applications as well as any benefits from having a higher income. My God. So, you just want to import all of the poorest people in the world to be kind to them. Billions and billions. Okay, unlimited numbers. This is just so ridiculous. It's difficult to even comment on it. So no income requirements, doesn't matter about the economics. Okay? Because the Green Party bases their entire ideology on something called modern monetary theory which is completely a complete nonsense economics. Nobody who understands economics properly agrees with modern monetary theory and effectively nobody who works in the banks or who works in that industry takes it seriously whatsoever. But the Green Party do because they have to have a fantastical economic theory to justify what they want to do because they know that if they actually well they don't know. Yeah, they actually don't know. They're actually really uneducated. But basically, if they did implement a lot of these things in reality, it would cause massive economic harm and hardship as it always does within socialist systems by the way through the USSR or China. There's many other examples.
And they go on, language requirements will be removed from all applications. Free language classes will be made available to promote and encourage integration. Integration. Integration into what? What are you protecting? Okay. Because ultimately, if there's no prioritisation, right, of British culture and British language and philosophies and ways of living, then what is it they're integrating into? Get real. You can't have your cake and eat it. You don't want integration. By the way, they actually want to devolve Scotland and Wales and Northern Ireland. So they want to get rid of the United Kingdom. They want to get rid of nukes. They just want to break up and end the entire concept of nation states. So what are you integrating into if you don't have a nation state? If you have open borders, what are you integrating into? Right? Language is connected into culture. It's connected into philosophy. It's extremely important. It connects us all as a group. And we're seeing more and more people in the United Kingdom that's aligned with mass migration not speaking English.
They go on, unless standard exclusions apply, no person will be held in detention because of their immigration status. Again, it's just a free-for-all, complete free-for-all. Don't worry, we're not going to do anything. You know, just anyone can come here and we're not going to lock you up ever. Doesn't matter how you get here or anything. You just under no circumstances. Though, well, they did say unless standard exclusions apply, which is like real proven crimes that have to have happened. But here's something I want to point out about this. We don't know of all of the crimes that are committed in other countries before people come here. Who do you how do you know who you're importing? We don't know who we're importing. We don't have a magic kind of, you know, a magic crystal ball that tells us what people who come here have done in their history. We don't.
And further, visa applications from specific individuals may be rejected on grounds of public safety. These grounds are restricted to serious crimes and threats to national security. Well, fine. Threats to national security. Let's define it because I think that a very large number of people in the world are a threat to national security. A very large number as in billions. Billions of people are potentially a threat to national security. So, I agree with them on that one. Bit of a different sort of definition of it though. But what they're getting at is that it has to be a proven thing. Like they have to we have to somehow magically know what everyone in the world has done throughout their entire life somehow, right? And bear in mind, they can lie in interviews. They're not going to tell you, are they? I mean, so naive. It really is childish. But those are the only grounds that visas would ever be rejected on the basis of. I mean, this is nuts. Moving on.
Visitors will have access to the NHS for urgent and medically necessary procedures only. Okay, but actually I think that we have a massive problem with this, right? That actually we are basically funding the healthcare of the world, right? Look at our economy. Our economy is not doing well and that is associated with mass migration and bringing large numbers of people into the United Kingdom. It actually absolutely is. So this is a completely ridiculous concept that we can just provide free healthcare to people all around the world because it makes some naive little student level people feel good about themselves. “Oh, we can just help everyone.” Where do you think the money comes from? Like we need to get serious about trying to teach people in this country, young people in particular, about how economics works, how the monetary system works and how geopolitics around the world, how it works. Because the fact that we've got so many people in this country at this point that the Green Party are taken seriously in any way is really like a national shame as far as I'm concerned.
Okay, now have a look at this next policy because this is an existential threat to Britain and this is an actual policy position that a party that is doing worryingly well in our polls has. Okay, this is an existential end of Britain threat and we need to take it seriously. So listen to this. For the purposes of this policy, visa residents are defined as migrants who have a non-visitor visa, do not have settled status, and are not British citizens. All visa residents will have the right to vote in all elections and referendums. What this means is you don't even need to have settled status, okay? Or be a citizen to vote in our elections. So anyone can come to the country, get a visa, they won't be rejected unless there is a proven security threat, security risk, which I'm sure would be very watered down. And if you come in for any reason given that visa, you can vote in our elections. That is the end of a national democracy. That's the end of a nation state democratic system. The end. Okay? So, if the Green, this is why I say they're an existential threat, and it's why I take it seriously because think about it. What's to stop our adversaries that exist that want to do us harm from moving large numbers of people or even just funding large numbers of people coming into Britain and then completely changing the way our country functions for their benefit because that's how reality works. You have to actually defend yourself because it's not all, you know, rainbows, right? It's not all rainbows. And so this is dangerous and we actually see we need to do something, right? Anyway, I'm doing what I can. Moving on.
