Google Exec Decries Trump’s Election: ‘How Do We Prevent It from Happening Again’ - "They can pressure us but we’re not changing," claims Google as they double-down on seditious strategy for election interference.

(backup video)

Project Veritas - Google Exec Decries Trump's Election: 'How Do We Prevent It from Happening Again' | Breitbart

Undercover videos recorded by Project Veritas reveals that Google is determined to prevent the re-election of Donald Trump in 2020, and is altering its products with this aim in mind.

www.breitbart.com

Project Veritas - Google Exec Decries Trump's Election: 'How Do We Prevent It from Happening Again' | Breitbart
Allum Bokhari



Undercover videos recorded by Project Veritas reveals that Google is determined to prevent the re-election of Donald Trump in 2020, and is altering its products with this aim in mind.
The report includes undercover footage featuring a top Google executive, Jen Gennai, discussing how Google might prevent an electoral outcome like 2016 from happening again.



Here’s what Gennai says in the undercover video:

We all got screwed over in 2016, again it wasn’t just us, it was, the people got screwed over, the news media got screwed over, like, everybody got screwed over so we’re rapidly been like, happened there and how do we prevent it from happening again.
We’re also training our algorithms, like, if 2016 happened again, would we have, would the outcome be different?

Gennai also declares her opposition to Democrat presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren’s proposal to break up Google. Why? Because, says Gennai, if Google is broken up it can’t prevent another “Trump situation.”

Elizabeth Warren is saying we should break up Google. And like, I love her but she’s very misguided, like that will not make it better it will make it worse, because all these smaller companies who don’t have the same resources that we do will be charged with preventing the next Trump situation, it’s like a small company cannot do that.

Gennai also declared that no amount of soft pressure from Congress or the White House will make Google change its ways. In other words, talk won’t help — if politicians want to change Google’s behavior, they’ll have to go beyond committee hearings and actually change the law.

We got called in front of Congress multiple times, so we’ve not shown up because we know that they’re just going to attack us. We’re not going to change our, we’re not going to change our mind. There’s no use sitting there being attacked over something we know we’re not going to change. They can pressure us but we’re not changing. But we also have to be aware of what they’re doing and what they’re accusing us of.

According to her professional profile, Gennai works on “responsible innovation” in the Global Affairs division of Google — the same division run by Kent Walker, the Google VP who has declared his intention to make the populist-nationalist movement represented by Donald Trump a “blip” or “hiccup” in history, which he said “bends towards progress.”

Walker made these statements just days after the 2016 election, in a confidential video recording that was leaked to Breitbart News.

Google Insider to Project Veritas: YouTube Deliberately Suppresses PragerU, Dave Rubin, Tim Pool | Breitbart

A Google insider who spoke anonymously to Project Veritas claims that Google-owned video platform YouTube is discriminating against creators who do not meet the tech giant's political criteria.

www.breitbart.com

Google Insider to Project Veritas: YouTube Deliberately Suppresses PragerU, Dave Rubin, Tim Pool | Breitbart
Allum Bokhari


A Google insider who spoke anonymously to Project Veritas claims that Google-owned video platform YouTube is discriminating against creators who do not meet the tech giant’s political criteria.

The insider explained that Google and YouTube use terms like “machine learning fairness” to give a sheen of neutrality to their efforts to suppress content that might contradict progressive narratives.

He also claimed that their efforts now extend beyond conservatives to non-partisan commentators who critique the left as well as the right, like independent journalist Tim Pool.

Via Project Veritas’ interview with the insider:

…They described that they were going to have more content filtering, and right after that happened a lot of the content creators started to get demonetized, and their videos started to get deranked. I’m talking about Dave Rubin, I’m talking about Carpe Diem, I’m talking about Tim Pool, and a lot of the other content creators that are within YouTube ecosystem just saw their, their view counts just go through the floor.
So, Google is targeting what they consider rightwing news commentators so that includes Tim Pool, Dave Rubin, Steven Crowder, and a host of other right wing people that they are coming in and they’re deciding that they don’t want these opinions to have a wide appeal. And so they’re coming in and they’re putting their thumb down, and they’re deciding which content the users are allowed to see.

