2025 Jeffrey Epstein Files

[celebrityskin]

I think the Epstein files have a lot of names in that many powerful people wouldn't want to get out BUT he wasn’t a “secret agent” or anything like that.

When you read about Prince Andrew’s case, its clear that Epstein is closer to Diddy than anything else. A ‘baller’ with a socialite gf who throws elite sex parties with teen girls for dirty old men in luxurious settings. That's why why rando celebs like Naomi Campbell etc. were on the flight logs in 2019.

 

[One Winged Pear Farmer]

Did you post this to yourself? Kikes run your country, not the UK. Imagine complaining about 10% sand niggers when your country is 50% spics and wogs.

Has the most powerful man in the world sold the lie to your niggers, spics and retards yet? Or has he released the list that he isn't allowed to release?

I’m sure prince andrew and the other royals are hoping he doesn’t lmao

 

[Whoopsie Daisy]

I’m sure prince andrew and the other royals are hoping he doesn’t lmao

Prince Andrew who slept with a 17 year old and every one knows about it?
Yeah I'm sure he's devvo that the last hasn't leaked.

Has the worlds most powerful man released the list yet?
How about now?
Maybe he is a pedophile and a liar then. Otherwise, being the most powerful man in the world, he wouldn't be beholden to anyone else.

 

[One Winged Pear Farmer]

Prince Andrew who slept with a 17 year old and every one knows about it?
Yeah I'm sure he's devvo that the last hasn't leaked.

Has the worlds most powerful man released the list yet?
How about now?
Maybe he is a pedophile and a liar then. Otherwise, being the most powerful man in the world, he wouldn't be beholden to anyone else.

Ok? I’m unsure why you think I would be defensive over trump. The point is you retards are completely irrelevant. Although it is hilarious you are defending an entire family of kid diddlers that lord over your country because you’re too retarded to get rid of monarchy

 

[soulgains]

Nothing is wrong with me. You, on the other hand, seem to be a fedora-tipping faggot, because you put a 30 year old woman having sex with a 14 year old, like a fucking faggot.
14 year old MEN having sex with women - men fuck women, not the other way around, is a normal desire, fantasy or achievement. If it isn't normal where you live, then you're the anomoly.

If you wish to continue this conversation, do it in another thread and stop shitting up this one with your white-knighting faggot ways or go collapse on your fainting couch.

Obviously not, according to the jews and your own jew-loving government and nigger-worshipping, muslim-loving, spic-importing plebs.

Post Lists.

There is no world in which a 14 year old boy is considered a "man". And its ironic you consider holding a consistent standard when it comes to people molesting children to be "white knighting", when you're so preformative in all of your posts vainly attempting to hide your own degeneracy.

 

[Drip Torch]

Post Lists.

If you mean the Epstein list then that's what we all want. Otherwise, WTF you trying to say, Euronigger?

 

[MrJokerRager]

 

[Drip Torch]

Belgians eating children? The sauce should be informative, but where is it?

 

[Real Abyss]

Tangentially related - there's a large amount of bots defending Trump:


This is under the latest voidzilla video about Epstein

 

[Lord of the Large Pants]

It's a slow weekend and I'm going to wildly speculate with some theories that have probably been mentioned a thousand times before.

I do think Trump is on the list. (And wasn't that public knowledge already? Did anybody NOT know he associated with Epstein?) I don't think he's a child fucker. Not because I consider him to be a moral person, but because there's no way the Uniparty would've sat on substantial evidence of it. They tried to burn down the entire country to keep him out of the Presidency. They tried to have him killed directly, twice. Don't tell me that outing him as a pedo would be a bridge too far. So, a few possibilities.

Maybe he's using it as blackmail.
Maybe he isn't a pedophile, but friends/family/political allies are.
Maybe pretty much EVERYBODY is on the list, and releasing it would bring down the entire government overnight.

But that doesn't explain why he would continue to promise to publish the list once he assumed office. Presumably he had some idea what was on it at that point. If he continued to promise it without even looking at it when he had the chance, that is historical levels of idiocy. To be clear, I am not discounting that possibility, but I don't think it's the most likely explanation.

Here's the thing. If we reasonably assume that Trump saw the list after taking office, continued to talk about releasing it, then tried to pretend it never existed, something changed. Something caused Trump to totally reverse course on this.

