so the fucking jeets only applied css to hide the text. my fucking sides.
So far, this is the only document that I've seen this redaction removal work on. This document was released with those redactions in 2022 and it's the same version they shared. I just don't think they cared enough to bother to fix, even back then.
I went over a few PDF's but no, it didn't work. It seems like what can be selected is based on OCR, meaning that poorly written s', t's and l's get copied as an eight, an l, and so on. So I copy-text a decent chunk of text and the black squares act like a line-break.
That's cool but the Krassensteins are still massive faggots.
Sometimes, my parents would ask me to edit various documents, mainly PDF files and scanned documents, and I've been doing this since my teenage years. One of the first things I realized when I was editing a PDF file is that if I wanted to hide anything by just putting stuff over it, then someone could use the same editor program and undo that, thus revealing the original thing I wanted to hide.
NO NO NO NO NO
This has always been the case though. Boomers often have great management and personnel and communication experience, they just don't understand computers well. A lot of people shit on the Boomer generation for this but I don't and often my work involves interfacing with boomers and doing paperwork shit in minutes that would otherwise take them days.
This proves that they did get a helicopter ride, straight to pedophile island.
That was Les Wexner. apparently he was blackmailed cause he was homosexual and he didnt want people to find out.
I figured they would have learned their lesson by now. Many years ago some redacted documents were released that were redacted by loading a black bar over the text. Someone found out you could see the redacted text by using a very slow computer to see the text before it could load the censor bar.
The real question is whether this is Griffith (victim) or Femto (collaborator.)
That's how they keep each other in check.