Any no recourse to public funds conditions will be abolished and visa residents will have access to welfare benefits and universal basic income. Universal basic income, right? This is what they're talking about now. So where are we going to get the money from? Zach and Green Party. Where does it come from? Out of the sky. And they'll then because of their very flawed ideas, right? Their very flawed understanding of economics. They'll say, “Oh, well, it just comes out of thin air anyway.” But actually, the value of money is defined in a global market, a global capital market. That's the way it works. That's what Forex is, foreign exchange. All of our trade right is what defines the value of the productivity and the pound of currency in Britain. Okay, the value of what we do is defined globally. That's how global markets function. It's not just foreign currency, forex, it's commodities markets and many other different kind of market. This is the way economics actually works. Okay. So what they're saying here is that anyone who comes here, they don't even have to have settled status. They will have full recourse to all welfare, to all kinds of benefits, right? Just immediately and universal basic income. So they're thinking anyone in the world of the hundreds of millions of people, billions of people have a lower standard of living than British people do. They can all now come here and will just somehow magic the money. Yeah. Because they don't understand how any of it works. It's just madness. All right, moving on.
Struggling through this. Workers with a confirmed contract of employment satisfying UK employment laws will automatically receive a visa to work unless standard exclusions apply. So any business could just go, “Yeah, I'll just bring you in. I'll give you a visa and you and you and you and all of you and all of you.” Yeah. And then you can just come and that will be it. There'll be no, they'll automatically get the visas, right? So effectively any company could bring in people from an economy that has a lower income, right? And then just bring in as many as that's what's led to the that's what's led to the problems that we have with GDP per capita. It's what's led to the productivity and living standard problems that we've got. Suppressed wages and they want to put that on steroids, right? And they think that's going to help people. This is like the fact that these people are actually this is what they do for a living and they are so utterly wrong about everything. It's maddening, right? As I said, it's like a national shame that they're doing so well. Moving on.
Residents on work visas can switch employers or if made redundant have six months to look for work automatically as part of their visa conditions. So, you come in on a care visa and then you switch to anything. It's just more and more people in and moving around and more and more and any it's oh not good. All right, there's even more. So, residents with settled status are no longer subject to immigration rules. Just madness. Madness. Residents with settled status have the same access to benefits, student finance, the NHS as British citizens. So, you know, all of that stuff your ancestors did, right, to put you in this position, all the hard work, the suffering, the industrial revolution, the agricultural revolution, all of that work and philosophising and getting our culture into this state and basically creating this environment. Yeah. No, that doesn't mean anything. It doesn't mean anything for you actually. No, it's like everyone in the world is just as entitled to all of that as you are. Yeah. So, all of that, those wars and world wars and people dying, all that stuff, yeah, doesn't mean anything whatsoever.
All children born in the UK are automatically British citizens. Right? So, anyone in the world can come here for any reason without a visa. This is what they say. Anyone in the whole world can come to Britain without a visa. Let's say they're pregnant. They come in without a visa. They're given a visa when they arrive and then they have their child here and they're British citizens fully. That's it. Okay? So that is a massive incentive for millions and millions of people just to fund coming here and making their children British citizens. This is absolutely not. No way. No. Not happening. No. All right. Moving on.
So the Green Party supports the teaching of the history of empire and colonialism including the viewpoint of those who are colonised. Right now, this is really important because this entire ideology is based on a completely one-sided, mistaken, and false view of history because it categorises all harm in the world. This is what all of this is about. It's about attacking Britain and British people. It's like Britain and British people are fundamentally flawed and bad and cause all the harm in the world. That's why we have all this wealth because we just stole it all. That's what all this is based on, this colonialism thing. Now, I'm not saying that colonialism was all good and fantastic and, you know, the transatlantic slave trade didn't exist. It was horrific and bad. But all cultures have bad histories if you go back in history and actually learn about it. Now, the fact that we've got huge amounts of young people who believe in this stuff and support the Green Party shows a false and flawed teaching of history within our schools. Okay? And the teachers union, the main teachers union are outright supporting the Green Party. When I went to this anti-racism march, I made a video about it. I saw the main teachers union there supporting the Green Party. So, it's no wonder that our young people support this absolute nonsense, one-sided, and ridiculous view of history that isn't true and isn't real.