I honestly think the strongest possibility is this: The Illuminati (whoever the fuck they actually are) show up and tell Trump, if you release this, we're going to kill you and your entire extended family. We won't miss this time. The consequences won't matter because we'll have nothing left to lose. Publish it, we dare you.

Something like that is the only thing I can think of to explain the complete 180.

 

[Taser Confetti]

Tangentially related - there's a large amount of bots defending Trump:
This is under the latest voidzilla video about Epstein

The Venn diagram of people telling you Epstein isn't a big deal and that you're a traitor for not wanting to bomb Iran is a circle.

 

[potato in mah painus]

So you think a 30 year old woman having sex with a 14 year old is acceptable but a 30 year old man doing the same thing isn't? What the fuck is wrong with you?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age-of-consent_reform

He's not wrong, and you are a faggot for trying to steer the conversation in this direction.

 

[AnOminous]

Belgians eating children? The sauce should be informative, but where is it?

It may be a reference to serial killer and child molester Marc Dutroux, who was connected to a pedophile ring of influential people, according to his own claims and fairly substantial circumstantial evidence. Somehow, the police "accidentally" completely botched the investigation and other than Dutroux himself, nobody was prosecuted and no substantial investigation occurred.

 

[Left Ass Cheek]

Tangentially related - there's a large amount of bots defending Trump:
View attachment 7669445
View attachment 7669447
This is under the latest voidzilla video about Epstein

Y'know they used to be able to get people in online spaces (who aren't Jewish and weren't programmed by Indians) to defend Trump unconditionally from every criticism imaginable, valid or otherwise. MAGA was and still is a lot of things, but inorganic in its online presence wasn't how I'd describe it until now.

Even the posters defending him ITT aren't bringing their A game and have to constantly sidestep addressing the fact that they were lied to by coping that it's actually all part of a 4d chess plan or asserting that they never cared about Epstein anyways so it doesn't matter. It's just so fake and gay and eye roll inducing all around.

 

[Angry Alt Right Nerd]

It's a slow weekend and I'm going to wildly speculate with some theories that have probably been mentioned a thousand times before.

I do think Trump is on the list. (And wasn't that public knowledge already? Did anybody NOT know he associated with Epstein?) I don't think he's a child fucker. Not because I consider him to be a moral person, but because there's no way the Uniparty would've sat on substantial evidence of it. They tried to burn down the entire country to keep him out of the Presidency. They tried to have him killed directly, twice. Don't tell me that outing him as a pedo would be a bridge too far. So, a few possibilities.

Maybe he's using it as blackmail.
Maybe he isn't a pedophile, but friends/family/political allies are.
Maybe pretty much EVERYBODY is on the list, and releasing it would bring down the entire government overnight.

But that doesn't explain why he would continue to promise to publish the list once he assumed office. Presumably he had some idea what was on it at that point. If he continued to promise it without even looking at it when he had the chance, that is historical levels of idiocy. To be clear, I am not discounting that possibility, but I don't think it's the most likely explanation.

Here's the thing. If we reasonably assume that Trump saw the list after taking office, continued to talk about releasing it, then tried to pretend it never existed, something changed. Something caused Trump to totally reverse course on this.

I honestly think the strongest possibility is this: The Illuminati (whoever the fuck they actually are) show up and tell Trump, if you release this, we're going to kill you and your entire extended family. We won't miss this time. The consequences won't matter because we'll have nothing left to lose. Publish it, we dare you.

Something like that is the only thing I can think of to explain the complete 180.

- "The uniparty would have used it against Trump" also works in reverse, if there's nothing that incriminates Trump he should be happy to release the list seeing as he has no problems going full scorched earth on both allies and enemies.
- "The Illuminati is threatening Trump" implies they control Trump, implying he's not a legitimate threat to the uniparty and discrediting the previous point. Also implies they're so powerful they could have simply prevented Trump from getting into office if he was a legitimate threat to the uniparty.

As for why, he probably just went along with what his base wanted to hear since people kept asking him about it and hoped everyone would forget. He never seemed very enthusiastic about it.

 

[Lord of the Large Pants]

I haven't historically found you to be a poster who deserves a serious response, but what the hell.

