That advertisement too. Maybe it's just a coincidence that the timing of the hack, 3 minute wait times, captchas and gay advertisements happened right before the files got released. It's also odd that after a decade and a half there hasn't been another successful imageboard.
The whole "Epstein created chuds" is a kneejerk troon cope to deflect from the emails from Trivers and Jess Ting. The email from Robert Trivers talks about how wonderful it would be to suck a "girl's cock" without being gay and how pooners are objectively unfuckable, the email chain from Jess Ting (one of Jazz Jennings' surgeons) thanks Epstein for a 50,000 dollar grant and discusses travel plans for Ting to stay at Little Saint James and "play with (Epstein's) toys". I have seen zero proof from the "Epstein created chuds" crowd other than him apparently having dinner with moot, who's not even a chud in the first place.
Because psyopping retards never try to psyopp on both sides of the aisle, right?
The only way I accept their narrative is without their framing. I do believe the culture war was manufactured by rich and powerful people, and Epstein would have a vested interest to keep us fighting each other rather than notice how hard his friends are fucking us... and that's where my agreement ends. Anti-troon backlash isn't happening because an Eyes Wide Shut sex cult convinced moot to open /pol/, the backlash is happening because these disgusting freaks used to be extremely rare, disowned, gay men of the road and now they're a dime a dozen, being glamorized and hammered into everyday life by news outlets and activist organizations.
Oy, vey!
Is it?
Flaming homosexual + conservatives = great idea
even if you discount the jeff-/pol/ connection this is still enough proof to show they at the very least knew what was going to happen and were okay with it. what i mean by this is, for example, they know pushing tranny shit or really extreme feminism onto the population is gonna alienate people. they want that to happen, along with tranny shit and the aforementioned extreme feminism being acknowledged as a "new normal". they manipulate both sides of the aisle
Yes, I thought that was the entire point. If you control all sides, you can steer the narrative the way you want.
Its a fairly common info control tactic to make true information look stupid by sharing that info through retards, and/or sharing retarded versions of it
but that doesn't mean that Epstein himself was relevant to the creation of /pol/. It could mean that wealthy influencers with an interest in retarding up the truth did, but keep in mind that /pol/ was the successor board to /news/ which was shut down
It's the typical backstory: 15 year old starts 4chan from basement being able to leverage almost 24/7 bandwidth loads. Same as Google was started out of a garage but it turns out it was originally backed by the CIA and NSA. Or Facebook came out on the day after the DARPA Lifelog project ended.
just like epstein's suicide
That never occurred to me, that the image board site had a good uptime despite being made by one guy. Either he was a genius at webcoding or he had resources that were just not disclosed.