They go on to clarify, “We support decolonising the curriculum as it is important that when learning, we should always question whose viewpoint the information is coming from and in particular being aware that history lessons are often written from a colonial point of view.” Again, it's more of the same, okay? Because ultimately what really happens in schools is this far-left ideology. We don't actually teach patriotism and the benefits of what we do and actually the greatness of Britain and what we've delivered to the world through our innovation and suffering of people and our development, unique development of philosophy, culture, law, language, everything okay that we did through as I said the agricultural revolution, industrial revolution, invention of vaccines, invention of electricity through turbines, basically the entire modern world. Okay? And we're blamed by the way for slavery. So we'll move on to that next.
They say slavery while all British children know that the UK abolished the slave trade. Well, based on what basis? That's not true. Not all. They say all British children know that. No, they don't. What are you basing that on? That's like misinformation in their policy document. Moving on. In 1807, the slave trade and slavery itself in 1833. What is very often left out is that before this, the UK was the number one slave trading nation. Okay. False. That is false. That's not true. I made a video on reparations recently. It's this one. Okay. And what I showed was that the British Empire doesn't even factor in the top 10 of the biggest slave trading nations. The biggest slave nations, sorry, empires that took slaves. Okay? Not even in the top 10. We weren't even the biggest slave trading nation in the transatlantic slave trade. So, what are they talking about? This is just factually incorrect.
Okay. So now I'm done going through those specific part. It was difficult. But I'm done going through those specific lines. It is so infuriating. But it's important for us to learn about this, as difficult as it is to understand, right, these extremist views that these individuals have that are disconnected from reality because we have to confront it and address it because they're basically putting on this front of we're lovely fluffy environmentalists who love polar bears when in reality they are directly against the British nation, okay? Against the nation state itself and they will produce extreme harms in Britain. Their policies would.
Okay so I think fundamentally their worldview is just so incorrect. It's really uneducated, naive and immature. One of the really fundamental flaws that they make, one of the real fundamental flaws in their philosophy, their sort of worldview, their map, their frames of reference in the world, right, the way that they see the world, one of the most fundamental flaws is that they don't accept that there are differences of people, right, as individuals and then as groups. They believe, right, that's not true. It's categorically objectively not the case. It's not right fact but they believe that everyone is the same and produces the same kind of results at the individual level and then the group level. And then they try to force that reality because it's really nice, feels really nice to them. They try to force that reality, that fantasy onto reality. But when you try to do that, you're going to produce extremely bad results.
Britain is an island, a relatively small island in the world that has produced more for the world per capita. We have produced a unique culture and philosophy, right? That has caused the rise of more people out of poverty than any other system, right? The industrial revolution, etc. So if you open the borders, you are going to get taken advantage of to an extreme degree by hundreds of millions or billions of people. If you have this idea of open borders, right? How are you going to get every other country in the world to agree with you? They're not going to agree with you. They're going to work in their self-interest and they're going to take advantage of you because that's the way the real world works. Yeah. I don't know how these people have got to this point in their life as adults and still believe this. It's ridiculous to me. These should be lessons that you learn literally in childhood because there are billions of people, as I've said, in the world who have lower standard of living than Britain does. And the point I want to make is that is not our fault because they think, right, the Green Party and this ideology, they think, well, we have all this stuff, right? We have all of these luxuries and stuff and so it's just because we've taken it from everybody else. But that's not true. We produced it, we innovated, we created it, right?
We developed our language. That's why it's such an important language in the world. And associated with that is philosophy, right? Parliamentary democracy, many legal standards, accountancy standards, right? Trading standards, commercial around the world. Okay? So, it's not our fault that other cultures and other people around the world didn't develop in the same way. Okay, it's not our fault. Actually, we've been a net benefit to them because we have produced innovations, medical innovations, technological innovations that give them a hand. Okay? And that's how things should function. We should have a strong United Kingdom that does have very strong borders that ultimately prioritises native citizens with very controlled migration much lower than it is today. Okay? And really prioritises and protects British culture as what it is. Okay? Because this is how we help the world. This is how we've helped the world historically.
You see, because the Green Party think they only look at one side of the ledger and they say, “Oh, we did all of this bad stuff, all of this war and stuff.” Yeah. And colonialism, etc. But they don't look at the fact that you know 300 million people died of smallpox in the 20th century alone and then Britain came along and literally invented vaccines and stopped that for good. What about refrigeration? Right? The list goes on and on and on. These are benefits that we produce for the world and the ledger is way in our favour. Right? And that's what they don't understand. They don't look at a balanced ledger. So I think fundamentally this is the same. It's like it's the same with everything. It's the same way that they view everything. It's oppressed and oppressor. It's always that if someone's got something, it's because they stole it from someone else because they don't understand how productivity works, how things actually manifest in the world. It's as if it's all just there magically already, right? You don't produce anything and then someone just takes it all for themselves off other people. But that's not how it works. That's completely not how it works. It's not how the economy or life or anything works, right?