"The uniparty would have used it against Trump" also works in reverse, if there's nothing that incriminates Trump he should be happy to release the list seeing as he has no problems going full scorched earth on both allies and enemies.

That's my entire point. Everyone already knew that Trump associated with Epstein. And if there was seriously incriminating evidence against him, why would he POSSIBLY continue promising to release it after he already won the election? There's absolutely no benefit.

"The Illuminati is threatening Trump" implies they control Trump, implying he's not a legitimate threat to the uniparty and discrediting the previous point. Also implies they're so powerful they could have simply prevented Trump from getting into office if he was a legitimate threat to the uniparty.

Are you actually retarded? Do you seriously not understand the difference in stakes between "Trump is threatening to derail the gravy train for a few years" and "Trump is about to publicly out the richest and most powerful people in the world as pedophiles"? Do you not see how that could potentially motivate them to cross some new lines? The Uniparty "controlling Trump" is not a binary. There are different levels of political control and threats.

 

[Froggy Fresh Sextape]

That's my entire point. Everyone already knew that Trump associated with Epstein. And if there was seriously incriminating evidence against him, why would he POSSIBLY continue promising to release it after he already won the election? There's absolutely no benefit.

This fact may shock you but Trump is a senile retard that craves attention (and little girls, but that's besides the point.) And so he filled executive positions with people who are equally retarded and this one got away from them.

What kind of 4D chess do you think his demented brain is cooking up here?

 

[soulgains]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age-of-consent_reform

He's not wrong, and you are a faggot for trying to steer the conversation in this direction.

You're a pedophile, and you deserve to be tortured to death in a CIA black site.

 

[Angry Alt Right Nerd]

That's my entire point. Everyone already knew that Trump associated with Epstein. And if there was seriously incriminating evidence against him, why would he POSSIBLY continue promising to release it after he already won the election? There's absolutely no benefit.

Probably to avoid the current shitshow and hoping people will eventually forget. He was never very enthusiastic about it like he is with immigration or tariffs, it was always other people prodding him and him going "uhh yeah sure".

Are you actually retarded? Do you seriously not understand the difference in stakes between "Trump is threatening to derail the gravy train for a few years" and "Trump is about to publicly out the richest and most powerful people in the world as pedophiles"? Do you not see how that could potentially motivate them to cross some new lines? The Uniparty "controlling Trump" is not a binary. There are different levels of political control and threats.

So the Uniparty would cross new lines to stop Trump from releasing the evidence, but if Trump was incriminated on them they'd release the evidence themselves because there isn't a bridge too far they wouldn't cross to stop Trump?

 

[Lord of the Large Pants]

This fact may shock you but Trump is a senile retard that craves attention (and little girls, but that's besides the point.) And so he filled executive positions with people who are equally retarded and this one got away from them.

What kind of 4D chess do you think his demented brain is cooking up here?

I'm not saying Trump is getting into MENSA any time soon, but you would have to be a moron on a completely different level to continually draw attention to documents that incriminate you for pedophilia. It would be quite possibly the biggest own goal in human history. Trump is dumb, but he's not THAT dumb.

Where did I imply 4D chess? Something changed his mind about releasing the files, and the common explanations simply don't make sense even from a standpoint of pure self interest. He didn't advertise the release of the files after he was elected, well past the point where it could possibly benefit him, then just wake one day and decide to gaslight the entire country as a goof. Something HAPPENED. I can't imagine anything that could possibly justify not releasing everything, but saying there's no justification is very different from saying that there's no reason.

Probably to avoid the current shitshow and hoping people will eventually forget. He was never very enthusiastic about it like he is with immigration or tariffs, it was always other people prodding him and him going "uhh yeah sure".

And yet he continued on it after the election, where there was no possible benefit to him unless he was actually planning to do it. Why tell everyone that it's on Pam Bondi's desk RIGHT NOW? How could that possibly make sense as a bluff?

So the Uniparty would cross new lines to stop Trump from releasing the evidence, but if Trump was incriminated on them they'd release the evidence themselves because there isn't a bridge too far they wouldn't cross to stop Trump?

If there was serious evidence against Trump in the Epstein files, what makes you think they'd have to release everything to get to him, or that they couldn't reconstruct it from other sources?