Britain 'has NO plan to defend itself from armed attack' concludes devastating review - The former head of the British Army has warned that the country is already in the 'last chance saloon'

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Link: https://www.gbnews.com/news/war-warning-report-britain-defend-itself
Credit: Dan McDonald, GB News
Archive: https://archive.ph/wip/RfVqV

Britain is not prepared to defend itself from an attack, a major new report has warned.

The Commons Defence Committee has concluded that the Government is moving at a "glacial" speed in response to the threats of Russia and China.

The 11-month-long inquiry said that Britain was struggling to meet its defence obligations under Nato Article 3, which requires member states to “maintain and develop individual and collective capacity to resist armed attack”.

The major report noted the UK had "next to nothing" with its integrated air and missile defence systems and “lacks a plan for defending the homeland and overseas territories”.

british-soldiers-with-labour-ministers.webp

Defence Committee chairman Tan Dhesi warned politicians not to bury "their heads in the sand" over the issue.

The Labour backbencher said: “We have repeatedly heard concerns about the UK’s ability to defend itself from attack.

"The Government must be willing to grasp the nettle and prioritise homeland defence and resilience.”

As part of the inquiry, MPs heard evidence from senior military figures and defence experts and conducted visits at Nato sites across Europe.

tan-dhesi.webp

Tan Dhesi warned politicians not to bury 'their heads in the sand' | PA

Defence Minister Luke Pollard told the Defence Committee: “I think we have been very clear that we are not satisfied with Article 3 in the UK.

"But, equally, I think that is a position that every European Nato member state is clear on as well.”

The report comes just months after Sir Keir Starmer vowed to increase defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP and the announcement of the Strategic Defence Review, which the Prime Minister says will transform Britain's Armed Forces.

And now, the former head of the British Army, General Lord Dannatt, has said he hoped the inquiry's findings served as a "wake up call" to politicians.

u200bgeneral-lord-dannatt.webp

General Lord Dannatt said he hoped the inquiry's findings serve as a 'wake up call' | PA
He said: “We have piled risk on risk over the years, taken too many peace dividends since the end of the Cold War and we now stand in grave danger from Putin’s Russia.

“The time to act is now. We are in the last chance saloon.”

Shadow Defence Secretary James Cartlidge said: “The defence select committee has exposed the hollowness of Labour’s defence rhetoric.

“Instead of prioritising defence readiness, the only pace Labour have shown is when it comes to surrendering the Chagos Islands and putting the British Army back in the dock.

“Labour’s policy documents have all been published far later than promised and their Strategic Defence Review won’t deliver until the 2030s.

“Meanwhile their own Defence Readiness Bill hasn’t even got a timetable and could be years away.

“Warfare is changing rapidly but Labour are moving far too slowly.”

A spokesman for the Ministry of Defence said: “Later today the Defence Secretary will outline his plans to bolster the UK’s warfighting readiness, keeping Britain secure at home and strong abroad.

“This includes identifying multiple sites across the UK for new factories to make munitions and military explosives as we move to the next phase of building factories of the future.

“Choices taken by the Chancellor at the upcoming Budget will ensure no return to the hollowed out and underfunded Armed Forces of the past, as we continue the biggest sustained increase in defence spending since the Cold War, allowing us to invest in the modern capabilities to keep the country safe.”
 
Could’ve stopped at “Britain has no plan”, really.

We’re supposed to do our best to keep Russia busy while America profits off it all and never gets a war on its doorstep. Pointless whining about it now, when we’ve willingly been part of NATO since the 1950s.
 
Thankfully I'm not in Bri'ain where NPoCC or whatever you Anglos call your Stasi check your mean tweets, so I can say this:

The Bri'ish military is so screwed that if anyone, in earnest, were to engage in armed revolt, there is a strong possibility that the Army would lose.
At this point, there's an even stronger possibility that the British military wouldn't even put up a fight.
 
It's performative faux-patriotism of the highest order for the country's elites to suddenly be afraid and ringing a panic bell like this.

They've been told time and time again their policies are wrecking the military and they press on because they'd rather have a wrecked military that supports globohomo than one that would fight if called on, but, still, after 40 years, believes in that outdated thing called a "nation state".

I thought the plan was to browbeat Americans into dying for them
That was still a viable plan as recently as the early 00's.

Before the average American saw the cops showing up at houses over unlicensed scissors while kids are murdered in the background by untouchable immigrants having "mental emergencies" and trying to sue and fine our citizens for mean words they overheard them say on the internet.

We won't save a government that terminally rotted.
 
Why would white men die for that multicultural shithole? Most young men these days can’t even afford their shitty “flats” that are smaller than the average garage in America. There isn’t a single redeeming thing worth fighting for in Britain.

People die for a motherland. Britain isn’t a motherland, it’s just a place where people live. No one is dying for a place. They’ll just move elsewhere. You can find the same kebab stores and hijab clad beauties everywhere else.
 
At this point, there's an even stronger possibility that the British military wouldn't even put up a fight.

I would actually agree with this, the british that are left in the army must be shitting themselves at the thought of conflict since they'll have to carry the trannies and sand niggers through it.
 
Lmao why would you admit this? What the actual hell is with the British army?
They're admitting it because it's an excuse to spend more billions on arms. Those arms will do nothing to actually provide any security, but a lot of well-connected people will line their pockets further.

Any potential adversary has been aware of the state of Britain's armed forces for a long time, this isn't anything new.

All other European countries are in the same sinking boat, too.
 
So you are saying that Britain and her surrounding territories and global territories are ripe for the plucking then?

[Laughs in swashbuckler, as I take off the good citizen hat and put on the pirate Kahn helmet]

Yar me hardies, now be the time to slay the ancient whore mother which laid her venereal rages upon our fellows at sea! Storm the ports of the great whore herself! Leave none unturned over, take every inch for each drop of pirate blood spilled! So say Hell Admiral Ghostbeard the dead!
 
This is not true. Any army that attempts to invade us has to:

  • Get across the channel without being sunk by hitting small boats
  • Traverse up roads that look like bombing ranges
  • Eat food prepared by third worlders
  • Prepare their troops for the most depressing, demoralising place on Earth
  • Avoid getting shanked by the browns
  • dodge getting baby-trapped by the fat rotters we call women
  • Have their ear-drums burst by scouse, cockney and brummy accents.
If they navigate all of that, then they have to repair this shit hole which would bankrupt them.

Impenetrable Britain.
Invading forces can't survive off the standard issue beans-on-toast MRE's and local crumpet trees, they'd easily starve.
 
Back
Top Bottom