They’re playing narrative control. And what they’re doing it is they’re applying their human, the human component, which is they’re going through – with an army people – and they are manually intervening, and removing your content from, from their servers, and they are saying that the algorithms did it. And in that case for the high profile people, it’s not just ML Fairness that you guys have to worry about, it’s actual people that have their head filled with this SJW mindset, they’re going through and removing the content because it – because they don’t agree with it.

Watch the full interview below:

Project Veritas also obtained undercover footage revealing yet another Google executive declaring the company’s intention to intervene in its products to stop Trump in 2020. “Responsible innovation” head Jen Gennai was recorded stating that Google shouldn’t be broken up because smaller companies couldn’t prevent “another Trump situation.”

Insider Blows Whistle & Exec Reveals Google Plan to Prevent “Trump situation” in 2020 on Hidden Cam

(New York City) — Project Veritas has released a new report on Google which includes undercover video of a Senior Google Executive, leaked documents, and testimony from a Google insider.

www.projectveritas.com

Insider Blows Whistle & Exec Reveals Google Plan to Prevent “Trump situation” in 2020 on Hidden Cam

Insider: Google “is bent on never letting somebody like Donald Trump come to power again.”
Google Head of Responsible Innovation Says Elizabeth Warren “misguided” on “breaking up Google”
Google Exec Says Don’t Break Us Up: “smaller companies don’t have the resources” to “prevent next Trump situation”
Insider Says PragerU And Dave Rubin Content Suppressed, Targeted As “Right-Wing”
LEAKED Documents Highlight “Machine Learning Fairness” and Google’s Practices to Make Search Results “fair and equitable”
Documents Appear to Show “Editorial” Policies That Determine How Google Publishes News
Insider: Google Violates “letter of the law” and “spirit of the law” on Section 230


(New York City) — Project Veritas has released a new report on Google which includes undercover video of a Senior Google Executive, leaked documents, and testimony from a Google insider. The report appears to show Google’s plans to affect the outcome of the 2020 elections and “prevent” the next “Trump situation.”

The report includes undercover footage of longtime Google employee and Head of Responsible Innovation, Jen Gennai saying:

“Elizabeth Warren is saying we should break up Google. And like, I love her but she’s very misguided, like that will not make it better it will make it worse, because all these smaller companies who don’t have the same resources that we do will be charged with preventing the next Trump situation, it’s like a small company cannot do that.”

Said Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe:

“This is the third tech insider who has bravely stepped forward to expose the secrets of Silicon Valley. These new documents, supported by undercover video, raise questions of Google’s neutrality and the role they see themselves fulfilling in the 2020 elections.”

Jen Gennai is the head of “Responsible Innovation” for Google, a sector that monitors and evaluates the responsible implementation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies. In the video, Gennai says Google has been working diligently to “prevent” the results of the 2016 election from repeating in 2020:

“We all got screwed over in 2016, again it wasn’t just us, it was, the people got screwed over, the news media got screwed over, like, everybody got screwed over so we’re rapidly been like, what happened there and how do we prevent it from happening again.”
“We’re also training our algorithms, like, if 2016 happened again, would we have, would the outcome be different?”

Google: Artificial Intelligence Is For A “fair and equitable” State

According to the insider, Machine Learning Fairness is one of the many tools Google uses to promote a political agenda. Documents leaked by a Google informant elaborate on Machine Learning Fairness and the “algorithmic unfairness” that AI product intervention aims to solve:



The insider showed Google search examples that show Machine Learning Fairness in action.



“The reason we launched our A.I. principles is because people were not putting that line in the sand, that they were not saying what’s fair and what’s equitable so we’re like, well we are a big company, we’re going to say it.” – Jen Gennai, Head Of Responsible Innovation, Google

The Google insider explained the impact of artificial intelligence and Machine Learning Fairness:

“They’re going to redefine a reality based on what they think is fair and based upon what they want, and what and is part of their agenda.”

Determining credible news and an editorial agenda. . .

Additional leaked documents detail how Google defines and prioritizes content from different news publishers and how its products feature that content. One document, called the “Fake News-letter” explains Google’s goal to have a “single point of truth” across their products.



