1st small modular nuclear reactor certified for use in US - Green meltdown sure to follow?

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Source: AP - Link (Archive)

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has certified the design for what will be the United States’ first small modular nuclear reactor.

The rule that certifies the design was published Thursday in the Federal Register. It means that companies seeking to build and operate a nuclear power plant can pick the design for a 50-megawatt, advanced light-water small modular nuclear reactor by Oregon-based NuScale Power and apply to the NRC for a license.

It’s the final determination that the design is acceptable for use, so it can’t be legally challenged during the licensing process when someone applies to build and operate a nuclear power plant, NRC spokesperson Scott Burnell said Friday. The rule becomes effective in late February.

The U.S. Energy Department said the newly approved design “equips the nation with a new clean power source to help drive down” planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions.

It’s the seventh nuclear reactor design cleared for use in the United States. The rest are for traditional, large, light-water reactors.

Diane Hughes, NuScale’s vice president of marketing and communications, said the design certification is a historic step forward toward a clean energy future and makes the company’s VOYGR power plant a near-term deployable solution for customers. The first small modular reactor design application package included over 2 million pages of supporting materials, Hughes added.

However, David Schlissel at the Ohio-based Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis expressed concerns about the costs. Schlissel, who has studied the history of the nuclear power industry and the finances of the NuScale project, expects they will continue to go up, which could limit how many NuScale reactors are built. He said he thinks they’re not competitive in price with renewables and battery storage.

Hughes said from wind and solar to hydrogen and nuclear, energy projects have seen cost increases due to changing financial market dynamics, interest rate hikes and inflationary pressures on the sector’s supply chain that have not been seen in decades. NuScale’s VOYGR power plant remains a cost competitive source of reliable, affordable and carbon-free energy, she added.

For many, nuclear power is emerging as an answer as states and countries transition away from coal, oil and natural gas to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and stave off the worst effects of a warming planet.

Roughly 40 serious concepts are in development for the next generation of advanced nuclear reactors worldwide. China was the first to connect a next-generation reactor to its grid to produce about 200 megawatts of electricity. A high-temperature, gas-cooled reactor began operating in 2021.

The U.S. Energy Department said it provided more than $600 million since 2014 to support the design, licensing and siting of NuScale’s VOYGR small modular reactor power plant and other domestic small reactor concepts. The department is working with Utah Associated Municipal Power Systems to demonstrate a six-module NuScale VOYGR plant at the Idaho National Laboratory. The first module is expected to be operational by 2029.

NuScale has signed 19 agreements in the U.S. and internationally to deploy its small reactor technology. Assistant Secretary for Nuclear Energy Kathryn Huff said small modular reactors are no longer an abstract concept.

“They are real and they are ready for deployment thanks to the hard work of NuScale, the university community, our national labs, industry partners, and the NRC,” Huff said in a statement. “This is innovation at its finest and we are just getting started here in the U.S.”

NuScale has also applied to the NRC for approval of a larger design, at 77 megawatts per module, and the agency is checking the application for completeness before starting a full review, Burnell said.
 
It's about fucking time. We're fortunate enough to have Uranium deposits in this country, we should be going heavy on nuclear and stop this bullshit with windmills and solar. Hydro electricity can stay.
 
The U.S. Energy Department said it provided more than $600 million since 2014 to support the design,
Guess what everyone, more unelected bureaucrats have allocated more money from government tax payers to be funneled into more of the "green" stocks they just so happen to own for "green" technologies that don't work half the time and are horribly inefficient the other half while also being designed with planned obsolescence in mind. Industries that don't make any actual money because the free market doesn't want them and therefore NEED government subsidies/contracts to exist at all in the first place.

Good Going America!
 
It's about fucking time. We're fortunate enough to have Uranium deposits in this country, we should be going heavy on nuclear and stop this bullshit with windmills and solar. Hydro electricity can stay.
Hydro does fuck up river ecosystems and destroys river fish populations. As long as Nuclear can handle the extra load, and I don't see why it can't, then I am fine with demolishing Hydro to restore the river ecosystems.
 
What decade is it?

Atomic energy is the only real answer if you want to step away from fossil fuels. No alternative can fill the void.
This. What the fuck are these retards talking about "emerging?" Nuclear power has been the only answer since its inception. The greentards and their climate change fearmongering have been stalling the only solution to the problem they themselves are terrified of by being anti-nuclear fuckwits. They sperg about what we'll do with the waste and the possibility of accidents, if they're really so scared of the climate falling apart soon who the fuck cares about what we're going to do with the waste? That's a next century problem.

Oh right it isn't about the climate, it's about petty control over your lifestyle.
 
Lmao at the tard saying nuclear isn't competitive with batteries and renewables. The only reason those techs are even remotely viable in the US is massive government subsidies. While they certainly have their place in some areas, they're far from viable in a lot of locations, not to mention they take up exponentially more space than nuclear power.
 
It's about fucking time. We're fortunate enough to have Uranium deposits in this country, we should be going heavy on nuclear and stop this bullshit with windmills and solar. Hydro electricity can stay.
Solar is fine imo if it’s relegated to peoples homes and not a large farm. And if you live in a place with lots of sun.
 
These smaller nuclear reactors are great. They use less water, making them viable for more desert like areas. Not to mention if you need more electricity, you get more, and if one is having problems, taking it off line won't fuck the grid as you have tons of the little guys. Eco terrorists suck my radioactive ass.
 
This. What the fuck are these retards talking about "emerging?" Nuclear power has been the only answer since its inception. The greentards and their climate change fearmongering have been stalling the only solution to the problem they themselves are terrified of by being anti-nuclear fuckwits. They sperg about what we'll do with the waste and the possibility of accidents, if they're really so scared of the climate falling apart soon who the fuck cares about what we're going to do with the waste? That's a next century problem.

Oh right it isn't about the climate, it's about petty control over your lifestyle.
Your looking at it from the wrong angle. Some of the biggest donators towards climate activist groups are big oil/coal BECAUSE they know green energy is a meme that will never replace them. Same reason that the biggest donators towards "save the ocean" groups are massive international fishing companies.

These groups exist to divert attention away from the actual solutions, not to actually solve the problem. Not to mention that solving the problem would dissolve the groups since they would have no reason to exist, which means no more money.

Activism is a joke and actively harmful towards the real solutions to the problems they harp about trying to solve.
 
"For many, nuclear power is emerging as an answer"

Welcome to 1950, you fucking morons. If only we didn't experience decades of obstruction and opposition from psychotic environmentalists, the energy industry, and pearl clutchers that treated Godzilla as a documentary over super scary nuclear energy.
 
Last edited:
It's about fucking time. We're fortunate enough to have Uranium deposits in this country, we should be going heavy on nuclear and stop this bullshit with windmills and solar. Hydro electricity can stay.
Solving the problem means you can't milk it for infinimoney tho, think of the share holders! (:_(
 
Gotta crank up the Simpsons to stop this from taking root!
I would take Homer running these plants at this point than giving these Eco Terrorists one more minute of smugness. Fine you don't want coal, we'll beat you at your own game! If anything these are safer, because if one of these mini reactors goes into overload, there isn't much there anyway, and you can contain it far quicker than say Chernobil, which already was the cause of stupidity.
 
See, something I've never understood about the criticism of radioactive power is the idea that if it gets severely fucked up somehow, it'll destroy the ecosystem. That's true of just about any viable fuel source, and true of any fully functional green energy source. Like yeah I guess it's easier to scrub oil off wildlife than it is tumors but you've got the added bonus of it being cleaner while running too.
 
Back
Top Bottom