🐮 Lolcow Andrew Peter Carlson / Anaiah Carlson / Tamarlover / Xtamarlover - Jewish/Christian Wannabe Cult Leader, Stalker, Ugly af, dogfucker, mayor of spitsville

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Can you expand on this anymore? I am on the fence about seeing it, but if it’s really that bad I would like to know.
Basically they made it so that Arthur isnt the real joker. Taking away the whole point of the first movie. The whole thing that made the first movie cool was that its the origin story of the joker. But then they undid that in this movie making Arthur not be the joker and they screw him over and no redemption and they have some random inmate kill arthur at the end and that random inmate is supposedly the real joker.
 
Basically they made it so that Arthur isnt the real joker. Taking away the whole point of the first movie. The whole thing that made the first movie cool was that its the origin story of the joker. But then they undid that in this movie making Arthur not be the joker and they screw him over and no redemption and they have some random inmate kill arthur at the end and that random inmate is supposedly the real joker.
Wow that sounds really gay. Thanks. I’ll be spending my money elsewhere.
 
Wow that sounds really gay. Thanks. I’ll be spending my money elsewhere.
Screenshot_20241007-194813-889.png
 
It means very little because review aggregates became battlefields for fans and people who hated the movie.
But I agree, the movie is gay.
Last movie I was happy to go and see in theater was Godzilla Minus One, and it was almost a year ago.
Actually the real viewers and "tomatometer" critics agreed for a change.
Screenshot 2024-10-05 150223.png
 
I assumed he did it on purpose.
You asked should you see it. Only way to explain why you should not see it is to tell you how fucked up it is at the end. If i didnt say what happened you cant really trust my word, right?

The other thing is this is a movie that if you were a fan of the first one, the second one being spoiled is a good thing. It should not exist and no one should like it.

As a movie if it wasnt tied to joker id rate it a 6 or 7. As a joker movie i give it a 4.

If the ending wasnt so ridiculous, the movie could actually be ok for a joker movie. Like when he was freed from the court due to his followers, that should have been how he then began his path to be the joker. The movie could have been the same up til that point and it wouldnt have been atrocious. Also he should have then killed the jail guards who abused him and killed his friend. That would have been much better ending and would have redeemed the movie. Still wouldnt have been as good as the first movie but at least it would be an acceptable sequel
 
You asked should you see it. Only way to explain why you should not see it is to tell you how fucked up it is at the end. If i didnt say what happened you cant really trust my word, right?

The other thing is this is a movie that if you were a fan of the first one, the second one being spoiled is a good thing. It should not exist and no one should like it.

As a movie if it wasnt tied to joker id rate it a 6 or 7. As a joker movie i give it a 4.

If the ending wasnt so ridiculous, the movie could actually be ok for a joker movie. Like when he was freed from the court due to his followers, that should have been how he then began his path to be the joker. The movie could have been the same up til that point and it wouldnt have been atrocious. Also he should have then killed the jail guards who abused him and killed his friend. That would have been much better ending and would have redeemed the movie. Still wouldnt have been as good as the first movie but at least it would be an acceptable sequel
ok but how much can you bench?
 
Na just nonconsensual exercise is a turnoff for me
Lol "nonconsensual exercise". This sort of attitude always makes me laugh.

You're a grown ass man and this is an internet forum. No one is compelling you to improve yourself with our words. You can relax.

It reminds me of a bit Maddox wrote long ago (before we knew what a massive cuck he was) entitled "Phrases that make my blood boil"
Well that's just your opinion:

This one pisses me off just thinking about it. If you slit my throat right now you'd get shot in the eye with boiling blood. Any time you say something sucks around someone who disagrees, they try to validate their taste in shitty music/movies/clothing by reminding you that you still only speak for yourself, as if their opinions are in jeopardy of being monopolized by your own. Everyone already knows it's my opinion by virtue of the fact that I said it, no need to restate the obvious you dopey twat.
The thing is, people who say goofy shit like this probably are sorta scared of their opinions being monopolized. Maybe not literally but they're super insecure and this is their attempt at ego self defense.
 
Back
Top Bottom