Another document received by Project Veritas explains the “News Ecosystem” which mentions “editorial guidelines” that appear to be determined and administered internally by Google. These guidelines control how content is distributed and displayed on their site.



The leaked documents appear to show that Google makes news decisions about what news they promote and distribute on their site.

Comments made by Gennai raise similar questions. In a conversation with Veritas journalists, Gennai explains that “conservative sources” and “credible sources” don’t always coincide according to Google’s editorial practices.

“We have gotten accusations of around fairness is that we’re unfair to conservatives because we’re choosing what we find as credible news sources and those sources don’t necessarily overlap with conservative sources …”

The insider shed additional light on how YouTube demotes content from influencers like Dave Rubin and Tim Pool:

“What YouTube did is they changed the results of the recommendation engine. And so what the recommendation engine is it tries to do, is it tries to say, well, if you like A, then you’re probably going to like B. So content that is similar to Dave Rubin or Tim Pool, instead of listing Dave Rubin or Tim Pool as people that you might like, what they’re doing is that they’re trying to suggest different, different news outlets, for example, like CNN, or MSNBC, or these left leaning political outlets.”

Internal Google Document: “People Like Us Are Programmed”

An additional document Project Veritas obtained, titled “Fair is Not the Default” says “People (like us) are programmed” after the results of machine learning fairness. The document describes how “unconscious bias” and algorithms interact.



Veritas is the “Only Way”

Said the insider:

“The reason why I came to Project Veritas is that you’re the only one I trust to be able to be a real investigative journalist. Investigative journalist is a dead career option, but somehow, you’ve been able to make it work. And because of that I came to Project Veritas because I knew that this was the only way that this story would be able to get out to the public.”
“I mean, this is a behemoth, this is a Goliath, I am but a David trying to say that the emperor has no clothes. And, um, being a small little ant I can be crushed, and I am aware of that. But, this is something that is bigger than me, this is something that needs to be said to the American public.”

Project Veritas intends to continue investigating abuses in big tech companies and encourages more Silicon Valley insiders to share their stories through their Be Brave campaign.

As of publishing, Google did not respond to Project Veritas’ request for comment. Additional leaked Google documents can be viewed HERE.

 

[UQ 770]

2. Huh, still a lot of black dudes in my search results for white american inventors.

I'll throw my hat in on this one.

You do know that modern search engines, especially Google, automatically tailor your search results based on both your search history and your broswer history, right?

If the AI feels you need results that fuck with history itself then man, you must be looking up a lot of bbc and interracial stuff.

 

[Autistsforuganda2]

Video just confirms to me that Google lives in a bubble. They only hear what they wanna hear, because all the critics are just bullies. I got that vibe especially when that cunt spoke about not showing up at congress and instead of saying that she dosen't have any real arguments, she just says "everyone is mean to me."

 

[Unog]

Already has a thread:

https://embed.kiwifarms.st/threads/...-do-we-prevent-it-from-happening-again.57720/

 

[nonvir_1984]

This story primes so many narratives and conspiracy theories, I think my tin foil cap is about to melt.

 

[turboNIG-3k]

I'll throw my hat in on this one.

You do know that modern search engines, especially Google, automatically tailor your search results based on both your search history and your broswer history, right?

If the AI feels you need results that fuck with history itself then man, you must be looking up a lot of bbc and interracial stuff.

I'll reiterate that search results alone don't prove manipulation; only with the knowledge of how fucked up google is I am comfortable enough to make a claim that they are engaging in some sort algorithm fiddling. With that being said, I asked few friends to do the same search and yt inventors always turned up at least 50/50 black/white split. Personally I logged out of google services and used a vpn with same results. There is a possibility they identified me based on some other information, but at this point I don't feel an obligation to give them a benefit of doubt.

 

[UQ 770]

I'll reiterate that search results alone don't prove manipulation; only with the knowledge of how fucked up google is I am comfortable enough to make a claim that they are engaging in some sort algorithm fiddling. With that being said, I asked few friends to do the same search and yt inventors always turned up at least 50/50 black/white split. Personally I logged out of google services and used a vpn with same results. There is a possibility they identified me based on some other information, but at this point I don't feel an obligation to give them a benefit of doubt.