Things, I shouldn't have to explain this, but when you create things, they didn't exist before and then you've created something and someone might have a use for that and then you can basically benefit, right? And often that's a mutually beneficial situation because you create innovation and then it helps other people. Now, if we don't protect ourselves, yeah, then we limit our ability as a country, as Britain, to help the world in the way that we have in history and that is a massively harmful thing to do to the world. So Green Party policies harm the world. So it is fundamentally not our fault that many, many countries around the world did not produce what Britain have produced, don't have the kind of society we have etc. It's their lack of innovation, their lack of organisation, their lack of working together, right? Their lack of cooperation, their lack of linguistic sophistication, okay? There's many other reasons, right? So, it's not our fault, it's their fault. And the crazy thing about all of this is that it's only through the production and the hard work and the creation innovation and the toil, right, of British culture in the past that's allowed this luxury situation where these people can be in this cotton wool bubble and believe these these suicidally empathetic beliefs that they have in the Green Party. So in other words, they're only able to have these ridiculous beliefs and continue in this cotton wool life that they've had clearly up to this point because of the work of others in the past. And now they want to prevent us from doing the same in future and creating beneficial conditions around the world.
So the Green Party have literally gone from we care about polar bears, aren't we nice, to destroy everything, right? But they do it in the name of protecting the polar bears. It's misselling. It's a missale. Now, another thing, this has happened before. So, if you go back to the 1970s, why is it that nuclear power wasn't taken up to the degree that it should have been when it was invented? Yeah. It was because of the environmentalists who protested, the student environmentalists, the anti-nuclear, right? Greenpeace, etc. They prevented the uptake of nuclear power. If we'd have utilised nuclear power back then, we wouldn't have the global war situation with the Middle East that we have that's so dependent on gas, on gas and oil, etc. on oil. Okay. And ultimately, we wouldn't have a lot of the global warming that we have. But they stopped us from doing it. Yeah. And this is the same thing again.
The reality is this. A mass migration experiment was conducted in Great Britain across Europe and also in the United States to some degree as well. Okay. And this went against the will of the British people. At no point since the 1960s have the British people, British citizens ever supported mass migration ever. It has not happened. It's one issue that across all parties, people have always agreed on to a very large degree. Okay? At this point in history now the number of foreign-born people in this country is around 20%. Something like that. That is historically unprecedented. It has never happened before. Now if the Green Party get into power that would skyrocket. Of course it will be the end basically of the United Kingdom because it will be unlimited. Anybody could come here for any reason be granted a visa. Okay? It is completely ridiculous.
Now the way that this functioned with mass migration, I made a whole series on legal migration. You can go and watch it to learn more about it. So but the way that this functioned was that big businesses pressured government. There was a globalist philosophy that took place and big businesses were pressuring government to bring in many many millions of people so that they could lower wages. There were much more wage competition. Lower wages. And then the asset-owning classes, the rich, would benefit at the expense of the working people. I thought the Green Party were in support of workers and were really against the wealthy. So why are they supporting mass migration? Because that is literally that was literally done by the asset-owning class to enrich themselves. But for some reason, the Green Party agree with it. But this just demonstrates their complete cluelessness. Have you noticed that the Green Party, no one will ever bring up charts and talk about data in detail. It's all feels, how I feel. Yeah, it's childish.
The Green Party talk about unity all the time. But I just want to show you a video of Zack Polanski. There are people though who would identify as right-wing or indeed even far-right. And no matter what humanity or community we put them in, they are set on destroying or pushing this toxicity. Do we think we can change our minds or is it a case of building a society that doesn't include them? Does that sound like it's unifying? He's talking about excluding, building some kind of society just for people who agree, right? And excluding basically the vast majority. Now, what I want to point out here is that they are absolutely tribal. So, they talk about unity, but think about the left. They're very tribal. They have all their different flags. They are different ingroups. What they are is ingroups that are counter to the nation state ingroup, right? They are anti-British and that's harmful because in history, in British history, we went through feudalism and eventually we created the nation state and that nation state was a unifying force for all people in these lands and what they're doing is they're cutting that down. Now if we want to have shared unity of people in Britain, okay, then we have to do that around the nation state and patriotism. That's the only way to do it. It doesn't work in any other way. So they are not about unity whatsoever. They're exactly against unity.