They're definitely fucking with the algorithm, but at the same time the AI is also just programmed to try and fetch results based on what it can read from your search history, location, etc. The best way to see what its up to is to completely delete your browsing history or possibly use a Private/Incognito window, though those have other problems. You can also try using other search engines and comparing the results, but that is an extremely tedious process.

 

[Autocrat]

Still not reported on in any mainstream media, or large tech media sources. A lot of tech media has no problem speaking truth to power. We'll see what happens.

Friendly reminder that if you use google products or services you are supporting this and other initiatives.

E: If you or someone you know needs help escaping the botnet feel free to message me.

It's a shame, because so many of their services are good. I might take you up on that. A How-To thread would be awesome.

Hey, sometimes a guy just wants to see the world burn.

In the most politically correct, milquetoast way.

Replying to both of you.
Part of why I supported Trump, was because of the backlash. (Which I now officially consider too strong for my liking). One step closer to getting more people politically aware. More real life demonstrations (Though I've only gone to one rally so far and didn't meet anyone there).
The one bright side of this thought policing is the dialectic backlash. We'll see how large it grows.

In before "muh private company" argument

The argument is still valid, sadly. One thing though, that the whistleblower brought up, is how this may mean section 230 no longer applies to them. If they choose to be a curator, rather than a platform, then they're going to have to go all the way.
May not hold up though.

 

[UQ 770]

Replying to both of you.
Part of why I supported Trump, was because of the backlash. (Which I now officially consider too strong for my liking). One step closer to getting more people politically aware. More real life demonstrations (Though I've only gone to one rally so far and didn't meet anyone there).
The one bright side of this thought policing is the dialectic backlash. We'll see how large it grows.

You can still enjoy the bitching, pissing, moaning and tears of dumbasses while at the same time not really liking Trump that much. I cheered like an idiot and released a sailor's string of profanity when Pennsylvania went red. I love watching optimistic faggots cry like little bitches.

 

[GrungyLawnChlorinate]

That is true of all the people, but these companies and corporations are smarter and they know how to manipulate. Google didn't necessarily plan for this in the beginning, but we can see that they are now thinking long-term and have enough pull to not give a fuck and state what they plan on doing. They make the idiots who think in the short-term feel empowered, which just assists them in what they plan on doing in the long-term plans. We see this similar pattern with all the companies that are involved with social media.

Here is a backup screenshot of the medium post:

Spoiler

View attachment 814286

She later also deleted the comments on it, as well as her twitter:

twitter:
https://archive.fo/bkben

Spoiler

View attachment 814287

View attachment 814290

Comments from Jen Gennai's Medium victimhood manifesto before they were pruned:

 

[Autocrat]

You can still enjoy the bitching, pissing, moaning and tears of dumbasses while at the same time not really liking Trump that much. I cheered like an idiot and released a sailor's string of profanity when Pennsylvania went red. I love watching optimistic faggots cry like little bitches.

I generally agreed with his rhetoric as well. I liked him, but figured he was also full of shit. At some brief point though, I did drink the kool-aid (meaning, I genuinely liked him without any reproach).

 

[UQ 770]

I generally agreed with his rhetoric as well. I liked him, but figured he was also full of shit. At some brief point though, I did drink the kool-aid (meaning, I genuinely liked him without any reproach).

I didn't go quite that far because according to my ego he still sounded like my casino-bound grandparents, but it was fun to see the bad guy win and ruin everything.

 

[The Jokester]

[QUOTE="Autocrat, post: 4898026, member:
The argument is still valid, sadly. One thing though, that the whistleblower brought up, is how this may mean section 230 no longer applies to them. If they choose to be a curator, rather than a platform, then they're going to have to go all the way.
May not hold up though.
[/QUOTE]
I'm not saying the argument isn't a vaild one. But I argue against it for two reasons; one is the Google and co have a ridiculous monopoly over the internet. What Google and credit card companies like Mastercard says goes. My second reason why I hate this argument is that these are the same fucks who butched about a tiny bakery refusing to make gay wedding cakes due to their religious beliefs.

 

[BroFistula]

I always thought Trump was full of shit, having been familiar with him from the 1980's hotel and casino stuff, up through his time on reality TV. Still I voted for him and enjoyed the reeeee'ing when he won. Hillary is a horribly evil cunt and it certainly wasn't "her turn" to confiscate guns, open the border, and start WW3 in Syria. Unfortunately Trump was, is, and always will be all talk and has the same people around him, doing a slightly modified version of the same shit they would be doing if some other random mainstream Republican or Democrat were in office.

 

[UQ 770]

Hillary is a horribly evil cunt and it certainly wasn't "her turn" to confiscate guns, open the border, and start WW3 in Syria.

You people make her sound like someone worth voting for. That Evil Overlord shit is gonna lose you a serious election in the future, I love tyranny.

 

[BroFistula]

You people make her sound like someone worth voting for. That Evil Overlord shit is gonna lose you a serious election in the future, I love tyranny.

Sure, but what makes her evil isn't her ability or propensity for tyrannical rule, but rather her incompetence at it coupled with her dishonesty about it. We aren't talking about someone who can build a pyramid from the skulls of her enemies, we're talking about someone who can laugh maniacally about having an enemy leader raped to death with a knife by some temporarily allied savages, then turn around and allow some of those same savages to murder her own subordinates, in order to avoid the bad optics of having to turn them all into grease spots.

 

[TowinKarz]

And again, the wrong lesson was learned from 2016, instead of seeing the "problem" of being the public at-large is disaffected by the typical liberal promises, the opposition instead saw it only as a failure of the old-guard media to sway them. Remember how Hillary had the endorsement of eleventy-billion newspapers and that was yet another reason she couldn't lose? And when she did, people IMMEDIATELY blamed the new-media for not supporting her?

I'm not surprised Silicon Valley and it's social media Moguls have responded with "Outta' the way and let us do it RIGHT this time" still being unaware that it wasn't a lack of messaging, but people rejecting a message of open borders, more IDpol, stagnating economy, open disdain for middle-class middle-America and phony promises of great social progress even if you, personally, can't see any of it in your personal life that did Hillary in.

So, it's unsurprising they are pretty much admitting they plan to pull out all the stops and make Trump unelectable, I just laugh because it won't work, for the same reasons it didn't last time. "DON'T VOTE TRUMP!" and refusing to run positive articles about him on paper aren't any different than the same headlines and burying of any positives will be online... but, never interrupt your enemy when they're fucking things up, as they say.....

I find it hilarious they THINK they have the ability to somehow change the minds of those who suffered for 8 years under Obama, who if not prospering now, are measurably better for once. SUch is their arrogance, they really believe their billion-dollar algorithms can manipulate the flow of information in a way that will actually convince people who paid less in taxes the last two years that they REALLY paid more.... or who didn't have a job in 2014 that they aren't at least working now.... or that there ISN'T a crisis at the border, and everything is the fault of blue-collar racism..... or that the Mueller probe didn't burn-out into a pile of impotent ash without a single charge to bear at Trump, who didn't rape anyone, despite the fact they keeping "finding" more victims in the loony corners of Feminazi land willing to say he did....

They simply cannot believe that even THEY have limits on their power, because if they can't overrule the masses, then those very same masses can't be stopped from eventually dismantling them. Sooner rather than later.

 

[Takodachi]

Anyone else finds ironic that they call their shit project "veritas" (truth in latin) when it does the exact same opposite of that

 

[Lone MacReady]

These authoritarians so desperately want to control human thought and behavior. disgusting propaganda. Even if I didn't like Trump I would still vote for him in a second just to spite these silicon valley goo-gobblers. And what does this tell us most of all, there was no russian election meddling - but there WAS google election meddling. Where's the rope?

 

[Coelacanth]

Sooooo when is 4chan going to find a way to redpill this AI like they did with Tay? Google are basically asking for it at this point.

 

[V0dka]

hide my power level but I must have a rep as the local Nazi girl because several came up to me and whispered in my ear "I voted for Trump fyi" with a conspiratorial smile.

LOL oh thats funny.

"Dude I voted for Trump"

"Tell the local Nazi girl, maybe she'll like you!"

"Okay!"